IP Library Granted Patent US 12,247,259
Granted Patent B2
US 12,247,259 · App. 17/521,333 · Granted Mar 11, 2025

Using nucleic acid size range for noninvasive cancer detection

Inventors: Yuk-Ming Dennis Lo (Homantin, CN); Rossa Wai Kwun Chiu (Shatin, CN); Kwan Chee Chan (Mei Foo Sun Chuen, CN); Peiyong Jiang (Pak Shek Kok, CN)
Assignees: The Chinese University of Hong Kong; GRAIL, Inc.
C12Q1/6886C12Q1/6883C12Q1/6809C12Q2600/154C12Q2600/156
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,247,259
App. No.
17/521,333
Granted
Mar 11, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Size-band analysis is used to determine whether a chromosomal region exhibits a copy number aberration or an epigenetic alteration. Multiple size ranges may be analyzed instead of focusing on specific sizes. By using multiple size ranges instead of specific sizes, methods may analyze more sequence reads and may be able to determine whether a chromosomal region exhibits a copy number aberration even when clinically-relevant DNA may be a low fraction of the biological sample. Using multiple ranges may allow for the use of all sequence reads from a genomic region, rather than a selected subset of reads in the genomic region. The accuracy of analysis may be increased with higher sensitivity at similar or higher specificity. Analysis may include fewer sequencing reads to achieve the same accuracy, resulting in a more efficient process.

Claims (56)

1. A method of determining a cancer classification in a biological sample from a subject, wherein the biological sample includes a mixture of cell-free DNA molecules including tumor DNA molecules and non-tumor DNA molecules, wherein the biological sample comprises plasma or serum, the method comprising:

performing a physical size separation of the biological sample for a range of sizes of the cell-free DNA molecules to form an enriched biological sample;

performing methylation-aware sequencing to identify methylated cell-free DNA molecules in the enriched biological sample;

for each size range of a plurality of size ranges:

measuring a first amount of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules from the enriched biological sample corresponding to the size range, and

determining, by a computer system, a methylation level using the first amount of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules corresponding to the size range and a second amount of DNA molecules in a second size range that includes sizes not in the size range;

obtaining, by the computer system, a reference size pattern including a reference methylation level for each size range of the plurality of size ranges, wherein the reference size pattern is determined from a plurality of reference samples from subjects with cancer or from subjects without cancer;

comparing, by the computer system, a plurality of the methylation levels to the reference size pattern; and

determining a level of cancer based on the comparison.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second amount is of methylated cell-free DNA molecules.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the methylated cell-free DNA molecules are from a chromosomal arm.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

comparing the plurality of the methylation levels to the reference size pattern comprises:

comparing each methylation level of the plurality of size ranges to the reference methylation level at the corresponding size range,

determining that each methylation level is statistically similar to the reference methylation level at the corresponding size range.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

comparing the plurality of the methylation levels to the reference size pattern comprises:

determining a size pattern including the plurality of the methylation levels for the plurality of size ranges;

comparing a slope or an inflection point of the size pattern with a threshold value for a reference slope or a reference inflection point of the reference size pattern, wherein the threshold value indicates a statistically significant difference between the slope and the reference slope or the inflection point with the reference inflection point,

based on the comparing, determining the size pattern has a similar shape as the reference size pattern when the slope or the inflection point is not statistically different than the reference slope or the reference inflection point of the reference size pattern.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein:

the reference size pattern is determined from the plurality of reference samples from subjects with cancer,

the method further comprising:

determining that the subject has cancer.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first amount of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules is from a genomic region.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the genomic region is a chromosomal arm, the chromosomal arm selected from the group consisting of 1p, 1q, 8p, 8q, 13q, and 14q.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the plurality of the methylation levels to the reference size pattern comprises comparing the plurality of the methylation levels to a plurality of threshold values that are determined from the plurality of reference samples.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the plurality of size ranges comprises M size ranges,

