IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,198,092
Granted Patent B2
US 12,198,092 · App. 18/440,128 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Systems and methods for trip management

Inventors: William S. Murphy (Germantown, TN); Kenneth L. Milman (Memphis, TN); Zachary S. Perry (Memphis, TN); Jesse Gately (Fort Collins, CO)
Assignee: Federal Express Corporation
G06Q10/0833G06Q10/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,198,092
App. No.
18/440,128
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

There is disclosed a method of providing information about a package in transit. The method involves receiving environmental data collected by a sensor associated with the package during transit and identifying contextual data about the package that is associated with the environmental data. The method also involves selectively providing access to the environmental and contextual data together as elements in an information feed to a plurality of parties, wherein the contextual data comprises at least one comment made by a party on an element in the information feed, and wherein one or more elements in the information feed are listed in chronological order beginning at a start time of the transit of the package.

Claims (47)

1. A system, comprising:

at least one processor; and

storage media storing program instructions, which, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform one or more operations, comprising:

receiving, by a host device over a network, environmental data collected by a sensor that is in or in proximity to an item in transit;

identifying, by the host device, contextual data associated with the item in transit;

identifying, by the host device, a party associated with the item;

identifying, by the host device, an accessible portion of the environmental data and contextual data by obfuscating one or more elements of the received environmental data based on access rights of the party;

providing, by the host device, the accessible portion of the environmental and contextual data as elements in an information feed to the party;

determining, by the host device and based on the received environmental data, that the item has reached a destination;

providing, by the host device, at least a portion of the obfuscated environmental data collected by the sensor while the item was in transit to the party; and

deactivating, by the host device, the sensor based on the determination that the item has reached the destination.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the contextual data comprises at least one of a phase of the item in transit, a risk level of the item in transit, an on-track notice of the item in transit, a notification associated with the item in transit, or a comment associated with the item in transit.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the contextual data is generated by a determination that a parameter of the environmental data has fallen outside of a permissible range.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the environmental data comprises real-time location data obtained via the sensor, and providing the accessible portion of the environmental data further comprises providing the received real-time location data associated with the item.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the provided location data comprises an estimated geographic location within a number of miles, the number of miles based on the access rights of the party.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the provided location data comprises a location of a waypoint along a journey of the item in transit.

7. The system of claim 1 , wherein the destination is determined based on the received location data indicating the sensor has entered a geofenced area associated with the destination.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the destination is determined based on identified contextual data comprising a package scan that indicates the item has been received at the destination.

9. The system of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining that the item is in transit when the received location data indicates that the item has left a geofenced area associated with an origin of the item.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the sensor comprises a GPS receiver.

11. The system of claim 1 , wherein deactivating the sensor comprises sending a signal, by the host device, to power down the sensor.

12. The system of claim 1 , wherein deactivating the sensor comprises sending a signal, by the host device, to cease the collection of environmental data by sensor.

13. The system of claim 1 , wherein deactivating the sensor comprises ceasing, by the host device, to associate a particular journey with the item in transit.

14. The system of claim 1 , wherein the received environmental data is received in response to a request from the host device.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein determining the item has reached a destination is based on the received environmental data indicating detected light via the sensor.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing program instructions, which, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform one or more operations providing information about an item in transit that comprises or is located in proximity to a sensor, comprising:

receiving, by a host device over a network, environmental data collected by the sensor while the item is in transit;

identifying, by the host device, contextual data associated with the item in transit;

identifying, by the host device, a party associated with the item;

identifying, by the host device, an accessible portion of the environmental data and contextual data by obfuscating one or more elements of the received environmental data based on access rights of the party;

providing, by the host device, the accessible portion of the environmental and contextual data as elements in an information feed to the party;

determining, by the host device and based on the received environmental data, that the item has reached a destination;

providing, by the host device, at least a portion of the obfuscated environmental data collected by the sensor while the item was in transit to the party; and

deactivating, by the host device, the sensor based on the determination that the item has reached the destination.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the destination is determined based on the received location data indicating the sensor has entered a geofenced area associated with the destination.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the destination is determined based on identified contextual data comprising a package scan that indicates the item has been received at the destination.

