IP Library Granted Patent US 11,800,532
Granted Patent B2
US 11,800,532 · App. 17/305,562 · Granted Oct 24, 2023

Tri-state hybrid automatic repeat request feedback

Inventors: Yi Huang (San Diego, CA); Wanshi Chen (San Diego, CA); Peter Gaal (San Diego, CA); Wei Yang (San Diego, CA); Tingfang Ji (San Diego, CA); Krishna Kiran Mukkavilli (San Diego, CA); Hwan Joon Kwon (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
H04W72/23H04L1/1812
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,800,532
App. No.
17/305,562
Granted
Oct 24, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a first wireless node may receive one or more communications from a second wireless node, wherein the one or more communications include at least one of: a control channel that schedules a data channel, or the control channel and the data channel; and transmit tri-state feedback indicating a result of decoding the communication, wherein the tri-state feedback indicates whether decoding of the control channel was unsuccessful, decoding of the control channel was successful and decoding of the data channel was unsuccessful, or decoding of the control channel and the data channel was successful.

Claims (68)

1. An apparatus for wireless communication at a first wireless node, comprising:

a memory; and

one or more processors, coupled to the memory, configured to:

receive one or more communications from a second wireless node, wherein the one or more communications include at least one of:

a first control channel that schedules a data channel, or

the first control channel and the data channel; and

transmit, on a second control channel, tri-state feedback indicating a result of decoding the one or more communications, wherein the tri-state feedback is associated with three potential states, the three potential states indicating whether (i) decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful, (ii) decoding of the first control channel was successful and decoding of the data channel was unsuccessful, or (iii) decoding of the first control channel and the data channel was successful.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

transmit capability information indicating that the first wireless node supports the tri-state feedback; and

receive configuration information indicating to provide the tri-state feedback.

3. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein at least one of the capability information or the configuration information is specific to a downlink component carrier (CC).

4. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein at least one of the capability information or the configuration information is specific to the first wireless node.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the tri-state feedback being generated using an ultra-reliable low-latency communication (URLLC) feedback codebook.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on a high-reliability block error rate (BLER) table being used to determine a modulation and coding scheme (MCS) or channel quality indicator (CQI) associated with the data channel.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the one or more communications being associated with a single transport block.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the one or more communications being configured without a code block group (CBG) based shared channel.

9. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein transmitting the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the one or more communications including multiple transport blocks or multiple shared channels.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the one or more communications are a first communication, and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

transmit bi-state feedback based at least in part on a second communication including a single transport block or a single shared channel, wherein the bi-state feedback indicates whether decoding of a data channel of the second communication was successful or unsuccessful.

11. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the tri-state feedback is generated based at least in part on a codebook generated based at least in part on a plurality of orthogonal sequences, wherein the codebook is generated based at least in part on an exponential expression with base 3.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

generate the tri-state feedback using the codebook based at least in part on converting a set of ternary feedback values to a decimal value and selecting a codeword from the codebook based at least in part on the decimal value.

13. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the one or more communications are received on a code block group (CBG) based data channel including one or more CBGs, and

wherein the tri-state feedback includes:

a bi-state feedback value for each CBG of the one or more CBGs indicating whether decoding of each CBG was successful or unsuccessful, and

a feedback value indicating whether decoding of the first control channel was successful or unsuccessful, wherein the first control channel is associated with the one or more CBGs.

14. The apparatus of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

map the bi-state feedback value and the feedback value to corresponding sequence indices of a plurality of orthogonal sequences of a codebook.

15. An apparatus for wireless communication at a first wireless node, comprising:

a memory; and

one or more processors, coupled to the memory, configured to:

transmit one or more communications to a second wireless node, wherein the one or more communications include at least one of:

a first control channel that schedules a data channel, or

the first control channel and the data channel; and

receive, on a second control channel, tri-state feedback indicating a result of decoding the one or more communications, wherein the tri-state feedback is associated with three potential states, the three potential states indicating whether (i) decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful, (ii) decoding of the first control channel was successful and decoding of the data channel was unsuccessful, or (iii) decoding of the first control channel and the data channel was successful.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the one or more communications are a first communication and the tri-state feedback indicates that decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful, and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

transmit a second communication using a modified control channel configuration relative to the first communication based at least in part on the tri-state feedback indicating that decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful.

