IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,198,272
Granted Patent B2
US 12,198,272 · App. 17/428,437 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Patient-specific cortical surface tessellation into dipole patches

Inventor: Lyubomir Georgiev Zagorchev (Burlington, MA)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06T17/20A61B5/291A61B5/6814G06T7/10G06T2207/10088G06T2207/30016G06T2210/41
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,198,272
App. No.
17/428,437
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method ( 26 ) that tessellates a cortical surface of a brain with a plurality of dipole patches, wherein a quantity of the plurality of dipole patches is variable and dependent upon a head size.

Claims (47)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving magnetic resonance imaging data;

segmenting the magnetic resonance imaging data, the segmenting comprising tissue segmentation of a cortical surface of a cortex;

tessellating the segmented cortical surface with a plurality of dipole patches, wherein a quantity of the plurality of dipole patches is variable and dependent upon a head size;

receiving a volumetric bitmask of the cortex, wherein each voxel of a plurality of voxels is labeled according to a tissue type;

providing a triangular mesh representation of the segmented cortical surface based on the volumetric bitmask; and

providing, for display, an image of a head or a portion thereof according to the tessellation.

2. The method of the claim 1 , wherein the cortical surface consists of a gray matter surface of the cortex.

3. A non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform the method of claim 2 .

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a high resolution triangular mesh containing triangles with uniform edge length by re-meshing the triangular mesh representation; and

providing a simplified triangular mesh representation by applying a topology preserving, mesh decimation algorithm to the high resolution triangular mesh representation.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the topology preserving, mesh decimation algorithm preserves cortical folding and geometry of the segmented cortex.

6. The method of claim 4 , further comprising obtaining the plurality of dipole patches by:

associating each triangle from the high resolution triangular mesh representation to its closest triangle from the simplified triangular mesh representation, wherein a final quantity of the plurality of dipole patches equals a quantity of triangles of the simplified triangular mesh representation.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein each dipole patch center is determined by:

determining a center of mass of all triangles of the high resolution triangular mesh representation associated with a particular one of the closest triangles, wherein a center of a high resolution mesh triangle closest to the center of mass is selected as the dipole patch center;

wherein a normal of the dipole patch corresponds to an average of all normals of the triangles of the high resolution triangular mesh representation.

8. A non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform the method of claim 4 .

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the triangular mesh representation of the segmented cortical surface is based on application of a marching cubes algorithm to the bitmask.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of dipole patches comprises properties that are used as boundary conditions in a forward model used in electrical source imaging.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the properties include a patch center, a patch normal, and surface triangles associated with each of the plurality of dipole patches.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

registering electrode positions on the head;

predicting electrical activity of the head based on the tessellated image;

recording electroencephalography signals from the head; and

based on the recording, predicting a source of targeted brain activity.

13. The method of claim 1 , further comprising displaying the image of the head or the portion thereof according to the tessellation, where the displayed image further comprises a visual representation of one or any combination of a patch center, a patch normal, or a cortical source.

14. A non-transitory computer readable medium including instructions that when executed by one or more processors cause the one or more processors to perform the method of claim 1 .

15. An apparatus, comprising:

a memory comprising instructions; and

one or more processors that, when the one or more processors execute the instructions, are caused to:

receive magnetic resonance imaging data;

segment the magnetic resonance imaging data, the segmenting comprising tissue segmentation of a cortical surface of a cortex;

tessellate the segmented cortical surface with a plurality of dipole patches, wherein a quantity of the plurality of dipole patches is variable and dependent upon a head size;

provide a triangular mesh representation of the segmented cortical surface based on a volumetric bitmask of the cortex, wherein the volumetric bitmask includes a plurality of voxels labeled according to a tissue type; and

provide, for display, an image of a head or a portion thereof according to the tessellation.

16. A system comprising the apparatus of claim 15 , and further comprising:

a magnetic resonance imaging system configured to scan a head of the subject and provide the magnetic resonance imaging data to the one or more processors of the apparatus;

a plurality of electroencephalography electrodes configured to sense the electroencephalography signals;

wherein the one or more processors of the apparatus are configured to receive the electroencephalography signals measured by the electroencephalography electrodes positioned on a scalp of a subject.

17. The system of claim 16 , further comprising a display device coupled to the apparatus, the display device configured to display the image of the head or the portion thereof according to the tessellation.

18. The system of claim 17 , where the displayed image further comprises a visual representation of one or any combination of a patch center, a patch normal, or a cortical source.

19. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to receive the volumetric bitmask of the cortex.

20. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the instructions further cause the one or more processors to:

provide a high resolution triangular mesh containing triangles with uniform edge length by re-meshing the triangular mesh representation; and

provide a simplified triangular mesh representation by applying a topology preserving, mesh decimation algorithm to the high resolution triangular mesh representation.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 5, 2021
From: ZAGORCHEV, LYUBOMIR GEORGIEV
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 057086/0028 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62802275 · Feb 7, 2019
Related Publication 20220108525A1 · Apr 7, 2022
References Cited (32)
US 7421136B2 · Sirohey · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 8031919B2 · Eskildsen · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 10149618B1 · Tandon · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10959656B2 · Kanayama · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20160081577A1 · Sridhar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170332933A1 · Krishnaswamy · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180276822A1 · Liu et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
CA 1606870A1 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 104605845A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
CN 105395194A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 107430690A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 107818567A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016073985A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020109188A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Hammond David K et al: “Cortical Graph Smoothing: A Novel Method for Exploiting DWI-Derived Anatomical Brain Connectivity to Improve EEG Source Estimation” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, IEEE service center, vol.… [cited by examiner]
Acar et al: “Patch-Based Cortical Source Imaging in Epilepsy”; Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, 2009, pp. 1-11. [cited by applicant]
Hyde et al: “Voxel-Based Dipole Orientation Constraints for Distributed Current Estimation”; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 61, No. 7, Jul. 2014, pp. 2028-2040. [cited by applicant]
Ding et al: “Three-Dimensional Imaging of Complex Neural Activation in Humans From EEG”; IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 56, No. 8, Aug. 2009, pp. 1980-1988. [cited by applicant]
Hammond et al: “Cortical Graph Smoothing: a Novel Method for Exploiting DWI-Derived Anatomical Brain Connectivity to Improve EEG Source Estimation”; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, No. 10, Oct. 2013, pp. … [cited by applicant]
PCT/EP2020/053208 ISR & WO, Apr. 9, 2020, 16 Pages. [cited by applicant]
Knapp: Mesh Decimation Using VTK; Institute of Computer Raphics and Algorithms, Vienna University of Technology, 2002, 8 Page Document. [cited by applicant]
Kruggel: Robust Parametrization of Brain Surface Meshes; Science Direct, Medical Image Analysis 12 (2008) pp. 291-299. [cited by applicant]
Kuo et al: “EEG Source Imagin GOF Epileptic Activity at Seizure Onset”; Epilepsy Research, 46 (2018), pp. 160-171. [cited by applicant]
Liao et al:“SPARSE Imaging of Cortical Electrical Current Densities via Wavelet Transforms”; Phys. Med. Biol. 57 (2012), pp. 6881-6901. [cited by applicant]
Lorensen et al: “Marching Cubes: a High Resolution 3D Surface Construction Algorithm”; Computer Graphics, vol. 21, No. 4, Jul. 1987, pp. 163-169. [cited by applicant]
Nielson et al: “The Asymptotic Decider: Resolving the Ambiguity in Marching Cubes”; IEEE, 1991, pp. 83-91. [cited by applicant]
Weese et al: “Shape-Constained Deformable Models and Applications in Medical Imaging”; Springer Link, Shape Analysis in Medical Image Analysis, pp. 151-184, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Wenzel et al: “Rapid Fully Automatic Segmentation of Subcortical Brain Structures by Shape-Constrained Surface Adaptation”; Philips Research Submitted to Medical Image Analysis, Feb. 23, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Zagorchev et al: “Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using a Shape-Constrained Deformable Model”; MBIA'11:Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multimodal Brain Image Analysis, Sep. 2011 pp. 11… [cited by applicant]
Zagorchev et al: “Manual Annotation, 3-D Shape Reconstruciton, and Traumatic Brain Injury Analysis”; MBIA 2011: Multimodal Brain Image Analysis, pp. 52-59 (Abstract). [cited by applicant]
Hammond D. K. et al., “Cortical Graph Smoothing: A Novel Method for Exploiting DWI-Derived Anatomical Brain Connectivity to Improve EEG Source Estimation”, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1952… [cited by applicant]
Jinj L.I. et al., “Study on the Effects of Skull Holes to the Scalp EEG by Means of Finite Difference Method”, Chinese Journal of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 26, No. 5, Oct. 2007. [cited by applicant]