IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,242,929
Granted Patent B2
US 12,242,929 · App. 17/019,531 · Granted Mar 4, 2025

Fano-based information theoretic method (FBIT) for design and optimization of nonlinear systems

Inventors: John A. Malas (Kettering, OH); Patricia A. Ryan (Centerville, OH); John A. Cortese (Reading, MA)
Assignee: United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force
G06N20/00G01S7/021G01S7/38G06F18/295G06V20/41
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,242,929
App. No.
17/019,531
Granted
Mar 4, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods are provided for identifying and quantifying information loss in a system due to uncertainty and analyzing the impact on the reliability of system performance. Models and methods join Fano's equality with the Data Processing Inequality in a Markovian channel construct in order to characterize information flow within a multi-component nonlinear system and allow the determination of risk and characterization of system performance upper bounds based on the information loss attributed to each component. The present disclosure additionally includes methods for estimating the sampling requirements and for relating sampling uncertainty to sensing uncertainty. The present disclosure further includes methods for determining the optimal design of components of a nonlinear system in order to minimize information loss, while maximizing information flow and mutual information.

Claims (48)

1. A radar design and tuning system comprising:

a) a computer comprising an input/output controller, a random access memory unit, a hard drive memory unit, a unifying computer bus system and a central processing unit comprising an entropy computation processer, said input/output controller being configured to receive a digital signal from said instrumentation interface unit and transmit said digital signal to said central processing unit comprising said entropy computation processer; said central processing unit programmed to identify and characterize a component-level information loss in a nonlinear system configured to observe a target, the nonlinear system comprising a plurality of components with each component of the plurality having a control parameter, and the plurality of components of the nonlinear system being subject to at least one random input variable, via:

determining, for the nonlinear system, a true target state and a decision state, the true target and decision states being characterized in a Markovian channel model;

modeling settings of the at least one random input variable to create a plurality of distributions, wherein each distribution comprises values ranging from a theoretical maximum entropy to a theoretical minimum entropy;

calculating an entropy at each component of the plurality that is attributable to the respective control parameter wherein the entropy for each component of the plurality is directly related to an amount of uncertainty at each respective component of the plurality;

computing a mutual information between the true state and the decision state;

calculating the mutual information for each component of the plurality between the true target state and the respective component;

deriving, using Fano's inequality, a bound for a component probability of error for each component of the plurality using the mutual information associated with the respective component of the plurality;

determining the optimal design of components of the nonlinear system that minimize information loss, while maximizing information flow and mutual information; and

generating a design model for the nonlinear system to guide production;

b) an instrumentation interface unit, said instrumentation interface unit placing said computer in communication with a radar system; and

c) a communication device for communicating an output from said central processing unit to a human and/or an information storage device.

2. The radar design and tuning system of claim 1 , wherein said central processing unit is further programmed to:

compute a reliability of the probability of error of each component of the plurality and attributing a contribution of each random input variable to the reliability of the probability of error using real world samples of system uncertainty parameters based on information from a selected one or more of: (i) actual events; and (ii) experiments, the method comprising:

determine a real world statistical variation of the at least one random input variable based on the real world samples;

perform a Monte-Carlo simulation of the statistical variations to calculate a statistical distribution of the probability of error for each component of the plurality;

determine the reliability based on a standard deviation of the statistical distribution of the probability of error for each component of the plurality; and

correlating the contribution of each random input variable to the reliability.

3. The radar design and tuning system of claim 2 , wherein said instrumentation interface unit comprises a hardware-in-the-loop facility.

4. The radar design and tuning system of claim 2 , wherein said central processing unit is further programmed to determine a proper ensemble sample size while performing the Monte-Carlo simulation.

5. The radar design and tuning system of claim 2 , wherein said central processing unit is further programmed to:

determine an ensemble sampling requirement for the method of claim 1 , the method comprising:

determine a set of test criteria for a maximum allowable sampling uncertainty of the mutual information relative to the standard deviation of the reliability probability of error;

determine a sample ensemble size for the mutual information using a phase transition method; and

compute the reliability using a numerical simulation method on the sample ensemble size.

