IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,235,095
Granted Patent B2
US 12,235,095 · App. 18/382,315 · Granted Feb 25, 2025

Methods and apparatus to determine a shape of an optical fiber sensor

Inventors: Mark E. Froggatt (Blacksburg, VA); Justin W. Klein (Winston-Salem, NC); Dawn K. Gifford (Blacksburg, VA); Stephen T. Kreger (Blacksburg, VA)
Assignee: Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc.
G01B11/24G01B11/16G01B11/168G01B11/18G01L1/242G01M11/025G01M11/31G01M11/3172G01M11/3181G01L1/246G02B6/02042
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,235,095
App. No.
18/382,315
Granted
Feb 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

To sense the shape of a multicore optical fiber sensor, light reflected in a center and two or more helixed outer cores of the optical fiber sensor is measured, and phases associated with strain in the center and helixed outer cores is tracked along the length of the fiber sensor. Further, a wobble signal indicative of a variation in the spin rate of the fiber sensor is determined. Based on the tracked phases and the wobble signal, the fiber shape is computed.

Claims (53)

1. A shape-sensing method for an optical fiber sensor, the optical fiber sensor comprising a center core and two or more helixed outer cores, the method comprising:

measuring light reflected in the center core and the two or more helixed outer cores of the optical fiber sensor to track phases associated with strain in the center core and the two or more helixed outer cores along a length of the optical fiber sensor;

determining a wobble signal indicative of a variation in spin rate of the two or more helixed outer cores along the length of the optical fiber sensor; and

computing a shape of the optical fiber sensor based at least in part on the tracked phases and the determined wobble signal.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a twist signal indicative of an extrinsic twist applied to the optical fiber sensor.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein determining the twist signal comprises:

subtracting the phase associated with strain in the center core from an average of the phases associated with strain in the two or more helixed outer cores.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein computing the shape of the optical fiber based at least in part on the tracked phases and the determined wobble signal comprises:

determining rotational positions of the two or more helixed outer cores based on the wobble signal; and

computing the shape of the optical fiber sensor based at least in part on the tracked phases and the rotational positions.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising tracking the phases by:

aligning a reference scan of the optical fiber sensor in a known shape against a measurement scan of the optical fiber sensor to maintain coherence; and

comparing the reference scan with the measurement scan.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein computing the shape of the optical fiber sensor comprises:

determining first and second orthogonal differential strain signals based at least in part on the tracked phases and at least one signal selected from the group consisting of: a twist signal and the wobble signal;

creating a rotation matrix comprising bend angles determined based on the first and second orthogonal differential strain signals;

using the rotation matrix to iteratively compute pointing vectors along the length of the optical fiber sensor; and

computing the shape of the optical fiber sensor based on sums of the pointing vectors.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the wobble signal comprises:

measuring, as a function of distance along the length of the optical fiber sensor, a shift of a phase in at least one core of the two or more helixed outer cores relative to an expected phase while the optical fiber sensor is placed in a configuration causing a continuous bend in a single plane.

8. A system for measuring a shape of an optical fiber sensor that comprises a center core and two or more helixed outer cores, the system comprising:

interferometers configured to measure light reflected in the center core and the two or more helixed outer cores of the optical fiber sensor; and

a system controller and data processor configured to:

process the light to track phases associated with strain in the center core and the two or more helixed outer cores along a length of the optical fiber sensor;

determine a wobble signal indicative of a variation in spin rate of the two or more helixed outer cores along the length of the optical fiber sensor; and

compute a shape of the optical fiber sensor based at least in part on the tracked phases and the determined wobble signal.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein the system controller and data processor is further configured to determine a twist signal indicative of an extrinsic twist applied to the optical fiber sensor.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein determining the twist signal comprises:

subtracting the phase associated with strain in the center core from an average of the phases associated with strain in the two or more helixed outer cores.

