IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,209,238
Granted Patent B2
US 12,209,238 · App. 18/502,499 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

CRISPR/Cas screening platform to identify genetic modifiers of tau seeding or aggregation

Inventors: Marine Prissette (Brooklyn, NY); Matthew Koss (Pleasantville, NY); Wen Fury (New York, NY); Brian Zambrowicz (Sleepy Hollow, NY)
Assignee: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
C12N15/1082C12N5/0018C12N5/0686C12N9/22C12N15/1086C12N15/1089C12N15/113G01N21/6428G01N33/6896G16B25/00A61K48/00C12N2310/20C12N2320/12C12N2502/99C12N2800/80G01N2021/6441G01N2800/7047
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,209,238
App. No.
18/502,499
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Cas-protein-ready tau biosensor cells, CRISPR/Cas synergistic activation mediator (SAM)-ready tau biosensor cells, and methods of making and using such cells to screen for genetic modifiers of tau seeding or aggregation are provided. Reagents and methods for sensitizing such cells to tau seeding activity or tau aggregation or for causing tau aggregation are also provided.

Claims (65)

1. A method of screening for genetic modifiers of tau aggregation, comprising:

(a) providing a population of cells comprising a chimeric Cas protein comprising a nuclease-inactive Cas protein fused to one or more transcriptional activation domains, a chimeric adaptor protein comprising an adaptor protein fused to one or more transcriptional activation domains, a first tau repeat domain linked to a first reporter, and a second tau repeat domain linked to a second reporter,

wherein the cells are mammalian cells,

wherein the first reporter and the second reporter are fluorescent proteins, and wherein the first reporter and the second reporter are a fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) pair;

(b) introducing into the population of cells a library comprising a plurality of unique guide RNAs that target a plurality of genes;

(c) culturing the population of cells to allow transcriptional activation and expansion, wherein the plurality of unique guide RNAs form complexes with the chimeric Cas protein and the chimeric adaptor protein, and the complexes activate transcription of the plurality of genes resulting in increased gene expression to produce a genetically modified population of cells;

(d) contacting the genetically modified population of cells with a tau seeding agent to produce a seeded population of cells,

wherein step (d) comprises culturing the genetically modified population of cells in the presence of conditioned medium harvested from cultured tau-aggregation-positive cells in which a tau repeat domain stably presents in an aggregated state, wherein the conditioned medium was harvested after being on confluent tau-aggregation-positive cells for 1 to 7 days;

(e) culturing the seeded population of cells to allow tau aggregates to form, wherein aggregates of the first tau repeat domain and the second tau repeat domain form in a subset of the seeded population of cells to produce an aggregation-positive population of cells; and

(f) determining abundance of each of the plurality of unique guide RNAs in the aggregation-positive population of cells identified in step (e) relative to the genetically modified population of cells in step (c),

wherein enrichment of a guide RNA in the aggregation-positive population of cells identified in step (e) relative to the cultured population of cells in step (c) indicates that the gene targeted by the guide RNA is a genetic modifier of tau aggregation, wherein transcriptional activation of the gene targeted by the guide RNA enhances tau aggregation.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the Cas protein is a Cas9 protein.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the Cas protein is Streptococcus pyogenes Cas9.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the chimeric Cas protein comprises the nuclease-inactive Cas protein fused to a VP64 transcriptional activation domain, wherein the chimeric Cas protein comprises from N-terminus to C-terminus: the nuclease-inactive Cas protein; a nuclear localization signal; and the VP64 transcriptional activation domain.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adaptor protein is an MS2 coat protein, and wherein the one or more transcriptional activation domains in the chimeric adaptor protein comprise a p65 transcriptional activation domain and an HSF1 transcriptional activation domain, wherein the chimeric adaptor protein comprises from N-terminus to C-terminus: the MS2 coat protein; a nuclear localization signal; the p65 transcriptional activation domain; and the HSF1 transcriptional activation domain.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the chimeric Cas protein comprises SEQ ID NO: 36, or wherein the chimeric Cas protein is encoded by a coding sequence comprising the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 38.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the chimeric adaptor protein comprises SEQ ID NO: 37, or wherein the chimeric adaptor protein is encoded by a coding sequence comprising the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 39.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the chimeric Cas protein, the chimeric adaptor protein, the first tau repeat domain linked to the first reporter, and the second tau repeat domain linked to the second reporter are stably expressed in the population of cells, and wherein nucleic acids encoding the chimeric Cas protein, the chimeric adaptor protein, the first tau repeat domain linked to the first reporter, and the second tau repeat domain linked to the second reporter are genomically integrated in the population of cells.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein each guide RNA targets a guide RNA target sequence within 200 bp upstream of a transcription start site.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein each guide RNA comprises two adaptor-binding elements to which the chimeric adaptor protein can specifically bind, wherein a first adaptor-binding element is within a first loop of each of the guide RNAs, and a second adaptor-binding element is within a second loop of each of the guide RNAs, wherein the adaptor-binding element comprises the sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO: 33, and

