IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,217,767
Granted Patent B2
US 12,217,767 · App. 17/630,090 · Granted Feb 4, 2025

Audio device with sound determination

Inventors: Fumiya Nagashima (Kanagawa, JP); Kengo Akimoto (Kanagawa, JP); Tatsuya Okano (Kanagawa, JP); Yusuke Koumura (Kanagawa, JP); Seiko Inoue (Kanagawa, JP)
Assignee: Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
G10L21/0272G10L25/30
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,217,767
App. No.
17/630,090
Granted
Feb 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

An audio device capable of inhibiting malfunction of an information terminal is provided. The audio device includes a sound sensor portion, a sound separation portion, a sound determination portion, and a processing portion. The sound sensor portion has a function of sensing sound. The sound separation portion has a function of separating the sound sensed by the sound sensor portion into a voice and sound other than a voice. The sound determination portion has a function of storing the feature quantity of the sound. The sound determination portion has a function of determining, with a machine learning model such as a neural network model, whether the feature quantity of the voice separated by the sound separation portion is the stored feature quantity. The processing portion has a function of analyzing an instruction contained in the voice and generating an instruction signal representing the content of the instruction in the case where the feature quantity of the voice is the stored feature quantity. The processing portion has a function of performing, on the sound other than a voice separated by the sound separation portion, processing for canceling the sound other than a voice. Specifically, the processing portion has a function of performing, on the sound other than a voice, processing for inverting the phase thereof.

Claims (37)

1. An audio device comprising:

a sound sensor portion;

a sound separation portion;

a sound determination portion;

a processing portion; and

an output portion,

wherein the audio device is an earphone or a headphone,

wherein the sound sensor portion is configured to sense first sound,

wherein the sound determination portion is configured to store a feature quantity of a voice of a user,

wherein the sound determination portion is configured to determine, with a machine learning model, whether the first sound has the stored feature quantity,

wherein the processing portion is configured to analyze an instruction contained in the first sound and, when the feature quantity of the first sound is the stored feature quantity, to generate a signal representing content of the instruction, and, when the feature quantity of the first sound is not the stored feature quantity, to not generate the signal representing content of the instruction,

wherein second sound is sound to cancel noise in the first sound,

wherein third sound is sound electrically input to the audio device,

wherein fourth sound is synthesized sound of the second sound and the third sound,

wherein the processing portion is configured to generate the second sound and the third sound, and

wherein the output portion is configured to output the fourth sound.

2. The audio device according to claim 1 ,

wherein learning for the machine learning model is performed using supervised learning in which a voice is learning data and a label indicating whether the storing is to be performed is training data.

3. The audio device according to claim 1 ,

wherein the machine learning model is a neural network model.

4. The audio device according to claim 1 ,

wherein the second sound is sound having a phase opposite to a phase of the noise in the first sound.

5. An operation method of an audio device, comprising:

sensing first sound;

determining, with a machine learning model, whether a feature quantity of the first sound is a stored feature quantity of a voice of a user;

analyzing an instruction contained in the first sound;

generating a signal representing content of the instruction when the feature quantity of the first sound is the stored feature quantity and not generating the signal representing content of the instruction when the feature quantity of the first sound is not the stored feature quantity;

generating second sound to cancel noise in the first sound;

electrically inputting third sound to the audio device;

generating fourth sound by synthesizing the second sound and the third sound; and

outputting the fourth sound.

6. The operation method of the audio device, according to claim 5 ,

wherein learning for the machine learning model is performed using supervised learning in which a voice is used as learning data and a label indicating whether storing is to be performed is used as training data.

7. The operation method of the audio device, according to claim 5 ,

wherein the machine learning model is a neural network model.

8. The operation method of the audio device, according to claim 5 ,

wherein the second sound is sound having a phase opposite to a phase of the noise in the first sound.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2022
From: NAGASHIMA, FUMIYA; AKIMOTO, KENGO; OKANO, TATSUYA; KOUMURA, YUSUKE; INOUE, SEIKO
To: SEMICONDUCTOR ENERGY LABORATORY CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 058764/0856 →
Priority Claims (1)
JP 2019-147368 · Aug 9, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220366928A1 · Nov 17, 2022
References Cited (29)
US 9913302B2 · Parkinson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10490194B2 · Yamamoto et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10650379B2 · Agrawal et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11302726B2 · Kobayashi et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20140297528A1 · Agrawal et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160098993A1 · Yamamoto et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170061951A1 · Starobin · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170064363A1 · Wexler · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170133041A1 · Mortensen · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170236512A1 · Williams · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20170270919A1 · Parthasarathi · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180228006A1 · Baker · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180233136A1 · Torok · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180260680A1 · Finkelstein · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180295656A1 · Parkinson et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190156846A1 · Kida · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190341057A1 · Zhang · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200349935A1 · Smith · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220041101A1 · Yamazaki et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
EP 2784710A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013213893A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
JP 2014191823A · 2014 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016075740A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2016130751A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
JP 2017513411 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2018107577A · 2018 [cited by applicant]
JP 2019036174A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report (Application No. PCT/IB2020/057125) Dated Sep. 15, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion (Application No. PCT/IB2020/057125) Dated Sep. 15, 2020. [cited by applicant]