6. The radar design and tuning system of claim 5 , wherein the numerical simulation method comprises Monte Carlo modeling.

7. The radar design and tuning system of claim 2 , wherein performing the Monte-Carlo simulation further comprises:

introducing a plurality of random input variables.

8. The radar design and tuning system of claim 7 , wherein said central processing unit is further programmed to:

correlate the each random input variable of the plurality to the its respective contribution to the reliability, the standard deviation of the distributions of the probabilities of error at each component, or both.

9. A radar design and tuning system comprising:

a) a computer comprising an input/output controller, a random access memory unit, a hard drive memory unit, a unifying computer bus system and a central processing unit comprising an entropy computation processer, said input/output controller being configured to receive a digital signal from said instrumentation interface unit and transmit said digital signal to said central processing unit comprising said entropy computation processer; said central processing unit programmed to: characterize information in a nonlinear system comprising a component characterized by a design control parameter, and the nonlinear system having a decision state and a true state, said programming comprising:

computing a mutual information between the decision state and the true state of the nonlinear system;

modeling a range for the design control parameter;

calculating an entropy at the component;

calculating an information loss at the component that is attributable to the control parameter;

determining the optimal design of components of the nonlinear system that optimize the design control parameter that minimizes information loss while maximizing information flow and mutual information;

computing a reliability of the system by:

defining a random input variable;

iteratively calculating a statistical distribution of the probability of error by iteratively modeling random input variable settings;

determining a standard deviation for the component-level statistical distribution of the reliability probability of error; and

correlating the random input variable setting to the standard deviation;

b) an instrumentation interface unit, said instrumentation interface unit placing said computer in communication with a radar system; and

c) a communication device for communicating an output from said central processing unit to a human and/or an information storage device.

10. The radar design and tuning system of claim 9 , wherein said programming comprises iteratively calculating a statistical distribution of the probability of error performing the Monte-Carlo simulation further comprises:

introducing a plurality of random input variables.