wherein each of guide RNAs is a single guide RNA comprising a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) portion fused to a transactivating CRISPR RNA (tracrRNA) portion, and the first loop is the tetraloop corresponding to residues 13-16 of SEQ ID NO: 17, and the second loop is the stem loop 2 corresponding to residues 53-56 of SEQ ID NO: 17.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (c) is about 3 days to about 9 days.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein step (c) is about 6 days.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the conditioned medium was harvested after being on confluent tau-aggregation-positive cells for about 4 days.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (d) comprises culturing the genetically modified population of cells in about 75% conditioned medium and about 25% fresh medium.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the genetically modified population of cells is not co-cultured with the tau-aggregation-positive cells in which a tau repeat domain stably presents in an aggregated state.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (e) is about 2 days to about 6 days.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein step (e) is about 4 days.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the aggregation-positive population of cells in step (e) is identified by flow cytometry.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein abundance is determined by next-generation sequencing.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein a guide RNA is considered enriched if the abundance of the guide RNA relative to the total population of the plurality of unique guide RNAs is at least 1.5-fold higher in the aggregation-positive population of cells in step (e) relative to the cultured population of cells in step (c).

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein step (f) comprises determining abundance of each of the plurality of unique guide RNAs in the aggregation-positive population of cells in step (e) relative to the cultured population of cells in step (c) at a first time point in step (c) and/or a second time point in step (c).

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the first time point in step (c) is at a first passage of culturing the population of cells, and the second time point is in the middle of culturing the population of cells to allow transcriptional activation and expansion.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein the first time point in step (c) is after about three days of culturing, and the second time point in step (c) is after about six days of culturing.

24. The method of claim 21 , wherein a gene is considered a genetic modifier of tau aggregation, wherein transcriptional activation of the gene enhances tau aggregation, if:

(1) the abundance of a guide RNA targeting the gene relative to the total population of the plurality of unique guide RNAs is at least 1.5-fold higher in the aggregation-positive population of cells in step (e) relative to the cultured population of cells in step (c) at both the first time point in step (c) and the second time point in step (c); and/or

(2) the abundance of at least two unique guide RNAs targeting the gene relative to the total population of the plurality of unique guide RNAs is at least 1.5-fold higher in the aggregation-positive population of cells in step (e) relative to the cultured population of cells in step (c) at either the first time point in step (c) or the second time point in step (c).

