IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,195,438
Granted Patent B2
US 12,195,438 · App. 17/548,249 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Process for removing THC from cannabinoids

Inventors: Anil Rajaram Oroskar (Oak Brook, IL); Kunal Gulati (Naperville, IL); David House (Arlington Heights, IL); Gautham Oroskar (Oak Brook, IL); Feng Peng (Chicago, IL); Michelle Chen (Naperville, IL); Faridedin Adel (Arlington Heights, IL); Pulak Sharma (Aurora, CO); Justin Fulford (Watkins, CO)
Assignee: KAZMIRA LLC.
C07D311/78
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,195,438
App. No.
17/548,249
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of removing THC and/or THCA from a mixture is provided, the mixture including at least one other cannabinoid. The method comprises passing a first feedstock stream through a first chromatographic resin arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration to provide a primary raffinate stream, preparing a second feedstock stream, the second feedstock stream comprising the primary raffinate stream or a concentrated primary raffinate stream, and passing the second feedstock stream through a second chromatographic resin to provide an eluate stream, the eluate stream having less than 0.3 wt % THC on a solvent free basis. The cannabinoid products can be used in various pharmaceutical and nutraceutical applications.

Claims (93)

1. A method of removing THC and/or THCA from a mixture, the mixture including THC and/or THCA and at least one cannabinoid, the method comprising:

preparing a first feedstock stream from the mixture, the first feedstock stream comprising THC and/or THCA, at least one cannabinoid, and a first solvent;

passing the first feedstock stream through a first chromatographic resin arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration to provide a primary raffinate stream and an SMB extract stream, the primary raffinate stream having less than 0.9 wt % THC on a solvent free basis and optionally a higher weight percentage of at least one cannabinoid than in the first feedstock stream on a solvent free basis;

optionally removing at least a portion of the first solvent from the primary raffinate stream to produce a concentrated primary raffinate stream;

preparing a second feedstock stream, the second feedstock stream comprising the primary raffinate stream or the concentrated primary raffinate stream and a second solvent and the second feedstock stream having less than 0.9 wt % THC on a solvent free basis; and

passing the second feedstock stream through a second chromatographic resin to provide an eluate stream, the eluate stream having less than 0.3 wt % THC on a solvent free basis and optionally a higher weight percentage of at least one cannabinoid than in the second feedstock stream on a solvent free basis.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one cannabinoid is cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), or a mixture thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first chromatographic resin and the second chromatographic resin are each independently selected from:

(i) an activated carbon adsorbent,

(ii) a silica adsorbent,

(iii) a hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent,

(iv) an activated alumina adsorbent,

(v) a reverse phase carbon-based adsorbent, and

(vi) a combination thereof.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first chromatographic resin is a hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent has:

(i) an average particle diameter of 20 microns to 600 microns,

(ii) an average surface area of 450 m 2 /g to 900 m 2 /g,

(iii) an average pore size of 75 Å to 550 Å,

(iv) an average water content of 35% to 80%,

(v) an average bulk density of 0.45 g/mL to 0.9 g/mL, or

(vi) any combination thereof.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent is a polystyrene-divinylbenzene adsorbent.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is an activated carbon adsorbent.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the activated carbon adsorbent has:

(i) an average particle diameter of 40 microns to 1700 microns,

(ii) an iodine number of 900 mg/g or more, or

(iii) a combination thereof.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is disposed in a single column or more than one column in series.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration.

