IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,194,535
Granted Patent B2
US 12,194,535 · App. 17/526,717 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Method and apparatus for additive manufacturing of a workpiece

Inventors: Frank Widulle (Neu-Ulm, DE); Christian Platt (Ulm, DE); Thomas Milde (Nausnitz, DE); Bernhard Wiedemann (Rottenburg, DE)
Assignee: Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik GmbH
B22F10/85B22F10/28B22F10/38B23K26/082B23K26/34B28B1/001B28B17/0081B33Y10/00B33Y30/00B33Y50/02
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,194,535
App. No.
17/526,717
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In a method for additive manufacturing of a workpiece, a data set defines the workpiece in multiple layers. A first energy beam is moved relative to a manufacturing platform along first trajectories to produce, in temporally successive steps, a stack of workpiece layers. Individual properties of the stack are determined using a measurement arrangement having an exciter that excites the stack with a second energy beam, and having a detector that detects properties of the stack resulting from an excitation along a defined detection path in a spatially resolved manner. At least one of the second energy beam and the detection path is moved relative to the manufacturing platform along further trajectories using a further scanning unit. The first scanning unit and the further scanning unit establish completely separate beam paths for the first energy beam and the at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path.

Claims (46)

1. A method for additive manufacturing of a workpiece using a structuring tool having a first scanning unit, the method comprising:

obtaining a data set that defines the workpiece in a plurality of layers arranged one on top of another;

determining a plurality of first trajectories using the data set;

moving a first energy beam of the first scanning unit in a spatially resolved manner relative to a manufacturing platform in temporally successive steps along a respective first trajectory from the plurality of first trajectories to produce, in the temporally successive steps, a stack of workpiece layers arranged one on top of another, wherein the workpiece layers correspond to the plurality of first trajectories;

determining individual properties of the stack using a measurement arrangement including (i) an exciter that excites the stack with a second energy beam and (ii) a detector that detects properties of the stack resulting from an excitation along a defined detection path in a spatially resolved manner; and

moving at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path relative to the manufacturing platform along a plurality of further trajectories using a further scanning unit,

wherein the first scanning unit and the further scanning unit establish completely separate beam paths for the first energy beam and the at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path, and

wherein the plurality of further trajectories differ at least partially from the plurality of first trajectories.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path is moved in one of the temporally successive steps along a further trajectory from the plurality of further trajectories, while the first energy beam is moved along a first trajectory.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the plurality of further trajectories based on the plurality of first trajectories.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first energy beam and the second energy beam are moved in a coordinated manner such that a superposition of the first energy beam and the second energy beam on the stack is avoided.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the manufacturing platform has a platform diameter, and

the method includes positioning, during the additive manufacturing of the workpiece, the at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path at a lateral distance from the first energy beam that is greater than half the platform diameter.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the manufacturing platform has a platform diameter, and

the method includes, during an entirety of the additive manufacturing of the workpiece, positioning at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path at a lateral distance from the first energy beam that is greater than half the platform diameter.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the exciter and the detector are arranged in separate housing modules that are spatially distant from one another.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the separate housing modules are arranged on different sides of the manufacturing platform.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein selected first trajectories from the plurality of first trajectories are modified based on the individual properties of the stack.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the plurality of further trajectories are determined iteratively based on the selected first trajectories from the plurality of first trajectories.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the further scanning unit moves the second energy beam and the detection path together along the plurality of further trajectories.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the further scanning unit has a first further scanning unit and a structurally separate second further scanning unit,

the second energy beam is moved using the first further scanning unit, and

the detection path is moved using the second further scanning unit.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path is continuously moved using the further scanning unit, and

the measurement arrangement includes a third scanning unit that follows the further scanning unit.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selectively heating the stack using the exciter; and

detecting, using the measurement arrangement, deformation contrasts in the stack resulting from selective heating.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating an ultrasonic wave in the stack using the exciter.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the measurement arrangement detects temperature contrasts in the stack.

17. An apparatus for additive manufacturing of a workpiece, the apparatus comprising:

an interface for obtaining a data set that defines the workpiece in a plurality of layers arranged one on top of another;

a manufacturing platform;

a structuring tool including a first scanning unit configured to move a first energy beam in a spatially resolved manner relative to the manufacturing platform;

a controller configured to control the first scanning unit using the data set to move the first energy beam relative to the manufacturing platform in temporally successive steps along a plurality of first trajectories, wherein the structuring tool produces, in the temporally successive steps, a stack of workpiece layers arranged one on top of another, and wherein the workpiece layers correspond to the plurality of first trajectories; and

a measurement arrangement configured to determine individual properties of the stack,

wherein the measurement arrangement includes an exciter configured to excite the stack with a second energy beam,

wherein the measurement arrangement includes a detector configured to detect properties of the stack resulting from an excitation along a detection path in a spatially resolved manner,

wherein the measurement arrangement includes a further scanning unit,

wherein the controller is configured to control the further scanning unit separately from the first scanning unit in such a manner that at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path moves relative to the manufacturing platform along a plurality of further trajectories,

wherein the plurality of further trajectories can differ from the plurality of first trajectories, and

wherein the first scanning unit and the further scanning unit establish completely separate beam paths for the first energy beam and the at least one of the second energy beam and the detection path.