11. The system of claim 8 , wherein the system controller and data processor is configured to compute the shape of the optical fiber sensor based at least in part on the tracked phases and the determined wobble signal by:

determining rotational positions of the two or more helixed outer cores based at least in part on the wobble signal; and

computing the shape of the optical fiber sensor based at least in part on the tracked phases and the determined rotational positions.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein processing the light to track the phases comprises:

comparing a reference scan of the optical fiber sensor in a known shape against a measurement scan of the optical fiber sensor.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein comparing the reference scan of the optical fiber sensor in the known shape against the measurement scan of the optical fiber sensor comprises:

using Rayleigh scatter signals in the reference and measurement scans.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein processing the light to track the phases comprises:

aligning the reference and measurement scans to maintain coherence.

15. The system of claim 8 , wherein determining the wobble signal comprises:

measuring, as a function of distance along the length of the optical fiber sensor, a shift of a phase in at least one core of the two or more helixed outer cores relative to an expected phase while the optical fiber sensor is placed in a configuration causing a continuous bend in a single plane.

16. The system of claim 8 , wherein each core of the center core and the two or more helixed outer cores comprises gratings continuously along the length of the optical fiber sensor.

17. The system of claim 8 , wherein computing the shape of the optical fiber sensor comprises:

determining first and second orthogonal differential strain signals based at least in part on the tracked phases and at least one signal selected from the group consisting of: a twist signal and the wobble signal;

creating a rotation matrix comprising bend angles determined based on the first and second orthogonal differential strain signals;

using the rotation matrix to iteratively compute pointing vectors along the length of the optical fiber sensor; and

computing the shape of the optical fiber sensor based on sums of the pointing vectors.

18. The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the interferometers are configured to measure the light at two orthogonal polarization states; and

the system controller and data processor is configured to, when processing the light to track the phases, correct the tracked phase for birefringence based on measurements at the two orthogonal polarization states.

19. The system of claim 8 , wherein the system controller and data processor is configured to process the light to track the phases by: tracking the phases continuously along an entirety of the length of the optical fiber sensor.

20. A computer-readable storage medium storing processor-executable instructions for determining a shape of an optical fiber sensor by processing tracked phases, the optical fiber sensor comprising a center core and two or more helixed outer cores, and the tracked phases being associated with strains in the center core and the two or more helixed outer cores, wherein the instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to perform operations comprising:

determining a wobble signal indicative of a variation in spin rate of the two or more helixed outer cores along a length of the optical fiber sensor; and

