IP Library Granted Patent US 12,266,426
Granted Patent B2
US 12,266,426 · App. 16/208,149 · Granted Apr 1, 2025

Method for administering a cancer treatment

Inventors: Shile Zhang (San Diego, CA); Mengchi Wang (La Jolla, CA); Aaron Wise (San Diego, CA); Han Kang (San Diego, CA); Vitor Ferreira Onuchic (San Diego, CA); Kristina Kruglyak (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: Illumina, Inc.
G16B40/20C12Q1/6886G06F17/153G06F17/16G06F17/18G16B45/00G16B50/20G16B50/30G16H50/20G16H50/50
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,266,426
App. No.
16/208,149
Granted
Apr 1, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Provided is a computer-implemented method, including inputting to a trained machine learning classifier genomic information of a non-training subject that includes features from a tumor sample, wherein the trained machine learning classifier trained on features of tumor samples obtained from training subjects and their a responsiveness to checkpoint inhibition treatment and the machine-learning classifier is trained to predict responsiveness to the treatment, and generating a checkpoint inhibition responsiveness classification predictive of the subject's responding to the checkpoint inhibition with the trained machine-learning classifier, and reporting the checkpoint inhibition responsiveness classification using a graphical user interface. Also provided are a computer system for performing the method and a machine learning classifier trained by the method.

Claims (26)

1. A method for administering a cancer treatment, comprising:

a) obtaining a responsiveness score for a non-training subject having cancer, said obtaining comprising:

i) inputting total mutational burden, tumor infiltration, and factor expression of the non-training subject to a machine learning classifier;

wherein total mutational burden comprises one or both of all mutations and nonsynonymous mutations, tumor infiltration comprises any one or more of tumor infiltration by cells expressing cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8), tumor infiltration by cells expressing cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4), and tumor infiltration by cells expressing cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19), and factor expression comprises any one or more of beta 2 microglobulin (B2M) expression, proteasome subunit beta 10 (PSMB10) expression, antigen peptide transmitter 1 (TAP1) expression, antigen peptide transporter 2 (TAP2) expression, human leukocyte antigen A (HLA-A) expression, major histocompatibility complex class I B (HLA-B) expression, major histocompatibility complex class I C (HLA-C) expression, major histocompatibility complex class II DQ alpha 1 (HLA-DQA1) expression, HLA class II histocompatibility antigen DRB1 beta chain (HLA-DRB1) expression, HLA class I histocompatibility antigen alpha chain E (HLA-E) expression, natural killer cell granule protein 7 (NKG7) expression, chemokine like receptor 1 (CMKLR1) expression, granzyme A (GZMA) expression, perforin-1 (PRF1) expression, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4) expression, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) expression, programmed death-ligand 1 (PDL1) expression, programmed cell death 1 ligand 2 (PDL2) expression, lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) expression, T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains (TIGIT) expression, cluster of differentiation 276 (CD276) expression, chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5 (CCL5) expression, cluster of differentiation 27 (CD27) expression, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 9 (CXCL9) expression, C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 6 (CXCR6) expression, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) expression, signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) expression, 3-fucosyl-N-acetyl-lactosamine (CD15) expression, interleukin-2 receptor alpha chain (CD25) expression, siglec-3 (CD33) expression, cluster of differentiation 39 (CD39) expression, cluster of differentiation (CD118) expression, and forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) expression;

wherein the machine learning classifier is selected from the group consisting of a neural network classifier, a support vector machine, a max entropy classifier, an extreme gradient boosting classifier, a random fern classifier, and a random forest classifier,

and wherein the machine learning classifier was trained on said total mutational burden, tumor infiltration, and factor expression of a plurality of training subjects having cancer and a responsiveness of each of said plurality of training subjects to cancer treatment to predict responsiveness of said non-training subject to said cancer treatment; and

ii) generating, using the machine-learning classifier, a responsiveness score for the non-training subject; and

b) administering, based on said obtaining, the cancer treatment to the non-training subject for responsiveness scores that equal or exceed a predetermined threshold of 5;