11. The radar design and tuning system of claim 10 , wherein said programming further comprising:

correlating the each random input variable of the plurality to the its respective contribution to the reliability, the standard deviation of the distributions of the probabilities of error at each component, or both.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2022
From: MALAS, JOHN A; RYAN, PATRICIA A; CORTESE, JOHN; GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
To: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AS REPRSENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
Reel/Frame 060211/0007 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation In Part 16666516 · Oct 29, 2019
Continuation In Part 14315365 · Jun 26, 2014
Provisional Application 61914429 · Dec 11, 2013
Related Publication 20210072348A1 · Mar 11, 2021
References Cited (50)
US 2790165A · Lien · 1957 [cited by applicant]
US 6337654B1 · Richardson et al. · 2002 [cited by applicant]
US 7002509B2 · Karisson · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 7692573B1 · Funk · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8026844B2 · Fox et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8085186B1 · Malakian et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8242952B1 · Barr · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8243989B2 · Vendrig · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8244469B2 · Cheung et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8259006B2 · Culkin · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 8350749B1 · Malas et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8872693B1 · Malas et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20030101451A1 · Bentolila · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20030164792A1 · Jahangir et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 20060284761A1 · Picard · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20070139251A1 · Shu · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20070146195A1 · Wallenberg et al. · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 20080184367A1 · McMillan · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 20090002224A1 · Khatib et al. · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20090299497A1 · Luko · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100109938A1 · Oswald et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110241928A1 · Oswald et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
J. A. Malas and J. A. Cortese, “The radar information channel and system uncertainty,” 2010 IEEE Radar Conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2010, pp. 144-149, doi: 10.1109/RADAR.2010.5494635. (Year: 2010). [cited by examiner]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/666,516 mailed Aug. 24, 2023, 76 pages total. [cited by applicant]
Principe et al., “Learning from examples with information theoretic criteria,” J VLSI Sign. Proc., vol. 26 (2000) 61-77. [cited by applicant]
Bell, “Information theory and radar: mutual information and the design and analysis of radar waveforms and systems,” Thesis for California Institute of Technology (1988). [cited by applicant]
Briles, “Information theoretic performance bounding of Bayesian identifiers,” Proc. SPIE, vol. 1960, vol. 1960 (1993) 255. [cited by applicant]
Wyner, “The common information of two dependent random variables,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. IT-21 (1975) 163-179. [cited by applicant]
Fuhrmann et al., “Transmit beamforming for MIMO radar systems using partial signal correlations,” 38th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers (2004) 295-299. [cited by applicant]
Malas et al., “Information theory based radar signature analysis,” IEEE Aerospace Conf. (2007) 13 pages total. [cited by applicant]
Malas et al., “The radar information channel and system uncertity,” IEEE Radar Conf. (2010) 144-149. [cited by applicant]
Malas et al., “The radar system and information flow,” 2nd Int'l Workshop on Cognitive Information Processing (2010) 17-22. [cited by applicant]
Tishby et al., “Chapter 19: The information theory of decision and action,” Perception-Action Cycle: Models, Architectures, and Hardware. (2011) Ed: Cutsuridis, Springer, 601-636. [cited by applicant]
Pasala et al., “HRR radar signature database validation for ATR: An information theoretic approach,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 27 (2011) 1045-1059. [cited by applicant]
Ahlswede et al., “Network information flow,” IEEE Trans. Infor. Theory, vol. 46 (2000) 1204-1216. [cited by applicant]
Malas et al., “Radar signature analysis using information theory,” IEEE Radar Conference (2008) 6 pages total. [cited by applicant]
Bell, “Information theory and radar waveform design,” IEEE Trans. Information Theory, vol. 39 (1993) 1578-1597. [cited by applicant]
Leshem et al., “Information theoretic adaptive radar waveform design for multiple extended targets,” IEEE Trans. Selected Topics Signal Processing, vol. 1 (2007) 42-55. [cited by applicant]
Cooper et al., “Information gain in object recognition via sensor fusion,” Int'l Conference Multisource-Multisensor Data Fusion, (1998) 143-148. [cited by applicant]
Han et al., “Generalizating the Fano inequality,” IEEE Trans. Info. Theory, vol. 40 (1994) 1247-1251. [cited by applicant]
Tishby et al., “The information bottleneck method,” Prc. 37th Allerton Conf. on Comm. and Comp. (1999) Ed: Hajek et al., Univ. Illinois. 368-377. [cited by applicant]
O'Sullivan et al., “SAR ATR performance using a conditionally Gaussian model,” IEEE Trans. Aerospace Electronic Systems, vol. 37 (2001) 91-108. [cited by applicant]
Geiger et al., “Information loss in static nonlinearities,” 8th International Symposium (2011) 799-803. [cited by applicant]
Merhav, “Data processing inequalities based on a certain structured class of information measures with application to estimation theory,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 58 (2012) 5287-5301. [cited by applicant]
Horne et al., “An information theory for the prediction of SAR target classification performance,” Proc. SPIE (2001) 404-415. [cited by applicant]
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Non-Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 16/666,516 mailed Oct. 31, 2022, 96 pages total. [cited by applicant]
Hassan, Rania et al. “Spacecraft Reliability-Based Design Optimization under Uncertainty Including Discrete Variables.” AIAA Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets vol. 45 No. 2 [Published 2008][Retrieved Jan. 2022] <DOI: : … [cited by applicant]
Heard, Nicholas, and Melissa Turcotte. “Monte Carlo convergence of rival samplers.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.2534 (2013). (Year: 2013). [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/666,516, filed Oct. 29, 2019, Non-Final Office Action dated Jan. 20, 2022, 49 pages. [cited by applicant]
U.S. Appl. No. 16/666,516, filed Oct. 29, 2019, Non-Final Office Action dated Aug. 2, 2024, 34 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,596,175