IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,198,346
Granted Patent B2
US 12,198,346 · App. 16/959,746 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Combining pH and metabolic activity imaging for response assessment in immune therapy

Inventors: Reinhold Wimberger-Friedl (Waalre, NL); Vanda Lucia de Carvalho Vittorino de Almeida (Veldhoven, NL); Ulrich Katscher (Norderstedt, DE)
Assignee: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
G06T7/0016A61B5/055A61B5/4842A61B5/4848A61B5/4866A61B6/037G06N20/00G06T7/11G16H15/00G16H20/40G16H30/40G16H50/20G16H50/50A61B5/1451A61B5/14539A61B2576/00G06T2207/10088G06T2207/10104G06T2207/30096
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,198,346
App. No.
16/959,746
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computerized system for monitoring cancer therapy and a related method. The system comprises an input port (IN) for receiving two or more input images acquired of a subject, the two or more input images capable of recording metabolic activity and extracellular pH level. An evaluator (EVAL) of the system is configured to assess, based on the input images, i) a change over time in metabolic activity and ii) a change over time in extracellular pH level. The evaluator (EVAL) is further configured to establish, based on the assessment, an indication on whether or not there is a response to a cancer therapy in relation to a lesion of the subject or on whether the assessment is inconclusive. The indication is output through an output interface (OUT).

Claims (29)

1. A computerized system for monitoring cancer therapy, comprising:

an input port for receiving two or more input images acquired of a subject, a first input image of the two or more input images recording metabolic activity based on a PET image and a second input image of the two or more input images recording extracellular pH level based on an MR image;

a computer configured to:

segment the two or more input images to find a lesion in the two or more input images;

assess i) a change (ma) in metabolic activity and ii) a change (pH) in extracellular pH level in the segmented two or more images by converting image values in the two or more input images to standard uptake values (SUVs):

form, from the SUVs, at least one ratio of pH/ma or ma/pH; and

c in relation to the lesion or on whether the assessment is inconclusive; and

an output interface for outputting said indication.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer is configured to establish in the indication that there is response to the cancer therapy if i) there is an increase in metabolic activity and there is increase in extracellular pH level or ii) there is a decrease in metabolic activity and increase in extracellular pH level.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer is configured to establish in the indication whether the response is a pseudo-progression or a real progression.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the computer includes an image segmenter to segment the two or more images for a region of interest (ROI), wherein the assessment of the changes of the metabolic activity and the extracellular pH level is based on image values in said ROI.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the assessment of the changes of the metabolic activity and the extracellular pH level is based on image values in a border portion of the ROI.

6. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing instructions executable by at least one processor to perform a computer-implemented method to monitor cancer therapy, the method comprising:

receiving two or more input images acquired of a subject, a first input image of the two or more input images recording metabolic activity based on a PET image and a second input image of the two or more input images recording extracellular pH level based on an MR image;

segmenting the two or more input images to find a lesion in the two or more input images;

assessing i) a change (ma) in metabolic activity and ii) a change (pH) in extracellular pH level in the segmented two or more images by converting image values in the two or more input images to standard uptake values (SUVs):

forming, from the SUVs, at least one ratio of pH/ma or ma/pH; and

establishing, based on the at least one ratio of pH/ma or ma/pH, an indication on whether or not there is a response to a cancer therapy in relation to the lesion or on whether the assessment is inconclusive; and

outputting said indication.

7. The non-transitory computer readable medium as per claim 6 , wherein the establishing includes establishing in the indication that there is response to the cancer therapy, if i) there is an increase in metabolic activity and there is increase in extracellular pH level or ii) there is a decrease in metabolic activity and an increase in extracellular pH level.

8. The non-transitory computer readable medium as per claim 6 , wherein the established indication is capable of distinguishing between a pseudo-progression and a real progression.

9. The non-transitory computer readable medium as per claim 6 wherein the establishing includes applying machine learning to the images.

10. A system for monitoring cancer therapy, comprising:

a positron emission tomography (PET) imager configured to acquire a PET image of a subject recording metabolic activity;

a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imager configured to acquire an MRI image of the subject recording extracellular pH level; and

a computer configured to:

assess a change (ma) over time in metabolic activity using the PET image and a change (pH) over time in extracellular pH level using the MRI image;

establish, based on the assessment, an indication on whether or not there is a response to a cancer therapy in relation to a lesion of the subject or on whether the assessment is inconclusive based on computing at least one ratio of pH/ma or ma/pH; and

output said indication.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 2, 2020
From: WIMBERGER-FRIEDL, REINHOLD; VITORINO DE ALMEIDA, VANDA LUCIA DE CARVALHO; KATSCHER, ULRICH
To: KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
Reel/Frame 053107/0300 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 18150251 · Jan 4, 2018 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20200372653A1 · Nov 26, 2020
References Cited (18)
US 20060177378A1 · Norfray · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20120130223A1 · Reicher · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130329973A1 · Cao · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140154185A1 · Van Zijl · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170135615A1 · Hasan · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20190374105A1 · Raylman · 2019 [cited by examiner]
WO 2015145447A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2016140974A1 · 2016 [cited by examiner]
Longo, et al., “In Vivo Imaging of Tumor Metabolism and Acidosis by Combining PET and MRI-CEST pH Imaging”, Cancer Research, vol. 76, No. 22, Nov. 15, 2016, pp. 6463-6470. [cited by applicant]
Gawlitza, et al., “In vivo Correlation of Glucose Metabolism, Cell Density and Microcirculatory Parameters in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: Initial Results Using Simultaneous PET/MRI”, PLOS One, vol. 10, No. 8, Au… [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors”, Wikipedia, Nov. 11, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wi kipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Response_evaluation_criteria_in_solidtumors&oldid=8097541… [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “PET response criteria in solid tumors”, Wikipedia, Apr. 10, 2016, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/w/i ndex.php?title=PET response criteria in solid tumors&oldid=714520181, 2 pages (… [cited by applicant]
Anonymous: “Standardized uptake value”, Wikipedia, Dec. 13, 2017, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:https://en.wi ki pedi a.org/w/i ndex.php?title=Standardized uptakevalue&oldid=815220289, 4 pages (Abstract). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2018/097141, filed Dec. 28, 2018, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhang, et al., “Tumor pH and its measurement”, J. Nucl. Med. Aug. 2010; 51(8), pp. 1167-1170. [cited by applicant]
Kircher, er al., “Molecular imaging for personalized cancer care”, Molecular Oncology 6 (2012), pp. 182-195. [cited by applicant]
Zaimenko, Inna et al “Approaches and Techniques to Characterize Cancer Metabolism in vitro and in vivo”, BBA Reviews on Cancer, vol. 1868, 2017, pp. 412-419. [cited by applicant]
Anemone, Annasofia et al “In vivo Evaluation of Tumour Acidosis for Assessing the Early Metabolic Response and Onset of Resistance to Dichloroactate by using Magnetic Resonance pH Imaging”, International Journal of Onco… [cited by applicant]