IP Library Granted Patent US 12,189,010
Granted Patent B2
US 12,189,010 · App. 17/633,849 · Granted Jan 7, 2025

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging

Inventors: Matthew Blackledge (Sutton, GB); Konstantinos Zormpas-Petridis (Sutton, GB)
Assignee: The Institute of Cancer Research: Royal Cancer Hospital
G01R33/5608A61B5/0033A61B5/055A61B5/7225A61B5/7264A61B5/7275G01R33/561G01R33/56341G06N3/08G06T2207/10088G06T2207/20081
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,189,010
App. No.
17/633,849
Granted
Jan 7, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of performing diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is provided. The method includes a step of: using a neural network to filter a diffusion-weighted image of an object acquired by a magnetic resonance imaging scanner, the neural network being programmed to produce an output image from the acquired image. The neural network improves the signal to noise ratio of the output image relative to the acquired image. The neural network, when applied to a synthetic knife-edge image to which Rician noise providing a signal-to-noise ratio of 13 or more is added, forms a curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency which has a higher area thereunder than the area under the corresponding curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency for a reference Gaussian smoothing filter.

Claims (185)

1. A method of performing diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, the method including a step of:

using a neural network to filter a diffusion-weighted image of an object acquired by a magnetic resonance imaging scanner, the neural network being programmed to produce an output image from the acquired image;

wherein the neural network improves a signal to noise ratio of the output image relative to the acquired image; and

wherein the neural network, when applied to a synthetic knife-edge image to which Rician noise providing a signal-to-noise ratio of 13 or more is added, forms a curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency which has a higher area thereunder than an area under a corresponding curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency for a reference Gaussian smoothing filter, {tilde over (G)}:

G

~

{

f

(

x

,

y

)

}

=

1

2

π

σ

2

exp

{

-

(

x

2

+

y

2

)

2

σ

2

}

f

(

x

,

y

)

g

(

x

,

y

)

where f(x, y) is the noisy synthetic knife-edge image, g(x, y) is the filtered diffusion-weighted image, is a convolution parameter, and σ 2 is a smoothing variance set such that σ 2 =4.

2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the acquired image is acquired by the magnetic resonance imaging scanner at a given b-value and a given orientation for that b-value and without signal averaging.

3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the neural network is a spatially variant filter.

4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the neural network is a convolutional neural network.

5. The method according to claim 1 , including a preliminary step of:

acquiring the diffusion-weighted image using the magnetic resonance imaging scanner.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the acquired image is acquired at a first b-value and at given location in the object, and the method includes a further step of:

combining the output image with one or more further diffusion-weighted images acquired at the given location in the object but at respective different b-values to derive an image of an apparent diffusion coefficient of water at the given location in the object.

7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the object is a human or animal subject.

8. The method according to claim 7 , including a further step of:

analysing the output image or an image derived therefrom for assessment of disease extent in the human or animal subject.

9. A computer program, stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium, that when executed, causes a computer to perform the method of claim 1 .

10. An imaging system for performing diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, the system including:

a magnetic resonance imaging scanner for acquiring a diffusion-weighted image of an object; and

a computer system which receives the acquired image, and is programmed with a neural network which filters the acquired image to produce an output image from the acquired image;

wherein the neural network improves a signal to noise ratio of the output image relative to the acquired image by a factor of X as measured by Y; and

wherein the neural network, when applied to a synthetic knife-edge image to which Rician noise providing a signal-to-noise ratio of 13 or more is added, forms a curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency which has a higher area thereunder than an area under a corresponding curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency for a reference Gaussian smoothing filter, {tilde over (G)}:

G

~

{

f

(

x

,

y

)

}

=

1

2

π

σ

2

exp

{

-

(

x

2

+

y

2

)

2

σ

2

}

f

(

x

,

y

)

g

(

x

,

y

)

where f(x, y) is the noisy synthetic knife-edge image, g(x, y) is the filtered acquired image, is a convolution parameter, and σ 2 is a smoothing variance set such that σ 2 =4.

11. A computer system which receives a diffusion-weighted image of an object acquired by a magnetic resonance imaging scanner, and is programmed with a neural network which filters the acquired image to produce an output image from the acquired image;

wherein the neural network improves a signal to noise ratio of the output image relative to the acquired image by a factor of X as measured by Y; and

wherein the neural network, when applied to a synthetic knife-edge image to which Rician noise providing a signal-to-noise ratio of 13 or more is added, forms a curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency which has a higher area thereunder than an area under a corresponding curve of normalised values of modulation-transfer-function against frequency for a reference Gaussian smoothing filter, {tilde over (G)}:

G

~

{

f

(

x

,

y

)

}

=

1

2

π

σ

2

exp

{

-

(

x

2

+

y

2

)