25. The method of claim 1 , wherein the following steps are taken in step (f) to identify a gene as a genetic modifier of tau aggregation, wherein transcriptional activation of the gene enhances tau aggregation:

(1) identifying which of the plurality of unique guide RNAs are present in the aggregation-positive population of cells produced in step (e);

(2) calculating the random chance of the guide RNAs identified in step (f)(1) being present using the formula nCn′*(x−n′)C(m−n)/xCm,

wherein x is the variety of unique guide RNAs introduced into the population of cells in step (b),

wherein m is the variety of unique guide RNAs identified in step (f)(1),

wherein n is the variety of unique guide RNAs introduced into the population of cells in step (b) that target the gene, and

wherein n′ is the variety of unique guide RNAs identified in step (f)(1) that target the gene;

(3) calculating average enrichment scores for the guide RNAs identified in step (f)(1),

wherein the enrichment score for a guide RNA is the relative abundance of the guide RNA in the aggregation-positive population of cells produced in step (e) divided by the relative abundance of the guide RNA in the cultured population of cells in step (c), and

wherein relative abundance is the read count of the guide RNA divided by the read count of the total population of the plurality of unique guide RNAs; and

(4) selecting the gene if a guide RNA targeting the gene is significantly below the random chance of being present and above a threshold enrichment score.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first tau repeat domain and/or the second tau repeat domain is a human tau repeat domain.

27. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first tau repeat domain and/or the second tau repeat domain comprises a pro-aggregation mutation, wherein the pro-aggregation mutation is a tau P301S mutation, which corresponds to position 59 of SEQ ID NO: 11.

28. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first tau repeat domain and/or the second tau repeat domain comprises a tau four-repeat domain.

29. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first tau repeat domain and/or the second tau repeat domain comprises SEQ ID NO: 11.

30. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first tau repeat domain and the second tau repeat domain are the same and each comprises a tau four-repeat domain comprising a tau P301S mutation, which corresponds to position 59 of SEQ ID NO: 11.

31. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first reporter is cyan fluorescent protein (CFP) and the second reporter is yellow fluorescent protein (YFP).

32. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cells are human cells.

33. The method of claim 32 , wherein the cells are HEK293T cells.

34. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of unique guide RNAs are introduced at a concentration selected such that a majority of the cells receive only one of the unique guide RNAs.

35. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of unique guide RNAs target 100 or more genes, 1000 or more genes, or 10000 or more genes.

36. The method of claim 1 , wherein the library is a genome-wide library.

37. The method of claim 1 , wherein a plurality of target sequences are targeted on average in each of the targeted plurality of genes.

38. The method of claim 37 , wherein at least three target sequences are targeted on average in each of the targeted plurality of genes or wherein about three to about six target sequences are targeted on average in each of the targeted plurality of genes.

39. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of unique guide RNAs are introduced into the population of cells by lentiviral transduction, wherein each of the plurality of unique guide RNAs is in a separate viral vector.

40. The method of claim 39 , wherein the population of cells is infected at a multiplicity of infection of less than 0.3.

41. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of unique guide RNAs are introduced into the population of cells together with a selection marker that imparts resistance to a drug, and step (b) further comprises selecting cells that comprise the selection marker.

