IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,256,952
Granted Patent B2
US 12,256,952 · App. 18/017,004 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

System for the controlled fragmentation of solids by means of vortex sound beams

Inventors: Noé Jiménez González (Valencia, ES); Francisco Camarena Femenia (Valencia, ES); Jose María Benlloch Baviera (Valencia, ES)
Assignees: UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA; CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTÍFICAS (CSIC)
A61B17/2255A61B17/2256B06B1/0215B06B1/0607A61B2017/0011
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,256,952
App. No.
18/017,004
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present invention relates to a system for the controlled fragmentation of solids by means of acoustic beams, comprising at least one acoustic beam generation unit ( 100 ); and one feedback and control unit ( 200 ) of said generation unit ( 100 ). Advantageously, the acoustic beams generated by the system are acoustic vortex beams; and the feedback and control unit ( 200 ) further comprises a feedback subsystem ( 12 ), configured to receive the information relating to the fragmented solids and to utilize it so as to adapt the operation of the acoustic beam generation unit ( 100 ). Given that the generation of shearing stresses is more efficient using vortex beams, the amplitudes of the ultrasonic field needed to fragment the calculi are much lower than in current extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy techniques. Likewise, the system minimizes unwanted effects on soft tissues surrounding the solid.

Claims (29)

1. A system for the controlled fragmentation of solids with acoustic beams, comprising at least:

one acoustic beam generation unit which, in turn, comprises:

an electric pulse generation subsystem;

a first transduction subsystem, adapted for converting electric pulses into acoustic waves;

an acoustic beam generation subsystem for generating acoustic beams from the acoustic waves produced by the transduction subsystem and for focusing said beams in a focal volume in which a solid or solids to be fragmented are located;

an acoustic coupling subsystem, adapted for coupling the acoustic beams to the solid or solids to be fragmented;

a positioning subsystem, adapted for adjusting the position of the focal point;

one feedback and control unit comprising:

a control subsystem, which controls the acoustic beam generation unit;

a second transduction subsystem, adapted for the acquisition of information relating to the acoustic beams;

a processing subsystem for processing the information acquired by the second transduction subsystem;

wherein:

the acoustic beams are acoustic vortex beams;

the feedback and control unit further comprises a feedback subsystem, configured to receive the information processed by the processing subsystem and send the information to the control subsystem; and

the control subsystem is configured to modify, based on the information sent by the feedback subsystem, parameters of the acoustic vortex beams, wherein said parameters comprise the topological charge of the acoustic vortex beams.

2. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the acoustic vortex beams are ultrasonic acoustic vortex beams.

3. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the feedback and control unit comprises a pulse echo ultrasonic imaging subsystem and further comprises a monitoring subsystem for monitoring the solid or solids equipped for the graphical representation of information associated with said solid or solids.

4. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the information processing subsystem comprises real-time measurement of the cavitation produced substantially at the focal point of the system, and wherein the feedback subsystem is further configured to process said information and readjust the acoustic beams striking the mentioned focal point.

5. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem is of the electrohydraulic type, and wherein the acoustic beam generation subsystem comprises a reflector with a helical-ellipsoidal surface for generating the vortex in reflection; and wherein the positioning subsystem is furthermore of the mechanical type for aligning the focal point of the system with the solid to be fragmented.

6. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem is of the electromagnetic type and wherein the acoustic beam generation subsystem comprises a helical-paraboloidal reflector; and wherein the positioning subsystem is furthermore of the mechanical type for aligning the focal point of the system with the solid to be fragmented.

7. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem is of the electromagnetic type and wherein the acoustic beam generation subsystem comprises an acoustic lens.

8. The system according to claim 7 , wherein the acoustic lens furthermore has a helical or helical-ellipsoidal phase profile.

9. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem is of the piezoelectric type and wherein the acoustic beam generation subsystem comprises a multiple element phased array immersed in a fluid; and wherein the positioning subsystem is of the electronic type and configures the delays applied to the excitation signal of each of a plurality of channels of the phased array for readjusting the position of the focal point of the system.

10. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem comprises a single piezoelectric transducer immersed in a fluid, with the arrangement of said transducer on a helical-spheroidal surface being what provides the acoustic beam generation subsystem; and wherein the system further comprises the positioning subsystem of the mechanical type for adjusting the focal point of the system.

11. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem comprises a multiple element piezoelectric transducer immersed in a fluid, with the arrangement of each of a plurality of channels thereof on a helical-spheroidal surface being what provides the acoustic beam generation subsystem; said system further comprising the positioning subsystem of the mechanical type for adjusting the focal point of the system.

12. The system according to claim 1 , wherein the first transduction subsystem is of the piezoelectric type and wherein the acoustic beam generation subsystem comprises an acoustic lens.