wherein the cancer treatment is a checkpoint inhibitor selected from an anti-CTLA4 drug, an anti-PD1 drug, an anti-PDL1 drug, and any combination of two or more of said drugs.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein, for the non-training subject, for one or more of the plurality of training subjects, or for the non-training subject and one or more of the plurality of training subjects, at least some of the total mutational burden, at least some of the tumor infiltration, at least some of the factor expression, or any combination of two or more of the foregoing, comprise gene sets.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the gene sets were selected using single sample gene set enrichment analysis.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein at least one total mutational burden, at least one tumor infiltration, or at least one factor expression, comprises an identifier selected from a valence, an importance, and a weight, and further comprising visually reporting the identifier by displaying a graphical user interface on a display connected to a computer or computer system comprising one or more microprocessor and one or more memory wherein the identifier of the non-training subject is stored, wherein the graphical user interface reports identifiers as aspects of an annulus sector, wherein an angle of the annulus sector reports the importance, an outer radius of the annulus sector reports the weight, and a color of the annulus sector reports the valence.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the identifier comprises an importance and the importance comprises a Gini index decrease.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the graphical user interface reports the identifier if and only if the importance is above a threshold.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the importance is not above the threshold if the square of the importance is not above 0.1.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein each of the annulus sectors comprises an inner arc and the inner arcs of the annulus sectors are arranged to form a circle.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising inputting, or having input, to the trained machine learning classifier a responsiveness of the non-training subject to the cancer treatment and further training the machine learning classifier, wherein further training comprises training, or having trained, the trained machine learning classifier on one or more of total mutational burden, tumor infiltration, and factor expression of a tumor sample obtained from the non-training subject and a responsiveness of the non-training subject to the cancer treatment.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cancer treatment is selected from an anti-CTLA4 antibody, an anti-PD1 antibody, an anti-PDL1 antibody, and any combination of two or more of the foregoing.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein

total mutational burden comprises all mutations and nonsynonymous mutations.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the cancer treatment is selected from an anti-CTLA4 antibody, an anti-PD1 antibody, an anti-PDL1 antibody, and any combination of two or more of the foregoing.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein

tumor infiltration comprises tumor infiltration by cells expressing cluster of different 8 (CD8), tumor infiltration by cells expressing cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4), and tumor infiltration by cells expressing cluster of differentiation 19 (CD19).

