IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,236,794
Granted Patent B2
US 12,236,794 · App. 17/539,107 · Granted Feb 25, 2025

Aircraft arrival management systems and methods

Inventors: Veeresh Kumar Masaru Narasimhulu (Bangalore, IN); Ajaya Srikanta Bharadwaja (Bangalore, IN)
Assignee: The Boeing Company
G08G5/025G08G5/0043G08G5/0091G08G5/045
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,236,794
App. No.
17/539,107
Granted
Feb 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for aircraft arrival management are disclosed. The system is configured to control a timing of landing between a leading and a trailing aircraft by calculating backward trajectories for each of the aircraft from a common touchdown point on a runway. The system is further configured to compute a delta distance, based on a separation threshold distance, corresponding to a travel distance for the trailing aircraft along an arc centered around a merge point, before turning towards a merge point.

Claims (62)

1. A method of controlling timing of aircraft landing, comprising:

providing a backward trajectory management system, including one or more processors and a memory having a plurality of stored instructions, and

using the backward trajectory management system to:

receive traffic and airspace data for a plurality of aircraft, including aircraft position and trajectory, weather data, and aircraft performance data, from external sources including an Arrival Manager and automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast system,

select a first leading aircraft and a first trailing aircraft of the plurality of aircraft, each aircraft being on a flight path configured for landing on a runway,

determine an adequate separation distance between the first leading aircraft and the first trailing aircraft to provide safe landing,

back calculate a trajectory profile from a touchdown point on the runway, to a current airspace position of the first leading aircraft, and estimating when the first leading aircraft will arrive at the touchdown point based on the received traffic and airspace data for the first leading aircraft,

back calculate a trajectory profile from the touchdown point to a current airspace position of the first trailing aircraft, and determine a time point when the first trailing aircraft will intersect an arc having a merge point as a center, based on the received traffic and airspace data for the first trailing aircraft,

stop back calculation of the trajectory profile for the first leading aircraft at the time point when the first trailing aircraft will intersect the arc,

calculate a delta distance (L) that the first trailing aircraft should travel along the arc before turning toward the merge point to provide adequate separation between the first leading aircraft and the first trailing aircraft for safe landing, and

synchronously communicate calculated trajectory profiles and an altered flight path for the first trailing aircraft including the delta distance (L) with an Air Traffic Control operator.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

redesignating the first trailing aircraft as a second leading aircraft, and selecting a second trailing aircraft,

back calculating trajectories of the second leading aircraft and the second trailing aircraft from the touchdown point, and

calculating a delta distance (L) corresponding to a travel distance (L) of the second trailing aircraft along the arc before turning toward the merge point to provide adequate separation between the second leading aircraft and the second trailing aircraft for safe landing.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

determining if the second trailing aircraft is faster than the second leading aircraft, and if so, adding an extension distance (E) to the delta distance (L) corresponding to a travel distance (L+E) of the second trailing aircraft along the arc before turning toward the merge point.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the extension distance (E) is calculated by:

calculating a time to touchdown for the second leading aircraft, and

adding the time to touchdown for the second leading aircraft to a flight time of the second trailing aircraft along the arc before turning toward the merge point.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a threshold separation point where a distance from the threshold separation point to the first leading aircraft is above a separation threshold (R), and

calculating the delta distance (L) corresponding to a distance between the threshold separation point and the arc.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the delta distance (L) is zero when the threshold separation point is inside the arc.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

using aerodynamic coefficients of the first leading aircraft in a three degree of freedom kinematic modeling of the first leading aircraft's dynamic motion, and

using aerodynamic coefficients of the first trailing aircraft in a three degree of freedom kinematic modeling of the first trailing aircraft's dynamic motion.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

adjusting back calculations based on changing wind conditions.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

assigning the first trailing aircraft to one of multiple arcs having a common center at the merge point.

10. The method of claim 1 , further including selecting the arc with the backward trajectory management system to minimize the delta distance (L) needed to provide the determined adequate separation distance based on the received traffic and airspace data.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the adequate separation distance is determined based on data received from the Arrival Manager and a Flight Management System, and input received from the Air Traffic Control operator.

