Injury based risk assessment software utility tool

1. A method for designing a manufacturing system, the method comprising:

identifying a potential hazard for the manufacturing system that could lead to injury of one or more individuals involved with the manufacturing system;

evaluating, via a processor, the potential hazard with respect to a plurality of possible injuries associated with the potential hazard; and

providing output, via instructions provided by the processor, with respect to the potential hazard based on the evaluating of the potential hazard with respect to the plurality of possible injuries associated with the potential hazard;

wherein:

the step of evaluating the potential hazard comprises:

identifying, via the processor, respective probabilities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

identifying, via the processor, respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries; and

determining, via the processor, a respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries based on both the respective probabilities and the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries, namely, by multiplying the respective probabilities by the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries; and

the step of providing the output comprises providing the output based on the respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of identifying the potential hazard comprises:

obtaining, via one or more sensors, user input from a user selecting the potential hazard; and

identifying the potential hazard based on the user input.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the step of evaluating the potential hazard further comprises determining, via the processor, a highest injury potential for the potential hazard to be a largest of the respective injury potentials; and

the step of providing the output comprises providing the output based on the highest injury potential.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

identifying a frequency of a task pertaining to the potential hazard;

wherein:

the step of evaluating the potential hazard further comprises determining, via the processor, an initial risk evaluation based on the frequency of the task in addition to the highest injury potential; and

the step of providing the output comprises providing the output, via the instructions provided by the processor, based on the initial risk evaluation that incorporates both the frequency of the task and the highest injury potential.

5. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

identifying a number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard;

wherein:

the step of evaluating the potential hazard further comprises determining, via the processor, an initial risk evaluation based on the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard in addition to the highest injury potential; and

the step of providing the output comprises providing the output, via the instructions provided by the processor, based on the initial risk evaluation that incorporates both the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard and the highest injury potential.

6. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

identifying one or more potential mitigation actions to potentially mitigate one or more of the possible injuries relating to the potential hazard;

wherein:

the step of evaluating the potential hazard further comprises:

determining, via the processor, an initial risk evaluation based on the highest injury potential; and

determining, via the processor, a final risk evaluation based on the initial risk evaluation and the one or more potential mitigation actions; and

the step of providing the output comprises providing the output, via the instructions provided by the processor, based on the final risk evaluation.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the step of providing the output comprises providing a visual display, via a display screen in accordance with the instructions provided by the processor, of the final risk evaluation.

8. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

identifying a frequency of a task pertaining to the potential hazard;

identifying a number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard; and

identifying one or more potential mitigation actions to potentially mitigate one or more of the possible injuries relating to the potential hazard;

wherein:

the step of evaluating the potential hazard further comprises:

determining, via the processor, an initial risk evaluation based on the frequency of the task, the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard, and the highest injury potential; and

determining, via the processor, a final risk evaluation based on the initial risk evaluation and the one or more potential mitigation actions; and

the step of providing the output comprises providing a visual display, via a display screen in accordance with the instructions provided by the processor, of the final risk evaluation.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein each of the steps of repeated for each of a plurality of different potential hazards.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, via the processor, a frequency of performance of a task pertaining to the hazard;

determining, via the processor, a number of people exposed to the hazard; and

calculating, via the processor, a risk evaluation (RE) for the hazard, based on the following equation:

RE= S×P×F×N,

in which “S” represents the severity of injury from the hazard, “P” represents the probability of injury associated with the hazard; “F” represents the frequency of performance of the task for the hazard; and “N” represents the number of people exposed to the hazard.

11. The method of claim 6 , wherein the step of determining the final risk evaluation is based on a plurality engineering mitigations for the manufacturing system.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of engineering mitigations for the manufacturing system include each of the following, in appropriate circumstances: safety scanners, safety light curtains, and safety relays.

