IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,723,566
Granted Patent B2
US 11,723,566 · App. 16/610,626 · Granted Aug 15, 2023

Deception detection system and method

Inventor: Daphna Palti-Wasserman (Haifa, IL)
Assignee: Eye-Minders Ltd.
A61B5/164A61B3/113A61B5/0533A61B5/163G06V40/193
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,723,566
App. No.
16/610,626
Granted
Aug 15, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

There is provided herein a computer implemented method for identifying if a subject is being deceptive, the method comprising: exposing a subject to a stimuli sequence and to a visual task; receiving from one or more sensors temporal data, indicative of the dynamics of at least one eye of a subject, wherein the received data comprises responsive and non-responsive data, the responsive data is responsive to the visual task; synchronizing the stimuli sequence with the received temporal data; analyzing the temporal data, which is indicative of the dynamics of the at least one eye of a subject; determining a probability of the subject being deceptive based on the analysis; and producing an output signal indicative of the probability of the subject being deceptive.

Claims (38)

1. A method for identifying if a subject is being deceptive, the method comprising:

exposing the subject to a stimuli sequence, wherein the stimuli sequence includes a plurality of stimuli that includes at least one evoking stimulus and at least one neutral stimulus, and wherein the plurality of stimuli are presented sequentially in time;

presenting a visual task to the subject, wherein the visual task requires the subject to track the position of a moving target;

determining at least one of (i) bad tracking of the target by the subject and (ii) no tracking of the target by the subject during a plurality of time intervals, wherein each of the plurality of time intervals corresponds to a respective one of the plurality of stimuli;

receiving, from one or more sensors, data indicative of pupil size of at least one eye of the subject, wherein the data includes a plurality of segments, and wherein each of the plurality of segments corresponds to a respective one of the plurality of stimuli;

deriving, based on the pupil size data, at least one parameter that corresponds to each of the plurality of segments;

determining a probability that the subject is being deceptive in response to a given one of the plurality of stimuli based on a combination of (a) whether bad tracking or no tracking was determined for the time interval that corresponds to the given stimulus and (b) the at least one parameter derived from the segment of data that corresponds to the given stimulus; and

producing an output signal indicative of the determined probability.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising applying one or more counter measure algorithms using the at least one eye dynamic signal to detect deception.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the subject is further exposed to a relaxing element.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein an optimal timing for exposing the subject to a stimulus from the stimuli sequence is determined based on physiological activity and/or behavior indicators of the subject.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the physiological activity of the subject comprises: eye dynamics, GSR, heart rate, respiration, body temperature, blood pressure, or any combination thereof.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one evoking stimulus comprises displaying an image to the subject.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one evoking stimulus comprises asking the subject a question.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one evoking stimulus comprises displaying an image to the subject and asking the subject a corresponding question.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one parameter that corresponds to each of the plurality of segments comprises an integral of the pupil size data for the respective segment.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one parameter that corresponds to each of the plurality of segments comprises (a) an integral of the pupil size data for each of the plurality of segments and (b) a peak of the pupil size data for each of the plurality of segments.

11. A system for identifying if a subject is being deceptive, the system comprising:

a processor,

a display configured to respond to instructions received from the processor; and

one or more sensors configured to (i) detect the pupil size of at least one eye of the subject, (ii) track movement of at least one eye of the subject, and (iii) output data indicative of the detected pupil size and the tracked movement;

wherein the processor is configured to

(a) control the exposing of the subject to a stimuli sequence, wherein the stimuli sequence includes a plurality of stimuli that includes at least one evoking stimulus and at least one neutral stimulus, and wherein the plurality of stimuli are presented sequentially in time,

(b) instruct the display to present a visual task to the subject, wherein the visual task requires the subject to track the position of a moving target,

(c) determine, based on the eye movement data, at least one of (i) bad tracking of the target by the subject and (ii) no tracking of the target by the subject during a plurality of time intervals, wherein each of the plurality of time intervals corresponds to a respective one of the plurality of stimuli,

(d) receive, from the one or more sensors, the data indicative of pupil size of at least one eye of the subject, wherein the data includes a plurality of segments, and wherein each of the plurality of segments corresponds to a respective one of the plurality of stimuli,

(e) derive, based on the pupil size data, at least one parameter that corresponds to each of the plurality of segments,

(f) determine a probability that the subject is being deceptive in response to a given one of the plurality of stimuli based on a combination of (a) whether bad tracking or no tracking was determined for the time interval that corresponds to the given stimulus and (b) the at least one parameter derived from the segment of data that corresponds to the given stimulus, and

(g) produce an output signal indicative of the determined probability.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to apply one or more counter measure algorithms using the at least one eye dynamic signal to detect deception.

13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to expose the subject to a relaxing element.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the processor is further configured to determine an optimal timing for exposing the subject to a stimulus from the stimuli sequence based on physiological activity and/or behavior indicators of the subject.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the physiological activity of the subject comprises: eye dynamics, GSR, heart rate, respiration, body temperature, blood pressure, or any combination thereof.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one evoking stimulus comprises displaying an image to the subject.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one evoking stimulus comprises asking the subject a question.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one evoking stimulus comprises displaying an image to the subject and asking the subject a corresponding question.

19. The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one parameter that corresponds to each of the plurality of segments comprises an integral of the pupil size data for the respective segment.

20. The system of claim 11 , wherein the at least one parameter that corresponds to each of the plurality of segments comprises (a) an integral of the pupil size data for each of the plurality of segments and (b) a peak of the pupil size data for each of the plurality of segments.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2019
From: PALTI-WASSERMAN, DAPHNA
To: EYE-MINDERS LTD.
Reel/Frame 051097/0587 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62503578 · May 9, 2017
Related Publication 20200060598A1 · Feb 27, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,213,786