IP Library Granted Patent US 12,284,186
Granted Patent B2
US 12,284,186 · App. 18/611,948 · Granted Apr 22, 2025

Hierarchical permissions model within a document

Inventors: Jeroen Van Rotterdam (Fort Lauderdale, FL); Michael T. Mohen (Millington, MD); Satyapal P. Reddy (San Ramon, CA); Muthukumarappa Jayakumar (Mountain House, CA)
Assignee: Open Text Corporation
H04L63/101G06F16/93G06F21/31G06F21/604G06F21/6218G06Q10/06G06Q10/06311H04L63/08
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,284,186
App. No.
18/611,948
Filed
Mar 21, 2024
Granted
Apr 22, 2025
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2497
USPC
707/784
Abstract

Case management systems and techniques are disclosed. In various embodiments, a hierarchical document permission model is received, the model describing a document hierarchy comprising a plurality of hierarchically related document nodes and defining for each of at least a subset of said document nodes one or more document roles and for each such role one or more document permissions with respect to that document node. The hierarchical document permission model is used to determine and enforce permissions with respect to case management instances to which the hierarchical document permission model applies.

Claims (48)

1. A case model system, comprising:

a storage device;

a processor coupled to the storage device and configured to:

obtain a case model definition for a case model based on user input, the case model definition defining a document permission model associated with a document, the document permission model comprising a hierarchy of document permission nodes defining document level hierarchical permissions, wherein a document level hierarchical permission of a document permission node defines an authorization permission to update a corresponding document portion of the document, and wherein the case model definition is stored in the storage device; and

process the case model definition to generate a data structure that embodies the case model in a format consumable by a case management system to instantiate a case instance based on the case model and set the document level hierarchical permissions on the respective document portions of the document.

2. The case model system of claim 1 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining a second set of permissions for the first role with respect to a second respective document portion.

3. The case model system of claim 1 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining the first set of permissions for the first role with respect to a second respective document portion.

4. The case model system of claim 1 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining a second set of permissions for a second role with respect to a second respective document portion.

5. The case model system of claim 1 , wherein the hierarchical document level permissions include at least one of a create permission, a read permission, an update permission or a delete permission.

6. The case model system of claim 1 wherein the processor is configured to dynamically determine the corresponding document level permission set with respect to the portion of the document based on a state machine.

7. The case model system of claim 1 , wherein generating the data structure comprises generating an XML data file that embodies the case model definition.

8. A computer program product embodied on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium and comprising instructions executable by a processor to:

obtain a case model definition for a case model based on user input, the case model definition defining a document permission model associated with a document, the document permission model comprising a hierarchy of document permission nodes defining document level hierarchical permissions, wherein a document level hierarchical permission of a document permission node defines an authorization permission to update a corresponding document portion of the document;

store the case model definition on a storage device; and

process the case model definition to generate a data structure that embodies the case model in a format consumable by a case management system to instantiate a case instance based on the case model and set the document level hierarchical permissions on the respective document portions of the document.

9. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining a second set of permissions for the first role with respect to a second respective document portion.

10. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining the first set of permissions for the first role with respect to a second respective document portion.

11. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining a second set of permissions for a second role with respect to a second respective document portion.

12. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein the hierarchical document level permissions include at least one of a create permission, a read permission, an update permission or a delete permission.

13. The computer program product of claim 8 , further comprising instructions executable to dynamically determine the corresponding document level permission set with respect to the portion of the document based on a state of a state machine.

14. The computer program product of claim 8 , wherein generating the data structure comprises generating an XML data file that embodies the case model definition.

15. A method comprising:

obtaining a case model definition for a case model based on user input, the case model definition defining a document permission model associated with a document, the document permission model comprising a hierarchy of document permission nodes defining document level hierarchical permissions, wherein a document level hierarchical permission of a document permission node defines an authorization permission to update a corresponding document portion of the document;

storing the case model definition on a storage device; and

processing the case model definition to generate a data structure that embodies the case model in a format consumable by a case management system to instantiate a case instance based on the case model and set the document level hierarchical permissions on the respective document portions of the document.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining a second set of permissions for the first role with respect to a second respective document portion.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining the first set of permissions for the first role with respect to a second respective document portion.

18. The method of claim 15 , wherein the hierarchy of document permission nodes comprises:

a first document permission node defining a first set of permissions for a first role with respect to a first respective document portion; and

a second document permission node defining a second set of permissions for a second role with respect to a second respective document portion.

19. The method of claim 15 , wherein the hierarchical document level permissions include at least one of a create permission, a read permission, an update permission or a delete permission.

20. The method of claim 15 , further comprising dynamically determining, by the processor, the corresponding document level permission set with respect to the portion of the document based on a state of a state machine.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2024
From: VAN ROTTERDAM, JEROEN; MOHEN, MICHAEL T.; REDDY, SATYAPAL P.; JAYAKUMAR, MUTHUKUMARAPPA
To: EMC CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067176/0851 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 22, 2024
From: EMC CORPORATION
To: OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 067176/0872 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 17524718 · Nov 11, 2021
Continuation 16858366 · Apr 24, 2020
Continuation 16265483 · Feb 1, 2019
Continuation 15918751 · Mar 12, 2018
Continuation 15198862 · Jun 30, 2016
Continuation 14502246 · Sep 30, 2014
Provisional Application 62031592 · Jul 31, 2014
Related Publication 20240275789A1 · Aug 15, 2024
References Cited (9)
US 5537526A · Anderson · 1996 [cited by examiner]
US 11985131B2 · Reddy et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20060064434A1 · Gilbert · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20120054636A1 · Robertson-Hodder · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20240179151A1 · Reddy et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
US 20240275790A1 · Reddy et al. · 2024 [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,293, mailed Jun. 21, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 18/436,097, mailed Sep. 28, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Office Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 17/161,293, mailed Dec. 31, 2024, 10 pages. [cited by applicant]
Cited By (3)
US 12,341,780 US 12,531,861 US 12,598,185