measuring the first amount of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules comprises measuring the first amount of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules corresponding to the size range and corresponding to each genomic region for N genomic regions,

calculating the methylation level using the first amount of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules corresponding to the size range and corresponding to the genomic region and the second amount generates a measurement vector of N×M methylation levels, wherein N is an integer greater than or equal to 1, and M is an integer greater than 1,

the reference size pattern includes a reference vector of reference methylation levels for the N genomic regions and the M size ranges, and

comparing the plurality of the methylation levels to the reference size pattern comprises comparing the measurement vector to the reference vector.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

measuring a size of each methylated cell-free DNA molecule of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules by:

obtaining sequence reads from both ends of the methylated cell-free DNA molecule,

aligning the sequence reads to a reference genome to obtain genomic coordinates of the ends of the methylated cell-free DNA molecule, and

subtracting the genomic coordinate of one end from the genomic coordinate of the other end.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

measuring a size of each methylated cell-free DNA molecule of the methylated cell-free DNA molecules using sequence reads, wherein the sequence reads are obtained by massively parallel sequencing.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the methylated cell-free DNA molecules comprise 1,000 molecules.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the methylation-aware sequencing includes bisulfite sequencing, sequencing preceded by methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion, immunoprecipitation using anti-methylcytosine antibody or methylation binding protein, or single molecule sequencing.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the methylation level comprises:

calculating a ratio of the first amount to the second amount,

determining a difference between the ratio and an average value for a control group, and

dividing the difference by a standard deviation for the control group.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of size ranges comprises at least 71 size ranges.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparing, by the computer system, the plurality of the methylation levels to the reference size pattern comprises using a machine learning model trained using datasets including samples from subjects with cancer and subjects without cancer.

18. The method of claim 10 , wherein N is at least 4 and M is at least 71.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the range of sizes comprises sizes including 100 bp to 140 bp.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the range of sizes comprises sizes including 50 bp to 400 bp.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the range of sizes comprises sizes including 385 bp to 425 bp.

22. The method of claim 1 , further comprising training the machine learning model, wherein training the machine learning model comprises:

collecting the datasets including the samples from the subjects with cancer and the subjects without cancer, and

training the machine learning model using the datasets.

