IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,950,915
Granted Patent B2
US 11,950,915 · App. 17/116,819 · Granted Apr 9, 2024

Automatic determination and selection of filtering in a cardiac rhythm management device

Inventors: Venugopal Allavatam (Saratoga, CA); Stephen J. Hahn (Shoreview, MN); Keith L. Herrmann (Minneapolis, MN); Mitchell D. Lanz (Maple Grove, MN); Krzysztof Z. Siejko (Maple Grove, MN); Benjamin Speakman (Eagan, MN)
Assignee: CARDIAC PACEMAKERS, INC.
A61B5/316A61B5/287A61B5/30A61B5/304A61B5/349A61B5/352A61B5/725A61N1/3627A61N1/3702A61N1/3925A61N1/3956A61B5/7282
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,950,915
App. No.
17/116,819
Granted
Apr 9, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and/or device facilitating and selecting among multiple modes of filtering a cardiac electrical signal, in which one filtering mode includes additional high pass filtering of low frequency signals, relative to the other filtering mode. The selection filtering modes may include comparing sensed signal amplitude to one or more thresholds, using the multiple modes of filtering. In another example, an additional high pass filter is enabled, over and above a default or baseline filtering mode, and the detected cardiac signal is monitored for indications of possible undersensing, and/or for drops in amplitude toward a threshold, and the additional high pass filter may be disabled upon finding of possible undersensing or drop in signal amplitude.

Claims (39)

1. A method of operation in a cardiac rhythm management device comprising plural sensing electrodes for capturing a cardiac signal and operational circuitry coupled to the plural sensing electrodes for analyzing the cardiac signal, the operational circuitry configured with a selectable filtering mode allowing filtering the captured cardiac signal according to a first approach and a second approach, the second approach applying an additional high pass filter relative to the first approach, the method comprising:

filtering cardiac signals with the second approach and analyzing the cardiac signals that have been filtered with the second approach to detect cardiac cycles;

determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate by analyzing intervals between detected cardiac cycles, and determining that plural such intervals exceed one or more predefined thresholds; and

switching to use of the first approach for filtering the cardiac signals.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate comprises:

observing that one or more amplitudes associated with one or more detected cardiac cycles fail to meet a minimum amplitude threshold; and

in response to determining that plural intervals exceed the one or more predefined thresholds, and one or more detected cardiac cycles fail to meet the minimum amplitude threshold while using the second approach, determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate comprises observing that one or more amplitudes associated with one or more detected cardiac cycles fail to meet a minimum amplitude threshold.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein:

the first approach uses a bandpass filtering in the range of 3 to 40 hertz; and

the second approach uses a bandpass filtering in the range of about 9 to 40 hertz.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate comprises determining that undersensing is occurring and, in response, determining that termination of the second approach is appropriate.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the cardiac rhythm management device is a cardiac stimulus device, and the method further comprises using the detected cardiac cycles to calculate a cardiac cycle rate, comparing the cardiac cycle rate to a threshold as part of a method of determining whether a malignant arrhythmia is present and, in response to determining that a malignant arrhythmia is present, delivering electrical therapy to the heart of the patient.

7. A method as in claim 1 wherein the cardiac rhythm management device is a cardiac monitoring device, and the method further comprises analyzing the cardiac signal and determining to store data in response thereto.

8. A cardiac rhythm management device (CRMD) comprising plural sensing electrodes for capturing a cardiac signal and operational circuitry coupled to the plural sensing electrodes for analyzing the cardiac signal, the operational circuitry configured with a selectable filtering mode allowing filtering of the captured cardiac signal according to a first approach and a second approach, the second approach applying an additional high pass filter relative to the first approach, wherein the operational circuitry is configured to operate using the selectable filtering mode as follows:

filtering cardiac signals with the second approach and analyzing the cardiac signals that have been filtered with the second approach to detect cardiac cycles;

determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate by analyzing intervals between detected cardiac cycles and determining that plural such intervals exceed one or more predefined thresholds; and

switching to use of the first approach for filtering the cardiac signals.

9. The CRMD of claim 8 wherein the operational circuitry is configured to determine that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate by:

observing whether one or more amplitudes associated with one or more detected cardiac cycles fail to meet a minimum amplitude threshold; and

if plural intervals exceed the one or more predefined thresholds, and one or more detected cardiac cycles fail to meet the minimum amplitude threshold while using the second approach, determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate.

10. The CRMD of claim 8 wherein

when it is determined that plural such intervals exceed one or more predefined thresholds, determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate.

11. The CRMD of claim 8 wherein the operational circuitry is configured to determine that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate by observing whether one or more amplitudes associated with one or more detected cardiac cycles fail to meet a minimum amplitude threshold.

12. The CRMD of claim 8 wherein:

the first approach uses a bandpass filtering in the range of 3 to 40 hertz; and

the second approach uses a bandpass filtering in the range of about 9 to 40 hertz.

13. The CRMD of claim 8 wherein the operational circuitry is configured to determine that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate by analyzing whether undersensing is occurring and, if so, determining that termination of the second approach is appropriate.

14. The CRMD of claim 8 , wherein the CRMD is a cardiac stimulus device having therapy delivery circuitry for generating cardiac stimuli, and the operational circuitry is further configured to:

use the detected cardiac cycles to calculate a cardiac cycle rate, compare the cardiac cycle rate to a threshold as part of a method of determining whether a malignant arrhythmia is present and, in response to determining that a malignant arrhythmia is present, deliver electrical therapy to the heart of the patient.

15. The CRMD of claim 8 , wherein the CRMD is a cardiac monitoring device, and the operational circuitry is further configured to analyze the cardiac signal and determine to store data in response thereto.

16. The CRMD of claim 8 , wherein the operational circuitry is configured to determine that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate by:

observing whether amplitudes of a plurality of detected cardiac cycles fail to meet a minimum amplitude threshold; and

in response to observing that amplitudes of the plurality of detected cardiac cycles fail to meet the minimum amplitude threshold, determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate.

17. The CRMD of claim 16 , wherein the plurality of detected cardiac cycles are consecutive.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate is performed by:

observing whether amplitudes of a plurality of detected cardiac cycles fail to meet a minimum amplitude threshold; and

in response to observing that amplitudes of the plurality of detected cardiac cycles fail to meet the minimum amplitude threshold, determining that conditions indicate a termination of the second approach is appropriate.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the plurality of detected cardiac cycles are consecutive.

Continuity (4)
Continuation 16177884 · Nov 1, 2018
Continuation 15362862 · Nov 29, 2016
Provisional Application 62262043 · Dec 2, 2015
Related Publication 20210113135A1 · Apr 22, 2021