IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,270,910
Granted Patent B2
US 12,270,910 · App. 17/884,273 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

System and method of capturing three-dimensional human motion capture with LiDAR

Inventors: Cheng Wang (Xiamen, CN); Jialian Li (Xiamen, CN); Lan Xu (Shanghai, CN); Chenglu Wen (Xiamen, CN); Jingyi Yu (Shanghai, CN)
Assignees: Xiamen University; ShanghaiTech University
G01S17/89G01S17/86G06N20/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,270,910
App. No.
17/884,273
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Described herein are systems and methods for training machine learning models to generate three-dimensional (3D) motions based on light detection and ranging (LiDAR) point clouds. In various embodiments, a computing system can encode a machine learning model representing an object in a scene. The computing system can train the machine learning model using a dataset comprising synchronous LiDAR point clouds captured by monocular LiDAR sensors and ground-truth three-dimensional motions obtained from IMU devices. The machine learning model can be configured to generate a three-dimensional motion of the object based on an input of a plurality of point cloud frames captured by a monocular LiDAR sensor.

Claims (79)

1. A computer-implemented method for training machine learning models to generate three-dimensional motions based on LiDAR point clouds, the method comprising:

encoding, by a computing system, a machine learning model representing an object in a scene; and

training, by the computing system, the machine learning model using a dataset comprising synchronous LiDAR point clouds captured by monocular LiDAR sensors and ground-truth three-dimensional motions obtained from Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) devices;

wherein the machine learning model is configured to generate a three-dimensional motion of the object based on an input of a plurality of point cloud frames captured by a monocular LiDAR sensor, and

the machine learning model comprises a feature learning network, a Gated Recurring Unit (GRU), a multiplayer perceptron (MLP) decoder, wherein the feature learning network is configured to extract a global descriptor from each point cloud frame, the GRU is configured to generate a plurality of hidden variables for the global descriptor, and the MLP decoder is configured to predict a plurality of joint locations based on the plurality of hidden variables.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the object is a human.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the synchronous LiDAR point clouds comprises a plurality of point cloud frames captured by the monocular LiDAR sensors situated at a particular distance away from the human, and each point of the plurality of point cloud frames comprises at least a timestamp, and wherein the distance ranges from at least 10 to 50 meters.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the ground-truth three-dimensional motions are associated with the human and each ground-truth three-dimensional motion of the human comprises a timestamp, spatial coordinates, rotations of a plurality of joints of the human, and three-dimensional poses of the human.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein the dataset further comprises synchronous images of the human.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the dataset further comprises labels for the synchronous images of the human, wherein each label comprises a two-dimension enclosure enclosing the human depicted in the synchronous images.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising

training a second machine learning model using the synchronous images of the human in the dataset;

outputting, by the trained second machine learning model, a second three-dimensional motion of the human; and

evaluating the three-dimensional motion of the human based on the second three-dimensional motion of the human.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the feature learning network comprises a PointNet++ network.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the machine learning model further comprises a kinematics solver module for concatenating a frame-wise global feature with each joint to generate completed joint features and outputting the completed joint features to compute a plurality of joint rotations, wherein the kinematics solver comprises a ST-GCN configured to concatenate the frame-wise global features with each joint.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the machine learning model further comprises a joint optimizer module for optimizing rotations of the plurality of joint rotations, wherein the joint optimizer module comprises a SMPL model configured to optimize the rotations of the plurality of joint rotations.

11. A system for training machine learning models to generate three-dimensional motions based on LiDAR point clouds, the system comprises comprising:

a processor;

a storage device for storing a machine learning model representing an object in a scene, and a dataset comprising synchronous LiDAR point clouds captured by monocular LiDAR sensors and ground-truth three-dimensional motions obtained from IMU devices, wherein the machine learning model is configured to generate a three-dimensional motion of the object based on an input of a plurality of point cloud frames captured by a monocular LiDAR sensor, and the machine learning model comprises a feature learning network, a Gated Recurring Unit (GRU), a multiplayer perceptron (MLP) decoder, wherein the feature learning network is configured to extract a global descriptor from each point cloud frame, the GRU is configured to generate a plurality of hidden variables for the global descriptor, and the MLP decoder is configured to predict a plurality of joint locations based on the plurality of hidden variables; and

a memory for storing instructions that, when executed by the processor, cause the system to perform training of the machine learning model using the dataset.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the object is a human.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the synchronous LiDAR point clouds comprises a plurality of point cloud frames captured by the monocular LiDAR sensors situated at a distance away from the human, and each point of the plurality of point cloud frames comprises a timestamp, and wherein the distance ranges from at least 10 to 50 meters.

14. The system of claim 12 , wherein the ground-truth three-dimensional motions are associated with the human and each ground-truth three-dimensional motion of the human comprises a timestamp, spatial coordinates, rotations of a plurality of joints of the human, and three-dimensional poses of the human.