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the cancer treatment is selected from an anti-CTLA4 antibody, an anti-PD1 antibody, an anti-PDL1 antibody, and any combination of two or more of the foregoing.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the machine learning classifier is a random forest classifier.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein 50,000 trees are used in training the random forest classifier.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2019
From: WISE, AARON
To: ILLUMINA, INC.
Reel/Frame 048802/0607 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2019
From: ZHANG, SHILE; WANG, MENGCHI; KANG, HAN; ONUCHIC, VICTOR FERREIRA
To: ILLUMINA, INC.
Reel/Frame 048813/0685 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 5, 2019
From: KRUGLYAK, KRISTINA M.
To: ILLUMINA, INC.
Reel/Frame 048813/0745 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62593802 · Dec 1, 2017
Related Publication 20200176083A1 · Jun 4, 2020
Related Publication 20230245724A9 · Aug 3, 2023
References Cited (63)
US D506473S · Segal et al. · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US D708636S · Wolfe et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US D736780S · Wang · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9454286B1 · Perttunen · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US D779550S · Yang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US D783673S · Xu · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US D783674S · Yang et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US D786273S · Battin · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US D806739S · Blackman et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D807384S · Quattrocchi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D835143S · Kim et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US D854551S · Pistiner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US D863338S · Antihi · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US D871435S · Tseng · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US D877747S · Belliveau · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US D877748S · Yamazaki et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US D877749S · Yamazaki et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10649611B2 · Rauschenbach et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10656805B2 · Mehta et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US D896241S · Zhang et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20150022674A1 · Blair et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170060520A1 · Cohen et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20170283873A1 · Rico et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180224836A1 · Oka · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180226153A1 · Rubenstein et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180238884A1 · Bass et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180242906A1 · Madabhushi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180259944A1 · Oka · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180261328A1 · Burton et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180282817A1 · You et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180291459A1 · Al-Deen Ashab et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180315507A1 · Mortazavi et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180321242A1 · Brandon et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200090087A1 · Singh · 2020 [cited by applicant]
JP D1432608S · 2012 [cited by applicant]
KR 300903879 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
RU 2155373C2 · 2000 [cited by applicant]
RU 2015148763A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015184061A2 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017013436A1 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017167942A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
WO 2017201165A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Geeleher et al. (Genome Biology 2014, 15:R47, pp. 1-12) (Year: 2014). [cited by examiner]
Jiang et al. (Genome Biology, 2016, 17:144, pp. 1-13). (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Van Allen et al. (Science. Oct. 9, 2015; 350(6257): 207-211) (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Lipson et al. (Clin Cancer Res. Nov. 15, 2011; 17(22): 6958-6962). (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Simon et al. (Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 2008, 138, pp. 308-320) (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
PCT/US2018/063658 , “International Search Report”, Mar. 18, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Barbie et al., Systematic RNA interference reveals that oncogenic KRAS-driven cancers require TBK1, HHS Public Access, May 5, 2010, pp. 108-112. [cited by applicant]
Hugo et al., Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma, Cell Press Article, vol. 165, Mar. 3, 2016, pp. 35-44. [cited by applicant]
Van Allen et al., Genomic correlates of response to CTLA4 blockade in metastatic melanoma, Sciencexpress Report, Sep. 10, 2015, pp. 1-30. [cited by applicant]
Charoentong et al., Pan-cancer Immunogenomic Analyses Reveal Genotype-Immunophenotype Relationships and Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Blockade, Cell Reports Resource, Jan. 3, 2017, pp. 248-262. [cited by applicant]
Finotello et al., Quantifying tumor-infiltrating immune cells from transcriptomics data, Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, Dec. 11, 2017, pp. 1031-1040. [cited by applicant]
Danaher et al., Gene expression markers of Tumor Infiltrating Leukocytes, Journal for Immuno Therapy of Cancer, Research Article, Feb. 21, 2017, pp. 1-15. [cited by applicant]
Rooney et al., Molecular and Genetic Properties of Tumors Associated with Local Immune Cytolytic Activity, Cell Article, Jan. 1, 2015, pp. 48-61. [cited by applicant]
Fitbark Inc., “Function related to exercise for smartphone software,” website address https://itunes.apple.com/jp/app/fitbark/id937936853?mt=8; published on Feb. 26, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Carrot Rocket Ltd., “Information provision function for smartphone software,” website address https://itunes.apple.com/jp/app/geozilla-zi-gongno-jian-shouri/id981856216?mt=8; published on Aug. 17, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Fabriqate Google, “Function of weather forecast for smartphone software, ” website address https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fabriqate.stateair; published on Aug. 8, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Xer.Lee. “Chart Ulkit.” Dribbble, published Apr. 23, 2016 (Retrieved from the internet Jun. 15, 2020). Internet URL: <https://dribbble.com/shots/2670411-Chart-Ulkit> (Year: 2016). [cited by applicant]
Hladik, David. “Financial app UI moodboard.” Dribbble, published Aug. 14, 2018 (Retrieved from the internet Jun. 15, 2020). Internet URL: <https://dribbble.com/shots/4955183> (Year: 2018). [cited by applicant]
Notification and Decision of Grant issued by the Japanese Patent Office in connection with Japanese Design Application No. 2018-028923 on Sep. 9, 2019. [cited by applicant]
Wang et al., Poster presentation: A comprehensive immunoscore to predict immunotherapy responses based on multivariate genomic/transcriptomic features, presented at the American Association for Cancer Research, Apr. 15,… [cited by applicant]
Gibney, Geoffrey T., et al.; “Predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy”; Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(12): e542-e551. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (2)
US 1,131,488 US 1,139,426