IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,271,283
Granted Patent B2
US 12,271,283 · App. 18/232,676 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Systems and methods for determining a user specific mission operational performance metric, using machine-learning processes

Inventors: Bradford R. Everman (Haddonfield, NJ); Brian Scott Bradke (Brookfield, VT)
G06F11/3428G06F18/2155G06F18/24155G06F18/2431G06N20/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,271,283
App. No.
18/232,676
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects relate to system and methods for determining a user specific mission operational performance, using machine-learning processes. An exemplary system includes a computing device configured to perform operations including receiving user-input structured data from at least a user device, receiving observed structured data related to the user and a mission performance metric, inputting the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to a machine-learning model, generating a user performance metric as a function of the machine-learning model, receiving a deterministic mission operational performance metric, disaggregating a deterministic user performance metric as a function of the deterministic mission operation performance metric and the mission performance metric, inputting training data to a machine-learning algorithm, where the training data includes the user-input structured data and the observed structured data correlated to the deterministic user performance metric, and training the machine-learning model as a function of the machine-learning algorithm and the training data.

Claims (54)

1. A method of determining a user specific mission operational performance metric, using machine-learning processes, comprising:

receiving, using a computing device, user-input structured data from at least a user device;

receiving, using the computing device, observed structured data related to a user and a mission performance metric associated with a mission of the user;

inputting, using the computing device, the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to a machine-learning model comprising an unsupervised machine learning process configured to continuously discover correlations among the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to a performance metric, wherein the machine learning model is selected based on a user identifier;

generating, using the computing device and the machine-learning model, a user performance metric as a function of the machine-learning model;

inputting, using the computing device, training data into a machine-learning algorithm, wherein the training data includes the user-input structured data and the observed structured data correlated to the user performance metric; and

training, using the computing device and the machine-learning algorithm, the machine-learning model as a function of the machine-learning algorithm and the training data.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, using the computer device, a deterministic mission operational performance metric.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

disaggregating, using the computing device, a deterministic user performance metric as a function of the deterministic mission operation performance metric and the mission performance metric.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mission performance metric comprises objective data associated with the mission and a plurality of environmental risk factors.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the user performance metric comprises a change in a probability for success of the mission.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the user performance metric comprises a risk factor.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

generating, using the computing device, at least a likelihood metric as a function of the machine learning model.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

classifying, using the computing device, the user identifier to a user class, wherein classifying the user identifier further comprises:

inputting the user identifier to a classifier; and

classifying the user identifier to the user class, as a function of the classifier.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein inputting training data into the machine-learning algorithm comprises:

correlating the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to the deterministic user performance metric.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

receiving, using the computing device, second user-input structured data from the at least a user device;

receiving, using the computing device, second observed structured data related to the user and a second mission performance metric;

inputting, using the computing device, the second user-input structured data and the second observed structured data to the machine-learning model; and

generating, using the computing device and the machine-learning model, a second user performance metric as a function of the machine-learning model.

11. A system for determining a user specific mission operational performance, using machine-learning processes, comprising a computing device configured to perform operations comprising:

receiving, using a computing device, user-input structured data from at least a user device;

receiving, using the computing device, observed structured data related to a user and a mission performance metric associated with a mission of the user;

inputting, using the computing device, the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to a machine-learning model comprising an unsupervised machine learning process configured to continuously discover correlations among the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to a performance metric, wherein the machine learning model is selected based on a user identifier;

generating, using the computing device and the machine-learning model, a user performance metric as a function of the machine-learning model;

inputting, using the computing device, training data into a machine-learning algorithm, wherein the training data includes the user-input structured data and the observed structured data correlated to the user performance metric; and

training, using the computing device and the machine-learning algorithm, the machine-learning model as a function of the machine-learning algorithm and the training data.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the computing device is further configured to:

receiving, using the computer device, a deterministic mission operational performance metric.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein the computing device is further configured to:

disaggregating, using the computing device, a deterministic user performance metric as a function of the deterministic mission operation performance metric and the mission performance metric.

14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the mission performance metric comprises objective data associated with the mission and a plurality of environmental risk factors.

15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the user performance metric comprises a change in a probability for success of the mission.

16. The system of claim 11 , wherein the user performance metric comprises a risk factor.

17. The system of claim 11 , wherein the computing device is further configured to:

generating, using the computing device, at least a likelihood metric as a function of the machine learning model.

18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the computing device is further configured to:

classifying, using the computing device, the user identifier to a user class, wherein classifying the user identifier further comprises:

inputting the user identifier to a classifier; and

classifying the user identifier to the user class, as a function of the classifier.

19. The system of claim 11 , wherein inputting training data into the machine-learning algorithm comprises:

correlating the user-input structured data and the observed structured data to the deterministic user performance metric.

20. The system of claim 11 , the computing device is further configured to:

receiving, using the computing device, second user-input structured data from the at least a user device;

receiving, using the computing device, second observed structured data related to the user and a second mission performance metric;

inputting, using the computing device, the second user-input structured data and the second observed structured data to the machine-learning model; and

generating, using the computing device and the machine-learning model, a second user performance metric as a function of the machine-learning model.

Continuity (2)
Continuation 17333209 · May 28, 2021
Related Publication 20230385172A1 · Nov 30, 2023
References Cited (11)
US 8781796B2 · Mott · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8812428B2 · Mollicone · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 10043397B2 · Salentiny · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 11410085B1 · Mudgil · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20160270718A1 · Heneghan · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20200241525A1 · Harbour · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210158213A1 · Shirakawa · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20230244998A1 · Roberts · 2023 [cited by examiner]
Title: Ensemble machine learning models for aviation incident risk prediction By: Zhang Date: Jan. 2019. [cited by applicant]
Title: Aviation Fatigue: Issues in Developing Fatigue Risk Management Systems By: Weiland Date: May 10, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Title: Neuroscientific tools in the cockpit: towards a meaningful decision support system for fatigue risk management By: Papanikou Date: May 29, 2020. [cited by applicant]