IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,227,106
Granted Patent B2
US 12,227,106 · App. 18/050,507 · Granted Feb 18, 2025

Intelligent battery system

Inventors: Andreas Martin Viktor Ropel (Gothenburg, SE); Ben Peter Lloyd (Gothenburg, SE); Matthias Yannick Philippe Le Saux (Gothenburg, SE); Konstantinos Chatziioannou (Gothenburg, SE); Klas Roland Persson Signell (Gothenburg, SE)
Assignee: Volvo Car Corporation
B60L58/16B60L3/0046B60W10/26B60W50/14G01R31/3646G01R31/392G01R31/396
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,227,106
App. No.
18/050,507
Granted
Feb 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments and approaches are described to minimize degradation of respective modules combined to form a battery pack onboard an electric vehicle (EV). Systems and components are presented to determine a respective operational state of the modules, and based thereon, a first subset of modules can be selected to provision power to various EV components while a second subset of modules can be deselected. Module selection can be based upon a threshold operating condition. A visual representation of the modules and their respective operational state can be presented, in conjunction with one or more alarms and recommended corrective operations. Artificial intelligence methods can be utilized to determine an operational state of a module(s). A module can be scheduled for replacement. Limiting degradation to a first module can minimize degradation of a second module. The various components can be stored in a memory and executed by a processor.

Claims (65)

1. An electric vehicle (EV), comprising:

a memory that stores computer executable components; and

a processor that executes at least one of the computer executable components that:

monitors driving operations being performed by a driver while driving the EV;

monitors respective operating parameters of battery modules electrically coupled in a battery pack of the EV, wherein the battery modules respectively comprise one or more battery cells;

in response to determining, based on the respective operating parameters, that a driving operation of the driving operations being performed by the driver is causing rates of degradation of respective states of health (SOH) of the battery modules that exceeds a defined threshold rate of degradation:

identifying a first subset of the battery modules having first respective SOH that have degraded greater than a defined threshold amount of degradation, and

identifying a second subset of the battery modules having second respective SOH that have not degraded greater than the defined threshold amount of degradation; and

until the driving operation being performed by the driver that is causing the rates of degradation that exceeds the defined threshold rate of degradation ends:

utilizes the first subset of battery modules to provision power to one or more vehicle components of the EV; and

prevents the second subset of battery modules from provisioning power to the EV.

2. The EV of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

presents, on a display device of the EV, a depiction of the first subset of battery modules provisioning power to the one or more vehicle components.

3. The EV of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

presents, on a display device of the EV, an override button to the driver; and

in response to selection of the override button by the driver:

overrides utilization of only the first subset of battery modules to provision power to the one or more vehicle components; and

utilizes the first subset of battery modules and the second subset of battery modules to provision power to the one or more vehicle components.

4. The EV of claim 3 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

generates a first user profile, wherein the first user profile includes a first configuration that enables selection of the override button by the driver.

5. The EV of claim 4 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

generates a second user profile, wherein the second user profile includes a second configuration that prevents selection of the override button by the driver.

6. The EV of claim 1 , wherein the driving operation is associated with at least one of acceleration, braking, or route of journey.

7. The EV of claim 1 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

determines an operational lifetime of the first subset of battery modules based on the respective operating parameters.

8. The EV of claim 7 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

determines a replacement schedule for the first subset of battery modules based on the operational lifetime.

9. The EV of claim 8 , wherein the replacement schedule is based on at least one of replacement battery module availability, replacement battery module cost, or location of service center to replace the first subset of battery modules.

10. A method for mitigating degradation of battery modules in a battery pack located on an electric vehicle (EV) comprising:

monitoring, by a system of the EV, driving operations being performed by a driver while driving the EV;

monitoring, by the system, respective operating parameters of the battery modules electrically connected via a circuit of the battery pack of the EV, wherein the battery modules respectively comprise one or more battery cells;

in response to determining, by the system, based on the respective operating parameters, that a driving operation of the driving operations being performed by the driver is causing rates of degradation of respective states of health (SOH) of the battery modules that exceeds a defined threshold rate of degradation:

identifying a first subset of the battery modules having first respective SOH that have degraded greater than a defined threshold amount of degradation, and

identifying a second subset of the battery modules having second respective SOH that have not degraded greater than the defined threshold amount of degradation; and

until the driving operation being performed by the driver that is causing the rates of degradation that exceeds the defined threshold rate of degradation ends:

utilizing, by the system, the first subset of battery modules to provision power to one or more components of the EV, and

preventing, by the system, the first second subset of battery modules from provisioning power to the EV.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the at least one of the computer executable components further:

presenting, by the system, on a display device of the EV, an override button to the driver; and

in response to selection of the override button by the driver:

overriding, by the system, utilization of only the first subset of battery modules to provision power to the one or more components of the EV; and

utilizing, by the system, the first subset of battery modules and the second subset of battery modules to provision power to the one or more components of the EV.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising generating, by the system, a first user profile configured to enable selection of the override button by the driver.

