IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,210,996
Granted Patent B2
US 12,210,996 · App. 17/986,534 · Granted Jan 28, 2025

Confidence ratings for delivery of items

Inventor: Jay Christian Staples (Duluth, GA)
Assignee: United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
G06Q10/083
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,210,996
App. No.
17/986,534
Granted
Jan 28, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Computer program products, methods, systems, apparatus, and computing entities for determining/identifying confidence ratings/indicators for delivery of items. In one embodiment, this comprises determining a number of location events that occurred within a zone of confidence for delivery an item to a serviceable address; and responsive to determining the number of location events that occurred within the zone of confidence for delivery the item to the serviceable address, determining, via one or more processors, a confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address based at least in part on the number of location events that occurred within the zone of confidence.

Claims (45)

1. A method comprising:

detecting, via at least one of one or more telematics sensors associated with a vehicle or a mobile computing entity being used by an operator of the vehicle, occurrences of a plurality of trigger events during a time the vehicle is on a route to a serviceable address for delivery of an item, wherein each trigger event of the plurality of trigger events comprises at least one of determining that the vehicle has entered or exited a street network, placing the vehicle in a park position, or starting the vehicle;

responsive to detecting each occurrence of the plurality of trigger events, collecting via a location sensor associated with the vehicle, a geo coordinate sample;

obtaining, via one or more processors, the geo coordinate sample collected for each of the plurality of trigger events;

determining, via the one or more processors, a geographic classification for the serviceable address;

based at least in part on the geographic classification, determining, via the one or more processors, a zone of confidence, wherein the serviceable address is associated with a reference latitude and a reference longitude, and the zone of confidence is indicative of a geographical area defined with respect to the reference latitude and the reference longitude within which delivery of the item is acceptable;

comparing, via the one or more processors, the geo coordinate sample for each of the plurality of trigger events to the reference latitude and the reference longitude to determine a quantity of the plurality of trigger events that has occurred within the zone of confidence;

based at least in part on the quantity of the plurality of trigger events that has occurred within the zone of confidence, determining; via the one or more processors, a confidence rating, wherein the confidence rating corresponds to a calculated level of confidence that the item has been delivered to the serviceable address; and

responsive to determining the confidence rating, assigning, via the one or more processors, the confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address, wherein assigning the confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address enables at least one of a carrier computing entity or a retailer computing entity to access, via one or more Application Programming Interfaces (APIs), the confidence rating.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the zone of confidence is a specific distance or tolerance from the reference latitude and the reference longitude based on the geographic classification.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the geographic classification is one of: super urban, urban, suburban, rural, and super rural.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the zone of confidence is a defined area outside of the serviceable address.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the zone of confidence is defined based on latitude and longitude coordinates of a center of the defined area.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: based at least in part on assigning the confidence rating to delivery of the item to the serviceable address, enabling at least one of the carrier computing entity or the retailer computing entity to access or retrieve an indicator of the confidence rating for delivery of the item using a unique identifier.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the zone of confidence includes a plurality of addresses, and in response to delivering the item within the zone of confidence at any location, an inference is made that the item has been delivered to the serviceable address.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising generating a confidence indicator indicative of a confidence level that a trigger event, of the plurality of trigger events, occurred within the zone of confidence.

9. A system comprising:

at least one telematics sensor associated with a vehicle that is configured to detect occurrences of a plurality of trigger events during a time the vehicle is on a route to a serviceable address for delivery of an item, wherein each trigger event of the plurality of trigger events comprises at least one of determining that the vehicle has entered or exited a street network, placing the vehicle in a park position, or starting the vehicle;

a location sensor associated with the vehicle that is configured to, responsive to detecting each occurrence of the plurality of trigger events, collect a geo coordinate sample; and

at least one processor and at least one memory including program code, the at least one memory and the program code configured to cause the at least one processor to at least:

obtain the geo coordinate sample for each of the plurality of trigger events;

determine a geographic classification for the serviceable address;

based at least in part on the geographic classification, determine a zone of confidence, wherein the serviceable address is associated with a reference latitude and a reference longitude, and the zone of confidence is indicative of a geographical area defined with respect to the reference latitude and the reference longitude within which delivery of the item is acceptable;

compare the geo coordinate sample for each of the plurality of trigger events to the reference latitude and the reference longitude to determine a quantity of the plurality of trigger events that has occurred within the zone of confidence;

based at least in part on the quantity of the plurality of trigger events that has occurred within the zone of confidence, determine a confidence rating, wherein the confidence rating corresponds to a calculated level of confidence that the item has been delivered to the serviceable address; and

responsive to determining the confidence rating, assign the confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the zone of confidence is a specific distance or tolerance from the reference latitude and the reference longitude based on the geographic classification.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the geographic classification is one of: super urban, urban, suburban, rural, and super rural.

12. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the zone of confidence is a defined area outside of the serviceable address.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the zone of confidence is defined based on latitude and longitude coordinates of a center of the defined area.

14. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the at least one processor is further caused to at least, based on assigning the confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address, enable at least one of a carrier computing entity or a retailer computing entity to access or retrieve an indicator of the confidence rating for delivery of the item using a unique identifier.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the zone of confidence includes a plurality of addresses, and in response to delivering the item within the zone of confidence at any location, an inference is made that the item has been delivered to the serviceable address.

16. A system comprising:

a mobile computing entity being used by an operator of a vehicle that is configured to detect occurrences of a plurality of trigger events during a time the vehicle is on a route to a serviceable address for delivery of an item, wherein each trigger event of the plurality of trigger events comprises at least one of determining that the vehicle has entered or exited a street network, placing the vehicle in a park position, or starting the vehicle;

a location sensor associated with the vehicle that is configured to, responsive to detecting each occurrence of the plurality of trigger events, collect a geo coordinate sample; and

at least one processor and at least one memory including program code, that at least one memory and the program code configured to cause the at least one processor to at least:

obtain the geo coordinate sample for each of the plurality of events;

determine a geographic classification for the serviceable address;

based at least in part on the geographic classification, determine a zone of confidence, wherein the serviceable address is associated with a reference latitude and a reference longitude, and the zone of confidence is indicative of a geographical area defined with respect to the reference latitude and the reference longitude within which delivery of the item is acceptable;

compare the geo coordinate sample for each of the plurality of trigger events to the reference latitude and the reference longitude to determine a quantity of the plurality of trigger events that has occurred within the zone of confidence;

based at least in part on the quantity of the plurality of trigger events that has occurred within the zone of confidence, determine a confidence rating, wherein the confidence rating corresponds to a calculated level of confidence that the item has been delivered to the serviceable address; and

responsive to determining the confidence rating, assign the confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the zone of confidence is a specific distance or tolerance from the reference latitude and the reference longitude based on the geographic classification.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the geographic classification is one of: super urban, urban, suburban, rural, or super rural.