17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the modified control channel configuration is based at least in part on feedback indicating that decoding of another control channel, transmitted using the modified control channel configuration, was successful.

18. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the one or more communications being associated with a single transport block.

19. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the one or more communications being configured without a code block group (CBG) based shared channel.

20. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on the one or more communications including multiple transport blocks or multiple shared channels.

21. The apparatus of claim 20 , wherein the one or more communications are a first communication, and wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

receive bi-state feedback based at least in part on a second communication including a single transport block or a single shared channel, wherein the bi-state feedback indicates whether decoding of a data channel of the second communication was successful or unsuccessful.

22. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the tri-state feedback is based at least in part on a codebook generated based at least in part on a plurality of orthogonal sequences, wherein the codebook is generated based at least in part on an exponential expression with base 3.

23. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the one or more communications is transmitted on a code block group (CBG) based data channel including one or more CBGs, and wherein the tri-state feedback includes:

a bi-state feedback value for each CBG of the one or more CBGs indicating whether decoding of each CBG was successful or unsuccessful, and

a feedback value indicating whether decoding of the first control channel was successful or unsuccessful, wherein the first control channel is associated with the one or more CBGs.

24. A method of wireless communication performed by a first wireless node, comprising:

receiving one or more communications from a second wireless node, wherein the one or more communications include at least one of:

a first control channel that schedules a data channel, or

the first control channel and the data channel; and

transmitting, on a second control channel, tri-state feedback indicating a result of decoding the one or more communications, wherein the tri-state feedback is associated with three potential states, the three potential states indicating whether (i) decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful, (ii) decoding of the first control channel was successful and decoding of the data channel was unsuccessful, or (iii) decoding of the first control channel and the data channel was successful.

25. The method of claim 24 , further comprising:

transmitting capability information indicating that the first wireless node supports the tri-state feedback; and

receiving configuration information indicating to provide the tri-state feedback.

26. The method of claim 24 , wherein the tri-state feedback is generated based at least in part on a codebook generated based at least in part on a plurality of orthogonal sequences, wherein the codebook is generated based at least in part on an exponential expression with base 3.

27. The method of claim 24 , wherein the one or more communications are received on a code block group (CBG) based data channel including one or more CBGs, and

wherein the tri-state feedback includes:

a bi-state feedback value for each CBG of the one or more CBGs indicating whether decoding of each CBG was successful or unsuccessful, and

a feedback value indicating whether decoding of the first control channel was successful or unsuccessful, wherein the first control channel is associated with the one or more CBGs.

28. A method of wireless communication performed by a first wireless node, comprising:

transmitting one or more communications to a second wireless node, wherein the one or more communications include at least one of:

a first control channel that schedules a data channel, or

the first control channel and the data channel; and

receiving, on a second control channel tri-state feedback indicating a result of decoding the one or more communications, wherein the tri-state feedback is associated with three potential states, the three potential states indicating whether (i) decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful, (ii) decoding of the first control channel was successful and decoding of the data channel was unsuccessful, or (iii) decoding of the first control channel and the data channel was successful.

29. The method of claim 28 , wherein the one or more communications are a first communication and the tri-state feedback indicates that decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful, and wherein the method further comprises:

transmitting a second communication using a modified control channel configuration relative to the first communication based at least in part on the tri-state feedback indicating that decoding of the first control channel was unsuccessful.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the modified control channel configuration is based at least in part on feedback indicating that decoding of another control channel, transmitted using the modified control channel configuration, was successful.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2021
From: HUANG, YI; CHEN, WANSHI; GAAL, PETER; YANG, WEI; JI, TINGFANG; MUKKAVILLI, KRISHNA KIRAN; KWON, HWAN JOON
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 057370/0485 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62705881 · Jul 20, 2020
Related Publication 20220022231A1 · Jan 20, 2022