IP Library Granted Patent US 12,229,963
Granted Patent B2
US 12,229,963 · App. 17/546,080 · Granted Feb 18, 2025

Adaptive auto-segmentation in computed tomography

Inventors: Igor Peterlik (Kuenten, CH); Adam Michal Strzelecki (Daettwil, CH); Dieter Marc Seghers (Zürich, CH); Mathieu Plamondon (Glattbrugg, CH); Mathias Lehmann (Zürich, CH); Pascal Paysan (Basel, CH); Alexander Heinz (Lörrach, DE)
Assignee: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
G06T7/11G06T7/136G06T7/62G06V10/457G06V10/764A61N5/1039A61N5/1067G06T2207/10081G06T2207/30196G06V2201/03
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,229,963
App. No.
17/546,080
Granted
Feb 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method of segmenting a reconstructed volume of a region of patient anatomy includes: determining an anatomical region associated with the reconstructed volume; detecting one or more metal objects disposed in an initial 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume; for each of the one or more metal objects disposed in the initial 3D metal object mask, determining a volume associated with the metal object; determining a value for at least one segmentation parameter based on the anatomical region and on the volume associated with the one or more metal objects; and generating a final 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed digital volume using the value for the segmentation parameter.

Claims (31)

1. A computer-implemented method of segmenting a reconstructed volume of a region of patient anatomy, the method comprising:

determining an anatomical region associated with the reconstructed volume;

detecting one or more metal objects disposed in an initial 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume;

for each of the one or more metal objects disposed in the initial 3D metal object mask, determining a volume associated with the metal object;

determining a value for at least one segmentation parameter based on the anatomical region and on the volume associated with the one or more metal objects; and

generating a final 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume using the value for the segmentation parameter.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one segmentation parameter comprises a thresholding parameter or a dilation radius.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

for each of the one or more metal objects disposed in the initial 3D metal object mask, determining a radiographic density associated with each metal object; and

determining the value for the at least one segmentation parameter based on the radiographic density associated with each metal object.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the anatomical region comprises generating an anatomical mask for the reconstructed volume.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein generating the anatomical mask for the reconstructed volume comprises including locations in the anatomical mask based on an anatomical threshold value.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the anatomical threshold value is associated with a material having a radiodensity that is greater than that of air.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the anatomical threshold value is associated with a material having a radiodensity that is less than that of water.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein determining the anatomical region associated with the reconstructed volume comprises determining whether the anatomical region is a head region or a body region based on an anatomical mask for the reconstructed volume.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein determining whether the anatomical region is the head region or the body region based on the anatomical mask comprises determining a minimum lateral width of the anatomical mask.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein determining the minimum lateral width of the anatomical mask is based on a maximum lateral width for each slice of the anatomical mask that has a non-zero width.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein detecting the one or more metal objects disposed in the initial 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume comprises:

generating the initial 3D metal object mask for the reconstructed volume; and

detecting one or more connected components contained within the initial metal object mask.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein detecting the one or more metal objects disposed in the initial 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume further comprises determining a respective volume for each of the one or more connected components contained within the initial metal object mask.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein detecting the one or more metal objects disposed in the initial 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume further comprises determining a metal classification of the reconstructed volume.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein the metal classification of the reconstructed volume is selected from the group consisting of a metal-free anatomical region, a dental region, a fiducial-containing region, and an orthopedic region.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein determining the metal classification of the reconstructed volume is based on at least one of a volume of a largest component of the one or more connected components, a cumulative volume of a set of the one or more connected components that are larger than a predetermined volume, or a radiographic density of at least one of the one or more connected components that are larger than a predetermined volume.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein generating the initial 3D metal object mask for the reconstructed volume comprises determining locations in the initial 3D metal object mask based on an initial metal threshold value.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising, generating a set of 2D projection metal masks by performing a forward projection process on the final 3D metal object mask associated with the reconstructed volume.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 17 , wherein each 2D mask projection in the set of 2D mask projections includes location information indicating pixels that are blocked during the forward projection process by one or more connected components contained within the initial metal object mask.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating a non-binary mask based on the final 3D metal object mask and the reconstructed volume; and

generating a final reconstructed volume based on the non-binary mask, the reconstructed volume, and a low-artifact reconstructed volume.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 19 , wherein generating the final reconstructed volume based on the non-binary mask comprises, for each edge voxel of a metal object in the reconstructed volume, providing a value that is based on an image value from the reconstructed volume, an image value from the low-artifact reconstructed volume, and a value from the non-binary mask.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 5, 2022
From: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
To: SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 061700/0141 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2021
From: PETERLIK, IGOR; STRZELECKI, ADAM MICHAL; SEGHERS, DIETER MARC; PLAMONDON, MATHIEU; LEHMANN, MATHIAS; PAYSAN, PASCAL; HEINZ, ALEXANDER
To: VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL AG
Reel/Frame 058354/0519 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63250046 · Sep 29, 2021
Related Publication 20230100798A1 · Mar 30, 2023
References Cited (18)
US 6721387B1 · Naidu et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7636461B2 · Spies et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 8503750B2 · Benson · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20110081071A1 · Benson et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20150029178A1 · Claus · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170270687A1 · Manhart · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180137658A1 · Zhang · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20220207794A1 · Sarti · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230095240A1 · Strzelecki et al. · 2023 [cited by applicant]
The Extended European Search Report, application No. 22198774.6, Feb. 27, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Yongbin Zhang et al., “Reducing Metal Artifacts in Cone-Beam CT Images by Preprocessing Projection Data”, International Journal of Radiation: Oncology Biology Physics, Feb. 9, 2007, pp. 924-932, vol. 67, No. 3. [cited by applicant]
S.B. Damelin et al., “On Surface Completion and Image Inpainting by Biharmonic Functions: Numerical Aspects”, arxiv. org, Cornell University Library, 201 Olin Library Cornell University Ithaca, Jul. 20, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Julia Hamer et al., “Modified Eulers Elastica Inpainting for Metal Artifact Reduction in CT”, Proceedings des workshops, Jan. 2012, pp. 310-315. [cited by applicant]
Mark Korpics, BS et al., “Metal Artifact Reduction in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Head and Neck Radiotherapy”, Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment, Dec. 2016, pp. NP88-NP94, vol. 15, No. 6. [cited by applicant]
The Extended European Search Report, application No. 22198789.4, Jan. 26, 2023. [cited by applicant]
Seemeen Karimi, “Metal Artifact Reduction in Computed Tomography”, Retrieved on Dec. 16, 2022 from the Internet at <URL: https://escholarship.org/content/qt9w55m91h/qt9w55m91h.pdf>, Jan. 1, 2014, XP093009091. [cited by applicant]
S. Lee et al., “Automated CNN-Based Tooth Segmentation in Cone-Beam CT for Dental Implant Planning”, Retrieved on Mar. 17, 2020, IEEE Access, Feb. 24, 2020, vol. 8, XP011778735. [cited by applicant]
Non-Published Commonly Owned U.S. Appl. No. 17/546,081, filed Dec. 9, 2021, 48 pages, Siemens Healthineers International AG. [cited by applicant]