IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,216,274
Granted Patent B2
US 12,216,274 · App. 17/305,611 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Method and program for predicting bending in optical products

Inventors: Muneo Sugiura (Okazaki, JP); Koichi Tamura (Okazaki, JP); Takuro Yoshida (Okazaki, JP)
Assignee: Tokai Optical Co., Ltd.
G02B27/0012G02B1/10G06F30/20G06F2111/10
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,216,274
App. No.
17/305,611
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In the optical product bending prediction method according to the present invention, bending δ of a substrate having a film is predicted by a computer performing calculation (steps S 11 to S 13 ) of the following Expressions (A1), (B1), etc., in which a and T d are set as fitting parameters and have been optimized in each coating condition using a plurality of samples. Here, σ int is intrinsic stress, E f is a Young's modulus of a multilayer film, v f is a Poisson's ratio of the multilayer film, α f is a linear coefficient expansion of the multilayer film, α s is a linear coefficient expansion of the substrate, T is a room temperature, d is a film thickness, b is a substrate thickness, l is a radius of the substrate, E s is a Young's modulus of the substrate, and v s is a Poisson's ratio of the substrate. [ Mathematical ⁢ 1 ] δ = 3 ⁢ l 2 b 2 ⁢ ( 1 - v s E s ) ⁢ d ⁢ σ ( A1 ) σ = a ⁢ σ i ⁢ n ⁢ t + ( α s - α f ) ⁢ ( E f 1 - v f ) ⁢ ( T - T d ) ( B1 )

Claims (539)

1. A computer implemented optical product bending prediction program configured to predict a bending δ of a substrate having a film by execution thereof by a computer,

wherein the computer includes a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium storing the optical product bending prediction program and an integrated film designing program, and control means capable of referring to the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium to execute the optical product bending prediction program and the integrated film designing program stored therein,

wherein the optical product bending prediction program stored in the non-transitory, computer-readable medium includes the following Expressions (A1) to (I), in which a is set as a first fitting parameter and T d is set as a second fitting parameter, the fitting parameters having been optimized for each coating condition using a plurality of samples,

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A1) to (I),

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

(

A1

)

σ

=

a

⁢

⁢

σ

int

+

(

α

s

-

a

f

)

⁢

(

E

f

1

-

v

f

)

⁢

(

T

-

T

d

)

(

B1

)

d

=

d

H

+

d

L

(

C

)

σ

i

⁢

n

⁢

t

=

d

~

H

⁢

σ

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

σ

L

(

D

)

d

~

H

=

d

H

/

d

(

E

)

d

~

L

=

d

L

/

d

(

F

)

E

f

=

d

~

H

⁢

E

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

E

L

(

G

)

v

f

=

d

~

H

⁢

v

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

v

L

(

H

)

α

f

=

d

~

H

⁢

α

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

α

L

.

(

I

)

wherein σ int is intrinsic stress, E f is a Young's modulus of a multilayer film, E H is a Young's modulus of a high refractive index layer, E L is a Young's modulus of a low refractive index layer, v f is a Poisson's ratio of the multilayer film, v H is a Poisson's ratio of the high refractive index layer, v L is a Poisson's ratio of the low refractive index layer, α f is a coefficient of linear expansion of the multilayer film, α H is a coefficient of linear expansion of the high refractive index layer, α L is a coefficient of linear expansion of the low refractive index layer, α s is a coefficient of linear expansion of the substrate, T is a room temperature, d is a film thickness, b is a thickness of the substrate, 1 is a radius of the substrate, E s is a Young's modulus of the substrate, v s is a Poisson's ratio of the substrate, d H is a total film thickness of the high refractive index layer, d L is a total film thickness of the low refractive index layer, σ H is intrinsic stress of the high refractive index layer, and σ L is intrinsic stress of the low refractive index layer, and

wherein the film designing program stored in the non-transitory, computer-readable medium, automatically passes values determined by the film designing program to the bending prediction program, whereby an accurate bending δ of the substrate can be determined during or at the completion of executing the film designing program.

2. A computer implemented optical product bending prediction program configured to predict a bending δ of a substrate having a film by execution thereof by a computer,

wherein the computer includes a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium storing the optical product bending prediction program and an integrated film designing program, and control means capable of referring to the non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium to execute the optical product bending prediction program and the integrated film designing program stored therein,

wherein the optical product bending prediction program stored in the non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium includes the following Expressions (A1) to (I), in which a H is set as a first primary fitting parameter, a L is set as a first secondary fitting parameter, and T d is set as a second fitting parameter, the fitting parameters having been optimized for each coating condition using a plurality of samples,

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having a film using the Expressions (A1) to (I),

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

(

A1

)

σ

=

a

H

⁢

σ

H

⁢

d

~

H

+

a

L

⁢

σ

L

⁢

d

~

L

+

(

α

s

-

a

f

)

⁢

(

E

f

1

-

v

f

)

⁢

(

T

-

T

d

)

(

B2

)

d

=

d

H

+

d

L

(

C

)

d

˜

H

=

d

H

/

d

(

E

)

d

~

L

=

d

L

/

d

(

F

)

E

f

=

d

~

H

⁢

E

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

E

L

(

G

)

v

f

=

d

~

H

⁢

v

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

v

L

(

H

)

α

f

=

d

~

H

⁢

α

H

+

d

~

L

⁢

α

L

.

