IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,225,289
Granted Patent B2
US 12,225,289 · App. 17/738,130 · Granted Feb 11, 2025

Precision non-contact core imaging of fiber optic assemblies

Inventors: David Matthew Berg (Rochester, NY); Sterling Michael Clarke (Corning, NY); Stefan Wolfgang Kramel (Regensburg, DE); David Andrew Pastel (Horseheads, NY); Michael Brian Webb (Lindley, NY)
Assignee: Corning Research & Development Corporation
H04N23/67G01M11/081G01M11/083G01M11/088G01M11/33G02B6/3843G02B6/385G02B6/4227G02B7/28G06T7/001G06T7/66G06T7/70G06T2207/10148
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,225,289
App. No.
17/738,130
Granted
Feb 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system, and computer program product for determining a core-to-ferrule offset of a ferrule for a fiber optic connector. A reference ferrule is physically aligned with a core imager by positioning the reference ferrule so that edges of the reference ferrule in a plurality of profile images are aligned with fiducial markers in the images. The reference ferrule is incrementally rotated about its longitudinal center access, a core image captured at each rotational angle, and a reference core-to-ferrule offset determined based on the core images. A test ferrule is physically aligned with the core imager by positioning the test ferrule so that edges of the test ferule are aligned with the edges of the reference ferrule in a plurality of profile images. The core-to-ferrule offset of the test ferrule is then determined based on an offset between the test and reference cores in a composite core image.

Claims (62)

1. A method of focusing a core image of a test ferrule that has an optical fiber coupled thereto, wherein the optical fiber includes a core for the core image, the method comprising:

positioning the test ferrule relative to a core imager including an optical sensor and a lens to achieve a rough focus of an image element in the core image;

positioning the lens of the core imager at each of a plurality of lens focus settings each corresponding to a different position of the lens in the core imager relative to the optical sensor of the core imager;

at each of the plurality of lens focus settings:

capturing another core image including the image element, and

determining a width of the image element in the core image;

identifying the lens focus setting having a smallest width of the image element; and

setting the position of the lens in the core imager to the lens focus setting having the smallest width.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the lens focus setting having the smallest width of the image element comprises:

plotting the width of each image element verses the lens focus setting;

fitting the plotted widths to a curve; and

identifying a minimum of the curve as the lens focus setting having the smallest width.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the curve is a polynomial curve.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the curve is a parabola.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the width of the image element comprises:

fitting a Gaussian function to the image element;

determining a standard deviation of the fitted Gaussian function; and

determining the width of the image element based on the standard deviation.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the width of the image element is twice the standard deviation.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

comparing the smallest width of the image element to a maximum allowable width;

in response to the smallest width of the image element exceeding the maximum allowable width:

repositioning the test ferrule; and

repeating the positioning the lens, the capturing another core image, the determining the width of the image element, the identifying the lens focus setting, and the setting the position of the lens steps.

8. A system for focusing a core image of a test ferrule that has an optical fiber coupled thereto, wherein the optical fiber includes a core for the core image, the system comprising:

a core imager including an optical sensor and a lens having a lens focus setting corresponding to a position of the lens in the core imager relative to the optical sensor of the core imager;

a positioner configured to position the test ferrule relative to the core imager;

one or more processors in communication with the core imager and the positioner; and

a memory coupled to the one or more processors and including program code that, when executed by the one or more processors, causes the system to:

position the test ferrule relative to the core imager to achieve a rough focus of an image element in the core image;

position the lens of the core imager at each of a plurality of lens focus settings each corresponding to a different position of the lens in the core imager relative to the optical sensor of the core imager;

at each of the plurality of lens focus settings:

capture another core image including the image element, and

determine a width of the image element of the core image;

identify the lens focus setting having a smallest width of the image element; and

set the position of the lens in the core imager to the lens focus setting having the smallest width.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the program code causes the system to identify the lens focus setting having the smallest width of the image element by:

plotting the width of each image element verses the lens focus setting;

fitting the plotted widths to a curve; and

identifying a minimum of the curve as the lens focus setting having the smallest width.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the curve is a polynomial curve.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the polynomial curve is a parabola.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the program code causes the system to determine the width of the image element by:

fitting a Gaussian function to the image element;

determining a standard deviation of the fitted Gaussian function; and

determining the width of the image element based on the standard deviation.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the width of the image element is twice the standard deviation.

14. The system of claim 8 , wherein the program code further causes the system to:

compare the smallest width of the image element to a maximum allowable width;

in response to the smallest width of the image element exceeding the maximum allowable width:

reposition the test ferrule; and

repeat the positioning the lens, the capturing another core image, the determining the width of the image element, the identifying the lens focus setting, and the setting the position of the lens steps.

15. A computer program product for focusing a core image of a test ferrule that has an optical fiber coupled thereto, wherein the optical fiber includes a core for the core image, the computer program product comprising:

a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium; and

program code stored on the non-transitory computer-readable storage medium that, when executed by one or more processors, causes the one or more processors to:

position the test ferrule relative to a core imager including an optical sensor and a lens to achieve a rough focus of an image element in the core image;

positioning the lens of the core imager at each of a plurality of lens focus settings each corresponding to a different position of the lens in the core imager relative to the optical sensor of the core imager;

at each of the plurality of lens focus settings:

capture another core image including the image element, and

determine a width of the image element of the core image;

identify the lens focus setting having a smallest width of the image element; and

set the position of the lens to the lens focus setting in the core imager having the smallest width.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2023
From: BERG, DAVID MATTHEW; CLARKE, STERLING MICHAEL; KRAMEL, STEFAN WOLFGANG; PASTEL, DAVID ANDREW; WEBB, MICHAEL BRIAN
To: CORNING RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062602/0445 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63189350 · May 17, 2021
Related Publication 20220377231A1 · Nov 24, 2022
References Cited (25)
US 4994679A · Esser et al. · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5729622A · Csipkes et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5768409A · Csipkes · 1998 [cited by examiner]
US 5862250A · Csipkes et al. · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6011616A · Volcy et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 7079743B2 · Lauzier et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 9612177B2 · Clarke · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 10185096B2 · Clarke et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20030210389A1 · Matsumoto · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20050041241A1 · Pahk · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20050196115A1 · Kim et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050211885A1 · Tobiason et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060045458A1 · Sasaki et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060078264A1 · Lauzier · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20130342852A1 · Fujimoto · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140327735A1 · Ruchet et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150177097A1 · Clarke et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160033325A1 · Fusco et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20180299632A1 · Van Baelen et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
DE 19725183A1 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003247806A · 2003 [cited by examiner]
WO 2015107440A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017140725A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
JP 2003247806 A English translation (Year: 2003). [cited by examiner]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority; PCT/US2022/028287; dated Jun. 24, 2022; 17 pages; European Patent Office. [cited by applicant]