IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,193,855
Granted Patent B2
US 12,193,855 · App. 18/209,692 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Method and system for rule based display of sets of images

Inventors: Malte Westerhoff (Berlin, DE); Detlev Stalling (Berlin, DE)
Assignee: PME IP PTTY LTD
A61B6/032A61B5/055A61B6/037A61B6/465A61B6/466G06T11/001G06T15/08G06T19/20G09G5/363G16H30/20G16H30/40G16H50/70G06F3/0481G06T2200/04G06T2210/41G06T2219/2012G06T2219/2024
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,193,855
App. No.
18/209,692
Filed
Jun 14, 2023
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2612
USPC
345/424
Abstract

The invention provides, in some aspects, a system for implementing a rule derived basis to display image sets. In various embodiments of the invention, the selection of the images to be displayed, the layout of the images, as well as the rendering parameters and styles can be determined using a rule derived basis. In an embodiment of the present invention, the user is presented with images displayed based on their preferences without having to first manually adjust parameters.

Claims (27)

1. A method comprising:

(a) receiving at a server digital data processor from a client a primary Study of a patient selected from a plurality of studies;

(b) executing on the server digital data processor a render server program which applies a step for identifying one or more Study Selection Rules;

(c) identifying a primary condition for a first rule of the one or more Study Selection Rules;

(d) identifying a secondary condition for a second rule of the one or more Study Selection Rules, where the secondary condition selects one or more other studies for which if the one or more other studies were selected as the primary Study, then applying the primary condition to the one or more other studies would be true;

(e) applying the first rule to the primary Study, where the first rule is true for the primary Study;

(f) generating a list of a plurality of secondary studies by applying the third rule, where the secondary condition selects the plurality of secondary studies for which the second rule is true; and

(g) sending the list and instructions from the server digital data processor to the client, where the instructions are adapted to display one or more of the plurality of secondary studies.

2. The method of claim 1 , where the first rule comprises IF Primary.Dicom.BodyPartExamined=‘bodypart’.

3. The method of claim 2 , where bodypart is selected from the group consisting of abdomen, chest, and gastrointestinal tract.

4. The method of claim 2 , where the second rule comprises THEN SELECT Other.Dicom.BodyPartExamined=“bodypart”.

5. The method of claim 4 , where bodypart is selected from the group consisting of abdomen, chest, and gastrointestinal tract.

6. The method of claim 1 , where the first rule comprises Primary.Dicom.Modality=‘mod’.

7. The method of claim 6 , where mod is selected from the group consisting of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, confocal microscopes, 2D ultrasound devices, 3D ultrasound devices, computer radiography, and mammogram.

8. The method of claim 6 , where the second rule comprises THEN SELECT Other.Dicom.Modality=“mod”.

9. The method of claim 8 , where mod is selected from the group consisting of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, confocal microscopes, 2D ultrasound devices, 3D ultrasound devices, computer radiography, and mammogram.

10. The method of claim 1 , where the first rule comprises IF Primary.Dicom.BodyPartExamined=‘bodypart’ and Primary.Dicom.Modality=‘mod’.

11. The method of claim 10 , where bodypart is selected from the group consisting of abdomen, chest, and gastrointestinal tract.

12. The method of claim 10 , where mod is selected from the group consisting of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, confocal microscopes, 2D ultrasound devices, 3D ultrasound devices, computer radiography, and mammogram.

13. The method of claim 10 , where the second rule comprises THEN SELECT Other.Dicom.BodyPartExamined=“bodypart”.

14. The method of claim 13 , where bodypart is selected from the group consisting of abdomen, chest, and gastrointestinal tract.

15. The method of claim 10 , where the second rule comprises THEN SELECT Other.Dicom.BodyPartExamined=“bodypart” and Other.Dicom.Modality=“mod”.

16. The method of claim 15 , where bodypart is selected from the group consisting of abdomen, chest, and gastrointestinal tract.

17. The method of claim 15 , where mod is selected from the group consisting of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, confocal microscopes, 2D ultrasound devices, 3D ultrasound devices, computer radiography, and mammogram.

18. The method of claim 10 , where the second rule comprises THEN SELECT Other.Dicom.BodyPartExamined=“bodypart” and Other.Dicom.Modality=“mod1” or Other.Dicom.Modality=“mod2”, where mod1 is not mod2.

19. The method of claim 18 , where bodypart is selected from the group consisting of abdomen, chest, and gastrointestinal tract.

20. The method of claim 18 , where mod1 and mod 2 are selected from the group consisting of computerized tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, confocal microscopes, 2D ultrasound devices, 3D ultrasound devices, computer radiography, and mammogram.

Continuity (8)
Continuation 17485864 · Sep 27, 2021
Continuation 16913839 · Jun 26, 2020
Continuation 16446546 · Jun 19, 2019
Continuation 15870681 · Jan 12, 2018
Continuation 15380848 · Dec 15, 2016
Continuation 14611163 · Jan 30, 2015
Continuation 13831975 · Mar 15, 2013
Related Publication 20230320678A1 · Oct 12, 2023
References Cited (28)
US 6765570B1 · Cheung · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 10762872B2 · Westerhoff · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11514572B2 · Westerhoff · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11599672B2 · Stalling · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11620773B2 · Westerhoff · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11640809B2 · Westerhoff · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11763516B2 · Westerhoff · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20060149850A1 · Bowman · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080052126A1 · Sasai · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080123917A1 · Magsig · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080166070A1 · Kariathungal · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20140173287A1 · Mizunuma · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170032546A1 · Westerhoff · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200327669A1 · Westerhoff · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200366614A1 · Stalling · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210256742A1 · Westerhoff · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210352133A1 · Westerhoff · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220165231A1 · Westerhoff · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230195937A1 · Stalling · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20230260478A1 · Westerhoff · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Higgins et al., Distributed System for Processing 3D Medical Images, Compat Biol Med (1997) 27, pp. 97-115. [cited by applicant]
Au2022200601, Office Action, dated Dec. 8, 2022, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
AU2018335370, Office Action, dated May 15, 2023, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
CA2991378, Office Action, dated Oct. 24, 2022, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
CA2991378, Office Action, dated Oct. 20,2023, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
EP3329405, Summons, dated Jul. 7, 2023, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
EP202303856_OA_Aug. 23, 2023, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
JP2022-191827, Office Action, dated Oct. 18, 2023, 2 pages (& English translation). [cited by applicant]