IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,726,442
Granted Patent B2
US 11,726,442 · App. 17/020,233 · Granted Aug 15, 2023

Scent delivery system scheduling

Inventors: John Thurston Chandler (Charlotte, NC); Chad Alan Morton (Fort Mill, SC)
Assignee: Scent Air Technologies, LLC
G05B19/0426A45D34/02A61L9/035A61L9/125A61L9/14B05B12/02G05D7/0629G06Q10/0631G06Q10/06314H04L67/125A61L2209/11A61L2209/111A61L2209/132A61L2209/16A61M2021/0016A61M2205/3561A61M2205/3584A61M2205/3592A61M2205/502G05B2219/25419
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,726,442
App. No.
17/020,233
Granted
Aug 15, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling one or more scent delivery units includes maintaining one or more scheduled events, maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, and generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more scent delivery units to control their activation and deactivation. Generating the command data includes identifying a conflicting period of time during which control specified by the one or more scheduled events differs from control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events and also includes generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events. Control for the one or more scent delivery units during the conflicting period of time is in accordance with control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events and not the one or more scheduled events.

Claims (38)

1. A method for controlling one or more scent delivery units, the method comprising:

maintaining one or more scheduled events, each scheduled event being associated with control logic that identifies one or more scent delivery units to be activated during a first time period, the first time period being defined by an activation start time and an activation end time;

maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, each scheduled anti-event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more scent delivery units to be deactivated during a second time period, the second time period being defined by a deactivation start time and a deactivation end time; and

generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more scent delivery units to control activation and deactivation of the one or more scent delivery units,

wherein generating the command data includes:

identifying a conflicting period of time during which control specified by the one or more scheduled events for the one or more scent delivery units differs from control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events for the one or more scent delivery units, and

generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events, control for the one or more scent delivery units being in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events during the conflicting period of time and not in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events includes generating command data that disregards control specified by the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events comprises generating command data that maintains priority of the control specified by the one or more anti-events over any additional conflicting scheduled events subsequently added to the scenting schedule.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, based upon subsequent removal of the one or more anti-events, generating additional command data solely based on the one or more scheduled events.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the command data comprises generating command data that gives priority to control specified by a manual activation request over control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the command data comprises generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events over control specified by a manual activation request.

7. A scent delivery system comprising:

one or more scent delivery units; and

one or more computers and one or more storage devices storing instructions that are operable, if executed by the one or more computers, to cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

maintaining one or more scheduled events, each scheduled event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more scent delivery units to be activated during a first time period, the first time period being defined by an activation start time and an activation end time,

maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, each scheduled anti-event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more scent delivery units to be deactivated during a second time period, the second time period being defined by a deactivation start time and a deactivation end time, and

generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more scent delivery units to control activation and deactivation of the one or more scent delivery units,

wherein generating the command data includes:

identifying a conflicting period of time during which control specified by the one or more scheduled events for the one or more scent delivery units differs from control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events for the one or more scent delivery units, and

generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events, control for the one or more scent delivery units being in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events during the conflicting period of time and not in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that disregards control specified by the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that maintains priority of the control specified by the one or more anti-events over any additional conflicting scheduled events subsequently added to the scenting schedule.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more storage devices further store instructions for generating, based upon subsequent removal of the one or more anti-events, additional command data solely based on the one or more scheduled events.

11. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that gives priority to control specified by a manual activation request over control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events.

12. The system of claim 7 , wherein the one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating the command data comprises one or more storage devices storing instructions for generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events over control specified by a manual activation request.

13. A computer-readable storage medium storing software comprising instructions executable by one or more computers, which, upon such execution, cause the one or more computers to perform operations comprising:

maintaining one or more scheduled events, each scheduled event being associated with control logic that identifies one or more scent delivery units to be activated during a first time period, the first time period being defined by an activation start time and an activation end time;

maintaining one or more scheduled anti-events, each scheduled anti-event being associated with control logic that identifies the one or more scent delivery units to be deactivated during a second time period, the second time period being defined by a deactivation start time and a deactivation end time; and

generating, based on the one or more scheduled events and the one or more scheduled anti-events, command data to be communicated to the one or more scent delivery units to control activation and deactivation of the one or more scent delivery units,

wherein generating the command data includes:

identifying a conflicting period of time during which control specified by the one or more scheduled events for the one or more scent delivery units differs from control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events for the one or more scent delivery units, and

generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events, control for the one or more scent delivery units being in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled anti-events during the conflicting period of time and not in accordance with the control logic of the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time.

14. The medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that disregards control specified by the one or more scheduled events during the conflicting period of time.

15. The medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that maintains priority of the control specified by the one or more anti-events over any additional conflicting scheduled events subsequently added to the scenting schedule.

16. The medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise, based upon subsequent removal of the one or more anti-events, generating additional command data solely based on the one or more scheduled events.

17. The medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that gives priority to control specified by a manual activation request over control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events.

18. The medium of claim 13 , wherein the operations further comprise generating command data that gives priority to control specified by the one or more scheduled anti-events over control specified by a manual activation request.

Assignments (1)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 5, 2026
From: SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: GLAS AGENCY (HONG KONG) LIMITED
Reel/Frame 073710/0984 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15284092 · Oct 3, 2016
Continuation 13939165 · Jul 10, 2013
Related Publication 20210072716A1 · Mar 11, 2021