IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,259,375
Granted Patent B2
US 12,259,375 · App. 18/704,256 · Granted Mar 25, 2025

Method and apparatus for methane management

Inventors: Kashif Rashid (Cambridge, MA); Lukasz Zielinski (Cambridge, MA); Andrew J. Speck (Cambridge, MA)
Assignee: CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
G01N33/0075G01M3/16G01W1/10G06F30/28
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,259,375
App. No.
18/704,256
Granted
Mar 25, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods presented herein generally relate to greenhouse gas emission management and, more particularly, to a greenhouse gas emission management workflow to perform greenhouse gas detection sensor placement or greenhouse gas leak detection. For example, the system and method enable improved gas sensor arrangements within an oil and gas worksite. In another example, the system and method enable the prediction of a location and a leak rate of a gas leak within an oil and gas production facility based on measurements collected by gas leak sensors disposed within the facility and prevailing wind information.

Claims (34)

1. A greenhouse gas emission analysis (GGEA) system, comprising:

at least one memory configured to store a plume model; and

at least one processor configured to execute stored instructions to perform actions comprising:

receiving gas concentration measurements from gas sensors communicatively coupled to the GGEA system;

receiving wind measurements from wind sensors communicatively coupled to the GGEA system;

convolving the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements into valid event records; and

predicting a location and leak rate of a gas leak within a worksite based at least in part on the valid event records and the plume model, comprising, for each potential gas leak location and each potential gas leak rate:

summing, for each gas sensor of the gas sensors, a cost function value that compares a gas concentration measurement of the gas sensor from a valid event record with a gas concentration predicted for the gas sensor by the plume model using, as input, at least the potential gas leak location, the potential gas leak rate, a location of the gas sensor, and wind measurements of the valid event record; and

selecting the potential gas leak location and the potential gas leak rate that yields a lowest summed cost function value as the predicted location and leak rate of the gas leak.

2. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the plume model is also configured to receive, as input, an initial plume jet momentum and direction, a composition and/or density of a leaking gas, a detailed two dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) worksite plan, an aerial or satellite view of the worksite, atmospheric information, vertical wind profiles, solar radiation intensity, vertical temperature profiles, humidity, cloud cover, presence of inversion layers, atmospheric stability classes, or combinations thereof.

3. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein, to convolve the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements into the valid event records, the at least one processor is configured to execute stored instructions to perform the actions comprising:

synchronizing the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements based on a time at which the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements were collected.

4. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the gas sensors comprise at least one optical gas imaging (OGI) sensor.

5. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the wind measurements comprise at least wind direction, wind speed, and wind variability over time.

6. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to execute stored instructions to perform the actions comprising:

receiving meteorological data from a communicatively coupled external weather service; and

convolving the gas concentration measurements, the wind measurements, and the meteorological data into the valid event records,

wherein at least a portion of the wind measurements are received from the communicatively coupled external weather service.

7. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is configured to execute stored instructions to perform the actions comprising:

storing the valid event records in an event record store in the at least one memory.

8. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the gas leak is a methane gas leak.

9. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the gas sensors, the wind sensors, and the gas leak are disposed within an oil and gas worksite.

10. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the plume model is a Gaussian plume dispersion model, a plume model based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD), a plume model based on trained machine learning models, or a plume model for flow around structures.

11. The GGEA system of claim 1 , wherein the GGEA system is implemented as an edge device in a cloud-based computing environment.

12. A method of predicting a location and leak rate of a gas leak within a worksite, the method comprising:

receiving gas concentration measurements from gas sensors disposed within the worksite;

receiving wind measurements from wind sensors disposed within the worksite;

convolving the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements into valid event records; and

predicting a location and leak rate of a gas leak within the worksite based at least in part on the valid event records and a plume model, comprising, for each potential gas leak location and each potential gas leak rate;

summing, for each gas sensor of the gas sensors, a cost function value that compares a gas concentration measurement of the gas sensor from a valid event record with a gas concentration predicted for the gas sensor by the plume model using, as input, at least the potential gas leak location, the potential gas leak rate, a location of the gas sensor, and wind measurements of the valid event record; and

selecting the potential gas leak location and the potential gas leak rate that yields a lowest summed cost function value as the predicted location and leak rate of the gas leak.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein convolving the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements into the valid event records comprises:

synchronizing the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements based on a time at which the gas concentration measurements and the wind measurements were collected; and

performing data smoothing of the synchronized gas concentration and wind measurements.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2024
From: RASHID, KASHIF; ZIELINSKI, LUKASZ; SPECK, ANDREW J.
To: CAMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067268/0616 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63265122 · Dec 8, 2021
Related Publication 20240418693A1 · Dec 19, 2024
References Cited (45)
US 9322735B1 · Tan · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 11454622B2 · Billat · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20090287520A1 · Zimmerman · 2009 [cited by applicant]
US 20100198736A1 · Marino · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 20110040493A1 · Choi · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20120010917A1 · De Godoi · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20130246027A1 · Rodriguez · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20140081579A1 · Tyburski · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150185194A1 · Prince et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170003684A1 · Knudsen · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170097274A1 · Thorpe et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170147958A1 · Hatfield · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180266240A1 · Jaaskelainen · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180266241A1 · Ferguson · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180292374A1 · Dittberner · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190285600A1 · Klein et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190366400A1 · Chambers · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190386790A1 · Hawinkel · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200240259A1 · Balasubramaniam · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200371079A1 · Abedini · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20220008972A1 · Quigley · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220065834A1 · Gadot · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20230176023A1 · Wang · 2023 [cited by applicant]
KR 20150138941A · 2015 [cited by applicant]
KR 20160008781A · 2016 [cited by applicant]
KR 20200074648A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
WO 2016089979A1 · 2016 [cited by applicant]
WO 2023033832A1 · 2023 [cited by applicant]
Kemp et al., 2021, New Technologiescan Cost-effectively Reduce Oil and 1Gas Methane Emissions, but Policieswill Require Careful2Design to Establish Mitigation Equivalence, published Jan. 22, 2021, non-peer reviewed pre-… [cited by applicant]
RSG, What is Responsibly Sourced Gas, https://www.projectcanary.com/responsibly-sourced-gas/, downloaded on Sep. 3, 2021, copyright 2021 (5 pages). [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/048981 dated Dec. 23, 2021, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion of PCT Application No. PCT/US2021/048977 dated Jun. 3, 2022 9 pages. [cited by applicant]
Alvarez, et al. “Assessment of methane emissions from the US oil and gas supply chain.” Science 361.6398 (2018): 186-188. [cited by applicant]
Stockie, John M. “The mathematics of atmospheric dispersion modeling.” Siam Review 53.2 (2011): 349-372. [cited by applicant]
Briggs, G. A. “Optimum formulas for buoyant plume rise.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences 265.1161 (1969): 197-203. [cited by applicant]
Hanna et al., Handbook on atmospheric diffusion. No. DOE/TIC-11223. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Oak Ridge, TN (USA). Atmospheric Turbulence and Diffusion Lab., 1982. [cited by applicant]
EPA ISC3 method, https://www.epa.gov/scram/air-quality-dispersion-modeling-alternative-models#isc3 (16 pages). [cited by applicant]
EPA OTM33a method, https://www.epa.gov/emc/emc-other-test-methods#Other%20Test%20Methods (20 pages). [cited by applicant]
Fugitive Emissions Abatement Simulation Testbed (FEAST) software, https://github.com/EAOgroup/FEAST (6 pages). [cited by applicant]
Seinfeld et al., Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. John Wiley Sons, 2016, Sections 18.10-18.11, pp. 859-868. [cited by applicant]
Turner, D. Bruce. Workbook of atmospheric dispersion estimates: an introduction to dispersion modeling. CRC press, 1994, Sections 2.4-2.9, pp. 2-3 to 2-13. [cited by applicant]
De Visscher, Alex. Air dispersion modeling: foundations and applications. John Wiley Sons, 2013, sections 6.3-6.5, pp. 145-152. [cited by applicant]
Ponish, A., et al, “Some guidelines for genetic algorithm implementation in MINLP batch plant design”, Advances in Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization: p. 293., Springer, 2007. [cited by applicant]
Whitley, D., “Next generation genetic algorithms: A users guide”, Handbook of Metaheuristics, Springer, 2019, p. 245-274. [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/US2022/081142; Dated Apr. 25, 2023; 12 pages. [cited by applicant]