15. The system of claim 12 , wherein the dataset further comprises synchronous images of the human.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the dataset further comprises labels for the synchronous images of the human, wherein each label comprises a two-dimension enclosure enclosing the human depicted in the synchronous images.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the instructions, when executed by the processor, further causes the system to perform:

training a second machine learning model using the synchronous images of the human in the dataset;

outputting, by the trained second machine learning model, a second three-dimensional motion of the human; and

evaluating the three-dimensional motion of the human based on the second three-dimensional motion of the human.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the feature learning network comprises a PointNet++ network.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the machine learning model further comprises a kinematics solver module for concatenating a frame-wise global feature with each joint to generate completed joint features and outputting the completed joint features to compute a plurality of joint rotations, wherein the kinematics solver comprises a ST-GCN configured to concatenate the frame-wise global features with each joint.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the machine learning model further comprises a joint optimizer module for optimizing the plurality of joint rotations, wherein the joint optimizer module comprises a SMPL model configured to optimize the rotations of the plurality of joint rotations.

21. A computer-implemented method for generating three-dimensional motions based on LiDAR point clouds, the method comprising:

inputting a plurality of point cloud frames to a machine learning model, wherein each point cloud frame comprises a plurality of points captured by a monocular LiDAR sensor, and the machine learning model comprises a temporal encoder module comprising a feature learning network, a two-way GRU, and an MLP decoder;

extracting, by the feature learning network, a global descriptor for each point cloud frame;

feeding the global descriptor into the two-way GRU to generate a plurality of hidden variables;

inputting the hidden variables to the MLP decoder to predict locations and rotations of a plurality of joints of an object;

outputting, by the machine learning model, a three-dimensional motion of the object based on the predicted locations and rotations of the plurality of joints.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the object is a human.

23. The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

training the machine learning model using a dataset comprising synchronous LiDAR point clouds captured by monocular LiDAR sensors and ground-truth three-dimensional motions obtained from IMU devices.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein the synchronous LiDAR point clouds comprises a plurality of point cloud frames captured by the monocular LiDAR sensors situated at a distance away from a human, and each point of the plurality of point cloud frames comprises a timestamp and an intensity value, wherein the distance ranges from at least 10 to 50 meters.

25. The method of claim 21 , wherein the feature learning network is a PointNet++ network.

26. The method of claim 21 , wherein the feature learning network is a Point 4D Transformer.

27. The method of claim 21 , wherein the two-way GRU comprises a hidden layer configured to output the hidden variables.

28. The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

estimating the locations of the plurality of joints by the temporal encoder by minimizing a loss formulated as:

ℒ

𝒥

=

∑

t

J

GT

(

t

)

-

J

^

(

t

)

2

2

(

1

)

where Ĵ (t) is a predicted joint location of the t-th frame and J GT (t) is a ground truth joint (t) location of the t-th frame.

29. The method of claim 21 , wherein the machine learning model further comprises a kinematics solver module, wherein the kinematics solver module comprises a ST-CGN, and the method further comprises:

concatenating by the kinematics solver module the global descriptor with each joint to generate joint features; and

outputting the joint features to compute the rotations of the plurality of joints.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the machine learning model further comprises a joint optimizer module, wherein the joint optimizer module comprises an SMPL model, and the method further comprises:

inputting the rotations of the plurality of joints to the joint optimizer module to obtain optimized rotations of the plurality of joints.

31. The method of claim 30 , further comprising:

estimating the rotations of the plurality of joints by the temporal encoder module, the kinematics solver module, and the joint optimizer module.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 9, 2022
From: WANG, CHENG; LI, JIALIAN; XU, LAN; WEN, CHENGLU; YU, JINGYI
To: XIAMEN UNIVERSITY; SHANGHAITECH UNIVERSITY
Reel/Frame 061132/0872 →
Continuity (2)
Continuation PCTCN2022078083 · Feb 25, 2022
Related Publication 20230273318A1 · Aug 31, 2023
References Cited (22)
US 10937178B1 · Srinivasan · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11537819B1 · Das · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11628855B1 · Pradhan · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20180072313A1 · Stenneth · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180204338A1 · Narang et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180217663A1 · Chandrasekhar et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190163968A1 · Hua · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200160559A1 · Urtasun et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200183007A1 · Nagashima · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210299873A1 · Badiozamani · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220066459A1 · Jain · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220143467A1 · Green · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220321343A1 · Bahrami · 2022 [cited by examiner]
CN 110596683A · 2019 [cited by applicant]
CN 110873879A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 111665512A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 113466890A · 2020 [cited by applicant]
CN 112923934A · 2021 [cited by applicant]
Deng et al. (Fusing Geometrical and Visual Information via Superpoints for the Semantic Segmentation of 3D Road Scenes, 2020) (Year: 2020). [cited by examiner]
David et al. (A Review on Deep Learning Techniques for 3D Sensed Data Classification, 2019) (Year: 2019). [cited by examiner]
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion mailed Nov. 10, 2022, issued in related International Application No. PCT/CN2022/078083 (9 pages). [cited by applicant]
PCT International Search Report and the Written Opinion mailed Nov. 29, 2022, issued in related International Application No. PCT/CN2022/079151 (10 pages). [cited by applicant]