IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,199,779
Granted Patent B2
US 12,199,779 · App. 18/462,781 · Granted Jan 14, 2025

Power control for feedback signaling

Inventor: Robert Baldemair (Solna, SE)
Assignee: Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (Publ)
H04L1/1864H04L1/0057H04L1/1812H04L1/1854H04L1/1896H04L5/001H04L5/003H04L5/0032H04L5/0044H04L5/0055H04L5/0057H04W52/146H04W52/346H04W52/40H04W52/48H04W72/0446H04L1/0045H04L1/0072H04L27/0006H04W16/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,199,779
App. No.
18/462,781
Granted
Jan 14, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

There is disclosed a method of operating a user equipment in a radio access network. The method includes transmitting feedback signaling pertaining to a plurality of cells, the feedback signaling being transmitted at a power level, the power level being based on a difference between a value V and a value U, the value V being indicative of the total number of scheduling assignments the user equipment is expected to receive for the plurality of cells, and the value U being indicative of the total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells received by the user equipment. The disclosure also pertains to related devices and methods.

Claims (28)

1. A method of operating a user equipment in a radio access network, the method comprising:

transmitting feedback signaling pertaining to a plurality of cells, the feedback signaling being transmitted at a power level, the power level being based on a sum of differences over a plurality of occasions of feedback signaling between a value V and a value U, the value V being indicative of a total number of scheduling assignments the user equipment is expected to receive for the plurality of cells, and the value U being indicative of a total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells received by the user equipment.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the feedback signaling comprises a maximum number of bits of feedback information.

3. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the feedback signaling is error encoded based on a Reed-Muller code.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the feedback signaling is transmitted on one of a control channel and a data channel.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein V pertains to a total number of scheduling assignments to which the feedback signaling pertains.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein V pertains to the total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells at the same assignment reception occasion time.

7. The method according to claim 1 , wherein V is determined based on a total downlink assignment indication received in a scheduling assignment.

8. The method according to claim 1 , wherein V is determined based on a counter downlink assignment indication received in a scheduling assignment.

9. The method according to claim 1 , wherein V us determined based on an assignment indication received in a scheduling grant.

10. The method according to claim 1 , wherein U pertains to all of the plurality of cells.

11. The method according to claim 1 , wherein U pertains to the scheduling assignments received at the same assignment reception occasion.

12. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the power level is also based on a value NB indicative of a number of bits to be included in the feedback signaling per missed scheduling assignment.

13. A user equipment for a radio access network, the user equipment being configured to:

transmit feedback signaling pertaining to a plurality of cells, the feedback signaling being transmitted at a power level, the power level being based on a sum of differences over a plurality of occasions of feedback signaling between a value V and a value U, the value V being indicative of a total number of scheduling assignments the user equipment is expected to receive for the plurality of cells, and the value U being indicative of a total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells received by the user equipment.

14. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein the feedback signaling comprises a maximum number of bits of feedback information.

15. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein the feedback signaling is error encoded based on a Reed-Muller code.

16. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein the feedback signaling is transmitted on one of a control channel and a data channel.

17. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein V pertains to a total number of scheduling assignments to which the feedback signaling pertains.

18. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein V pertains to the total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells at the same assignment reception occasion time.

19. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein Vis determined based on a total downlink assignment indication received in a scheduling assignment.

20. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein Vis determined based on a counter downlink assignment indication received in a scheduling assignment.

21. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein V us determined based on an assignment indication received in a scheduling grant.

22. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein U pertains to all of the plurality of cells.

23. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein U pertains to the scheduling assignments received at the same assignment reception occasion.

24. The user equipment according to claim 13 , wherein the power level is also based on a value NB indicative of a number of bits to be included in the feedback signaling per missed scheduling assignment.

25. A non-transitory computer storage medium storing an executable computer program that, when executed, cause processing circuitry to at least one of control and perform a method of operating a user equipment in a radio access network, the method comprising:

transmitting feedback signaling pertaining to a plurality of cells, the feedback signaling being transmitted at a power level, the power level being based on a sum of differences over a plurality of occasions of feedback signaling between a value V and a value U, the value V being indicative of a total number of scheduling assignments the user equipment is expected to receive for the plurality of cells, and the value U being indicative of a total number of scheduling assignments for the plurality of cells received by the user equipment.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 20, 2023
From: BALDEMAIR, ROBERT
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 064970/0655 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16588175 · Sep 30, 2019
Continuation 16292999 · Mar 5, 2019
Continuation PCTSE2018050362 · Apr 6, 2018
Related Publication 20230421311A1 · Dec 28, 2023
References Cited (56)
US 10491338B2 · Baldemair · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11777667B2 · Baldemair · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20090129317A1 · Che · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20130329688A1 · Yang · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140078974A1 · Falahati · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140119339A1 · Yang · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140126491A1 · Ekpenyong · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150230242A1 · Papasakellariou · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150236824A1 · Lei · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150249982A1 · Falahati · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160029250A1 · Yi · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160050632A1 · Falahati · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20160295574A1 · Papasakellariou · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170215157A1 · Yang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170215172A1 · Yang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170366305A1 · Hwang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180019843A1 · Papasakellariou · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180077652A1 · Seo · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180092085A1 · Shaheen · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180159665A1 · Yang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180206224A1 · Hwang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180234954A1 · Takeda · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180278366A1 · Papasakellariou · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180302896A1 · Nayeb Nazar · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180310257A1 · Papasakellariou · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180332568A1 · Wu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190028242A1 · Xiao · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190036669A1 · Park · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190045489A1 · He · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190149271A1 · Yin · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190158250A1 · Ang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190159138A1 · Lee · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190159206A1 · Sun · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190215712A1 · Babaei · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190215870A1 · Babaei · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190312688A1 · Baldemair · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200029282A1 · Baldemair · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20230421311A1 · Baldemair · 2023 [cited by examiner]
CN 101911794A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
CN 103339893A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
CN 107683575A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 2876947A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013542692A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014513886A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015523032A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
JP 2015523831A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
RU 2559830C2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
RU 2599730C2 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017026814A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report dated Dec. 21, 2018 for International Application No. PCT/SE2018/050362 filed on Apr. 6, 2018, consisting of 17-pages. [cited by applicant]
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #AH 1801 R1-1800453; Title: Corrections on HARQ Feedback; Agenda Item: 7.3.3.2; Source: Samsung; Document for: Discussion and Decision; Location and Date: Vancouver, Canada, Jan. 22-26, 2018, consisting… [cited by applicant]
Japanese Notice of Allowance and Machine Translation dated Aug. 31, 2020 for International Application No. 2019563567, consisting of 5-pages. [cited by applicant]
Russian Decision to Grant dated Jan. 26, 2021 for Application No. 2020136380/07 filed on Apr. 6, 2018, consisting of 24-pages. [cited by applicant]
Indian Examination Report dated Dec. 3, 2021 for Application No. 202047043248, consisting of 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chinese Office Action and English Summary dated Oct. 18, 2022 for Application No. 201880090448.3, consisting of 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #82bis R1-155093; Title: Dynamic adaptation of PUCCH formats for HARQ-ACK feedback; Agenda Item: 7.2.2.1.2; Source: Huawei, HiSilicon; Document for: Discussion/Decision; Location and Date: Malmö… [cited by applicant]