IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,206,817
Granted Patent B2
US 12,206,817 · App. 18/387,756 · Granted Jan 21, 2025

Privileged electronic communications with inmates

Inventor: Stephen L. Hodge (Aubrey, TX)
Assignee: Global Tel*Link Corporation
H04M3/2281H04L63/306H04L65/1069
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,206,817
App. No.
18/387,756
Granted
Jan 21, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for providing secure communication between an inmate and an outside user are disclosed. In various aspects, account information of both the user and the inmate is stored. A message transmission is received from a first device that includes a header portion and an encrypted payload portion. The system verifies that confidential communication between the inmate and the outside user is permitted based on the header portion and the stored account information. Once verified, the message is transmitted to a second device without decrypting the payload portion of the message.

Claims (38)

1. A method for privileged communication between a first device and a second device, one of the first device or the second device being associated with an inmate of a controlled environment facility and the other of the first device or the second device being associated with an outside user, the method comprising:

receiving a communication from the first device that includes a request for privileged communication;

determining whether privileged communication is permitted in response to the request;

routing the communication through a monitoring subsystem in response to the request being denied; and

routing the communication through a non-monitoring subsystem in response to the request being granted,

wherein the monitoring subsystem and the non-monitoring subsystem are separate and isolated from each other.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising transmitting a notification to the first device, notifying the outside user as to whether the request has been granted.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring subsystem is configured to monitor and record the communication.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the non-monitoring subsystem includes a non-monitoring pathway that bypasses the monitoring subsystem.

5. The method of claim 2 , further comprising determining whether the communication is a real-time communication or a non-real time communication.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the notification differs depending on whether the communication is determined to be a real-time communication or a non-real time communication.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein in response to determining that the communication is a non-real time communication, the notification is transmitted to the outside user as a reply to the non-real time communication.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a notification message in response to the request being denied.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the notification message informs the outside user that the request was denied and the method further comprises requesting authorization to proceed with recording the communication.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising:

receiving a reply from the outside user in response to the notification message; and

proceeding with or terminating the communication based on the reply.

11. A communication platform for privileged communication between a first device and a second device, the first device being associated with an outside user and the second device being associated with an inmate of a controlled environment facility, the communication platform comprising:

a memory;

a receiver;

a transmitter configured to transmit a communication from the first device that includes a request for privileged communication; and

one or more processors configured to:

receive, via the receiver, the communication;

determine whether privileged communication is permitted in response to the request;

route the communication through a monitoring subsystem in response to the request being denied; and

route the communication through a non-monitoring subsystem in response to the request being granted,

wherein the monitoring subsystem and the non-monitoring subsystem are separate and isolated from each other.

12. The communication platform of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to transmit a notification to the first device, notifying the outside user as to whether the request has been granted.

13. The communication platform of claim 11 , wherein a monitoring pathway passes through the monitoring subsystem configured to monitor and record the communication.

14. The communication platform of claim 13 , wherein a non-monitoring pathway bypasses the monitoring subsystem.

15. The communication platform of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to determine whether the communication is a real-time communication or a non-real time communication.

16. The communication platform of claim 15 , wherein the notification differs depending on whether the communication is determined to be a real-time communication or a non-real time communication.

17. The communication platform of claim 16 , wherein in response to determining that the communication is a non-real time communication, the notification is transmitted to the outside user as a reply to the non-real time communication.

18. The communication platform of claim 11 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to generate a notification message in response to the request being denied.

19. The communication platform of claim 18 , wherein the notification message informs the outside user that the request was denied and requesting authorization to proceed with recording the communication.

20. The communication platform of claim 19 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

receive a reply from the outside user in response to the notification message; and

proceed with or terminating the communication based on the reply.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 5, 2024
From: HODGE, STEPHEN L.
To: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 069501/0134 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 7, 2024
From: GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION; DSI-ITI, INC.; VALUE-ADDED COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; TOUCHPAY HOLDINGS, LLC; RENOVO SOFTWARE, INC.; INTELMATE LLC; 3V TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
To: TEXAS CAPITAL BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068510/0764 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 17893593 · Aug 23, 2022
Continuation 17399723 · Aug 11, 2021
Continuation 16840777 · Apr 6, 2020
Continuation 16357849 · Mar 19, 2019
Continuation 15822832 · Nov 27, 2017
Continuation 15620322 · Jun 12, 2017
Continuation 15354417 · Nov 17, 2016
Related Publication 20240155050A1 · May 9, 2024
References Cited (35)
US 4965819A · Kannes · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 7061521B2 · Bulriss et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 8761353B1 · Apple et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9020115B2 · Hangsleben · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9030292B2 · Torgersrud et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9094569B1 · Humphries · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 9344390B1 · Chandrasekar et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9680838B1 · Hodge · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9680878B2 · Hodge et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9832202B1 · Hodge · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10237273B2 · Hodge · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10616404B2 · Hodge · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10673860B1 · Passe et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10686935B1 · Parampottil et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11363135B2 · Hodge · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11431840B2 · Hodge · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20040049696A1 · Baker et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050128283A1 · Bulriss et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060212303A1 · James et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070041545A1 · Gainsboro · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20100325698A1 · Ginter et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120262271A1 · Torgersrud et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130194377A1 · Humphries · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20140020063A1 · Hodge et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20170302671A1 · Rivelli · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180352077A1 · Chang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190014449A1 · Hangsleben · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20210112220A1 · Humphries · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230051388A1 · Hodge · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Non-Final Office Action directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/354,417, mailed Feb. 16, 2017; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/354,417, mailed Apr. 18, 2017; 14 pages. [cited by applicant]
Notice of Allowance directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/620,322 mailed Sep. 8, 2017; 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority directed to related International Patent Application No. PCT/US2017/061917, mailed Dec. 14, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Texas Rules of Evidence Rule 509, http://texasevidence.com/article-v-privileges/rule-509/, pp. 1-7, accessed May 6, 2018. [cited by applicant]
Joel Rose, NPR, “When Prisoners Email their Lawyers, It's Often Not Confidential” Nov. 18, 2015, https://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2015/11/18/456496859/when-prisoners-email-their-lawyers-its-often-not-confi… [cited by applicant]