(

I

)

wherein σ int is intrinsic stress, E f is a Young's modulus of a multilayer film, E H is a Young's modulus of a high refractive index layer, E L is a Young's modulus of a low refractive index layer, v f is a Poisson's ratio of the multilayer film, v H is a Poisson's ratio of the high refractive index layer, v L is a Poisson's ratio of the low refractive index layer, α f is a coefficient of linear expansion of the multilayer film, α H is a coefficient of linear expansion of the high refractive index layer, α L is a coefficient of linear expansion of the low refractive index layer, α s is a coefficient of linear expansion of the substrate, T is a room temperature, d is a film thickness, b is a thickness of the substrate, 1 is a radius of the substrate, E s is a Young's modulus of the substrate, v s is a Poisson's ratio of the substrate, d H is a total film thickness of the high refractive index layer, d L is a total film thickness of the low refractive index layer, σ H is intrinsic stress of the high refractive index layer, and σ L is intrinsic stress of the low refractive index layer, and

wherein the film designing program stored in the non-transitory, computer-readable medium, automatically passes values determined by the film designing program to the bending prediction program, whereby an accurate bending δ of the substrate is determined during or at the completion of the execution of the film designing program.

3. The computer implemented optical product bending prediction program according to claim 1 , wherein the Expression (A1) is replaced with the following Expression (A2), in which δ s is set as a third fitting parameter, and

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A2) to (I) for which optimization has been performed in each of the coating conditions using the plurality of samples

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

+

δ

s

.

(

A2

)

4. The computer implemented optical product bending prediction program according to claim 2 , wherein the Expression (A1) is replaced with the following Expression (A2), in which δ s is set as a third fitting parameter, and

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A2) to (I) for which optimization has been performed in each of the coating conditions using the plurality of samples

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

+

δ

s

.

(

A2

)

5. The computer implemented optical product bending prediction program according to claim 1 , wherein the Expression (A1) is replaced with the following Expression (A3), including bending δ 0 of the substrate on which the film has not yet been formed, and

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A3) to (I) for which optimization has been performed in each of the coating conditions using the plurality of samples

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

+

δ

0

.

(

A3

)

6. The computer implemented optical product bending prediction program according to claim 2 , wherein the Expression (A1) is replaced with the following Expression (A3), including bending δ 0 of the substrate on which the film has not yet been formed, and

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A3) to (I) for which optimization has been performed in each of the coating conditions using the plurality of samples

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

+

δ

0

.

(

A3

)

7. The computer implemented optical product bending prediction program according to claim 1 , wherein the Expression (A1) is replaced with the following Expression (A4), including a third fitting parameter δ s and bending δ 0 of the substrate on which the film has not yet been formed, and

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A4) to (I) for which optimization has been performed in each of the coating conditions using the plurality of samples

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

+

δ

0

+

δ

s

.

(

A4

)

8. The computer implemented optical product bending prediction program according to claim 2 , wherein the Expression (A1) is replaced with the following Expression (A4) including a third fitting parameter δ s and bending δ 0 of the substrate on which the film has not yet been formed, and

wherein the control means is configured to execute the optical product bending prediction program to perform calculations to predict the bending δ of the substrate having the film using the Expressions (A4) to (I) for which optimization has been performed in each of the coating conditions using the plurality of samples

δ

=

3

⁢

l

2

b

2

⁢

(

1

-

v

s

E

s

)

⁢

d

⁢

⁢

σ

+

δ

0

+

δ

s

.

(

A4

)

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2021
From: SUGIURA, MUNEO; TAMURA, KOICHI; YOSHIDA, TAKURO
To: TOKAI OPTICAL CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 056822/0926 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2019-006368 · Jan 17, 2019 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTJP2019050662 · Dec 24, 2019
Related Publication 20210341733A1 · Nov 4, 2021
References Cited (24)
US 10545731B1 · Ciolfi · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 11131838B2 · Ishihara · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11657194B2 · Horesh · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20070087529A1 · Chung et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080157235A1 · Rogers · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090061214A1 · Banno · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090310220A1 · Suzuki · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20110295573A1 · Iwane · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20160153811A1 · Tamura · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20200313121A1 · Kuo · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210088707A1 · Kawashima · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210198426A1 · Yun · 2021 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020149118A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
C.Q Guo, Predicting multilayer film's residual stress from its monolayers, Aug. 2016 (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Chuen-Lin Tien, Accurate prediction of multilayered residual, Nov. 2020 (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Huang-Wei Pan, Silicon nitride and silica quarter-wave stacks for low-thermal-noise mirror coatings, Aug. 2018 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
Çetinörgü, Eda, et al. “Mechanical and thermoelastic characteristics of optical thin films deposited by dual ion beam sputtering.” Applied optics 48.23 (2009): 4536-4544. (Year: 2009). [cited by examiner]
Stoney, Gerald G., “The Tension of Metallic Films Deposited by Electrolysis,” [cited by applicant]
Abner Brenner, et al., “Calculation of Stress in Electrodeposits from the Curvature of a Plated Strip,” [cited by applicant]
Karen Hendrix, et al., “Optical Interference Coatings Design Contest 2013: Angle-Independent Color Mirror and Shortwave Infrared/Midwave Infrared Dichroic Beam Splitter,” [cited by applicant]
Eda Centinörgü, et al., “Mechanical and Thermoelastic Characteristics of Optical Thin Films Deposited by Dual Ion Beam Sputtering,” [cited by applicant]
R. W. Hoffman, “The Mechanical Properties of Thin Condensed Films,” [cited by applicant]
“OIC 2013 Design Problems,” [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion (Application No. PCT/JP2019/050662) dated Mar. 31, 2020. [cited by applicant]