IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,251,775
Granted Patent B2
US 12,251,775 · App. 16/229,217 · Granted Mar 18, 2025

Methods and devices for determining a reference focus position of a beam of beam-based machine tools by performing test cuts on a workpiece

Inventor: Jeremy Meyer (Leonberg, DE)
Assignee: TRUMPF Laser—und Systemtechnik GmbH
B23K26/048B23K26/0093B23K26/032B23K26/0861B23K26/0884B23K26/38B23K31/12B23K37/0235B23K37/0408
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,251,775
App. No.
16/229,217
Granted
Mar 18, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Disclosed are methods of determining a reference focus position of a beam of a beam-based machine tool. The methods providing a relative motion trajectory defining a discoid area with respect to a surrounding area, the discoid area being connected to the surrounding area via at least one bridge area, and performing a sequence of test cuts on a workpiece, wherein at each test cut, a cutting structure is cut in the workpiece by guiding the beam along the relative motion trajectory and the cutting is performed along the at least one bridge area of the relative motion trajectory at differently set focus positions.

Claims (27)

1. A method for determining a reference focus position of a beam of a beam-based machine tool, the method comprising:

providing a relative motion trajectory that delimits a sequence of discoid areas with respect to a surrounding area, wherein the discoid areas are each connected to the surrounding area via at least one respective bridge area for each discoid area;

performing a plurality of test cuts on a workpiece, wherein at each test cut of the plurality of test cuts, a cutting structure is cut in the workpiece by guiding the beam of the beam-based machine tool along the relative motion trajectory around a discoid area and along the bridge area to form a plurality of cutting structures, wherein each test cut is performed along the at least one bridge area of each of the discoid areas of the relative motion trajectory at a different focus position, wherein test cuts at focus positions that result in narrow cutting widths form a bridge that connects the cutting structure to remaining material of the workpiece, and test cuts at focus positions that result in wide cutting widths that overlap in the bridge area sever the cutting structure from remaining material of the workpiece and cause the cutting structure to fall out of the workpiece;

evaluating whether for a single cutting structure of the plurality of cutting structures, the workpiece has the single cutting structure held by at least one bridge in the discoid area of the relative motion trajectory or whether the workpiece has, in the discoid area of the relative motion trajectory, an opening in the workpiece where the single cutting structure has fallen out of the workpiece, and

assigning the reference focus position, based on the evaluating of the plurality of cutting structures.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating comprises irradiating the associated discoid area and detecting radiation reflected from the held disc and/or radiation passing through the opening in the workpiece.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein evaluating comprises optically recording an image of the workpiece in the area of the sequence of test cuts and processing the image for recognition of held discs and/or openings in the workpiece.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising controlling machining of the workpiece based on a focus position assigned to the reference focus position.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising

identifying a central group of cutting structures, in which the workpiece has a disc held by at least one bridge in the discoid area,

identifying, at the sides of the central group, edge groups of cutting structures, in which the workpiece has an opening in the discoid area, and

assigning a central position of the central group or that is positioned centrally between the edge groups as the reference focus position.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein test cuts are performed in a central area in which the reference focus position is to be expected, and test cuts are performed on both sides of the central area, and/or

wherein the focus positions specific to the test cuts differ by an adjustable, step size in a propagation direction.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the relative motion trajectory in the at least one bridge area comprises two line segments extending along one another and characterized by a predetermined distance, and

wherein, when the workpiece is positioned in the reference focus position, cut widths generated in the bridge area are in the range of 10% to 45% of the predetermined distance.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the relative motion trajectory in the discoid area has a substantially closed annular shape, wherein the substantially closed annular shape merges at ends of the substantially closed annular shape into the two line segments of the at least one bridge area.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the relative motion trajectory comprises two trajectory sections extending substantially mirror-symmetrically, wherein the trajectory sections are formed in a central area as opposite semicircular segments, between which the discoid area is formed, and formed in side areas, which are adjacent to the central area and lay opposite to each other, as spaced apart line segments extending along each other and forming two bridge areas.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the spaced apart line segments extend different distances away from the central area with respect to one another.

