IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,201,412
Granted Patent B2
US 12,201,412 · App. 17/172,644 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

System and method for reconstruction using a high-resolution phase in magnetic resonance images

Inventors: Xinzeng Wang (Houston, TX); Daniel V. Litwiller (Denver, CO); Arnaud Guidon (Boston, MA); Ersin Bayram (Houston, TX); Robert Marc Lebel (Calgary, CA); Tim Sprenger (Sundybyberg, SE)
Assignee: GE Precision Healthcare LLC
A61B5/055A61B5/726A61B5/7267G01R33/4616G01R33/4818G01R33/5602
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,201,412
App. No.
17/172,644
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for producing an image of a subject with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comprises acquiring a first set of partial k-space data from the subject and generating a phase corrected image based on a phase correction factor and the first set of the partial k-space data. The method further includes transforming the phase corrected image into a second set of partial k-space data and reconstructing the image of the subject from the second set of the partial k-space data and a weighting function.

Claims (38)

1. A method for producing an image of a subject with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, the method comprising:

acquiring, using the MRI system, a first set of partial k-space data from the subject, wherein the first set of the partial k-space data is asymmetric and truncated in at least one k-space dimension;

zero-filling the first set of the partial k-space data with zeros at locations corresponding to skipped k-space locations to derive full k-space data;

reconstructing a first image based on the zero-filled k-space data;

determining a phase correction factor from the first image;

generating a phase corrected image based on the phase correction factor and the first set of the partial k-space data;

transforming the phase corrected image into a second set of partial k-space data; and

reconstructing, from the second set of the partial k-space data and a weighting function, the image of the subject.

2. The method of claim 1 , comprises using a neural network model with the first image to determine the phase correction factor.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the neural network model is trained with a pair of pristine images and corrupted images, wherein the corrupted images include corrupted phase information, the pristine images are the corrupted images with the corrupted phase information reduced.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the neural network model is trained with a loss function including a constraint based on prior knowledge of phase information.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the phase corrected image based on the phase correction factor and the first set of the partial k-space data comprises multiplying the first image with the phase correction factor.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the image of the subject is reconstructed by determining a real portion of a multiplication result of the weighting function and the second set of the partial k-space data.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the weighting function represents a spectral sampling density.

8. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system, comprising:

a magnet configured to generate a polarizing magnetic field about at least a portion of a subject arranged in the MRI system;

a gradient coil assembly including a plurality of gradient coils configured to apply at least one gradient field to the polarizing magnetic field;

a radio frequency (RF) system configured to apply an RF field to the subject and to receive magnetic resonance signals from the subject; and

a processing system programmed to:

acquire a first set of partial k-space data from the subject, wherein the first set of partial k-space data is asymmetric and truncated in at least one k-space dimension;

zero-fill the first set of the partial k-space data with zeros at locations corresponding to skipped k-space locations to derive full k-space data;

reconstruct a first image based on the zero-filled k-space data;

determine a phase correction factor from the first image;

generate a phase corrected image based on the phase correction factor and the first set of the partial k-space data;

transform the phase corrected image into a second set of partial k-space data; and

reconstruct, from the second set of the partial k-space data and a weighting function, the image of the subject.

9. The MRI system of claim 8 , wherein the processing system is programmed to determine the phase correction factor from the first image using a neural network model.

10. The MRI system of claim 9 , wherein the processing system is programmed to train the neural network model with a pair of pristine images and corrupted images, wherein the corrupted images include corrupted phase information, the pristine images are the corrupted images with the corrupted phase information reduced.

11. A method of MR imaging, comprising:

acquiring a first set of k-space data for less than all of k-space from a subject, wherein the first set of the k-space data is asymmetric and truncated in at least one k-space dimension;

zero-filling the first set of the k-space data with zeros at locations corresponding to skipped k-space locations to derive full k-space data;

reconstructing a first image based on the zero-filled k-space data;

determining a phase correction factor from the first image;

generating the phase corrected image based on a phase correction factor and the first set of the k-space data;

transforming the phase corrected image into a second set of k-space data; and

reconstructing, from the second set of the k-space data and a weighting function, the image of the subject.