42. The method of claim 1 , wherein the population of cells into which the plurality of unique guide RNAs are introduced in step (b) comprises greater than 300 cells per unique guide RNA.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2024
From: PRISSETTE, MARINE; KOSS, MATTHEW; FURY, WEN; ZAMBROWICZ, BRIAN
To: REGENERON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Reel/Frame 069124/0091 →
Continuity (3)
Division 16821453 · Mar 17, 2020
Provisional Application 62820086 · Mar 18, 2019
Related Publication 20240084293A1 · Mar 14, 2024
References Cited (92)
US 9910048B2 · Diamond et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11001829B2 · Zhang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11149267B2 · Wang et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11781131B2 · Prissette et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11845930B2 · Fury et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 11845931B2 · Prissette et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20160272965A1 · Zhang et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170204407A1 · Gilbert et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180291370A1 · Gersbach et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180305704A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190032155A1 · Gong et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190284572A1 · Hunt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200165601A1 · Zhang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200299679A1 · Fury et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200299681A1 · Prissette et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200299682A1 · Prissette et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210009949A1 · Prissette et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20230416728A1 · Prissette et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20240182887A1 · Fury et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
CN 107002093A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 108779471A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
EP 3011033B1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2002062851A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014008404A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014089104A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2015122922A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017015637A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017100343A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017172764A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018127519A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2018224531A1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019010384A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019028032A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019183123A1 · 2019 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020190927A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020190932A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020190944A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2020252340A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 62/820,086, filed Mar. 18, 2019, Expired. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/821,453, filed Mar. 17, 2020, U.S. Pat. No. 11,845,931, Issued. [cited by applicant]
PCT/US2020/023131, Mar. 17, 2020, WO 2020/190932, Expired. [cited by applicant]
EP 23215659.6 Extended European Search Report mailed Mar. 15, 2024. [cited by applicant]
“The 96th Annual Meeting of the Physiological Society of Japan,” Journal of Physiological Sciences, Springer Japan KK, 69(Suppl 1), (2019). [cited by applicant]
Agrotis et al., “A new age in functional genomics using CRISPR/Cas9 in arrayed library screening,” Front. Genet., 6:300, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Anders et al., “Differential expression analysis for sequence count data,” Genome Biol., 11:R106, pp. 1-12, (2010). [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, “Identification of genetic regulators for intracellular aggregation by genome-wide CRISPR screening,” 2016 Fiscal Year Annual Research Report, The University of Tokyo, Kaken, 2 pages, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Anonymous, Abstracts: Oral Presentations, Cell Biology, ASCB Annual Meeting, 84 pages, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Bajar et al., “A Guide to Fluorescent Protein FRET Pairs,” Sensors (Basel), 16:E1488, pp. 1-24, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Bennett et al., “Enhanced Tau Aggregation in the Presence of Amyloid β,” Am. J. Pathol., 187(7):1601-1612, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Chakrabarti et al., “Target-Specific Precision of CRISPR-Mediated Genome Editing,” Mol. Cell, 73(4):699-713, (2019). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Compromised function of the ESCRT pathway promotes endolysomal escape of tau seeds and propagation of tau aggregation,” J. Biol. Chem., 294(50):18952-18966, (2019). [cited by applicant]
Chen et al., “Genome-wide CRISPR Screen in a Mouse Model of Tumor Growth and Metastasis,” Cell, 160(6):1246-1260 plus supplementary materials, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Chiu et al., “Identification of Calcium and Integrin-Binding Protein 1 as a Novel Regulator of Production of Amyloid β Peptide Using CRISPR/Cas9-based Screening System,” FASEB J., 34(6):7661-7674 (2020). [cited by applicant]
