IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,201,835
Granted Patent B2
US 12,201,835 · App. 17/835,389 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Systems and methods for spatially selective spinal cord stimulation

Inventors: Tianhe Zhang (Studio City, CA); Que T. Doan (West Hills, CA)
Assignee: Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation
A61N1/36062A61N1/0551A61N1/0553A61N1/36071A61N1/36185A61N1/36189A61N1/37247
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,201,835
App. No.
17/835,389
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system may include electrodes on at least one lead configured to be operationally positioned for use in modulating a volume of neural tissue, a neural modulation generator configured to deliver energy using at least some electrodes to modulate the volume of neural tissue, a programming system configured to program the programmed modulation parameter set, including determine electrode fractionalizations for the electrodes based on a target multipole. The programmed parameter set may include the determined electrode fractionalizations. The target multipole may be used to determine electrode fractionalizations having at least three target poles that directionally and progressively stack fractionalizations of target poles to provide a linear electric field over the volume of tissue. The neural modulation generator may be configured to use the programmed modulation parameter set to provide the linear electric field over the volume of tissue.

Claims (50)

1. A method for programming a modulation device that has a plurality of physical electrodes, comprising:

determining electrode contributions for at least some of the plurality of physical electrodes, wherein:

the determined electrode contributions are for a target multipole;

the target multipole having opposing first and second sides, the first side having a first polarity and the second side having a second polarity;

the target multipole including a central region and at least three target poles, at least two of the at least three target poles being outside of the central region;

the at least three target poles including at least two target poles of the first polarity and at least one target pole of the second polarity, at least one of the at least two target poles of the first polarity being within the central region;

the at least two target poles of the first polarity have fractionalization magnitudes representing fractional contributions toward the first polarity in the target multipole;

the fractionalization magnitudes for the at least two target poles of the first polarity progressively increase in an outward direction away from a point within the central region to a point on the first side outside of the central region; and

the fractionalization magnitudes correspond to a linear field; and

programming the modulation device with a modulation parameter set using the determined electrode contributions.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the at least three target poles are in-line with each other.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of electrodes is on one lead.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of electrodes is on a paddle lead or distributed over at least two leads.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving a user input to adjust an angle of an axis of progression for the fractionalization magnitudes.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving a user input to adjust a focus of the target multipole.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising receiving a user input to adjust a spread of the target multipole.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising automatically moving the target multipole within an array of electrodes.

9. A method for programming a modulation device that has a plurality of physical electrodes, comprising:

determining electrode contributions for at least some of the plurality of physical electrodes and programming the modulation device with a modulation parameter set using the determined electrode contributions, wherein:

the determined electrode contributions are for a target multipole;

the target multipole having opposing first and second sides, the first side having a first polarity and the second side having a second polarity;

the target multipole including a central region and at least four target poles, at least two of the at least four target poles being outside of the central region;

the at least four target poles including at least two target anodes and at least two target cathodes, at least one of the at least two target anodes being within the central region and at least one of the at least two target cathodes being within the target region;

the at least two target anodes have fractionalization magnitudes representing fractional anodic contributions in the target multipole, and the at least two target cathodes have fractionalization magnitudes representing fractional cathodic contributions in the target multipole;

the fractionalization magnitudes for the at least two target anodes progressively increase in an outward direction away from a point within the central region to a point on the first side outside of the central region, and the fractionalization magnitudes for the at least two target cathodes progressively increase in an outward direction away from the point within the central region to another point on the second side outside of the central region; and

the fractionalization magnitudes correspond to a linear field; and

programming the modulation device with a modulation parameter set using the determined electrode contributions.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the at least four target poles are in-line with each other.

11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the at least two target anodes include a first target anode and a second target anode, and the at least two target cathodes include a first target cathode and a second target cathode, and wherein the first target anode and the first target cathode have equal fractionalization magnitudes, and the second target anode and second target cathode have equal fractionalization magnitudes.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the target multipole has a center, and distances from the first target anode to the center and from the first target cathode to the center are equal, and distances from the second target anode to the center and from the second target cathode to the center are equal.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the distances from the second target anode to the first target anode, from the first target anode to the center, from the center to the first target cathode, and from the first target cathode to the second target cathode are equal.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the at least two target anodes include a first target anode and a second target anode, and the at least two target cathodes include a first target cathode and a second target cathode, the target multipole includes a center, the second target anode is further away from the center than the first target anode and the second target anode has a higher fractionalization percentage then the first target anode, and the second target cathode is further away from the center than the first target cathode and the second target cathode has a higher fractionalization percentage then the first target cathode.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the at least two target anodes are on the first side of the target multipole and includes three target anodes, and the at last least two target cathodes are on the second side of the target multipole and includes three target cathodes.

16. The method of claim 9 , wherein the target multipole further comprises a flanking target anode and a flanking target cathode, wherein the first, second and flanking target anodes, the center, and the first, second and flanking target cathodes are in-line.

17. The method of claim 9 , further comprising receiving a user input to adjust an angle of an axis of progression for the fractionalization magnitudes, a user input to adjust a focus of the target multipole, or a user input to adjust a spread of the target multipole.