13. The system according to claim 12 , wherein the acoustic lens has a helical or helical-ellipsoidal phase profile.

14. The system according to claim 1 , for use in lithotripsy.

15. The system according to claim 14 , wherein the feedback and control unit comprises a plurality of actuators for readjusting the focal point of said system.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 19, 2023
From: JIMÉNEZ GONZÁLEZ, NOÉ; CAMARENA FEMENIA, FRANCISCO; BENLLOCH BAVIERA, JOSE MARÍA
To: UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE VALENCIA; CONSEJO SUPERIOR DE INVESTIGACIONES CIENTIFICAS (CSIC)
Reel/Frame 062426/0282 →
Priority Claims (1)
ES ES202030757 · Jul 20, 2020 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20230346407A1 · Nov 2, 2023
References Cited (30)
US 4865042A · Umemura · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 4928672A · Grasser · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 4957099A · Hassler · 1990 [cited by examiner]
US 5209222A · Viebach · 1993 [cited by applicant]
WO 20010180708A2 · 2001 [cited by applicant]
WO 2004089188A2 · 2004 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2004089188 · 2005 [cited by examiner]
W. Folberth et al., “Pressure distribution and energy flow in the focal region of two different electromagnetic shock wave sources”, J. Stone Dis., 1992, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 1-7. [cited by applicant]
Jimenez et al., “Sharp acoustic vortex focusing by Fresnel-spiral zone plates,” AIP Publishing, Applied Physics Letters, 2018, vol. 112, Issue 20, p. 204101, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cleveland et al., “Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of Storz Modulith SLX”, PubMed, National Library of Medicine, J. Endourol., 2004, vol. 18, Issue 7, pp. 629-633, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
Kim et al., “Cystine calculi: Correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy”, SpringerLink, Urological Research, 2007, vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 319-324, 6… [cited by applicant]
D. L. Sokolov et al., “Dual-pulse lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro,” PubMed, National Library of Medicine, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2003, vol. 29, Issue 7, pp. 1045-1052, 8 page… [cited by applicant]
C. Chaussy et al., “Extracorporeally Induced Destruction of Kidney Stones by Shock Waves”, PubMed, National Library of Medicine, Lancet, 1980, vol. 2, Issue 8207, pp. 1265-1268, 4 pages. [cited by applicant]
C. Bohris et al., “Hit/miss monitoring of ESWL by spectral Doppler ultrasound”, Elsevier, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2003, vol. 29, Issue 5, pp. 705-712, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
X. Xi and P. Zhong, “Improvement of stone fragmentation during shock-wave lithotripsy using a combined EH/PEAA shock-wave generator-in vitro experiments,” Elsevier, Ultrasound Med. Biol., 2000, vol. 26, Issue 3, pp. 457… [cited by applicant]
A. P. Evan et al., “Independent assessment of a wide-focus, low-pressure electromagnetic lithotripter: absence of renal bioeffects in the pig”, Journal Compilation, BJU Int, 2008, vol. 101, Issue 3, pp. 382-388, 7 pages. [cited by applicant]
J. A. McAteer et al., “Independent Evaluation of the Lithogold LG-380 Lithotripter: In Vitro Acoustic Characteristics and Assessment of Renal Injury in the Pig Model”, The Journal of Urology, 2009, vol. 181, Issue 4, pp… [cited by applicant]
R. O. Cleveland and O. A. Sapozhnikov, “Modeling elastic wave propagation in kidney stones with application to shock wave lithotripsy”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2005, vol. 118, Issue 4, pp. 2667-2676, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
K. Maeda et al., “Energy shielding by cavitation bubble clouds in burst wave lithotripsy,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2018, vol. 144, Issue 5, pp. 2952-2961, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
T. G. Leighton and R. O. Cleveland, “Lithotripsy”, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H J. Eng. Med., 2010, vol. 224, Issue 2, pp. 317-342, 26 pages. [cited by applicant]
A. Z. Weizer et al., “New Concepts in Shock Wave Lithotripsy,” Elsevier, Urol. Clin. North Am., 2007, vol. 34, Issue 3, pp. 375-382, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
Y. A. Pishchalnikov et al, “Air Pockets Trapped During Routine Coupling in Dry Head Lithotripsy Can Significantly Decrease the Delivery of Shock Wave Energy,” J. Urol., 2006, vol. 176, Issue 6, pp. 2706-2710, 11. [cited by applicant]
J. J. Rassweiler et al., “Shock Wave Technology and Application: An Update”, Eur. Urol., 2011, vol. 59, Issue 5, pp. 784-796, 23 pages. [cited by applicant]
L. J. Wang et al., “Predictions of outcomes of renal stones after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy from stone characteristics determined by unenhanced helical computed tomography: A multivariate analysis”, Eur. Rad… [cited by applicant]
W. Folberth et al., “Pressure distribution and energy flow in the focal region of two different electromagnetic shock wave sources”, J. Stone Dis., 1992, vol. 4, Issue 1, pp. 1-7, 1 page. [cited by applicant]
J. A. McAteer et al., “Shock Wave Injury to the Kidney in SWL: Review and Perspective”, AIP Publishing, Conference Proceedings, 2007, vol. 900, pp. 287-301, 2007, 16 pages. [cited by applicant]
N. Bhojani and J. E. Lingeman, “Shockwave Lithotripsy—New Concepts and Optimizing Treatment Parameters”, Urol. Clin. North Am., 2013, vol. 40, Issue 1, pp. 59-66, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
N. R. Owen et al., “The use of resonant scattering to identify stone fracture in shock wave lithotripsy”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2007, vol. 121, Issue 1, pp. EL41-EL47, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
F. Fernandez et al, “Treatment time reduction using tandem shockwaves for lithotripsy: An in vivo study,” J. Endourol. 2009, vol. 23, Issue 8, pp. 1247-1253, 8 pages. [cited by applicant]
D. L. Sokolov et al., “Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2001, vol. 110, Issue 3, pp. 1685-1695, 12 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,531,550