23. The method of claim 1 , wherein the physical size separation includes gel electrophoresis, filtration, selective-size precipitation, or hybridization.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 15, 2021
From: LO, YUK-MING DENNIS; CHIU, ROSSA WAI KWUN; CHAN, KWAN CHEE; JIANG, PEIYONG
To: THE CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG; GRAIL, INC.
Reel/Frame 058117/0308 →
Continuity (3)
Division 16178378 · Nov 1, 2018
Provisional Application 62580906 · Nov 2, 2017
Related Publication 20220064714A1 · Mar 3, 2022
References Cited (48)
US 8620593B2 · Lo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 8706422B2 · Lo et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 9732390B2 · Lo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 11116835B2 · McGuire · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20120208711A1 · Cortese · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130237431A1 · Lo et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140080715A1 · Lo et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150011403A1 · Lo et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20150087529A1 · Lo et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160017419A1 · Chiu et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170220736A1 · Lo et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20200335215A1 · Rabizadeh · 2020 [cited by examiner]
CN 105243295 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
CN 106795562A · 2017 [cited by applicant]
CN 106886688 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009013496 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2009051842 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014043763 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016008451 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016112850 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016116033 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2019085988 · 2019 [cited by examiner]
Bartak et al Gastroenterology. May 2014. 146.5, Suppl. 1: S324 (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Grunt et al Transl Cancer res. 2018. 7(Suppl 2): S171-S184 (Year: 2018). [cited by examiner]
English translation of Office Action mailed Aug. 2, 2022 in JP Patent Application No. 2020-544091. 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Jiang, Peiyong et al.; “The Long and Short of Circulating Cell-Free DNA and the Ins and Outs of Molecular Diagnostics”; Trends in Genetics; Jun. 2016; vol. 32, No. 6; pp. 360-371. [cited by applicant]
Yu, Stephanie C. et al.; “Combined Count- and Size-Based Analysis of Maternal Plasma DNA for Noninvasive Prenatal Detection of Fetal Subchromosomal Aberrations Facilitates Elucidation of the Fetal and/or Maternal Origin… [cited by applicant]
European Application No. EP18874285.2 , Extended European Search Report mailed on Jul. 14, 2021, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Chan et al., Size Distributions of Maternal and Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma, Clinical Chemistry, vol. 50, No. 1, Jan. 2004, pp. 88-92. [cited by applicant]
Chiu et al., Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Fetal Chromosomal Aneuploidy by Massively Parallel Genomic Sequencing of DNA in Maternal Plasma, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, No. 51, Dec. 23,… [cited by applicant]
Fan et al., Analysis of the Size Distributions of Fetal and Maternal Cell-Free DNA by Paired-End Sequencing, Clinical Chemistry, vol. 56, No. 8, Aug. 2010, pp. 1279-1286. [cited by applicant]
Fan et al., Non-Invasive Prenatal Measurement of the Fetal Genome, Nature, vol. 487, Jul. 19, 2012, pp. 320-326. [cited by applicant]
Flusberg et al., Direct Detection of DNA Methylation During Single-Molecule, Real-Time Sequencing, Nature Methods, vol. 7, No. 6, Jun. 2010, pp. 461-465. [cited by applicant]
Jiang et al., Lengthening and Shortening of Plasma DNA in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 112, No. 11, Feb. 2, 2015, pp. E1317-E1325. [cited by applicant]
Lo et al., Maternal Plasma DNA Sequencing Reveals the Genome-Wide Genetic and Mutational Profile of the Fetus, Science Translational Medicine, vol. 2, No. 61, Dec. 2010, pp. 1-13. [cited by applicant]
Lo et al., Plasma Nucleic Acid Analysis by Massively Parallel Sequencing: Pathological Insights and Diagnostic Implications, Journal of Pathology, vol. 225, No. 3, Aug. 24, 2011, pp. 318-323. [cited by applicant]
Lun et al., Noninvasive Prenatal Methylomic Analysis by Genomewide Bisulfite Sequencing of Maternal Plasma DNA, Clinical Chemistry, vol. 59, No. 11, Nov. 2013, pp. 1583-1594. [cited by applicant]
International Application No. PCT/CN2018/113640, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed on Feb. 1, 2019, 13 pages. [cited by applicant]
Schreiber et al., Error Rates for Nanopore Discrimination among Cytosine, Methylcytosine, and Hydroxymethylcytosine along Individual DNA Strands, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 110, No. 47, Nov. 1… [cited by applicant]
Soto et al., The Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing on the DNA Methylation-Based Translational Cancer Research, Translational Research, vol. 169, Mar. 2016, pp. 1-18. [cited by applicant]
Vaca-Paniagua et al., Targeted Deep DNA Methylation Analysis of Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Plasma using Massively Parallel Semiconductor Sequencing, Epigenomics, Volume 7, Issue 3, 2015, pp. 353-362. [cited by applicant]
Yu et al., Size-Based Molecular Diagnostics Using Plasma DNA for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 111, No. 23, Jun. 10, 2014, pp. 8583-8588. [cited by applicant]
English translation of Office Action and Search Report mailed Feb. 10, 2023 in TW Patent Application No. 107139084. 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
English translation of Office Action mailed Apr. 4, 2023 in JP Patent Application No. 2020-544091. 3 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action dated Mar. 6, 2024 in IL Patent Application No. 274097. 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report No. 1 dated Apr. 26, 2024 in AU Patent Application No. 2018359944. 5 pages. [cited by applicant]
English translation of Office Action mailed Nov. 26, 2024 in JP Patent Application No. 2023-127899. 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
English translation of Office Action dated Dec. 24, 2024 in KR Patent Application No. 10-2020-7014693. 7 pages. [cited by applicant]