12. The method of claim 11 , comprising determining the phase correction factor from the first image using ene of a neural network model.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the neural network model is trained with a pair of pristine images and corrupted images, wherein the corrupted images include corrupted phase information, the pristine images are the corrupted images with the corrupted phase information reduced.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 10, 2021
From: WANG, XINZENG; LITWILLER, DANIEL V.; GUIDON, ARNAUD; BAYRAM, ERSIN; LEBEL, ROBERT MARC; SPRENGER, TIM
To: GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
Reel/Frame 055216/0832 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220248972A1 · Aug 11, 2022
References Cited (39)
US 7652474B2 · Griswold · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 10635943B1 · Lebel · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20040258326A1 · Lee · 2004 [cited by examiner]
US 20140266192A1 · Taviani · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20170178318A1 · Wang · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20200041592A1 · Huang · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200126190A1 · Lebel · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200202586A1 · Li · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200341101A1 · Splitthoff · 2020 [cited by examiner]
DE 102020209913A1 · 2021 [cited by examiner]
T. Jhamb. 2015. A Review on Image Reconstruction through MRI k-Space Data, I.J. Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, p. 42-59 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
J. Pauly. 2005. Partial k-Space Reconstruction, p. 1-13 (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
I. Fantini. 2018. Automatic Detection of Motion Artifacts on MRI Using Deep CNN, p. 1-4 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
L. Wu. 2020. Complex Imaging of Phase Domains by Deep Neural Networks, p. 12-21 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
K. Jin. 2016. A General Framework for Compressed Sensing and Parallel MRI Using Annihilating Filter Based Low-Rank Hankel Matrix, p. 480-495 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
J. Pauly, Partial k-Space Recconstruction, 2005, 1-13 (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
I. Fantini, Automatic detection of motion artifacts on MRI using Deep CNN, IEEE, Jan. 4, 2018 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
T. Jhamb, A Review on Image Reconstruction through MRI k-Space Data, I.J. Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, Jul. 2015, 42-59 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
J. Pauly, Partial k-Space Recconstruction, Jan. 13, 2005 (Year: 2005). [cited by examiner]
K.H. Jin, A General Framework for Compressed Sensing and Parallel MRI Using Annihilating Filter Based Low-Rank Hankel Matrix, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 2, No. 4, Dec. 2016, 480-495 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
I. Fantini, Automatic detection of motion artifacts on MRI using Deep CNN, IEEE, 2018, 1-4 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Paul et al., “Least-Squares FIR Models of Low-Resolution MR data for Efficient Phase-Error Compensation with Simultaneous Artefact Removal,” https://arxiv.org/pdf/1303.2437; Mar. 11, 2013, 34 pages. [cited by applicant]
Antun et al., “On Instabilities of Deep Learning in Image Reconstruction and the Potential Cost of AI,” PNAS 2020, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Blaimer et al., “Virtual coil concept for improved parallel MRI employing conjugate symmetric signals,” MRM, 2009, 61: pp. 93-102, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chang et al., “High-quality and self-navigated diffusion-weighted imaging enabled by a novel interleaved block-segmented (iblocks),” Proc ISMRM, 2015, Abstract Only, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Cuppen et al., “Reducing MR Imaging Time by One-Sided Reconstruction,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, May 1987: pp. 516-527, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Haacke et al., “A Fast Iterative, Partial-Fourier Technique Capable of Local Phase Recovery”, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 1991, 92: pp. 126-145, 20 pages. [cited by applicant]
Huang et al., “Partial Fourier Reconstruction through Data Fitting and Convolution in k-Space,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2009, 62: pp. 1261-1269, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ju et al., “Ultrafest 3D Partial Fourier Reconstruction with Well-Preserved Phase using DNN,” Proc ISMRM, 2019, pp. 4708, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kadimesetty et al., “Optimal Partial Fourier MRI reconstruction: Homodyne vs POCS,” Proc ISMRM, 2018, pp. 3521, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
McGibney et al., “Quantitative Evaluation of Several Partial Fourier Reconstruction Algorithms Used in MRI,” Partial Fourier Reconstruction Algorithms, University of Calgary, 1993, pp. 51-59, pages. [cited by applicant]
Muckley et al., “Learned Gibbs Removal in Partial Fourier Acquisitions for Diffusion MRI,” Proc ISMRM, 2019, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Muckley et al., “Training a Neural Network for Gibbs and Noise Removal in Diffusion MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Jul. 14, 2020, vol. 85, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
Noll et al., “Homodyne Detection in Magnetic Resonance Imaging,” IEEE Trans Med Imaging, Oct. 1991: pp. 154-163, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Paul et al., “Higher dimensional homodyne filtering for suppression of incidental phase artifacts in multichannel MRI,” https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1501/1501.03271.pdf, Jan. 14, 2015, 36 pages. [cited by applicant]
Pauly, “Partial k-Space Reconstruction,” Stanford University, 2005, Chapter 2, pp. 11-24, 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Toews et al., “Deep Partial Fourier Reconstruction,” Proc ISMRM, 2019, pp. 4702, 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ueker et al., “Robust Partial Fourier Parallel Imaging Using ESPIRIT and Virtual Conjugate Coils,” Proc ISMRM 2014, pp. 1629, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
Yan et al., “Data Truncation Artificat Reduction in MR Imaging Using a Multilayer Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 1993, vol. 12, pp. 73-77, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]