computing a shape of the optical fiber sensor based at least in part on the tracked phases and the determined wobble signal.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2023
From: FROGGATT, MARK E.; KLEIN, JUSTIN W.; GIFFORD, DAWN K.; KREGER, STEPHEN T.
To: LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 065461/0572 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2023
From: LUNA INNOVATIONS INCORPORATED
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 065461/0575 →
Continuity (12)
Continuation 17894718 · Aug 24, 2022
Continuation 17142634 · Jan 6, 2021
Continuation 16908414 · Jun 22, 2020
Continuation 16723824 · Dec 20, 2019
Continuation 16506998 · Jul 9, 2019
Continuation 15698707 · Sep 8, 2017
Continuation 14326004 · Jul 8, 2014
Continuation 12874901 · Sep 2, 2010
Provisional Application 61350343 · Jun 1, 2010
Provisional Application 61255575 · Oct 28, 2009
Provisional Application 61243746 · Sep 18, 2009
Related Publication 20240044638A1 · Feb 8, 2024
References Cited (140)
US 3692068A · Auer et al. · 1972 [cited by applicant]
US 4443698A · Schiffner · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 4697876A · Dyott · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4697926A · Youngquist et al. · 1987 [cited by applicant]
US 4748686A · Glomb · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 4761073A · Meltz et al. · 1988 [cited by applicant]
US 5009505A · Malvern · 1991 [cited by applicant]
US 5118931A · Udd et al. · 1992 [cited by applicant]
US 5263103A · Kosinski · 1993 [cited by applicant]
US 5493113A · Dunphy et al. · 1996 [cited by applicant]
US 5627637A · Kapteyn · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5698848A · Belk · 1997 [cited by applicant]
US 5748312A · Kersey et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5798521A · Froggatt · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5809198A · Weber et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5826626A · Huemer · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 5987197A · Kersey · 1999 [cited by applicant]
US 6023325A · Sahlgren et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6141098A · Sawatari et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 6289740B1 · Posey, Jr. et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6301420B1 · Greenaway et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6389187B1 · Greenaway et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 6545760B1 · Froggatt et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6621956B2 · Greenaway et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 6856400B1 · Froggatt · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6888623B2 · Clements · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 6900897B2 · Froggatt · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 7027699B2 · Tao et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7042573B2 · Froggatt · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7317849B1 · Meneghini et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7324714B1 · Cranch et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7330245B2 · Froggatt · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7379168B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7440087B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7538883B2 · Froggatt · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 7664347B2 · Childers et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7720322B2 · Prisco et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7772541B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7781724B2 · Childers et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7813599B2 · Moore · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7815376B2 · Rogers et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7930065B2 · Larkin et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 7948633B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8004686B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8050523B2 · Younge et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8116601B2 · Prisco et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8183520B2 · Prisco · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8265431B2 · Childers et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8335405B2 · Askins · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8400620B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8515215B2 · Younge et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8531655B2 · Klein et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8746076B2 · Rogge et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8773650B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8842963B2 · Wysocki et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8864655B2 · Ramamurthy et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8923678B2 · Fini et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8970845B1 · Chan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 8989528B2 · Udd · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9025158B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9200971B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9285246B2 · Prisco et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9417057B2 · 'T Hooft et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9606021B2 · Lally et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 9784569B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10378885B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10551173B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10739129B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10775157B2 · Gifford et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10921117B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11473902B2 · Froggatt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 11828586B2 · Froggatt · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20010017971A1 · Iwata et al. · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 20020028034A1 · Chen et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20020088931A1 · Danisch et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 20050089326A1 · Regev et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050226584A1 · Williams et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20060013523A1 · Childlers et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060061770A1 · Erskine · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060152733A1 · Waagaard et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060188212A1 · Oron et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070201793A1 · Askins et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070265503A1 · Schlesinger et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20110255077A1 · Rogers · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20110301455A1 · Numajiri et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120062901A1 · Yoshida et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20160018245A1 · Yamate et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20190033062A1 · Horikx et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190094459A1 · Froggatt et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200264018A1 · Froggatt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200300614A1 · Van Putten · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220404144A1 · Froggatt et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
