IP Library Granted Patent US 12,232,970
Granted Patent B2
US 12,232,970 · App. 17/103,146 · Granted Feb 25, 2025

Implant facilitating upper humerus resurfacing and method for use and implantation thereof

Inventor: Eduardo Gonzalez-Hernandez (Miami, FL)
A61F2/4081A61F2/4003A61F2002/30128A61F2002/30242A61F2002/3069A61F2002/4007A61F2002/4085A61F2002/4088
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,232,970
App. No.
17/103,146
Filed
Nov 24, 2020
Granted
Feb 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
3774
USPC
623/19.11
Abstract

A surface-reconfiguration implant, a method of using the surface-reconfiguration implant, and a method of implantation of the surface-reconfiguration implant that creates an articular surface between an upper portion of a humeral head and a greater tuberosity, and an undersurface of an acromion in shoulders with massive rotator cuff tears is provided. The surface-reconfiguration implant can include a body portion including at least an undersurface and an articular surface, where the undersurface is configured to interface with portions of a proximal humerus to facilitate attachment of the body portion thereto, and portions of the articular surface extend to and/and preferably beyond a normal anatomical shape of portions a humeral head and a greater tuberosity both superiorly and medially when the body portion is attached to the proximal humerus.

Claims (21)

1. A surface-reconfiguration implant for creating an articular surface facilitating articulation with an acromion and a glenoid during movement of a shoulder joint, the surface-reconfiguration implant comprising:

a body portion including at least an undersurface and an articular surface, the undersurface of the body portion being configured to interface with portions of a proximal humerus to facilitate attachment of the body portion thereto, portions of the articular surface extending to and/or beyond at least a normal anatomical shape of an upper portion of a humeral head and a greater tuberosity both superiorly and medially when the body portion is attached to the proximal humerus, the articular surface including a first portion being substantially shaped as portions of one of a sphere and an egg, and a second portion having a medial leading edge portion with a nose portion and an indentation provided adjacent the nose portion, the nose portion being positioned farther medially than the indentation and a perpendicular distance from the undersurface of the body portion to a peak of the nose portion is less than a perpendicular distance from the undersurface of the body portion to a minimum of the indentation, portions of the nose portion being configured to blend into portions of the proximal humerus;

wherein, when attached to the proximal humerus, the articular surface contacts an undersurface of the acromion, and correspondingly provides inferior translation of the proximal humerus in the shoulder joint.

2. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 1 , wherein, when attached to the proximal humerus, the nose portion is slidable over an upper edge of the glenoid, and the upper edge of the glenoid is receivable in the indentation during articulation of the shoulder joint.

3. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 2 , wherein receipt of the upper edge of the glenoid in the indentation serves in preventing outward displacement of the proximal humerus relative to the glenoid.

4. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 1 , wherein the undersurface of the body portion is one of planar and concave, and the undersurface of the body portion is configured to interface with the proximal humerus after portions thereof have been removed.

5. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 1 , wherein, from an anterior direction, a portion of a first circle is capable of following an outline of the humeral head of the proximal humerus, and a second circle is capable of being centered on a center of the first circle and has a radius extending to or just beyond the greater tuberosity, the articular surface being configured to extend along portions of and within the second circle.

6. A surface-reconfiguration implant for creating an articular surface facilitating articulation with an acromion and a glenoid during movement of a shoulder joint, the surface-reconfiguration implant comprising:

a body portion including at least an undersurface and an articular surface, the body portion being configured for attachment to portions of a proximal humerus to extend to and/or beyond a normal anatomical shape of an upper portion of a humeral head and a greater tuberosity both superiorly and medially when the body portion is attached to the proximal humerus, the articular surface including a first portion being substantially dome-shaped, and a second portion having a medial leading edge portion with a nose portion and an indentation provided adjacent the nose portion, the nose portion being positioned farther medially than the indentation, and a perpendicular distance from the undersurface of the body portion to a peak of the nose portion is less than a perpendicular distance from the undersurface of the body portion to a minimum of the indentation, portions of the nose portion being configured to blend into portions of the proximal humerus;

wherein, when attached to the proximal humerus, the articular surface contacts an undersurface of the acromion, and correspondingly provides inferior translation of the proximal humerus in the shoulder joint.

7. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 6 , wherein, when attached to the proximal humerus, the nose portion is slidable over an upper edge of the glenoid, and the upper edge of the glenoid is receivable in the indentation during articulation of the shoulder joint.

8. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 7 , wherein receipt of the upper edge of the glenoid in the indentation serves in preventing outward displacement of the proximal humerus relative to the glenoid.

9. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 6 , wherein the undersurface of the body portion is one of planar and concave, the undersurface of the body portion being configured to interface with the proximal humerus after portions thereof have been removed.

10. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 6 , wherein, from an anterior direction, a portion of a first circle is capable of following an outline of the humeral head of the proximal humerus, and a second circle is capable of being centered on a center of the first circle and has a radius extending to or just beyond the greater tuberosity, the articular surface being configured to extend along portions of and within the second circle.

11. A surface-reconfiguration implant for creating an articular surface facilitating articulation with an acromion and a glenoid during movement of a shoulder joint, the surface-reconfiguration implant comprising:

a body portion including at least an undersurface and an articular surface, the undersurface of the body portion being configured to interface with portions of a proximal humerus to facilitate attachment of the body portion thereto, portions of the articular surface extending to and/or beyond at least a normal anatomical shape of an upper portion of a humeral head and a greater tuberosity both superiorly and medially when the body portion is attached to the proximal humerus, the articular surface being at least in part bi-convex including a first convex portion, a second convex portion, and an indentation positioned between the first convex portion and the second convex portion, the second convex portion forming a nose portion being configured to blend into portions of the proximal humerus, the nose portion being positioned farther medially than the first convex portion and the indentation, and a perpendicular distance from the undersurface of the body portion to a peak of the nose portion is less than a perpendicular distance from the undersurface of the body portion to a minimum of the indentation;

wherein, when attached to the proximal humerus, the articular surface contacts an undersurface of the acromion, and correspondingly provides inferior translation of the proximal humerus in the shoulder joint.

12. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 11 , wherein, when attached to the proximal humerus, the nose portion is slidable over an upper edge of the glenoid, and the upper edge of the glenoid is receivable in the indentation during articulation of the shoulder joint.

13. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 12 , wherein receipt of the upper edge of the glenoid in the indentation serves in preventing outward displacement of the proximal humerus relative to the glenoid.

14. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 11 , wherein the undersurface of the body portion is one of planar and concave, and the undersurface of the body portion is configured to interface with the proximal humerus after portions thereof have been removed.

15. The surface-reconfiguration implant of claim 11 , wherein, from an anterior direction, a portion of a first circle follows an outline of the humeral head of the proximal humerus, and a second circle centered on a center of the first circle has a radius extending to or just beyond the greater tuberosity, the articular surface being configured to extend along portions of and within the second circle.

Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62953679 · Dec 26, 2019
Related Publication 20210196466A1 · Jul 1, 2021
References Cited (35)
US 4261062A · Amstutz et al. · 1981 [cited by applicant]
US 4865605A · Dines et al. · 1989 [cited by applicant]
US 4919670A · Dale et al. · 1990 [cited by applicant]
US 5489309A · Lackey et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5944757A · Grammont · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6187050B1 · Khalili et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6197062B1 · Fenlin · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6508840B1 · Rockwood, Jr. et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6679916B1 · Frankle et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6699289B2 · Iannotti et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6719799B1 · Kropf · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6783549B1 · Stone et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6790234B1 · Frankle · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 6942699B2 · Stone et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7044973B2 · Rockwood, Jr. et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7175663B1 · Stone · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7462197B2 · Tornier et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7621961B2 · Stone · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7648530B2 · Habermeyer et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7819923B2 · Stone et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7854768B2 · Wiley et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8062376B2 · Shultz et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8236059B2 · Stone et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8246687B2 · Katrana et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8317871B2 · Stone et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8419798B2 · Ondrla et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8512410B2 · Metcalfe et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8845742B2 · Kusogullari et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9512445B2 · Iannotti · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9579106B2 · Lo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10751190B2 · Humphrey · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10842512B2 · Bonin, Jr. et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20150223940A1 · Papadonikolakis · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20160008137A1 · Long · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20180256217A1 · Dekel · 2018 [cited by examiner]