11. A method of removing THC and/or THCA from a mixture, the mixture including THC and/or THCA and at least one cannabinoid, the method comprising:

preparing a first feedstock stream from the mixture, the first feedstock stream comprising THC and/or THCA, at least one cannabinoid, and a first solvent;

passing the first feedstock stream through a first chromatographic resin arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration to provide a primary raffinate stream and an SMB extract stream, the SMB extract stream having a higher weight percentage of THC and/or THCA on a solvent free basis and optionally a higher weight percentage of at least one cannabinoid than in the first feedstock stream on a solvent free basis;

optionally removing at least a portion of the first solvent from the SMB extract stream to produce a concentrated SMB extract stream;

preparing a second feedstock stream, the second feedstock stream comprising the SMB extract stream or the concentrated SMB extract stream and a second solvent; and

passing the second feedstock stream through a second chromatographic resin to provide an eluate stream, the eluate stream having less than 0.3 wt % THC on a solvent free basis and optionally a higher weight percentage of at least one cannabinoid than in the second feedstock stream on a solvent free basis.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least one cannabinoid comprises cannabichromene (CBC).

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first chromatographic resin and the second chromatographic resin are each independently selected from:

(i) an activated carbon adsorbent,

(ii) a silica adsorbent,

(iii) a hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent,

(iv) an activated alumina adsorbent,

(v) a reverse phase carbon-based adsorbent, and

(vi) a combination thereof.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first chromatographic resin is a hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent has:

(i) an average particle diameter of 20 microns to 600 microns,

(ii) an average surface area of 450 m 2 /g to 900 m 2 /g,

(iii) an average pore size of 75 Å to 550 Å,

(iv) an average water content of 35% to 80%,

(v) an average bulk density of 0.45 g/mL to 0.9 g/mL, or

(vi) any combination thereof.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent is a polystyrene-divinylbenzene adsorbent.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is a silica adsorbent.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the silica adsorbent has:

(i) an average particle diameter of 25 microns to 300 microns,

(ii) an average surface area of 350 m 2 /g to 850 m 2 /g,

(iii) an average pore size of 40 Å to 1000 Å,

(iv) an average bulk density of 0.4 g/mL to 0.8 g/mL,

(v) an average pore volume of 0.7 mL/g to 0.85 mL/g, or

(vi) any combination thereof.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is disposed in a single column or more than one column arranged in series.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration.

21. A method of removing THC and/or THCA from a mixture, the mixture including THC and/or THCA and at least one cannabinoid, the method comprising:

preparing a first feedstock stream from the mixture, the first feedstock stream comprising THC and/or THCA, at least one cannabinoid, and a first solvent;

passing the first feedstock stream through a first chromatographic resin arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration to provide a primary raffinate stream and an SMB extract stream, wherein passing the first feedstock stream through the first chromatographic resin arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration removes greater than 50 wt % of the THC from the mixture as measured by the mass of THC in the primary raffinate compared to the mass of THC in the mixture;

optionally removing at least a portion of the first solvent from the primary raffinate stream to produce a concentrated primary raffinate stream;

preparing a second feedstock stream, the second feedstock stream comprising the primary raffinate stream or the concentrated primary raffinate stream and a second solvent; and

passing the second feedstock stream through a second chromatographic resin to provide an eluate stream, wherein passing the second feedstock stream through the second chromatographic resin removes up to 50 wt % of the THC from the mixture as measured by the mass of THC in the eluate stream compared to the mass of THC in the mixture.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the at least one cannabinoid is cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), or a mixture thereof.

23. The method of claim 21 , wherein the first chromatographic resin and the second chromatographic resin are each independently selected from:

(i) an activated carbon adsorbent,

(ii) a silica adsorbent,

(iii) a hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent,

(iv) an activated alumina adsorbent,

(v) a reverse phase carbon-based adsorbent, and

(vi) a combination thereof.

24. The method of claim 21 , wherein the first chromatographic resin is a hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein the hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent has:

(i) an average particle diameter of 20 microns to 600 microns,

(ii) an average surface area of 450 m 2 /g to 900 m 2 /g,

(iii) an average pore size of 75 Å to 550 Å,

(iv) an average water content of 35% to 80%,

(v) an average bulk density of 0.45 g/mL to 0.9 g/mL, or

(vi) any combination thereof.

26. The method of claim 24 , wherein the hydrophobic divinylbenzene-based adsorbent is a polystyrene-divinylbenzene adsorbent.

