Variable preemption for LSP tunnels
Variable preemption for label-switched paths (LSP) tunnels includes provisioning a label-switched path (LSP) tunnel at a first bandwidth with a first priority value; and provisioning one or more different priority values at one or more of (1) corresponding one or more bandwidths such that a current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a current bandwidth value of the LSP tunnel and (2) redial failure attempts such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a number of the redial failure attempts. The priority values can include one of a Setup Priority, a Holding Priority, and a combination thereof. The one of the Setup Priority, the Holding Priority, and the combination thereof can be based on RFC 3209.
1. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause at least one processor to perform steps of:
provisioning a label-switched path (LSP) tunnel at a first bandwidth with a first priority value;
provisioning one or more different priority values for the LSP tunnel, wherein the one or more different priority values change a current priority value for the LSP tunnel based on one or more of (1) corresponding one or more bandwidths of the LSP tunnel such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a current bandwidth value of the LSP tunnel and (2) redial failure attempts such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a number of the redial failure attempts;
operating the LSP tunnel at the first priority on the first bandwidth, and
in response to auto-sizing the LSP tunnel based on monitored usage, changing the first priority value due to the auto-sizing, to a second priority value.
2. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the priority values include one of a Setup Priority, a Holding Priority, and a combination thereof.
3. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the steps further include
detecting one or more of the current bandwidth value of the LSP tunnel and the number of the redial attempts, and setting the current priority value of the LSP tunnel based thereon.
4. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the corresponding one or more bandwidths are based on a threshold of bandwidth.
5. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the steps further include
preempting other LSP tunnels or preventing preemption by the other LSP tunnels based on the second priority value.
6. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the current bandwidth value causes a setting to a higher priority value for a higher bandwidth value, thereby allowing the LSP tunnel to preempt a lower priority LSP tunnel.
7. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the current bandwidth value includes different Upgrade and Downgrade thresholds to control oscillations.
8. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 1 , wherein the LSP tunnel is configured over an underlay network comprising one of an optical network, an optical transport network (OTN), a segment routing (SR) network, and a combinations thereof.
9. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 8 , wherein the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on bandwidth on given links in the underlay network.
10. An apparatus comprising:
one or more processors; and
memory storing instructions that, when executed, cause the one or more processors to
cause provisioning of a label-switched path (LSP) tunnel at a first bandwidth with a first priority value,
cause provisioning of one or more different priority values for the LSP tunnel, wherein the one or more different priority values change a current priority value for the LSP tunnel based on one or more of (1) corresponding one or more bandwidths of the LSP tunnel such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a current bandwidth value of the LSP tunnel and (2) redial failure attempts such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a number of the redial failure attempts;
responsive to operating the LSP tunnel at the first priority value based on the first bandwidth and auto-sizing of the LSP tunnel based on monitored usage, changing the first priority value due to the auto-sizing, to a second priority value.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the priority values include one of a Setup Priority, a Holding Priority, and a combination thereof.
12. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the instructions that, when executed, further cause the one or more processors to
detect one or more of the current bandwidth value of the LSP tunnel and the number of the redial attempts, and set the current priority value of the LSP tunnel based thereon.
13. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the corresponding one or more bandwidths are based on a threshold of bandwidth.
14. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the current bandwidth value causes a setting to a higher priority value for a higher bandwidth value, thereby allowing the LSP tunnel to preempt lower a priority LSP tunnel.
15. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the current bandwidth value includes different Upgrade and Downgrade thresholds to control oscillations.
16. The apparatus of claim 10 , wherein the LSP tunnel is configured over an underlay network comprising one of an optical network, an optical transport network (OTN), a segment routing (SR) network, and a combinations thereof.
17. A method comprising steps of:
provisioning a label-switched path (LSP) tunnel at a first bandwidth with a first priority value;
provisioning one or more different priority values for the LSP tunnel, wherein the one or more different priority values change a current priority value for the LSP tunnel based on one or more of (1) corresponding one or more bandwidths of the LSP tunnel such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a current bandwidth value of the LSP tunnel and (2) redial failure attempts such that the current priority value of the LSP tunnel is set based on a number of the redial failure attempts;
operating the LSP tunnel at the first priority value based on the first bandwidth, and
in response to auto-sizing the LSP tunnel based on monitored usage, changing the first priority value due to the auto-sizing, to a second priority value.
18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the steps further include
preempting other LSP tunnels or preventing preemption by the other LSP tunnels based on the second priority value.