IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,175,224
Granted Patent B2
US 12,175,224 · App. 18/586,490 · Granted Dec 24, 2024

Software systems and methods for multiple TALP family enhancement and management

Inventors: Scott Andrew Smith (Ocala, FL); Christopher Graham Smith (Aurora, CO); Kevin David Howard (Mesa, AZ)
Assignee: C SQUARED IP HOLDINGS LLC
G06F8/447G06F11/3664
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,175,224
App. No.
18/586,490
Granted
Dec 24, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Software systems and methods convert algorithms and software codes into time affecting linear pathways (TALPs) via decomposition and convert paired Input/Output (I/O) datasets into TALPs via Value Complexity polynomials. Generated TALPs can be enhanced through merging with other TALPs. TALPs can be grouped by matching the outputs of the TALP-associated prediction polynomials with some set of given criteria into families and cross-families that are useful in a new type of software optimization that allows for output values of grouped TALPs to be modeled, pooled, discretized and optimized to enhance goals or meet user goals.

Claims (34)

1. A method of software enhancement and management, comprising:

inputting one or more data transformation algorithms representing asset data;

decomposing the one or more data transformation algorithms into a plurality of time-affecting linear pathways (TALPs);

executing the plurality of TALPs to generate at least one or more value complexity prediction polynomials;

modeling a chained unit system of one or more preceding temporally sequenced TALP investment units and one or more succeeding temporally sequenced TALP investment units based at least on the one or more value complexity prediction polynomials;

simulating the chained unit system of the one or more preceding temporally sequenced TALP investment units and the one or more succeeding temporally sequenced TALP investment units to optimize one or more predictive algorithmic output values based at least on acceptance criteria, wherein the acceptance criteria includes one or more acceptable input values and one or more acceptable output values; and

outputting optimized temporally sequenced TALP investment data from the one or more predictive algorithmic output values.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating one or more advanced time complexity prediction polynomials to determine execution of chained TALPs, wherein each of the chained TALPs include a different starting time.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating one or more advanced space complexity prediction polynomials to predict memory allocation.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the modeling of the chained unit system further comprises using at least one of one or more advanced time complexity prediction polynomials and one or more advanced space complexity prediction polynomials.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the modeling of the chained unit system is processed via at least one of a Data Discretization Optimization (DDO) software engine and a Risk/Return Allocation Vehicle (rRAV) software engine.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the outputted optimized temporally sequenced TALP investment data comprises at least one of: Private Equity (PE) fund data, venture fund data, asset structure data, Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) data, capital call data, venture capital requirements data, prioritized investment units data, principle data, cash flow data, payment data, payment timing data, and interest data.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the outputted optimized temporally sequenced TALP investment data comprises at least one of: investment return data, investment risk data, bond rater data, rating agency data, derivative data, securities data, multiple assets data, and multiple securities data.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the outputted optimized temporally sequenced TALP investment data comprises data for multiple investment portfolios or multiple investment families.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the acceptance criteria further comprises at least one of: asset acceptance criteria, venture capital requirements criteria, investment acceptance criteria, investment return criteria, investment risk criteria, bond rater criteria, rating agency criteria, and economic conditions data.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the acceptance criteria is based at least on input values received from a general partner, a limited partner, a bond investor, or a rating agency.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the modeling of the chained unit system occurs at one of a stand-alone server system, a client-server system, or a cloud-based server system.

12. A software enhancement and management system, comprising:

a memory; and

a processor operatively coupled to the memory, wherein the processor is configured to execute a program code to:

input one or more data transformation algorithms representing asset data;

decompose the one or more data transformation algorithms into a plurality of time-affecting linear pathways (TALPs);

execute the plurality of TALPs to generate at least one or more value complexity prediction polynomials;

model a chained unit system of one or more preceding temporally sequenced TALP investment units and one or more succeeding temporally sequenced TALP investment units based at least on the one or more value complexity prediction polynomials;

simulate the chained unit system of the one or more preceding temporally sequenced TALP investment units and the one or more succeeding temporally sequenced TALP investment units to optimize one or more predictive algorithmic output values based at least on acceptance criteria, wherein the acceptance criteria includes one or more acceptable input values and one or more acceptable output values; and

output optimized temporally sequenced TALP investment data from the one or more predictive algorithmic output values.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to execute the program code to generate one or more advanced time complexity prediction polynomials to determine execution of chained TALPs, wherein each of the chained TALPs include a different starting time.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processor is further configured to execute the program code to generate one or more advanced space complexity prediction polynomials to predict memory allocation.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the modeling of the chained unit system further comprises using at least one of: one or more advanced time complexity prediction polynomials and one or more advanced space complexity prediction polynomials.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the modeling of the chained unit system is processed via at least one of a Data Discretization Optimization (DDO) software engine and a Risk/Return Allocation Vehicle (rRAV) software engine.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the outputted optimized temporally sequenced TALP investment data comprises at least one of: Private Equity (PE) fund data, venture fund data, bond rater data, rating agency data, asset structure data, Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT) data, capital call data, venture capital requirements data, prioritized investment units data, principle data, cash flow data, payment data, payment timing data, interest data, investment return data, investment risk data, derivative data, securities data, multiple assets data, multiple securities data, multiple investment portfolios data, and multiple investment families data.

18. The system of claim 12 , wherein the acceptance criteria further comprises at least one of: asset acceptance criteria, venture capital requirements criteria, investment acceptance criteria, investment return criteria, investment risk criteria, bond rater criteria, rating agency criteria, and economic conditions data.

19. The system of claim 12 , wherein the acceptance criteria is based at least on input values received from a general partner, a limited partner, a bond investor, or a rating agency.

20. The system of claim 12 , wherein the modeling of the chained unit system occurs at one of a stand-alone server system, a client-server system, or a cloud-based server system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 26, 2024
From: SMITH, SCOTT ANDREW; SMITH, CHRISTOPHER GRAHAM; HOWARD, KEVIN DAVID
To: C SQUARED IP HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 066556/0181 →
Continuity (6)
Continuation 18241943 · Sep 4, 2023
Continuation 18102638 · Jan 27, 2023
Continuation In Part 17887402 · Aug 12, 2022
Provisional Application 63303945 · Jan 27, 2022
Provisional Application 63232576 · Aug 12, 2021
Related Publication 20240192937A1 · Jun 13, 2024
Cited By (3)
US 12,393,410 US 12,511,109 US 12,608,186