12. A method of controlling timing of aircraft landing, comprising:

providing a backward trajectory management system, including a digital processing system and a memory including stored instructions,

receiving traffic and airspace data from a plurality of aircraft, including aircraft position and trajectory, weather data, and aircraft performance specifications,

selecting a first leading aircraft and a first trailing aircraft of the plurality of aircraft, each aircraft being on a flight path configured for landing on a runway,

back calculating flight trajectories for each aircraft from a touchdown point on the runway based on the received traffic and airspace data,

determining a threshold separation distance (D) required between the leading and trailing aircraft for safe landing,

calculating a delta distance (L), based on the threshold separation distance (D), corresponding to a travel distance (L) of the first trailing aircraft along an arc centered around a merge point, before turning toward the merge point, and

synchronously communicating calculated trajectories with an Air Traffic Control system.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the threshold separation distance (D) is a distance from the leading aircraft to a separation threshold point beyond the arc.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the delta distance (L) is a distance from the separation threshold point to the arc.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the delta distance is zero when the separation threshold point is inside the arc.

16. The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

redesignating the first trailing aircraft as a second leading aircraft, and selecting a second trailing aircraft,

back calculating trajectories of the second leading aircraft and the second trailing aircraft from the touchdown point runway based on the received traffic and airspace data, and

calculating a delta distance (L) corresponding to a travel distance (L) of the second trailing aircraft along the arc before turning toward the merge point to provide adequate separation between the second leading aircraft and the second trailing aircraft.

17. A system for controlling timing of aircraft landing, comprising:

one or more processors,

a memory including one or more digital storage devices,

a radar communication system providing communication with Air Traffic Control, and

a plurality of instructions stored in the memory and executable by the one or more processors to:

receive traffic and airspace data for a plurality of aircraft, including aircraft position and trajectory, weather data, and aircraft performance specifications,

back calculate flight trajectories for each of a leading aircraft and a trailing aircraft from a common touchdown point on a runway based on the received traffic and airspace data,

determine a threshold separation distance (D) required between the leading and trailing aircraft for safe landing,

calculate a delta distance (L), based on the threshold separation distance (D), corresponding to a travel distance (L) of the trailing aircraft along an arc centered around a merge point, before turning toward the merge point, and

synchronously communicate calculated trajectories with an Air Traffic Control system.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the threshold separation distance (D) is a distance from the leading aircraft to a separation threshold point beyond the arc.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the delta distance (L) is a distance from the separation threshold point to the arc.

20. The system of claim 17 , wherein the plurality of instructions are further executable by the one or more processors to:

determine if the trailing aircraft is faster than the leading aircraft, and if so, add an extension distance (E) to the delta distance (L) corresponding to a travel distance (L+E) of the trailing aircraft along the arc before turning toward the merge point.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 30, 2021
From: NARASIMHULU, VEERESH KUMAR MASARU; BHARADWAJA, AJAYA SRIKANTA
To: THE BOEING COMPANY
Reel/Frame 058946/0266 →
Priority Claims (1)
IN 202011051285 · Nov 25, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230169876A1 · Jun 1, 2023
References Cited (32)
US 7877197B2 · Lewis et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8107961B1 · Vargantwar et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8682316B2 · Lynch et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9355566B2 · Garrido-Lopez et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9430948B2 · Henderson · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 10269251B2 · Berge · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10402675B2 · Owechko · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20140343760A1 · Le Gall et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150081198A1 · Garrido-Lopez · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20150120100A1 · Sacle et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160362194A1 · Boyer · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20170018196A1 · Shay · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180009545A1 · Black, Jr. et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180061243A1 · Sloosh · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180218615A1 · Myr · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180284813A1 · Boyer et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200023994A1 · Lax · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200202724A1 · De Riese · 2020 [cited by examiner]
EP 2849167A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
EP 3671695A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
GB 2589302A · 2021 [cited by examiner]
JP 2016062449A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013078461A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
Computation of Optimal Profiles in Descent and Approach Phases Ramon Andreu Altava Hal science (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
Successive Convexification for 6-DoF Powered Descent Guidance with Compound State-Triggered Constraints-Szmuk et al, AIAA Scitech Forum (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
Wong, Cheryl Sze Yin et al., “CDAS: A Cognitive Decision-Making Architecture for Dynamic Airspace Sectorization for Efficient Operations.” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 20.5 (2018): 1659-1668. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report regarding European Patent Application No. 21194233.9, dated Feb. 22, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
European Patent Office, Extended European Search Report regarding European Patent Application No. 21194037.4, dated Feb. 24, 2022, 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Gianazza et al., “Learning Air Traffic Controller Workload from Past Section Operations”, HAL open science, HAL Id: hal-01592233, submitted on Sep. 22, 2017, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/539,096, dated Feb. 14, 2024, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
Ribeiro et al., Review of Conflict Resolution Methods for Manned and Unmanned Aviation, Aerospace 2020, 7, 79; doi:10.3390/ aerospace7060079, Jun. 16, 2020, 37 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action regarding U.S. Appl. No. 17/539,096, dated Jun. 12, 2024, 22 pages. [cited by applicant]