IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,273,144
Granted Patent B2
US 12,273,144 · App. 18/187,341 · Granted Apr 8, 2025

Satellite optical transceivers

Inventors: Michael Y. Frankel (Hallandale Beach, FL); James Westdorp (Perry Hall, MD)
Assignee: Ciena Corporation
H04B10/118H04B10/1127H04B10/40H04B10/50H04B10/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,273,144
App. No.
18/187,341
Filed
Mar 21, 2023
Granted
Apr 8, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2634
USPC
398/121
Abstract

A satellite includes a plurality of transceivers, each configured to selectively connect to one of another transceiver in another satellite and a ground station; and configurable pass-through between the plurality of transceivers that is configured based on a location of the satellite in a constellation. The configurable pass-through can provide data signal pass-through without one or more of full decoding, regeneration, and error correction, thereby saving power.

Claims (27)

1. A satellite comprising:

a plurality of transceivers, each configured to selectively connect to one of another transceiver in another satellite and a ground station, wherein two transceivers of the plurality of transceivers are connected to one another in a data path; and

configurable pass-through between the two transceivers that is configured to selectively bypass functions in the data path between the two transceivers, based on a location of the satellite in a constellation and the selective connectivity of the two transceivers.

2. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the selectively bypassed functions provide data signal pass-through without one or more of full decoding, regeneration, and error correction, selected based on the location of the satellite in the constellation and the selective connectivity of the two transceivers.

3. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the configurable pass-through includes an optical switch in the satellite.

4. The satellite of claim 3 , wherein the optical switch in the satellite is connected to the plurality of transceivers, to/from telescopes, and to/from pre/boost amplifiers, wherein the settings of the optical switch are based on the location of the satellite in the constellation.

5. The satellite of claim 3 , wherein the optical switch in the satellite is connected to at least one spare transceiver.

6. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the configurable pass-through is via circuitry interconnecting the plurality of transceivers.

7. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of transceivers include a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) for programming thereof.

8. The satellite of claim 7 , wherein the plurality of transceivers share the FPGA.

9. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of transceivers are in an integrated transceiver design including Electro-Optic (EO) components, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), and one or more Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs).

10. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the configurable pass-through is via any of the Electro-Optic (EO) components, the Digital Signal Processor (DSP), and the one or more Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs).

11. The satellite of claim 1 , wherein the configurable pass-through includes optical pass-through, analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to digital-to-analog converter (DAC) pass-through, Digital Signal Processor (DSP) pass-through, and Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) pass-through.

12. A method implemented in a satellite comprising steps of:

selectively connecting one or more transceivers of a plurality of transceivers, to one of another transceiver in another satellite and a ground station; and

configuring pass-through between two transceivers of the plurality of transceivers that is configured to selectively bypass functions in a data path between the two transceivers, based on a location of the satellite in a constellation and connectivity of the two transceivers.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the selectively bypassed function provide data signal pass-through without one or more of full decoding, regeneration, and error correction, selected based on the location of the satellite in the constellation and the connectivity of the two transceivers.

14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the configurable pass-through includes an optical switch in the satellite.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the optical switch in the satellite is connected to the plurality of transceivers, to/from telescopes, and to/from pre/boost amplifiers, wherein the settings of the optical switch are based on the location of the satellite in the constellation.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the optical switch in the satellite is connected to at least one spare transceiver.

17. The method of claim 12 , wherein the configurable pass-through is via circuitry interconnecting the plurality of transceivers.

18. The method of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of transceivers include a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) for programming thereof.

19. The method of claim 12 , wherein the plurality of transceivers are in an integrated transceiver design including Electro-Optic (EO) components, a Digital Signal Processor (DSP), and one or more Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs).

20. An optical node configured to operate in one of a satellite network and a terrestrial optical network, the optical node comprising:

a plurality of transceivers, each configured to selectively connect to another transceiver in another optical node, wherein two transceivers of the plurality of transceivers are connected to one another in a data path; and

configurable pass-through between the two transceivers that is configured based on the connectivity thereof, and that is integrated within the plurality of transceivers, wherein the configurable pass-through selectively bypassing functions in the data path between the two transceivers, based on corresponding link budgets due to the connectivity,

wherein the configurable pass-through includes optical pass-through, analog-to-digital converter (ADC) to digital-to-analog converter (DAC) pass-through, Digital Signal Processor (DSP) pass-through, and Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) pass-through.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2023
From: FRANKEL, MICHAEL Y.; WESTDORP, JAMES
To: CIENA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063048/0258 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63322161 · Mar 21, 2022
Related Publication 20230308182A1 · Sep 28, 2023
References Cited (47)
US 6243175B1 · Pelekhaty · 2001 [cited by applicant]
US 6795607B1 · Archambault et al. · 2004 [cited by applicant]
US 7184215B2 · Pelekhaty · 2007 [cited by applicant]
US 7415208B1 · Haggans et al. · 2008 [cited by applicant]
US 7853156B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 7853157B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2010 [cited by applicant]
US 8005375B2 · Frankel · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 8625994B2 · Archambault et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8699880B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 8977125B2 · Grigoryan et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9191117B2 · Alexander et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 9270405B2 · Blair et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9374166B2 · Mateosky et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9509410B2 · Mateosky et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9515767B2 · Frankel et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 9551836B2 · Frankel et al. · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 10141926B2 · Frankel et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10142092B2 · Pelekhaty et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 10171169B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10194221B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10200305B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10212496B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10313014B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10313021B1 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10404365B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10476815B2 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 10715888B2 · Swinkels et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 10749602B2 · Charlton et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 11026001B1 · Frankel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11063667B1 · Ritter · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11128373B1 · Podmore et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 11329728B1 · Adams · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20050100271A1 · Frankel · 2005 [cited by applicant]
US 20050100339A1 · Tegge · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20120281740A1 · Fujita et al. · 2012 [cited by applicant]
US 20140016941A1 · Coleman · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20180006712A1 · Hreha · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180269972A1 · Djordjevic et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20190028197A1 · Turner et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190082481A1 · Ravishankar et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20190182180A1 · Frankel et al. · 2019 [cited by applicant]
US 20200236064A1 · Frankel et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210058685A1 · Frankel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20210075746A1 · Frankel et al. · 2021 [cited by applicant]
US 20220209868A1 · Frankel et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
Pan “Satellite Payloads Pay Off”, IEEE Microwave Magazine. Jul. 30, 2015;16(8):61-73. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Qi Xiaogang et al., “A survey of routing techniques for satellite networks,” Journal of Communications and Information Networks, vol. 1, No. 4, DOI: 10.11959/j.issn.2096-1081, 2016.058, Review Paper, Dec. 2016, pp. 67-8… [cited by applicant]