18. The method of claim 9 , further comprising automatically moving the target multipole within an array of electrodes.

19. A non-transitory machine-readable medium including instructions, which when executed by a machine, cause the machine to perform a method for programming a modulation device that has a plurality of physical electrodes, the method comprising:

determining electrode contributions for at least some of the plurality of physical electrodes, wherein:

the determined electrode contributions are for a target multipole;

the target multipole having opposing first and second sides, the first side having a first polarity and the second side having a second polarity;

the target multipole including a central region and at least three target poles, at least two of the at least three target poles being outside of the central region;

the at least three target poles including at least two target poles of the first polarity and at least one target pole of the second polarity, at least one of the at least two target poles of the first polarity being within the central region;

the at least two target poles of the first polarity have fractionalization magnitudes representing fractional contributions toward the first polarity in the target multipole;

the fractionalization magnitudes for the at least two target poles of the first polarity progressively increase in an outward direction away from a point within the central region to a point on the first side outside of the central region; and

the fractionalization magnitudes correspond to a linear field; and

programming the modulation device with a modulation parameter set using the determined electrode contributions.

20. The non-transitory machine-readable medium of claim 19 , wherein the method further comprises at least one of:

receiving a first user input to adjust an angle of an axis of progression for the fractionalization magnitudes;

receiving a second user input to adjust a focus of the target multipole; or

receiving a third user input to adjust a spread of the target multipole.

Continuity (4)
Continuation 16737601 · Jan 8, 2020
Continuation 15684196 · Aug 23, 2017
Provisional Application 62379098 · Aug 24, 2016
Related Publication 20220296902A1 · Sep 22, 2022
References Cited (47)
US 8412345B2 · Moffitt · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8909350B2 · Lee · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9044610B2 · Rosenberg et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 10549097B2 · Zhang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11376433B2 · Zhang et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20090287271A1 · Blum et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110022114A1 · Navarro et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120239115A1 · Lee · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120296396A1 · Moffitt et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130204327A1 · Carlton · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130253610A1 · Lee et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140100631A1 · Rao · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150073502A1 · Lee et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160082261A1 · Moffitt et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180056068A1 · Zhang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200139127A1 · Zhang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
AU 2017316684B2 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 3035110C · 2021 [cited by applicant]
CA 3124443C · 2023 [cited by applicant]
EP 3503966B1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010028084A2 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018039296A2 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018039296A3 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,196, Non Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2019”, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,196, Notice of Allowance mailed Sep. 25, 2019”, 7 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,196, Response filed Aug. 26, 2019 to Non Final Office Action mailed May 15, 2019”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,601, Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2021”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,601, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 2, 2022”, 10 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,601, Response filed Dec. 7, 2021 to Non Final Office Action mailed Sep. 7, 2021”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Australian Application Serial No. 2017316684, First Examination Report mailed Jun. 19, 2019”, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Australian Application Serial No. 2017316684, Response filed Mar. 23, 2020 to First Examination Report mailed Jun. 19, 2019”, 14 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,035,110, Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2020”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,035,110, Response filed Aug. 5, 2020 to Office Action mailed Apr. 6, 2020”, 17 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“European Application Serial No. 17761171.2, Response to Communication Pursuant to Rules 161 & 162 filed Oct. 10, 2019”, 12 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/048125, International Preliminary Report on Patentability mailed Mar. 7, 2019”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/048125, International Search Report mailed Feb. 9, 2018”, 8 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/048125, Invitation to Pay Add'l Fees and Partial Search Report mailed Dec. 5, 2017”, 15 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“International Application Serial No. PCT/US2017/048125, Written Opinion mailed Feb. 9, 2018”, 11 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Al-Kaisy, Adnan, et al., “Sustained Effectiveness of 10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients with Chronic, Low Back Pain: 24-Month Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study”, Pain Medicine 2014; 15, … [cited by applicant]
Alo, Kenneth, et al., “New Trends in Neuromodulation for the Management of Neuropathic Pain”, Neurosurgery, vol. 50, No. 4, (Apr. 2002), 690-704. [cited by applicant]
Gustafsson, Bengt, et al., “Direct and Indirect Activation of Nerve Cells by Electrical Pulses Applied Extracellularly”, J. Physiol. 258, pp. 33-61 (1976). [cited by applicant]
Reilly, J. Patrick, et al., “Sensory Effects of Transient Electrical Stimulation—Evaluation with a Neuroelectric Model”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. BME-32, No. 12, (Dec. 1985), 1001-1011. [cited by applicant]
Szucs, Peter, et al., “Axon Diversity of Lamina I Local-Circuit Neurons in the Lumbar Spinal Cord”, The Journal of Comparative Neurology | Research in Systems Neuroscience 521, (2013), 2719-2741. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 15/684,196 U.S. Pat. No. 10,549,097, filed Aug. 23, 2017, Systems and Methods for Spatially Selective Spinal Cord Stimulation. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/737,601, filed Jan. 8, 2020, Systems and Methods for Spatially Selective Spinal Cord Stimulation. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,124,443, Examiner's Rule 86(2) Requisition mailed Sep. 6, 2022”, 3 pgs. [cited by applicant]
“Canadian Application Serial No. 3,124,443, Response filed Nov. 25, 2022 to Examiner's Rule 86(2) Requisition mailed Sep. 6, 2022”, 37 pgs. [cited by applicant]