CRISPR 101: A Desktop Resource, Addgene, 2nd ed., 195 pages, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Furman et al., “Sensitive Detection of Proteopathic Seeding Activity with FRET Flow Cytometry,” J. Vis. Exp., 106:e53205, pp. 1-12, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Goedert, “Tau filaments in neurodegenerative diseases,” FEBS Lett., 592(14):2383-2391, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Hart et al., “High-Resolution CRISPR Screens Reveal Fitness Genes and Genotype-Specific Cancer Liabilities,” Cell, 163(6):1515-1526, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Holmes et al., “Proteopathic tau seeding predicts tauopathy in vivo,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111(41):E4376-E4385, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Joung et al., “Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening,” Nat. Protoc. 12(4):828-863, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Jjoung et al., “Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout and transcriptional activation screening,” Nat. Protoc., 12(4):828-863, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Jucker et al., “Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases,” Nature, 501(7465):45-51, (2013). [cited by applicant]
Kampmann, “A CRISPR Approach to Neurodegenerative Diseases,” Trends Mol. Med., 23(6):483-485, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Kampmann, “CRISPRi and CRISPRa Screens in Mammalian Cells for Precision Biology and Medicine,” ACS Chem. Biol., 13(2):406-416, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Kaufman et al., “Tau Prion Strains Dictate Patterns of Cell Pathology, Progression Rate, and Regional Vulnerability In Vivo,” Neuron, 92(4):796-812, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Kfoury et al., “Trans-cellular Propagation of Tau Aggregation by Fibrillar Species,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(23):19440-19451, (2012). [cited by applicant]
Konermann et al., “Genome-scale transcriptional activation by an engineered CRISPR-Cas9 complex,” Nature, 517(7536):583-588 plus supplementary materials, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Li et al., “MAGeCK enables robust identification of essential genes from genome-scale CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens,” Genome Biol., 15(12):554, 12 pages, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Miles et al., “Design, execution, and analysis of pooled in vitro CRISPR/Cas9 screens,” FEBS J., 283(17):3170-3180, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Murugan et al., “The Revolution Continues: Newly Discovered Systems Expand the CRISPR-Cas Toolkit,” Mol. Cell 68(1):15-25, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Nagai et al., “Astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutated SOD1 release factors selectively toxic to motor neurons,” Nat. Neurosci., 10(5):615-622, (2007). [cited by applicant]
Nakade et al., “Cas9, Cpf1 and C2c1/2/3—What's next?,” Bioengineered, 8(3):265-273, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Nathaniel et al., “Elucidating Cellular Trafficking Pathways Controlling Prion-like Spread of Tau Aggregation Using CRISPR Interference Screens [abstract],” Abstracts; Poster Presentations, Cell Biology 2016, ASCB Annua… [cited by applicant]
Nicholls et al., “Characterization of TauC3 antibody and demonstration of its potential to block tau propagation,” PLOS One, 12(5):e0177914, 11 pages, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Nobuhara et al., “Tau Antibody Targeting Pathological Species Blocks Neuronal Uptake and Interneuron Propagation of Tau in Vitro,” Am. J. Pathol., 187(6):1399-1412, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Jong et al., “Optimised metrics for CRISPR-KO screens with second-generation gRNA libraries,” Sci. Rep., 7(1):7384, 10 pages, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Park et al., “A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies a restricted set of HIV host dependency factors,” Nat. Genet., 49(2):193-203 plus online methods, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Park et al., “Cpf1-Database: web-based genome-wide guide RNA library design for gene knockout screens using CRISPR-Cpf1,” Bioinformatics, 34(6):1077-1079, (2018). [cited by applicant]
Prissette et al., “Disruption of nuclear envelope integrity as a possible initiating event in tauopathies,” Cell. Rep., 40(8):111249, (Aug. 23, 2022). [cited by applicant]
Reczek et al., “A CRISPR screen identifies a pathway required for paraquat-induced cell death,” Nat. Chem. Biol., 13(12):1274-1279 plus online methods, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Sanders et al., “Distinct Tau Prion Strains Propagate in Cells and Mice and Define Different Tauopathies,” Neuron, 82(6):1271-1288, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Sanjana et al., “Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening,” Nat. Methods, 11(8):783-784, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Shalem et al., “Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells,” Science, 343:84-87 and Supplementary Material, (2014). [cited by applicant]
Tycko et al., “Pairwise library screen systematically interrogates [cited by applicant]
Tzelepis et al., “A CRISPR Dropout Screen Identifies Genetic Vulnerabilities and Therapeutic Targets in Acute Myeloid Leukemia,” Cell Reports, 17:1193-1205, (2016). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Gene Essentiality Profiling Reveals Gene Networks and Synthetic Lethal Interactions with Oncogenic Ras,” Cell, 168(5):890-903 plus supplemental materials, (2017). [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., “Identification and characterization of essential genes in the human genome,” Science, 350(6264):1096-1101, (2015). [cited by applicant]
Wu et al., “Neuronal activity enhances tau propagation and tau pathology in vivo,” Nat. Neurosci., 19(8):1085-1092, (2016). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/821,453, Non-Final Office Action mailed Feb. 14, 2023. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/821,453, Notice of Allowance and Interview Summary mailed Aug. 9, 2010. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/821,453, Requirement for Restriction/Election mailed Sep. 30, 2022. [cited by applicant]
WIPO Application No. PCT/US2020/023131, PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Jul. 21, 2020. [cited by applicant]
WIPO Application No. PCT/US2020/023131, PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees mailed May 27, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,421,512