13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising generating, by the system, a second user profile configured to prevent selection of the override button by the driver.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the driving operation is associated with at least one of acceleration, braking, or route of journey.

15. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

determining, by the system, an operational lifetime of the first subset of battery modules based at least on the respective operating parameters; and

scheduling, by the system, replacement of the first subset of battery modules based on the operational lifetime.

16. A computer program product comprising a non-transitory computer readable medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable by a processor of an electric vehicle (EV) to cause the processor to:

monitor driving operations being performed by a driver while driving of the EV;

monitor respective operating parameters of battery modules electrically connected via a circuit to form a battery pack of the EV, wherein the battery modules respectively comprise one or more battery cells;

in response to determining, based on the operating parameters, that a driving operation of the driving operations being performed by the driver is causing rates of degradation of respective states of health (SOH) of the battery modules that exceeds a defined threshold rate of degradation:

identify a first subset of the battery modules having first respective SOH that have degraded greater than a defined threshold amount of degradation, and

identify a second subset of the battery modules having second respective SOH that have not degraded greater than the defined threshold amount of degradation; and

until the driving operation being performed by the driver that is causing the rates of degradation that exceeds the defined threshold rate of degradation ends:

utilize the first subset of battery modules to provision power to one or more vehicle components onboard the EV, and

prevent the second subset of battery modules from provisioning power to the EV.

17. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the program instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the processor to:

present, on a display device of the EV, a depiction of the first subset of battery modules provisioning power to the one or more vehicle components.

18. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the program instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the processor to:

in response to generation of an override signal, utilize both the first subset of battery modules and the second subset of battery modules while the driving operation is being performed by the driver.

19. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the program instructions are further executable by the processor to cause the processor to:

determine an operational lifetime of a battery module of the battery modules based on the respective operating parameters; and

in response to determining the operational lifetime of the battery module is below a threshold condition, schedule replacement of the battery module.

20. The computer program product of claim 16 , wherein the driving operation is associated with at least one of acceleration, braking, or route of journey.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2022
From: ROPEL, ANDREAS MARTIN VIKTOR; LLOYD, BEN PETER; LE SAUX, MATTHIAS YANNICK PHILIPPE; CHATZIIOANNOU, KONSTANTINOS; SIGNELL, KLAS ROLAND PERSSON
To: VOLVO CAR CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061576/0709 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240140261A1 · May 2, 2024
References Cited (20)
US 9160037B2 · Park · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 11104231B2 · Froelich · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20100094496A1 · Hershkovitz · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20120282906A1 · Frye · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20200254898A1 · Singhal · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20220115879A1 · Kahn · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220302719A1 · Tenorio · 2022 [cited by examiner]
JP 2016086506A · 2016 [cited by examiner]
De Gennaro et al. “A case study to predict the capacity fade of the battery of electrified vehicles in real-world use conditions” Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 8, Issue 2, Jun. 2020, pp. 517-534, 18 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Department of Energy “Batteries for Electric Vehicles” U.S. Department of Energy—Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Alternative Fuels Data Center, https://afdc.energy.gov/vehicles/electric_batteries.html, Last … [cited by applicant]
Edge et al. “Lithium ion battery degradation: what you need to know” Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Issue 14, 2021, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]
Okada et al. “Development of Lithium-ion Battery Deterioration Diagnosis Technology” Yokogawa Technical Report English Edition vol. 56 No. 2 (2013), 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Unknown “Updated: Electric Car Batter Replacement Costs” Recurrent, https://www.recurrentauto.com/research/ costs-ev-battery-replacement, Mar. 26, 2023, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Unknown “How EV Batteries Degrade” Recurrent, https://www.recurrentauto.com/research/how-batteries-degrade, Jul. 10, 2021, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. “Predictive modeling of battery degradation and greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. state-level electric vehicle operation” Nature Communications, 2018, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Unknown “State of Health (SOH) Determination” https://www.mpoweruk.com/soh.htm, Last Accessed May 3, 2023, 2 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kong et al. “State of Health Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, Issue 18, 2018, pp. 667-671. [cited by applicant]
Zhang et al. “Evaluation of the State of Health of Lithium-Ion Battery Based on the Temporal Convolution Network” Energy Res., Jun. 27, 2022, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Yang et al. “Fast and Accurate Health Assessment of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Typical Voltage Segments” Energy Res., May 23, 2022, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
Remmlinger et al., “On-board state-of-health monitoring of lithium-ion batteries using linear parameter-varying models” Abstract: Elsevier; Science Direct. vol. 239, Oct. 1, 2013, pp. 689-695. [cited by applicant]