Assignments (5)
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Dec 3, 2024
From: MILDE, THOMAS, DR.
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 069470/0281 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 3, 2024
From: CARL ZEISS AG
To: CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 069470/0626 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 11, 2022
From: WIDULLE, FRANK, DR.; PLATT, CHRISTIAN, DR.
To: CARL ZEISS AG
Reel/Frame 058616/0972 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 11, 2022
From: WIEDEMANN, BERNHARD, DR.
To: CARL ZEISS INDUSTRIELLE MESSTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 058617/0274 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 11, 2022
From: MILDE, THOMAS, DR.
To: CARL ZEISS MICROSCOPY GMBH
Reel/Frame 058617/0408 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 10 2019 112 757.2 · May 15, 2019 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTEP2020063012 · May 11, 2020
Related Publication 20220072620A1 · Mar 10, 2022
References Cited (52)
US 6309809B1 · Starikov et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6483596B1 · Philippi et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6930278B1 · Chung et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7043330B2 · Toyserkani et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7278315B1 · Klein et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 8514389B2 · Aoki · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8666142B2 · Shkolnik · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8778252B2 · Mackie et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8804102B2 · Green · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9527272B2 · Steele · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9936995B2 · Dacosta et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20050248065A1 · Owanda · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20070228592A1 · Dunn et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090024243A1 · Suh · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090248355A1 · Kriegmair · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100125356A1 · Shkolnik et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110061591A1 · Stecker · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110130854A1 · Lettenbauer et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20130015596A1 · Mozeika et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130078821A1 · Furutono · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130178952A1 · Wersborg et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130189435A1 · Mackie et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140107823A1 · Huang · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140271961A1 · Khoshnevis · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150045928A1 · Perez et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150140147A1 · Konstantinos · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150165681A1 · Fish et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150174828A1 · Creuzer et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150375456A1 · Cheverton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160193790A1 · Shuck et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170059529A1 · Kamel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 10101057A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
DE 10314461A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008016026A1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
DE 102008034117A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016115241A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
DE 102016110266A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
EP 1815936B1 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
EP 2313867B2 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2018197389A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2019028184A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
Sarah K. Everton et al., “Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing,” Materials and Design 95 (2016) p. 431-445, Published by Elsevier Ltd. <https://www.sciencedirect. c… [cited by applicant]
Scott Betts et al., “The relationship between In-Process Quality Metrics & Computational Tomography,” Sigma Labs, Inc. <http://sigmalabsinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/TEP-CT-correlation-Sigma-Labs- Quality-Assurance… [cited by applicant]
Will Dalrymple, “Pooling information,” Machinery Magazine, Published Aug. 2015 <http://www.machinery.co.uk/machinery-features/ concept-laser-is-promising-additive-manufacturing-users-a-more-comprehensive-part-propertyan… [cited by applicant]
Volker Carl, “Monitoring system for the quality assessment in Additive Manufacturing,” [email protected] <http://www.impulsthermografie.de/QNDE2014-Proceeding_EN_V3.pdf>. [cited by applicant]
Trumpf, “Deposition welding, Building shapes our of powder and wire,” Retrieved from the internet on Dec. 2, 2021 <https://www.trumpf.com/en_US/solutions/applications/laser-welding/deposition-welding/>. [cited by applicant]
Econolyst, “Direct Rapid Manufacturing of Metallic Parts—A UK Industry overview,” Enconolyst Ltd, Wirksworth, Derbyshire, UK, Feb. 2008. [cited by applicant]
RJ Dewhurst et al., “Optical remote measurement of ultrasound,” Meas. Sci. Technol. 10 (1999) R139-R168, Published Jul. 15, 1999. [cited by applicant]
Miguel Avervallilo Herraez et al., “Fast two-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm based on sorting by reliability following a noncontinuous path,” Applied Optics, vol. 41, No. 35, Published Dec. 10, 2002, Optical Soci… [cited by applicant]
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, “Real-time Melt Pool Sensor,” Retrieved from the internet on May 6, 2019, <https://manufacturing.llnl.gov/additive-manufacturing/accelerated-certification/real-time-melt-pool-sens… [cited by applicant]
G. Zenzinger et al., “Online-Prozesskontrolle bei der additiven Fertigung mittels Laserstrahlschmelzen,” NDT Journal, Technical papers from ZfP Zeitung, Jun. 2014. [cited by applicant]
Mitsuo Takeda et al., “Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry,” Journal of the Optical Society of America vol. 72, No. 1, Jan. 1982. [cited by applicant]