Malicious code purification in graphics files
An information handling system improves detection of steganography data embedded in a graphics file by parsing the portable network graphics file to determine a location of a graphics file signature in the graphics file, and determining whether there is data embedded in the graphics file before the graphics signature. The embedded data may then be removed from the graphics file.
1. A method, comprising:
parsing, by a processor, a graphics file to determine a location of a graphics file signature in the graphics file;
determining, by the processor, whether there is embedded data at a location in the graphics file that is after the determined location of the graphics file signature;
in response to the determining that there is embedded data after the graphics file signature, removing, by the processor, the embedded data from the graphics file;
subsequent to the removing the embedded data from the graphics file, setting a flag to indicate that the embedded data in the graphics file has been removed;
determining a hash of the embedded data after removing the embedded data from the graphics file; and
based on the hash, alerting a malware detection system of a possible malware infection.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the graphics file comprises a portable network graphics (PNG) file, and wherein the graphics file signature comprises hexadecimal values comprising “00 00 00 00 49 45 4E 44 AE 42 60 82”.
3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining, by a processor, to scan the graphics file for potential steganographic content, wherein the determining includes determining whether at least one of a plurality of steganographic criteria is satisfied, wherein the plurality of steganographic criteria includes at least one of:
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been downloaded;
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been replicated;
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been backed up; or
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been restored.
4. An information handling system comprising:
a processor; and
a memory having code stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, performs a method comprising:
parsing, by the processor, a graphics file to determine a location of a graphics file signature in the graphics file;
determining, by the processor, whether there is embedded data at a location in the graphics file that is after the determined location of the graphics file signature;
in response to the determining that there is embedded data after the graphics file signature, removing, by the processor, the embedded data from the graphics file;
subsequent to the removing the embedded data from the graphics file, setting a flag to indicate that the embedded data in the graphics file has been removed;
determining a hash of the embedded data after removing the embedded data from the graphics file; and
based on the hash, alerting a malware detection system of a possible malware infection.
5. The information handling system of claim 4 , wherein the graphics file comprises a portable network graphics (PNG) file, and wherein the graphics file signature comprises hexadecimal values comprising “00 00 00 00 49 45 4E 44 AE 42 60 82”.
6. A non-transitory computer-readable medium including code for performing a method, the method comprising:
parsing, by a processor, a graphics file to determine a location of a graphics file signature in the graphics file;
determining, by the processor, whether there is embedded data at a location in the graphics file that is after the determined location of the graphics file signature;
in response to the determining that there is embedded data after the graphics file signature, removing, by the processor, the embedded data from the graphics file;
subsequent to the removing the embedded data from the graphics file, setting a flag to indicate that the embedded data in the graphics file has been removed;
determining a hash of the embedded data after removing the embedded data from the graphics file; and
based on the hash, alerting a malware detection system of a possible malware infection.
7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 6 , wherein the graphics file comprises a portable network graphics (PNG) file, and wherein the graphics file signature comprises hexadecimal values comprising “00 00 00 00 49 45 4E 44 AE 42 60 82”.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of parsing, by the processor, a graphics file to determine the location of a graphics file signature in the graphics file comprises parsing, by the processor, the graphics file to determine a location of a post-fix graphics file signature, and wherein the step of determining, by the processor, whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after the graphics file signature comprises determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after the post-fix graphics file signature.
9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the step of parsing, by the processor, a graphics file to determine the location of a graphics file signature in the graphics file comprises parsing, by the processor, the graphics file to determine a location of a post-fix graphics file signature, and wherein the step of determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after a post-fix graphics file signature comprises determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after the post-fix graphics file signature at an end of a body of the graphics file.
10. The information handling system of claim 4 , wherein the memory further comprises code stored thereon that, when executed by the processor, performs a method comprising:
determining, by a processor, to scan the graphics file for potential steganographic content, wherein the determining whether to analyze the graphics file for potential steganography includes determining whether at least one of a plurality of steganographic criteria is satisfied.
11. The information handling system of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of steganographic criteria includes at least one of:
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been downloaded;
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been replicated;
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been backed up; or
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been restored.
12. The information handling system of claim 4 , wherein the step of determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after the graphics file signature comprises determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after a post-fix graphics file signature at an end of a body of the graphics file.
13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 6 , further comprising code for performing: determining to scan the graphics file for potential steganographic content, wherein the determining includes determining whether at least one of a plurality of steganographic criteria is satisfied.
14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the plurality of steganographic criteria includes at least one of:
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been downloaded;
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been replicated;
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been backed up; or
a field associated with the graphics file indicates that the graphics file has been modified after the graphics file has been restored.
15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 6 , wherein the step of determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after the graphics file signature comprises determining whether there is embedded data in the graphics file after a post-fix graphics file signature at an end of a body of the graphics file.