IP Library › Granted Patent US 11,963,181
Granted Patent B2
US 11,963,181 · App. 17/294,292 · Granted Apr 16, 2024

Base-station-initiated grant revoke

Inventors: Jibing Wang (San Jose, CA); Erik Richard Stauffer (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: Google LLC
H04W72/23H04L1/0003H04L1/1812H04W72/1263H04W72/569
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,963,181
App. No.
17/294,292
Granted
Apr 16, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

This document describes techniques and systems that enable a base-station-initiated grant revoke. The techniques and systems allow a base station to generate and send a grant-revocation message (GRM) to a user equipment (UE) to revoke a scheduled uplink (UL) or downlink (DL) grant from the base station. The base station can transmit the GRM to the UE using a variety of techniques. For example, based on a trigger event, the base station may assign a UE identifier, such as a specific radio network temporary identifier (RNTI), to the UE and transmit the GRM to the UE using a revoke-physical-downlink-control-channel (R PDCCH) transmission that is associated with the UE identifier. These techniques allow the base station to revoke a scheduled UL or DL grant, which can enable the UE to quickly address timing-critical resource allocation issues and mitigate the effects of adverse operating conditions.

Claims (72)

1. A method performed by a base station for reallocating a scheduled grant for a first user equipment (UE) in a wireless network to a second UE in the wireless network, the method comprising:

detecting a trigger event;

in response to detecting the trigger event, determining to revoke at least a portion of the scheduled grant;

generating a grant-revocation message (GRM) that indicates to terminate a scheduled transmission that uses at least the portion of the scheduled grant;

revoking at least the portion of the scheduled grant by transmitting the GRM to the first UE; and

reallocating at least the portion of the scheduled grant to the second UE.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein detecting the trigger event further comprises:

detecting a priority conflict exists between the first UE and the second UE.

3. The method as recited in claim 2 , wherein detecting the priority conflict further comprises:

detecting a quality of service (QoS) issue associated with the second UE; or

detecting the second UE has a higher-priority grant request than the scheduled grant for the first UE.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining to revoke at least the portion of the scheduled grant further comprises:

determining to revoke a partial grant of the scheduled grant, and

wherein reallocating at least the portion of the scheduled grant to the second UE further comprises:

reallocating the partial grant to the second UE.

5. The method as recited in claim 4 , wherein determining to revoke the partial grant further comprises:

determining to revoke at least one of:

a beam of the scheduled grant;

a layer of the scheduled grant; or

a subset of granted resource units or blocks of the scheduled grant.

6. The method as recited in claim 5 , further comprising:

selecting, as the partial grant of the scheduled grant to revoke, a first beam of the scheduled grant that has a higher modulation and coding scheme (MCS) relative to a second MCS of a second beam of the scheduled grant.

7. The method as recited in claim 5 , further comprising:

selecting, as the partial grant of the scheduled grant to revoke, at least one of:

a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) layer of multiple PDSCH layers in the scheduled grant; or

a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) layer of multiple PUSCH layers in the scheduled grant.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

rescheduling the scheduled transmission that uses at least the portion of the scheduled grant.

9. The method as recited in claim 8 , wherein rescheduling the scheduled transmission further comprises:

rescheduling the scheduled transmission using:

an automatic repeat request (ARQ); or

a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARD).

10. The method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

providing at least the portion of the scheduled grant to be revoked using a first radio access technology, RAT; and

transmitting the GRM using a second RAT.

11. A base station, comprising:

a radio-frequency (RF) transceiver;

at least one processor; and

a computer-readable storage memory system including processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to perform operations comprising:

detecting a trigger event;

in response to detecting the trigger event, determining to revoke at least a portion of a scheduled grant for a first user equipment (UE) in a wireless network;

generating a grant-revocation message (GRM) that indicates to terminate a scheduled transmission that uses at least the portion of the scheduled grant;

revoking at least the portion of the scheduled grant by transmitting the GRM to the first UE; and

reallocating at least the portion of the scheduled grant to a second UE in the wireless network.

12. The base station as recited in claim 11 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to detect the trigger event by:

detecting a priority conflict exists between the first UE and the second UE.

13. The base station as recited in claim 12 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to detect the priority conflict exists by:

detecting a quality of service (QoS) issue associated with the second UE; or

detecting the second UE has a higher-priority grant request than the scheduled grant for the first UE.

14. The base station as recited in claim 11 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to perform further operations comprising:

determining to revoke a partial grant of the scheduled grant, and

reallocating the partial grant to the second UE.

15. The base station as recited in claim 14 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to determine to revoke the partial grant by:

determining to revoke at least one of:

a beam of the scheduled grant;

a layer of the scheduled grant; or

a subset of granted resource units or blocks of the scheduled grant.

16. The base station as recited in claim 15 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to perform further operations comprising:

selecting, as the partial grant of the scheduled grant to revoke, a first beam of the scheduled grant that has a higher modulation and coding scheme (MCS) relative to a second MCS of a second beam of the scheduled grant.

17. The base station as recited in claim 15 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to determine to perform further operations comprising:

selecting, as the partial grant of the scheduled grant to revoke, at least one of:

a physical downlink shared channel (PDSCH) layer of multiple PDSCH layers in the scheduled grant; or

a physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) layer of multiple PUSCH layers in the scheduled grant.

18. The base station as recited in claim 11 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to perform further operations comprising:

rescheduling the scheduled transmission that uses at least the portion of the scheduled grant.

19. The base station as recited in claim 18 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to reschedule the scheduled transmission by:

rescheduling the scheduled transmission using:

an automatic repeat request (ARQ); or

a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ).

20. The base station as recited in claim 11 , wherein the computer-readable storage memory system includes processor-executable instructions that, responsive to execution by at least the one processor, cause the base station to perform further operations comprising:

providing at least the portion of the scheduled grant to be revoked using a first radio access technology, RAT; and

transmitting the GRM using a second RAT.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2021
From: WANG, JIBING; STAUFFER, ERIK RICHARD
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 056250/0117 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62776371 · Dec 6, 2018
Related Publication 20220030618A1 · Jan 27, 2022