13. A system for designing a manufacturing system, the system comprising:

one or more sensors configured to at least facilitate obtaining sensor data reflecting user input selecting a potential hazard for the manufacturing system that could lead to injury of one or more individuals involved with the manufacturing system; and

a processor coupled to the one or more sensors and configured to at least facilitate:

identifying the potential hazard based on the user input;

evaluating the potential hazard with respect to a plurality of possible injuries associated with the potential hazard; and

providing output, via instructions provided by the processor, with respect to the potential hazard based on the evaluating of the potential hazard with respect to the plurality of possible injuries associated with the potential hazard;

wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying respective probabilities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

identifying respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

determining a respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries based on both the respective probabilities and the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries, namely, by multiplying the respective probabilities by the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries; and

providing the output based on the respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying respective probabilities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

identifying respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

determining a respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries based on both the respective probabilities and the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries; and

providing the output based on the respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying a frequency of a task pertaining to the potential hazard based on the user input;

determining an initial risk evaluation based on the frequency of the task in addition to the highest injury potential; and

providing the output based on the initial risk evaluation that incorporates both the frequency of the task and the highest injury potential.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying a number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard based on the user input;

determining an initial risk evaluation based on the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard in addition to the highest injury potential; and

providing the output based on the initial risk evaluation that incorporates both the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard and the highest injury potential.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying one or more potential mitigation actions to potentially mitigate one or more of the possible injuries relating to the potential hazard based on the user input;

determining an initial risk evaluation based on the highest injury potential;

determining a final risk evaluation based on the initial risk evaluation and the one or more potential mitigation actions;

providing the output based on the final risk evaluation; and

providing the instructions to a display screen to provide a visual display of the final risk evaluation.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying a frequency of a task pertaining to the potential hazard from the user data;

identifying a number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard from the user data;

identifying one or more potential mitigation actions to potentially mitigate one or more of the possible injuries relating to the potential hazard from the user data;

determining an initial risk evaluation based on the frequency of the task, the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard, and the highest injury potential;

determining a final risk evaluation based on the initial risk evaluation and the one or more potential mitigation actions; and

providing the output by providing the instructions to a display screen to provide a visual display of the final risk evaluation;

wherein the processor is configured to at least facilitate identifying the frequency of the task pertaining to the potential hazard from the user data, identifying the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard from the user data, identifying the one or more potential mitigation actions to potentially mitigate the one or more of the possible injuries relating to the potential hazard from the user data, determining the initial risk evaluation based on the frequency of the task, the number of people potentially affected by the potential hazard, and the highest injury potential, determining the final risk evaluation based on the initial risk evaluation and the one or more potential mitigation actions, and providing the output by providing the instructions to the display screen to provide the visual display of the final risk evaluation, for each of a plurality of different potential hazards.

19. The system of claim 13 , wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

determining a frequency of performance of a task pertaining to the hazard;

determining a number of people exposed to the hazard; and

calculating a risk evaluation (RE) for the hazard, based on the following equation:

RE= S×P×F×N,

in which “S” represents the severity of injury from the hazard, “P” represents the probability of injury associated with the hazard; “F” represents the frequency of performance of the task for the hazard; and “N” represents the number of people exposed to the hazard.

20. A system for designing a manufacturing system, the system comprising:

a user input device;

one or more sensors configured to at least facilitate obtaining sensor data reflecting user input selecting a potential hazard provided by a user via the user input device that could lead to injury of one or more individuals involved with the manufacturing system; and

a processor coupled to the one or more sensors and configured to at least facilitate:

identifying the potential hazard for the manufacturing system based on the user input;

evaluating the potential hazard with respect to a plurality of possible injuries associated with the potential hazard; and

providing instructions for output with respect to the potential hazard based on the evaluating of the potential hazard with respect to the plurality of possible injuries associated with the potential hazard;

wherein the processor is further configured to at least facilitate:

identifying respective probabilities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

identifying respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries;

determining a respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries based on both the respective probabilities and the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries, namely, by multiplying the respective probabilities by the respective severities for each of the plurality of possible injuries; and

providing the instructions for the output based on the respective injury potential for each of the plurality of possible injuries; and

a display device configured to display the output in accordance with the instructions provided by the processor.