IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,220,245
Granted Patent B2
US 12,220,245 · App. 18/617,398 · Granted Feb 11, 2025

System and method for determining a subject's muscle fuel level, muscle fuel rating, and muscle energy status

Inventors: Pierre Sarnow (Littleton, CO); Stephen S. Kurtz (Englewood, CO); Andrew D. Jackson (Denver, CO); Wayne Phillips (Gilbert, AZ)
Assignee: MUSCLESOUND, INC.
A61B5/4519A61B8/48A61B8/5215A61B8/5223
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,220,245
App. No.
18/617,398
Granted
Feb 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided is a non-invasive system and method for determining a fuel value for a target muscle and potentially at least one indicator muscle. The method includes receiving an ultrasound scan of a target muscle; evaluating at least a portion of the ultrasound scan to determine fuel value within the target muscle; recording the determined fuel value for the muscle as an element of a data set for the muscle; evaluating the fuel data set to determine a value range; and in response to the range being at least above a pre-determined threshold, establishing a target score for the muscle as based on an upper portion of the value range. The method may be repeated to identify ranges for a plurality of muscles, the muscle with the greatest range being identified as an indicator muscle. Based thereon, the muscles estimated fuel level, fuel rating and energy status may be determined.

Claims (38)

1. A method, comprising:

developing a fuel profile for a target muscle by:

obtaining a first ultrasound scan of the target muscle prior to depletion;

evaluating the first ultrasound scan to determine a first fuel value;

obtaining a second ultrasound scan of the target muscle after replenishment; and

evaluating the second ultrasound scan to determine a second fuel value;

obtaining a current ultrasound scan of the target muscle;

establishing a current fuel value for the target muscle; and

ranking the current fuel value within the fuel profile to determine a current fuel level for the target muscle.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein depletion corresponds to use of the target muscle.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein depletion corresponds to passage of time since nutrition intake.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein developing the fuel profile for the target muscle further comprises obtaining at least one additional ultrasound scan.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein developing the fuel profile for the target muscle further comprises evaluating the at least one additional ultrasound scan to determine at least one additional fuel value.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a recommendation based on the current fuel level.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a recommendation based on the current fuel value.

8. A method, comprising:

developing a fuel profile for a target muscle by:

obtaining a series of ultrasound scans of the target muscle at a number of times corresponding at least to a prior to depletion and after replenishment; and

evaluating the series of ultrasound scans to determine a range of fuel values;

obtaining a current ultrasound scan of the target muscle;

establishing a current fuel value for the target muscle; and

ranking the current fuel value within the fuel profile to determine a current fuel level for the target muscle.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein replenishment corresponds to rest.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein replenishment corresponds to nutrition intake.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein replenishment corresponds to passage of time since use of the target muscle.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein developing the fuel profile further comprises dividing the range of fuel values.

13. The method of claim 8 , further comprising tracking the current fuel level over time.

14. The method of claim 8 , further comprising providing the current fuel level.

15. A method, comprising:

developing a fuel profile for a target muscle by:

obtaining a series of ultrasound scans of the target muscle at a number of times corresponding at least to a prior to depletion and an after replenishment; and

evaluating the series of ultrasound scans to determine a range of fuel values; and

determining a current fuel level for the target muscle using a current ultrasound scan of the target muscle and the fuel profile.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein developing the fuel profile for the target muscle further comprises determining to obtain at least one additional ultrasound scan.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein developing the fuel profile for the target muscle further comprises evaluating the at least one additional ultrasound scan to determine at least one additional fuel value.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein a processing unit tracks the target muscle over time.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein developing the fuel profile for the target muscle further comprises obtaining a threshold number of ultrasound scans.

20. The method of claim 15 , further comprising determining an additional current fuel level for a different muscle using a current ultrasound scan of the different muscle and the fuel profile.