2

σ

2

}

f

(

x

,

y

)

g

(

x

,

y

)

where f(x, y) is the noisy synthetic knife-edge image, g(x, y) is the filtered acquired image, is a convolution parameter, and σ 2 is a smoothing variance set such that σ 2 =4.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 4, 2022
From: BLACKLEDGE, MATTHEW; ZORMPAS-PETRIDIS, KONSTANTINOS
To: THE INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH; ROYAL CANCER HOSPITAL
Reel/Frame 059170/0248 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 1913481 · Sep 18, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220291317A1 · Sep 15, 2022
References Cited (29)
US 20170108570A1 · Eichner · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180356486A1 · Yang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
CN 107633486A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020198582 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
Muckley et al., “Training a Neural Network for Gibbs and Noise Removal in Diffusion MRI,” arXiv, 2019, p. 1-18. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Kong et al., “Noise reduction of diffusion tensor images by sparse representation and dictionary learning,” BioMed Eng Online, 2016 , p. 1-11. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Garg, G. and Juneja, M., “A survey of denoising techniques for multi-parametric prostate MRI,” Multimedia Tools and Applications (2019) 78: 12689-12722. (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Cheng et al., (2015) “Response evaluation in mesothelioma: Beyond RECIST” Lung Cancer 90, pp. 433-441. [cited by applicant]
Dow-Mu Koh et al., (2012) “Whole-Body Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls,” AJR: 199 pp. 252-262. [cited by applicant]
Eiber et al., (2011) “Whole-Body MRI Including Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Patients With Recurring Prostate Cancer: Technical Feasibility and Assessment of Lesion Conspicuity in DWI,” Journal of Magnetic Resona… [cited by applicant]
Giles et al., (2014) “Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Assessment of Treatment Response in Myeloma,” Radiology 271(3): pp. 785-794. [cited by applicant]
Hamstra et al., (2008) “Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Imaging Treatment Response Biomarker to Chemoradiotherapy in a Mouse Model of Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck,” Translation Oncology, 1(4): pp. … [cited by applicant]
Hill et al., (2017) “Non-Invasive Prostate Cancer Characterization with Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Insight from In silico Studies of a Transgenic Mouse Model,” Prostate Cancer Characterisation with DW-MRI, Frontiers in Onc… [cited by applicant]
He et al., (2015) “Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classification,” Microsoft Research arXiv:1502.01852v1 [cs.CV] pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Kingma and Lei Ba (2015) “Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization,” Published as a conference paper at ICLR, arXiv:1412.6980v9 [cs.LG] 2017 pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Padhani et al., (2011) “Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging in Cancer: Current Status and Research Directions,” Radiology 261(3) pp. 700-718. [cited by applicant]
Ronneberger et al., (2015) “U-Net: Convolutional Network for Biomedical Image Segmentation,” arXiv:1505.04597v1 [cs.CV] pp. 1-8. [cited by applicant]
Thoeny Md and Ross PhD (2010) “Predicting and Monitoring Cancer Treatment Response with Diffusion-Weighted MRI,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 32 pp. 2-16. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., (2004) “Image Quality Assessment: From Error Visibility to Structural Similarity,” IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4): pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., (2012) “A Comprehensive Evaluation of Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms,” 978-1-4673-2533-2/12 IEE, ICP: pp. 1477-1480. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al., (2018) “The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric,” arXiv:1801.03924v2 [cs.CV] pp. 1-14. [cited by applicant]
Zhao et al., (2018) “Loss Function for Image Restoration with Neural Network,” arXiv:1511.08861v3 [cs.CV] pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Zu et al., (2018) “Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning,” Nature, 555: pp. 487-501. [cited by applicant]
Zhu et al., (2018) “Deep learning MR reconstruction with Automated Transform by Manifold Approximation (AUTOMAP) in real-world acquisitions with imperfect training” Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reason. Med. 0572: pp. 1-3. [cited by applicant]
Muckley et al., (2019) “Training a Neural Network for Gibbs and Noise Removal in Diffusion MRI.” Magnetic resonance in medicine, vol. 85, No. 1, pp. 413-428. [cited by applicant]
Patch-Based Techniques in Medical Imaging, 4 [cited by applicant]
Thakur et al., (2019), “State-of-are analysis of image denoising methods using convolutional neural networks.” IET Image Processing, vol. 13, Issue 13, pp. 2367-2380. [cited by applicant]
Kong et al., (2016) “Noise Reduction of Diffusion Tensor Images by Sparse Representation and Dictionary Learning”, Biomedical Engineering Online, 15:5:11 pages. [cited by applicant]
Garg and Juneja (2019) “A survey of denoising techniques for multi-parametric prostate MRI,” Multimedia Tools and Applications 78: 12689-12722. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,455,335