27. The method of claim 21 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is an activated carbon adsorbent.

28. The method of claim 27 , wherein the activated carbon adsorbent has:

(i) an average particle diameter of 40 microns to 1700 microns,

(ii) an iodine number of 900 mg/g or more, or

(iii) a combination thereof.

29. The method of claim 21 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is disposed in a single column or more than one column in series.

30. The method of claim 21 , wherein the second chromatographic resin is arranged in a simulated moving bed (SMB) chromatography configuration.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 8, 2022
From: OROCHEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: KAZMIRA LLC
Reel/Frame 060746/0566 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2021
From: OROSKAR, ANIL RAJARAM; GULATI, KUNAL; HOUSE, DAVID; OROSKAR, GAUTHAM; PENG, FENG; CHEN, MICHELLE; ADEL, FARIDEDIN; SHARMA, PULAK; FULFORD, JUSTIN
To: OROCHEM TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reel/Frame 058364/0927 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63123933 · Dec 10, 2020
Related Publication 20220185787A1 · Jun 16, 2022
References Cited (58)
US 2985589A · Broughton · 1861 [cited by applicant]
US 2304669A · Roger · 1942 [cited by applicant]
US 8343553B2 · Hospodor · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 9034395B2 · Whittle · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9044390B1 · Speier · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9199960B2 · Ferri · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9358259B2 · Hospodor et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10189762B1 · Oroskar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10413845B1 · Tegen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10414709B1 · Tegen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10604464B2 · Oroskar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10799546B1 · Jansen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10843991B2 · Oroskar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11078145B2 · Oroskar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20040033280A1 · Whittle · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050266108A1 · Flockhart et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060167283A1 · Flockhart et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20080167483A1 · Whittle et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20120294887A1 · Saunois et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20150126596A1 · Gutman et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180200315A1 · Silver · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180206518A1 · Silver · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180333446A1 · Shan et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180362429A1 · Zhang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190010106A1 · Oroskar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190010110A1 · Oroskar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190144414A1 · Erfurt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190210946A1 · Qu et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190276420A1 · Tegen et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200255389A1 · Tegen et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200399194A1 · Oroskar et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210363083A1 · Oroskar et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CN 110724589A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
EP 1536810B1 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2003074144A2 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004026802A1 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016187679A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017026897A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017194173A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019010419A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019173582A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020028198A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020046822A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020117688A2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/644,112, filed Jul. 7, 2017. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/113,947, filed Aug. 27, 2018. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/011,780, filed Sep. 3, 2020. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/392,718, filed Aug. 3, 2021. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 17/830,098, filed Jun. 1, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Elixinol LLC, “Pros and Cons of Hemp Oil Extraction Techniques,” https://elixinolcbd.com/blogs/buyers-guide/16641671-pros-and-cons-of-hemp-oil-extraction-techniques (Mar. 12, 2015). [cited by applicant]
Konen, “Why Ethanol Works So Well for Cannabis Extraction,” Capna Labs, https://www.leafly.com/news/industry/ethanol-cannabis-extraction (Aug. 31, 2016). [cited by applicant]
Meyer et al., “Development of a rapid method for the sequential extraction and subsequent quantification of fatty acids and sugars from avocado mesocarp tissue,” [cited by applicant]
Shimadzu Corporation, HPLC-015 Application News—“Potency Testing in Cannabis Extracts Using a High Resolution Method with Cannabis Analyzer for Potency,” (Feb. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Shimadzu Corporation, HPLC-016 Application News—“Potency Testing in Cannabis Extracts Using a High Sensitivity Method with Cannabis Analyzer for Potency,” (Feb. 2017). [cited by applicant]
Shimadzu Corporation, HPLC-017 Application News—“Potency Testing in Cannabis Extracts Using a High Throughput Method with Cannabis Analyzer for Potency,” (Feb. 2017). [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US2018/041096 (Oct. 31, 2018). [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US2019/048160 (Jan. 24, 2020). [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/US2021/062920 (Apr. 4, 2022). [cited by applicant]