Continuity (5)
Continuation 18103995 · Jan 31, 2023
Continuation 17410378 · Aug 24, 2021
Continuation 15909593 · Mar 1, 2018
Provisional Application 62466844 · Mar 3, 2017
Related Publication 20240237939A1 · Jul 18, 2024
References Cited (88)
US 4831527A · Clark · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4876733A · Lavin · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 5208747A · Wilson et al. · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5670135A · Schroder · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5941825A · Lang et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6542250B1 · Weber et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6656121B2 · Jeong et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6705994B2 · Vortman et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6891961B2 · Eger et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7658714B2 · Leibig et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7664298B2 · Lang et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7683617B2 · Van Zijl et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7809153B2 · Bravomalo · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7918794B2 · Pineau et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8068899B2 · Llewellyn et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8135179B2 · Wilson et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8351655B2 · Hwang · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8512247B2 · Hill · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8517942B2 · Hill · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8562529B2 · Hill · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8715187B2 · Davis et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8811745B2 · Farsiu et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9364179B2 · Hill · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9497976B2 · Sun · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9555052B2 · Paturu · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9579079B2 · Jeanne et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9642593B2 · Sarnow · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 9873868B2 · Koeberl · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9996926B2 · Leinhard et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10028700B2 · Sarnow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10157465B2 · Sugiyama et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10327692B2 · Uchiyama · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10463346B2 · Hill · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10548528B2 · Appleby · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11013490B2 · Sarnow et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11064971B2 · Sarnow et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11121176B2 · Liu · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11147481B1 · Kirby · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11147781B2 · Kirby · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11160493B2 · Sarnow · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11229787B2 · Daniels · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11261460B2 · Byrne · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11389372B2 · Warlick · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11389373B2 · Warlick · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11623043B2 · Lipschultz · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 11911003B2 · McDowall · 2024 [cited by examiner]
US 20030018257A1 · Hsu et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060184024A1 · Da Silva et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070016061A1 · Da Silva et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090012406A1 · Llewellyn et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090264756A1 · Da Silva et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090270728A1 · Da Silva et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100036246A1 · Kushculey et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20120116223A1 · Da Silva et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120165703A1 · Bottum · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20120254749A1 · Downs, III et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130123629A1 · Rosenberg et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20150045690A1 · Uchiyama · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150374343A1 · Shan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20180146947A1 · Sarnow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180214118A1 · Sarnow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180249946A1 · Sarnow et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20210236085A1 · Sarnow et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
KR 20130006011 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO WO14115056 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Costill et al., “Muscle glycogen utilization during prolonged exercise on successive days,” [cited by applicant]
Definition of “doubling,” https://www.thefreedictionary.com/doubling, retrieved on Jan. 28, 2021. [cited by applicant]
Definition of “Sleek,” https://https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sleek, retrieved on Aug. 2022. [cited by applicant]
Elamaran et al., “A Case Study of Impulse Noise Reduction Using Morphological Image Processing with Structuring Elements,” [cited by applicant]
Fisher et al., “Spatial Filters—Gaussian Smoothing,” https://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/rbf/HIPR2/gsmooth.htm, Apr. 24, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gabriel et al., “Ultrasound of the abdomen in endurance athletes,” [cited by applicant]
Hendrick et al., “Image and Signal Processing in Diagnotic Ultrasound Imaging” JDMS 1989 5:231-239. [cited by applicant]
Jackson et al., “Practical Assessment of Body Composition,” Physicians Sports Medicine, 1985, vol. 13, pp. 76-90. [cited by applicant]
Kadah et al., “Classification Algorithms for Quantitative Tissue Characterization of Diffuse Liver Disease from Ultrasound Images,” [cited by applicant]
Kawakami, Y. et al. “Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles” (1993) J. Appl. Physiol. 74(6) 2740-2744. [cited by applicant]
Koda et al., “Sonographic subcutaneous and visceral fat indices represent the distribution of body fat volume,” [cited by applicant]
Leahy et al., “Ultrasound Measurement of Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness Accurately Predicts Total and Segmental Body Fat of Young Adults,” Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2012, vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 28-34. [cited by applicant]
MathWorks Announces Release 2014a of the MATLAB and Simulink Product Families, https://www.mathworks.com/company/newsroom/mathworks-announces-release-2014a-of-the-matlab-and-simulink-product-families.html, Mar. 7, 2014,… [cited by applicant]
Nguyen et al., “Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography in Patients with Glycogen Storage Disease Type Ia and Adenomas,” [cited by applicant]
Price et al., “Effect of muscle glycogen content on exercise-induced changes in muscle T2 times,” [cited by applicant]
Ramsay, J. et al. “Differences in Plantar Flexor Fascicle Length and Pennation Angle Between Healthy and Poststroke Individuals and Implications for Poststroke Plantar Flexor Force Contributions” (2014) Stroke Research … [cited by applicant]
Salvi, “Architectural Analysis of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Images,” Politecnico di Torino, Dec. 2014, 61 pages. [cited by applicant]
Steensberg et al., “Muscle glycogen content and glucose uptake during exercise in humans: influence of prior exercise and dietary manipulation,” [cited by applicant]
The University of Auckland, “Gaussian Filtering,” May 25, 2010, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Wagner, “Ultrasound as a Tool to Assess Body Fat,” [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., “Automatic measurement of pennation angle and fascicle length of gastrocnemius muscles ultrasound imaging,” Ultrasonics, vol. 57, 2015, pp. 72-83. [cited by applicant]
Zhou et al., “Dynamic measurement of pennation angle of gastrocnemius muscles during contractions based on ultrasound imaging” (2012) 11:63 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhu, S. et al., “The correlation of muscle thickness and pennation angle assessed by ultrasound with sarcopenia in elderly Chinese community dwellers” (2019) Clinical Interventions in Aging 14:987-996. [cited by applicant]