19. The system of claim 16 , wherein the at least one processor is further caused to at least, based on assigning the confidence rating for delivery of the item to the serviceable address, enable at least one of a carrier computing entity or a retailer computing entity to access or retrieve an indicator of the confidence rating for delivery of the item using a unique identifier.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2022
From: STAPLES, JAY CHRISTIAN
To: UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.
Reel/Frame 061762/0465 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 16572036 · Sep 16, 2019
Continuation 14315665 · Jun 26, 2014
Provisional Application 61840983 · Jun 28, 2013
Related Publication 20230077696A1 · Mar 16, 2023
References Cited (184)
US 3956740A · Jones et al. · 1976 [cited by applicant]
US 4408782A · Condon · 1983 [cited by applicant]
US 4832204A · Handy et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4850009A · Zook et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5014206A · Scribner et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5227614A · Danielson et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5292004A · Cesarini · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5313051A · Brigida et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5325303A · Walz et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5347274A · Hassett · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5375226A · Sano et al. · 1994 [cited by applicant]
US 5444444A · Ross et al. · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5472097A · Villachica · 1995 [cited by applicant]
US 5496992A · Madan et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5497149A · Fast · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5500516A · Durbin · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5506580A · Whiting et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5528758A · Yeh · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5532694A · Mayers et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5534684A · Danielson · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5593267A · Mcdonald et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5635693A · Benson et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5648770A · Ross · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5650967A · Seibert · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5682379A · Mahany et al. · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5736725A · Danielson · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5751973A · Hassett · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5764774A · Liu · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5770841A · Moed et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5778377A · Marlin et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5780778A · Schwartz et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5790429A · Baker et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5797134A · Mcmillan et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5805416A · Friend et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5805419A · Hundt et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5808564A · Simms et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5822739A · Kara · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5834749A · Durbin · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5835377A · Bush · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5855006A · Huemoeller et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5862500A · Goodwin · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5867382A · Mclaughlin · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5869819A · Knowles et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5884238A · Noll et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5905232A · Schwartz et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5919239A · Fraker et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5948040A · Delorme et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5971587A · Kato et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5992753A · Xu · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5993098A · Osada · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5995118A · Masuda · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 5995950A · Barns-slavin et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6003773A · Durbin et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6006106A · Cook et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6018715A · Lynch et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6034379A · Bunte et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6061398A · Satoh et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6064970A · Mcmillan et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6071643A · Chino et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6084528A · Beach et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6124806A · Cunningham et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6134437A · Karabinis et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6148262A · Fry · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6173209B1 · Laval et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6175826B1 · Malandra et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6182053B1 · Rauber et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6189702B1 · Bonnet · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6208980B1 · Kara · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6211781B1 · Mcdonald · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6232915B1 · Dean et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6241099B1 · Hendrickson et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6246672B1 · Lumelsky · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6249008B1 · Bunte et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6266612B1 · Dussell et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6285916B1 · Kadaba et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6329919B1 · Boies et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6332098B2 · Ross et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6408233B1 · Solomon et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6433732B1 · Dutta et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6459969B1 · Bates et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6493550B1 · Raith · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6496775B2 · Mcdonald et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6529786B1 · Sim · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6532152B1 · White et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6571197B1 · Frank et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6648770B1 · Snyder · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6731940B1 · Nagendran · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6745027B2 · Twitchell, Jr. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6749122B1 · Koenck et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6756918B2 · Fomukong · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6801850B1 · Wolfson · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6816784B1 · Khan et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6819267B1 · Edmark et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6868386B1 · Henderson et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6885991B2 · Skonberg et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6889194B1 · Kadaba · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6895329B1 · Wolfson · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6934634B1 · Ge · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6990409B2 · Khan et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7034683B2 · Ghazarian · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7039496B2 · Perez et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7076505B2 · Campbell · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7118034B2 · Baldassari et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7324666B2 · Zoken et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7366919B1 · Sobel et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7421311B2 · Perez et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7489240B2 · Soliman · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7660666B2 · Finn et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7797104B2 · Finn et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7840340B2 · Graham et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7868753B2 · Jenkins et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7953547B2 · Graham et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8065076B2 · Graham et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 10417601B2 · Staples · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20010005171A1 · Farringdon et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020006806A1 · Kinnunen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020010604A1 · Block · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020024448A1 · Olesen · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020044084A1 · Itoh et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020065065A1 · Lunsford et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020077060A1 · Lehikoinen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020082931A1 · Siegel et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020085515A1 · Jaynes et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020132632A1 · Brassil et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020133437A1 · Ansley · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020137472A1 · Quinn et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020156661A1 · Jones et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030010822A1 · Davies et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030040946A1 · Sprenger et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030055689A1 · Block et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030055690A1 · Garback · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030083060A1 · Menendez · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030109266A1 · Rafiah et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030114206A1 · Timothy et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030120526A1 · Altman et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030144985A1 · Ebert · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030163287A1 · Vock et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030224818A1 · Nagasaka et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040138817A1 · Zoken et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040139049A1 · Hancock et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040243452A1 · Barton et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20040249557A1 · Harrington et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050137933A1 · Holsen et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060164232A1 · Waterhouse et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070008129A1 · Soliman · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070285227A1 · Timothy et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20100094688A1 · Olsen et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110112761A1 · Hurley · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110208751A1 · Graham · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20110258134A1 · Mendez · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20130304349A1 · Davidson · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150006429A1 · Staples · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20200118059A1 · Staples · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CA 2682052A1 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
CN 101657697A · 2010 [cited by applicant]
DE 44120974C1 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
DE 19618535A1 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
EP 0635800A1 · 1995 [cited by applicant]
EP 1216901A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
EP 1343129A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
EP 2137492A2 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
GB 2225459A · 1990 [cited by applicant]
GB 2358427A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
GB 2363884A · 2002 [cited by applicant]
JP 3143824A · 1991 [cited by applicant]
JP 468942A · 1992 [cited by applicant]
JP 6333117A · 1994 [cited by applicant]
JP 768222A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
JP 7199861A · 1995 [cited by applicant]
JP 9147032A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
JP 9305669A · 1997 [cited by applicant]
JP 10255166A · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 11347892A · 1999 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001209468A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
JP 2001278414A · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 9631846A1 · 1996 [cited by applicant]
WO 0191438A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 03014752A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 03081560A1 · 2003 [cited by applicant]
WO 2006065492A2 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
WO 2008127540A2 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
“When the USPS Confirms Delivery Sometimes There's Nothing There,” by Cliff Aliperti, Feb. 20, 2011 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Cliff, Aliperti, “When the USPS Confirms Delivery Sometimes There's Nothing There”, Immortal Ephemera, Available online at: <https://web.archive.org/web/20130617200815/https://immortalephemera.com/8970/usps-delivery-con… [cited by applicant]
Murphy, Jean V, “Yard Management Systems Extend Automation Beyond the Dock Door”, Global Logistic & Supply Chain Strategies, Mar. 2005. [cited by applicant]