IP Library Granted Patent US 11,743,777
Granted Patent B2
US 11,743,777 · App. 17/460,050 · Granted Aug 29, 2023

Flexible quality of service framework for diverse networks

Inventor: Nishithkumar D. Tripathi (Parker, TX)
Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
H04W28/24H04W8/24H04W28/0268
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,743,777
App. No.
17/460,050
Granted
Aug 29, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatuses in a wireless communication system. A method of operating a user equipment (UE) includes generating an indicator indicating that the UE is capable of supporting adjusted quality of service (QoS), wherein the adjusted QoS corresponds to scaling of QoS parameters associated with an existing QoS indicator. The method also includes generating a capability message comprising the indicator. The method also includes transmitting, to a base station (BS), the capability message including the indicator. The method further includes receiving, from the BS, a message comprising an adjusted QoS value based on the scaling of QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

Claims (64)

1. A user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system, the UE comprising:

a processor configured to:

generate an indicator indicating that the UE is capable of supporting adjusted quality of service (QoS), wherein the adjusted QoS corresponds to a scaling of QoS parameters associated with an existing QoS indicator; and

generate a capability message comprising the indicator; and

a transceiver operably connected to the processor, the transceiver configured to:

transmit, to a base station (BS), the capability message including the indicator; and

receive, from the BS, a message comprising an adjusted QoS value based on the scaling of the QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

2. The UE of claim 1 , wherein the adjusted QoS comprises QoS scaling factors for the QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

3. The UE of claim 2 , wherein the QoS scaling factor is configured to indicate one of:

more relaxed QoS parameters compared to a set of fixed QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator; or

more stringent QoS parameters compared to a set of fixed QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

4. The UE of claim 2 , wherein the QoS scaling factor is configured to define an adjusted value for the QoS parameter of a packet delay budget or define an adjusted value for the QoS parameter of a packet loss error rate.

5. The UE of claim 2 , wherein the QoS scaling factor comprises:

a first value corresponding to a geosynchronous equatorial orbit (GEO) network;

a second value corresponding to a low earth orbit (LEO) network; or

a third value corresponding to a high-performance network.

6. The UE of claim 2 , wherein the QoS scaling factors correspond to one of:

a regular voice service; or

a relaxed QoS voice service.

7. The UE of claim 2 , wherein the QoS scaling factors correspond to one of:

a first value for a first type of frames; or

a second value for a second type of frames.

8. A base station (BS) in a wireless communication system, the BS comprising:

a transceiver configured to receive, from a user equipment (UE), a capability message comprising an indicator, the indicator configured to indicate that the UE is capable of supporting adjusted quality of service (QoS), wherein the adjusted QoS corresponds to scaling of QoS parameters associated with an existing QoS indicator; and

a processor operably connected to the transceiver, the processor configured to:

identify the indicator;

transmit a variable QoS capability to a network entity;

receive an adjusted QoS value from the network entity, the adjusted QoS value based on the scaling of QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator; and

transmit the adjusted QoS value to the UE.

9. The BS of claim 8 , wherein the adjusted QoS comprises QoS scaling factors for the QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

10. The BS of claim 9 , wherein the QoS scaling factor is configured to indicate one of:

more relaxed QoS parameters compared to a set of fixed QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator; or

more stringent QoS parameters compared to a set of fixed QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

11. The BS of claim 9 , wherein the QoS scaling factor is configured to define an adjusted value for the QoS parameter of a packet delay budget, or

define an adjusted value for the QoS parameter of a packet loss error rate.

12. The BS of claim 9 , wherein the QoS scaling factor comprises:

a first value corresponding to a geosynchronous equatorial orbit (GEO) network;

a second value corresponding to a low earth orbit (LEO) network; or

a third value corresponding to a high-performance network.

13. The BS of claim 9 , wherein the QoS scaling factors correspond to one of:

a regular voice service; or

a relaxed QoS voice service.

14. The BS of claim 9 , wherein the QoS scaling factors correspond to one of:

a first value for a first type of frames; or

a second value for a second type of frames.

15. A method of a user equipment (UE) in a wireless communication system, the method comprising:

generating an indicator indicating that the UE is capable of supporting adjusted quality of service (QoS), wherein the adjusted QoS corresponds to scaling of QoS parameters associated with an existing QoS indicator;

generating a capability message comprising the indicator;

transmitting, to a base station (BS), the capability message including the indicator; and

receiving, from the BS, a message comprising an adjusted QoS value based on the scaling of QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the adjusted QoS comprises QoS scaling factors for the QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator, and further comprising:

indicating, by the indicator one of: more relaxed QoS parameters compared to a set of fixed QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator; or more stringent QoS parameters compared to a set of fixed QoS parameters associated with the existing QoS indicator.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the QoS scaling factor is configured to define an adjusted value for the QoS parameter of a packet delay budget, or

define an adjusted value for the QoS parameter of a packet loss error rate.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the QoS scaling factor comprises:

a first value corresponding to a geosynchronous equatorial orbit (GEO) network;

a second value corresponding to a low earth orbit (LEO) network; or

a third value corresponding to a high-performance network.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the QoS scaling factors correspond to one of:

a regular voice service; or

a relaxed QoS voice service.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the QoS scaling factors correspond to one of:

a first value for a first type of frames; or

a second value for a second type of frames.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 27, 2021
From: TRIPATHI, NISHITHKUMAR D.
To: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 057317/0327 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 63141752 · Jan 26, 2021
Provisional Application 63079723 · Sep 17, 2020
Provisional Application 63073780 · Sep 2, 2020
Related Publication 20220070738A1 · Mar 3, 2022