IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,229,711
Granted Patent B2
US 12,229,711 · App. 18/197,631 · Granted Feb 18, 2025

Method and system for physical asset tracking

Inventors: Leore Avidar (San Francisco, CA); Ami Wang (San Francisco, CA); Manushika Yapa (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Lob.com, Inc.
G06Q10/0833G06F3/12G06K7/1413G06K19/06028G06Q30/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,229,711
App. No.
18/197,631
Granted
Feb 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for tracking physical assets can include: receiving a digital asset; determining an asset identifier for the digital asset; generating an asset barcode; optionally facilitating printing and sending of the asset to an asset recipient; determining an asset event for the asset; and notifying a sender of an asset event.

Claims (32)

1. A method comprising:

generating an asset barcode for an asset associated with a sender, wherein the asset is labeled with the asset barcode and shipped to a recipient;

receiving information in response to a scan of the asset barcode by a device of the recipient, wherein the information comprises an asset identifier and a timestamp associated with a time of occurrence of the scan;

determining a received-by-recipient event based on the asset identifier and the timestamp; and

triggering an action based on the asset identifier in response to the receipt of the received-by-recipient event, wherein the action comprises providing the information to the sender.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the asset identifier further comprises an order identifier.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the asset comprises a second asset barcode; wherein the method further comprises receiving a delivery update comprising the asset identifier in response to a scan of the second asset barcode by a delivery service.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the asset barcode and the second asset barcode are the same.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the information update further comprises a geolocation associated with the scan.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a recipient metric associated with the recipient based on the received-by-recipient event.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising adding the recipient metric to a set of recipient metrics associated with a plurality of recipients.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the recipient metric comprises a recipient response time.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the asset barcode comprises a QR code.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sender initiates an out-of-band communication to the recipient based on the information.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the asset is programmatically generated from HTML that specifies a value to include on the asset.

12. A system comprising a processing system configured to:

determine an asset identifier for an asset associated with a sender;

generate an asset barcode based on the asset identifier, wherein the asset barcode is scannable by a device of a recipient, wherein the asset is labeled with the asset barcode and mailed to the recipient, wherein the asset barcode comprises a QR code;

in response to a scan of the asset barcode by the device, receive an update, comprising the asset identifier and a timestamp associated with the scan, and

determine a received-by-recipient event based on the asset identifier and the timestamp, wherein the processing system is further configured to determine a recipient metric based on the received-by-recipient event.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the asset identifier comprises an asset group identifier.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processing system is further configured to generate a notification to the sender comprising the received-by-recipient event.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processing system is further configured to aggregate recipient metrics associated with each of a plurality of received-by-recipient events for a plurality of assets.

16. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processing system is further configured to send the recipient metric to the sender.

17. The system of claim 12 , wherein the processing system is further configured to:

determine a second asset barcode; and

receive a delivery update comprising the asset identifier in response to a scan of the second asset barcode by a delivery service.

18. A system comprising a processing system configured to:

determine an asset identifier for an asset associated with a sender;

generate an asset barcode based on the asset identifier, wherein the asset barcode is scannable by a device of a recipient, wherein the asset is labeled with the asset barcode and mailed to the recipient;

in response to a scan of the asset barcode by the device, receive an update, comprising the asset identifier and a timestamp associated with the scan, wherein the asset barcode comprises a QR code; and

determine a received-by-recipient event based on the asset identifier and the timestamp.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2023
From: AVIDAR, LEORE; WANG, AMI; YAPA, MANUSHIKA
To: LOB.COM, INC.
Reel/Frame 063647/0377 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 17396570 · Aug 6, 2021
Continuation 17127244 · Dec 18, 2020
Provisional Application 62950388 · Dec 19, 2019
Related Publication 20230289709A1 · Sep 14, 2023
References Cited (38)
US 7778939B2 · Ogg et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 9977633B1 · Khafizova · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10482356B2 · Tastl et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 11113657B2 · Avidar · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 11221813B2 · Avidar et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11782662B1 · Fritsch et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
US 20020019786A1 · Gonzalez et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20030218770A1 · Field · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20040207867A1 · Stringham · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20070076237A1 · Kudo · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20090055206A1 · Orbke · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090187733A1 · El-Ghazawi · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20110029429A1 · Whitehouse · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120084222A1 · Zimberoff et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130054491A1 · Chatow et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130129372A1 · Manabe · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140079428A1 · Park et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140149308A1 · Ming · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140214716A1 · Mauch · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20140258832A1 · Hepp et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20160300250A1 · Rai et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160352976A1 · Kuroiwa · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170060490A1 · Rajalingam et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170154347A1 · Bateman · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180240066A1 · Streebin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190311325A1 · Reblin et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200234229A1 · Bolha et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200278987A1 · Liu et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200310725A1 · Fukami · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP 2005050045A · 2005 [cited by applicant]
JP 2013206235A · 2013 [cited by applicant]
“Are Print Providers switched automatically based on the customer's delivery details?”, Printify, first downloaded Dec. 14, 2022, https://help.printify.com/hc/en-us/articles/4483623864593-Are-Print-Providers-switched-au… [cited by applicant]
“How Do We Route Print Jobs?”, Smart Order Routing, https://www.cloudprinter.com/order-routing, Nov. 9, 2020, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
“Order Routing Feature”, Printify, first downloaded Dec. 14, 2022, https://help.printify.com/hc/en-us/articles/4483625090321-Order-Routing-Feature. [cited by applicant]
“Send Tracker FAQ”, https://sendoso.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/360045052631-Send-Tracker-FAQ-Senoso, first downloaded Nov. 18, 2020. [cited by applicant]
Chen, Anthony , “How We Solve Problems at Lob—Intelligent Mail Through Routing”, Lob Blog,https://www.lob.com/blog/how-we-solve-problems-at-lob-intelligent-mail-through-routing, Jul. 18, 2018, 15 pages. [cited by applicant]
Comber, Sam , “Machine learning innovations in address matching: A practical comparison of word2vec and CRFs”, wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tgis, Transactions in GIS, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Duchene, Patty , https://help.postal.io/en/articles/3727502-reporting-metrics, first downloaded Nov. 18, 2020. [cited by applicant]