CN 1776374A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 1841027A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 1880913A · 2006 [cited by applicant]
CN 1954218A · 2007 [cited by applicant]
DE 3921440A1 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
JP H0293503A · 1990 [cited by applicant]
JP H08334649A · 1996 [cited by applicant]
JP 3159861B2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0138914A1 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO WO0233464A1 · 2002 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2010054262A1 · 2010 [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP23192524.9, mailed on Jan. 3, 2024, 06 pages. [cited by applicant]
Askins C.G., et al., Inscription of Fiber Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fiber, in Nonlinear Photonics, OSA Technical Digest (CD), Optical Society of America, 2007, paper JWA39,. [cited by applicant]
Askins, Charles G. et al., “Bend and Twist Sensing in a Multi-Core Optical Fiber,” Optical Fiber Communications/National Fiber Optic Engineers conference, 2008 (OFC/NFOEC 2008), Feb. 24-28, 2008, San Diego, CA, pp. 1-3,… [cited by applicant]
Bertholds A., et al., “Determination of the Individual Strain-optic Coefficients in Single-mode Optical Fibres,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, Jan. 1988, vol. 6 (1), pp. 17-20. [cited by applicant]
Blanchard P. M., et al., “Two-Dimensional Bend Sensing with a Single, Multi-Core Optical Fibre,” Smart Materials and Structures, 2000, vol. 9 (2), pp. 132-140. [cited by applicant]
Blandino J., et al., Three-Dimensional Shape Sensing for Inflatable Booms, Proceedings of the 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/Ahs/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Cranch C.A., et al., “Ultra-High-Sensitivity Two-Dimensional Bend Sensor,” Electronics Letters, 2006, vol. 42 (9). pp. 520-522. [cited by applicant]
Cranch G.A., et al., Ultra-High Sensitivity Curvature Sensor Based on Bragg Grating Defined Interferometric Cavities Formed in Multicore Fiber, in Optical Fiber Sensors, OSA Technical Digest (CD), Optical Society of Ame… [cited by applicant]
Duncan R., et al., “Fiber-Optic Shape and Position Sensing,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Structural Health Monitoring, 2005. [cited by applicant]
Duncan R.G., et al., “High-Accuracy Fiber-Optic Shape Sensing,” Proceedings of SPIE—International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Mar. 29, 2007, vol. 6530, pp. 65301S-1-65301S-11, XP055372588. [cited by applicant]
Duncan, Roger, “Sensing Shape: Fiber-Bragg-grating sensor arrays monitor shape at a high resolution,” 2005, pp. 18-21, SPIE. [cited by applicant]
Duncan, Roger G. et al., “Characterization of a Fiber-Optic Shape and Position Sensor,” Proc. of SPIE, 2006, pp. 616704-1-616704-11, vol. 6167, SPIE. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 10817557.1, mailed on May 30, 2017, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11790200.7, mailed on Jun. 2, 2017, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11790271.8, mailed on May 30, 2017. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 11822548.1, mailed on Feb. 21, 2017. 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. 19162603.5 mailed on Jul. 10, 2019, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP19163646.3 mailed on Nov. 18, 2019, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report for Application No. EP22158300.8, mailed on Jul. 11, 2022, 08 pages. [cited by applicant]
Flockhart G.M.H., et al., “Differential Phase Tracking Applied to Bragg Gratings in Multi-Core Fibre for High Accuracy Curvature Measurement,” Electronics Letters, 2006, vol. 42 (7). pp. 390-391. [cited by applicant]
Flockhart G.M.H., et al., “Two-Axis Bend Measurement with Bragg Gratings in Multicore Optical Fiber,” Optics Letters, 2003, vol. 28 (6), pp. 387-389. [cited by applicant]
Froggatt, Mark and Jason Moore, “Distributed measurement of static strain in an optical fiber with multiple Bragg gratings at nominally equal wavelengths,” Journal of Applied Optics, Apr. 1, 1998, vol. 37, Issue 10, pp.… [cited by applicant]
Gordon M.H.Flockhart, et al., “Differential Phase Tracking Applied to Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fiber for High-Accuracy Curvature Measurement,” Proc. SPIE, 2006, vol. 6167. [cited by applicant]
Iiyama K et al., “Frequency Domain Detection of Coherence Multiplexed Sensor Signals by Using an Optical Loop with a Frequency Shifter,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, IEEE Service Center, New York, NY, US, vol. 15 (1… [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/002517, mailed on Mar. 20, 2012, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2011/037518, mailed on Dec. 4, 2012, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2011/038512, mailed on Dec. 13, 2012, 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/037518, mailed on Feb. 9, 2012, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/038512, mailed on Feb. 9, 2012, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2010/002517, mailed on Jun. 1, 2011, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2011/049934, mailed on Mar. 28, 2012, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Klute S., et al., “Fiber-Optic Shape Sensing and Distributed Strain Measurements on a Morphing Chevron,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2006, pp. 1-23. [cited by applicant]
MacPherson W.N., et al., “Pitch and Roll Sensing Using Fibre Bragg Gratings in Multicore Fibre,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2004, vol. 15 (8), pp. 1642. [cited by applicant]
Miller G.A., et al., “Shape Sensing Using Distributed Fiber Optic Strain Measurements,” Proceedings of SPIE—Second European Workshop on Optical Fibre Sensors, 2004, vol. 5502, pp. 528-531. [cited by applicant]
Office Action and English Translation mailed Jan. 23, 2014 for Chinese Application No. CN201080041709.6. [cited by applicant]
Vertut, J., and Coiffet, P., “Robot Technology: Teleoperation and Robotics Evolution and Development.” English translation, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Inglewood Cliffs, NJ, USA 1986, vol. 3A, 332 pages. [cited by applicant]
Zhao D., et al., “Implementation of Vectorial Bend Sensors Using Long-Period Gratings UV-Inscribed in Special Shape Fibres,” Measurement Science and Technology, 2004, vol. 15 (8), pp. 1647-1650. [cited by applicant]