IP Library Granted Patent US 12,196,892
Granted Patent B2
US 12,196,892 · App. 17/797,316 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Computer-implemented method for identifying and localizing radiation events and a pixilated radiation detector for carrying out the method

Inventors: Max Ludwig Ahnen (Zürich, CH); Jannis Nikolaus Rudolf Fischer (Zürich, CH)
Assignee: ETH Zurich
G01T1/2018A61B6/4208
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,196,892
App. No.
17/797,316
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method ( 200 ) of radiation events localizations is indicated for a pixelated radiation detector ( 10 ) having a scintillator array ( 24 ) of scintillator array elements ( 26 ) arranged in an (m)×(n) array, and an optical sensor array ( 28 ) of optical sensors ( 30 ) arranged in a (q)×(z) array and coupled to the scintillator array ( 24 ) in light sharing mode. The method includes the steps of sampling ( 72 ) spatial intensity distributions of scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator array ( 24 ) in response to multiple incident radiation events; performing a clustering analysis ( 76 ) based on the sampled spatial intensity distributions, to obtain clusters ( 84 ) of radiation events attributed to scintillator array elements ( 26 ), wherein the dimension of the sampled spatial intensity distributions correspond to the (q)×(z) dimensions of the optical sensor array ( 28 ), and determining the localization of the radiation events based on the clustering analysis ( 76 ).

Claims (23)

1. A computer-implemented method of radiation events localizations for a pixelated radiation detector comprising at least one scintillator array of scintillator array elements arranged in an (m)×(n) array, and an optical sensor array of optical sensors arranged in a (q)×(z) array and coupled to the scintillator array in light sharing mode for determining a spatial intensity distribution of scintillation photons, wherein the scintillation photons are emitted by the scintillator array in response to incident radiation events at photo conversion positions, wherein the computer-implemented method comprises the steps of:

sampling spatial intensity distributions of scintillation photons emitted by the scintillator array in response to multiple incident radiation events,

performing at least one clustering analysis on the sampled spatial intensity distributions of scintillation photons, to obtain clusters of radiation events attributed to scintillator array elements, wherein the dimension of the sampled spatial intensity distributions of the scintillation photons correspond to the (q)×(z) dimensions of the optical sensor array, and

determining the localization of the radiation events based on the at least one clustering analysis.

2. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein a clustering analysis is repeated based on the clusters obtained by the previously performed clustering analysis.

3. The computer-implemented method according to claim 2 , wherein the first and second clustering analyses use the same clustering algorithm or different clustering algorithms.

4. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein the clustering analysis comprises using a standard clustering algorithm.

5. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein the or each clustering analysis is based on a supervised, semi-supervised, or unsupervised Machine-Learning clustering algorithm.

6. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein the or each clustering analysis is based on a density-based spatial clustering algorithm.

7. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein the clustering analysis comprises the steps of

defining cluster domain edges

parametrizing said cluster domain edges,

saving obtained parameters in a calibration data array,

applying said parameters to the sampled spatial intensity distributions of scintillation photons sensed by the optical sensor array (q)×(z), and

obtaining data separated into (m)×(n) domains, according to a previous calibration.

8. The computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , wherein said optical sensors are arranged to read out scintillation data from each scintillator element of the at least one scintillator array.

9. The computer-implemented method according to claim 8 , wherein said at least one clustering analysis is based on light intensity samples, to obtain clusters of radiation events attributed to a scintillator array element, and wherein the spatial intensity distributions of scintillation photons of the matrix for each scintillator array element is based on said clusters.

10. A pixelated radiation detector for carrying out the computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , comprising an imaging region within which radiation events may occur, an imaging device arranged to detect radiation events, and a computer operatively connected to the imaging device, wherein the imaging device comprises one or more detector module arrays comprising each several detector modules and a detector module array read-out arrangement connected to read the output of each detector module array, wherein the detector module array read-out arrangement comprises a processing unit to store and/or process acquisition data.

11. The pixelated radiation detector according to claim 10 , wherein each of said detector modules comprises several scintillator units, each scintillator unit comprising a scintillator array having a dimension of (m)×(n), an optical sensor arrangement to detect light from the scintillator array and a scintillator unit output interface connected to a detector module read-out arrangement.

12. The pixelated radiation detector according to claim 11 , wherein the scintillator array comprises scintillator elements, wherein at least one optical sensor of the optical sensor array is associated with two or more scintillator elements, wherein the optical sensor array defines a (q)×(z) array which is related to the size of the scintillator array by (q)<(m) or (z)<(n), or (q)<(m) and (z)<(n).

13. The pixelated radiation detector module according to claim 12 , wherein the acquisition data comprises information about the (q)×(z) dimensional intensity distribution of photons, an identifier of the optical sensor and at least one time stamp, possibly (q)×(z) time stamps or multiple time stamps per (q)×(z) optical sensor, providing a time and spatially sampled intensity distribution of scintillated photons.

14. Medical imaging device comprising a pixelated radiation detector for carrying out the computer-implemented method according to claim 1 , the pixelated radiation detector comprising an imaging region within which radiation events may occur, an imaging device arranged to detect radiation events, and a computer operatively connected to the imaging device, wherein the imaging device comprises one or more detector module arrays comprising each several detector modules and a detector module array read-out arrangement connected to read the output of each detector module array, wherein the detector module array read-out arrangement comprises a processing unit to store and/or process acquisition data.

15. A non-transitive, computer readable storage medium for storing instructions that when executed by a processor execute the method according to claim 1 .

Assignments (2)
LICENSE Recorded Mar 28, 2024
From: ETH ZURICH
To: POSITRIGO AG
Reel/Frame 066930/0829 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2022
From: AHNEN, MAX LUDWIG; FISCHER, JANNIS NIKOLAUS RUDOLF
To: ETH ZURICH
Reel/Frame 061179/0742 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 20155592 · Feb 5, 2020 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230063565A1 · Mar 2, 2023
References Cited (11)
US 20160187497A1 · Lerche · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20190282186A1 · Feng et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 109727226A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
EP 3033636A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015022354A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
Wei et al., “Influence factors of two dimensional position map on photomultiplier detector block designed by quadrant sharing technique”, Nuclear Science and Techniques, vol. 22, pp. 224-229, Apr. 2011 (7 pages total). [cited by applicant]
Wei et al., “Crystal Identification in Dual-Layer-Offset DOI-PET Detectors Using Stratified Peak Tracking Based on SVD and Mean-Shift Algorithm”, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, vol. 63, No. 5, Oct. 2016, pp. 2502… [cited by applicant]
Lerche et al., “Maximum Likelihood Based Positioning and Energy Correction for Pixelated Solid State PET Detectors”, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, MIC I 8.M-8, pp. 3610-3613, 2011 (4 pages total… [cited by applicant]
Jimenez, “Analysis of positron emission tomography images for recurrence prediction of cervical cancer”, Dec. 20, 2016, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01420492/document (167 pages … [cited by applicant]
Scheiner et al., “A Multi-Stage Clustering Framework for Automotive Radar Data”, 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), Auckland, NZ, Oct. 27-30, 2019, pp. 2060-2067 (8 pages total). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Mar. 29, 2021 from the International Searching Authority in International Application No. PCT/IB2021/050850. [cited by applicant]