11. A machine tool comprising

a laser processing system with a laser system,

a workpiece holder,

a laser processing head, wherein the laser processing head is optically connected to the laser system and a relative motion between the laser processing head and the workpiece holder for guiding a laser beam along a trajectory over the workpiece can be controlled, and

a controller configured to obtain a relative motion trajectory that delimits a sequence of discoid areas with respect to a surrounding area, wherein the discoid areas are each connected to the surrounding area via at least one respective bridge area for each discoid area, wherein the controller is configured to cause the laser beam to perform a plurality of test cuts on the workpiece, wherein at each test cut of the plurality of test cuts, a cutting structure is cut in the workpiece by guiding the laser beam along the relative motion trajectory around a discoid area and along the bridge area to form a plurality of cutting structures, wherein each test cut is performed along the at least one bridge area of each of the discoid areas of the relative motion trajectory at a different focus position;

wherein test cuts at focus positions that result in narrow cutting widths form a bridge that connects the cutting structure to remaining material of the workpiece, and test cuts at focus positions that result in wide cutting widths that overlap in the bridge area sever the cutting structure from remaining material of the workpiece and cause the cutting structure to fall out of the workpiece; and

wherein the controller is further configured to evaluate whether for a single cutting structure of the plurality of cutting structures, the workpiece has the single cutting structure held by at least one bridge area in the discoid area of the relative motion trajectory or whether the workpiece has, in the discoid area of the relative motion trajectory, an opening in the workpiece where the single cutting structure has fallen out of the workpiece, and to assign a reference focus position based on the evaluation of the plurality of cutting structures.

12. The machine tool of claim 11 , further comprising a camera configured to record an image of the cutting structure generated at each test cut in accordance with the relative motion trajectory.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2019
From: MEYER, JEREMY
To: TRUMPF LASER- UND SYSTEMTECHNIK GMBH
Reel/Frame 048138/0962 →
Priority Claims (1)
DE 102016111455.3 · Jun 22, 2016 · national
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTEP2017065291 · Jun 21, 2017
Related Publication 20190111516A1 · Apr 18, 2019
References Cited (55)
US 5682319A · Boland · 1997 [cited by examiner]
US 5856649A · Yamazaki · 1999 [cited by examiner]
US 6046427A · Richter et al. · 2000 [cited by applicant]
US 8304691B2 · Scholich-Tessmann et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 9274517B2 · Otsuki · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 9981357B2 · Lu · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10207360B2 · Wadehn · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 10843296B2 · Mienhardt · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20010042427A1 · Yu · 2001 [cited by examiner]
US 20030052104A1 · Matsumoto · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20040024485A1 · McCoy · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 20050172764A1 · Fagan · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060109757A1 · Nishiwaki · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060138111A1 · Hillebrand et al. · 2006 [cited by applicant]
US 20060157191A1 · Matsuo · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20080101687A1 · Goeller · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080180657A1 · Scholich-Tessmann · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20080185368A1 · Fagan · 2008 [cited by examiner]
US 20090003952A1 · Schmauder · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20090103579A1 · Ushimaru · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20100200552A1 · Mienhardt · 2010 [cited by examiner]
US 20110147347A1 · Maurer · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 20120192690A1 · Norberg Ohlsson · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130200051A1 · Hert · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130200052A1 · Wittwer · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20130327194A1 · Hagenlocher et al. · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140060271A1 · Norberg Ohlsson · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20140339207A1 · Sugiyama · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20190009361A1 · Xu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190099993A1 · Chen · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20190240786A1 · Mach · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200055141A1 · Schürmann · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200189027A1 · Lim · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210346991A1 · Sugiyama · 2021 [cited by examiner]
CN 1199357 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
CN 101028671 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
CN 101815596A · 2010 [cited by examiner]
CN 101534974B · 2012 [cited by examiner]
CN 103350281 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
DE 102007016301 · 2008 [cited by applicant]
DE 102007016301A1 · 2008 [cited by examiner]
DE 102007063627 · 2009 [cited by applicant]
DE 102011004117 · 2012 [cited by applicant]
EP 0437676 · 1991 [cited by applicant]
EP 1750891 · 2007 [cited by applicant]
EP 2163339A1 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
JP 2637523 · 1997 [cited by applicant]
JP H1076384 · 1998 [cited by applicant]
JP 2006508352 · 2006 [cited by applicant]
JP 2011110591 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004050290 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
JP Japanese Office Action in Japanese Appln. No. 2018-566949, dated Feb. 16, 2021, 6 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
CN Office Action in Chinese Appln. No. 201780039204.8, dated Jul. 30, 2020, 15 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/EP2017/065291, mailed on Nov. 13, 2017, 19 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]
Office Action in German Application No. 10 2016 111 455.3, dated Feb. 9, 2017, 10 pages (with English translation). [cited by applicant]