19. A method of providing information about an item in transit that comprises or is located in proximity to a sensor, the method comprising:

receiving, by a host device over a network, environmental data collected by the sensor while the item is in transit;

identifying, by the host device, contextual data associated with the item in transit;

identifying, by the host device, a party associated with the item;

identifying, by the host device, an accessible portion of the environmental data and contextual data by obfuscating one or more elements of the received environmental data based on access rights of the party;

providing, by the host device, the accessible portion of the environmental and contextual data as elements in an information feed to the party;

determining, by the host device and based on the received environmental data, that the item has reached a destination;

providing, by the host device, at least a portion of the obfuscated environmental data collected by the sensor while the item was in transit to the party; and

deactivating, by the host device, the sensor based on the determination that the item has reached the destination.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the destination is determined based on the received location data indicating the sensor has entered a geofenced area associated with the destination.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2024
From: MURPHY, WILLIAM S.; GATELY, JESSE; MILMAN, KENNETH L.; PERRY, ZACHARY S.
To: FEDEX CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 066451/0916 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation 18119961 · Mar 10, 2023
Continuation 16877946 · May 19, 2020
Continuation 13834088 · Mar 15, 2013
Provisional Application 61614279 · Mar 22, 2012
Related Publication 20240185169A1 · Jun 6, 2024
References Cited (154)
US 5347274A · Hassett · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5686888A · Welles, II et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5771455A · Kennedy, III et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5917433A · Keillor et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6281797B1 · Forster et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6463272B1 · Wallace et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6492904B2 · Richards · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6496775B2 · McDonald, Jr. et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6539360B1 · Kadaba · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6847892B2 · Zhou et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6952645B1 · Jones · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7149658B2 · Kadaba · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7187278B2 · Biffar · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7212829B1 · Lau · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 7253731B2 · Joao · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7468927B1 · Battista · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 7480867B1 · Racine · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 7937244B2 · Kadaba · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8154421B2 · Saltzman · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8314704B2 · Cova · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 8334773B2 · Cova et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8369867B2 · Van Os · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8456302B2 · Stevens · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8555355B2 · Rathbun · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8572000B1 · Weingarten · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 8725165B2 · Lau et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9177282B2 · Stevens · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9552565B2 · Minogue · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9576264B2 · Bolene · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9924315B1 · Cornwall · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9974042B2 · Skaaksrud · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10404615B2 · Marshall · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10438162B2 · Sharma et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10990922B1 · Subramanian et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11244275B2 · Sakai · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11246012B1 · Nugumanov · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11847603B1 · Roy Chowdhury · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20020000916A1 · Richards · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020017989A1 · Forster et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020032582A1 · Feeney, Jr. · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 20020120475A1 · Morimoto · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030069831A1 · Le · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030140064A1 · Klein · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030144985A1 · Ebert · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030204407A1 · Nabors · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030217122A1 · Roese · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030233189A1 · Hsiao · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040024644A1 · Gui et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040049428A1 · Soehnlen · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040068502A1 · Vogedes · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040124977A1 · Biffar · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20040186691A1 · LeBlanc · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20050171738A1 · Kadaba · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050250440A1 · Zhou · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050258955A1 · Gloekler · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050259658A1 · Logan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050288947A1 · Mallonee · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060047419A1 · Diendorf · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060173797A1 · Sheehan · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060229895A1 · Kodger · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060235739A1 · Levis · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060261946A1 · Himberger et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070120736A1 · Mackenzie · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070192191A1 · Neal · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070229350A1 · Scalisi · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070262861A1 · Anderson · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070271367A1 · Yardeni · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20070290836A1 · Ainsworth · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20080019516A1 · Frransdonk · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080032703A1 · Krumm · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080071633A1 · Ozkan · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080082812A1 · Kirshenbaum et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080162034A1 · Breen · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080174485A1 · Carani · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080186166A1 · Zhou et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080231438A1 · Curcio · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20080281719A1 · Hall · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090102659A1 · Evans et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090102660A1 · Evans · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090134999A1 · Dobson et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090207015A1 · Diem · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100014676A1 · McCarthy · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100076902A1 · Kraft · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100141445A1 · Venkatasubramaniyam · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100146583A1 · Prehofer · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100182148A1 · Fan · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100289644A1 · Slavin · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20100324782A1 · Gupta · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110016318A1 · Syngkon · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110018707A1 · Dobson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110050423A1 · Cova · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110074587A1 · Hamm · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110078089A1 · Hamm · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110082812A1 · Salemizadeh · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110192191A1 · Timminns et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110307390A1 · Ogg · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120023555A1 · Putterman · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120030134A1 · Campbell · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120188104A1 · Choi · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120192291A1 · Diem · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120209787A1 · Foulds · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120212323A1 · Skaaksrud · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120221552A1 · Reponen · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120268244A1 · Ljung · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120310854A1 · Cova et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130024393A1 · Fleur · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130030134A1 · Ghasemi Hamedani et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130094693A1 · Bolton · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130198060A1 · Whitehouse · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130268191A1 · Telang · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130297524A1 · Lau et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130324151A1 · Lee · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130346336A1 · Murphy · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140123315A1 · Baker · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140347193A1 · Ljung · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150262123A1 · Sharma et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170148313A1 · Zografos · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20220172164A1 · Hamm et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230283682A1 · Scarborough · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 202066958U · 2009 [cited by applicant]
CN 102196038A · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0175700 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0244865 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2007024987 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2009088538 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2011037800 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013134958 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2013134958A1 · 2013 [cited by examiner]
Peter Ruppel, “Anonymous user tracking for location-based community services”, published by Springer-Verlag in 2006, all pages (Year: 2006). [cited by examiner]
James Scott, “Exploring end user preferences for location obfuscation, location-based services, and the value of location”, published by UbiComp in 2010, all pages (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
Christian, Jensen, “Location Privacy Techniques in Client-Server Architectures”, published by Springer in 2009, all pages (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
U.S. Appl. No. 60/263,877, filed Jan. 23, 2001. [cited by applicant]
Strom, Stephanie, “A Wild Sleigh Ride at Federal Express,” The New York Times, Dec. 20, 1994, 3 pp., http://www.nytimes.com/1994/12/20/business/a-wild-sleigh-ride-at-federal-express.html. [cited by applicant]
Canadian Examiner's Report, dated Oct. 21, 2019, issued in Canadian Application No. 2,868,044 (5 pp.). [cited by applicant]
Canadian Examiner's Report in Canadian Application No. 2,868,044, issued on Nov. 16, 2018 (10 pp). [cited by applicant]
C. Heywood, “GPS tracking of intermodal transportation: System integration with delivery order system,” punlished by IEEE.com, Dec. 4, 2009. [cited by applicant]
W. He, “A solution for intergrated track and trace in supply chain based on RFID and GPS,” published on IEEE.com, Dec. 4, 2009. [cited by applicant]
Elmasri et al., “Fundamentals of Databse Systems,” Fundamentals of Database Systems Fourth Edition, pp. 731-741 (XP 055288082), 2004. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report from EP 17 17 5546, issued Jan. 17, 2018, 13 pp. [cited by applicant]
Result of Consultation from the European Patent Office for counterpart European Application No. EP 13 714 807.8 dated Feb. 23, 2017. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office Communication Pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC in corresponding European Application No. 13714807.8, dated Nov. 3, 2015. [cited by applicant]
A.J. Bernheim Brush et al., Exploring End User Preferences for Location Obfuscation, Location-Based Services, and the Value of Location, NA, 1 and 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Search Report and Search Opinion, Mar. 5, 2015, 6 pp. [cited by applicant]
Bhuptani, et al.; RFID Field Guide Deploying Radio Frequency Identification Systems; Feb. 2005; Prentice Hall; USA (292 pages). [cited by applicant]
Bajpai, et al.; Provisional Application; [cited by applicant]
Geofencing, a Useful Way To Corral Your Devices; posted by Katie Lane; Cisco Meraki; Sep. 11, 2013; (3 pages). https:/web.archive.org/web/20131023085003/https://meraki.cisco.com/blog/2013/09/geofencing-a-useful-way-to-c… [cited by applicant]
Heydon; Bluetooth Low Energy the Developer's Handbook; Oct. 2012; Prentice Hall; USA (368 pages). [cited by applicant]
Guidelines for Seafood Retailers; Govt. of Australia Dept. of Fisheries, Feb. 2002 (45 pages). [cited by applicant]
An Analysis of the Requirements, Current Conditions and Opportunities for Traceability in the British Columbia Seafood Sector; Jun. 2005 (177 pages). [cited by applicant]
SiLabs; Optimizing Current Consumption in Bluetooth Low Energy Devices; Version 2.13 (https://docs.silabs.com/bluetooth/2.13/) (12 pages). [cited by applicant]
Tiwari; an Introduction to QR Code Technology; [cited by applicant]
Vice Article; How the Railroad Industry Invented, Then Immediately Discarded, the Barcode; Oct. 24, 2017 (https://www.vice.com/en/article/qv38wp/how-the-railroad-industry-invented-then-immediately-discarded-the-barcode)… [cited by applicant]
Peter Ruppel, “Anonymous user tracking for location-based community services,” published by Springer-Veriag in 2006, all pages, 2006. [cited by applicant]
James Scott, “Exploring end user preferences for location-based obfuscation, location-based services, and the value of location,” published by UbiComp, 2010. [cited by applicant]