IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,287,394
Granted Patent B2
US 12,287,394 · App. 18/082,393 · Granted Apr 29, 2025

Distance assessment with headerless packets

Inventors: Michael Schober (Graz, AT); Manuel Lafer (Ottendorf, AT); Pablo Corbalán Pelegrín (Callosa de Segura, ES)
Assignee: NXP B.V.
G01S13/765B60R25/24H04L43/0864H04L43/106B60R25/04
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,287,394
App. No.
18/082,393
Granted
Apr 29, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Aspects of the present disclosure are directed to communicating data for authentication and location determination, such as for authenticating a key FOB and locating the key FOB within a defined distance. As may be implemented in accordance with one or more embodiments, a plurality of headerless packets, respectively including scrambled timestamp sequence (STS) packets but not including encoding and/or synchronization headers, are communicated between respective communication circuits. A time of flight (TOF) value indicative of time elapsed between transmission and reception of the plurality of headerless packets is assessed based on the STS packets. A distance between the communication circuits is determined based on the assessed time of flight.

Claims (27)

1. A method comprising:

communicating a plurality of headerless packets, respectively including scrambled timestamp sequence (STS) packets but not including encoding headers, between respective communication circuits;

assessing a time of flight (TOF) value indicative of time elapsed between transmission and reception of the plurality of headerless packets based on the STS packets; and

determining a distance between the communication circuits based on the assessed time of flight.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein each of the plurality of headerless packets is a group or stream of bits, irrespective of whether the bits are in a fixed size or are in a contiguous sequence, that does not provide a code used in any part of the group or stream of bits to encode data, for synchronization, identification and/or recognition of a packet, in communications to one of the communication circuits.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the time of flight value includes identifying the start of the STS packets based on a ranging protocol specifying that STS-only packets without headers are being transmitted, therein facilitating identification of the start of the STS packets without utilization of a packet header.

4. The method of claim 1 , further including communicating a pre-poll message prior to communicating the headerless packets, and using the pre-poll message for timestamp synchronization.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein assessing the TOF value is carried out based on a frequency offset between the respective communication circuits.

6. The method of claim 5 , further including determining the frequency offset based on a delay time between reception of the pre-poll message and the headerless packets.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein communicating the plurality of headerless packets includes communicating respective ones of the packets in parallel and wherein assessing the TOF value includes utilizing the ones of the packets communicated in parallel.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein communicating the plurality headerless packets includes using multi-receiver circuitry to concurrently receive different packets communicated in parallel.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein assessing the TOF value includes determining the TOF value without utilizing synchronization data.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein one of the communication circuits is a key FOB and the other one of the communication circuits is based in an automobile and includes processing circuitry, further including utilizing the determined distance and security data communicated from the key FOB to the automotive-based circuit to enable operation of the automobile in response to the key FOB being within a defined proximity of the automobile and the security data authenticating the key FOB.

11. An apparatus comprising:

a first communication circuit to communicate a plurality of headerless packets, respectively including scrambled timestamp sequence (STS) packets but not including encoding headers, with a second communication circuit; and

processing circuitry to assess a time of flight (TOF) value indicative of time elapsed between transmission and reception of the plurality of headerless packets based on the STS packets, and to determine a distance between the communication circuits based on the assessed time of flight.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein each of the plurality of headerless packets is a group or stream of bits, irrespective of whether the bits are in a fixed size or are in a contiguous sequence, that does not provide a code used in any part of the group or stream of bits to encode data, for synchronization, identification and/or recognition of a packet, in communications to one of the communication circuits.

13. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine the time of flight value by identifying the start of the STS packets based on a ranging protocol specifying that STS-only packets without headers be transmitted, therein facilitating identification of the start of the STS packets without utilization of a packet header.

14. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first communication circuit is configured to communicate a pre-poll message prior to communicating the headerless packets, and the processing circuitry is configured to use the pre-poll message to timestamp synchronize the plurality of headerless packets.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to assess the TOF value based on a frequency offset between the respective communication circuits.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine the frequency offset based on a delay time between reception of the pre-poll message and the headerless packets.

17. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the first communication circuit is configured to communicate respective ones of the plurality of headerless packets in parallel, and the processing circuitry is configured to assess the TOF value utilizing ones of the packets communicated in parallel.

18. The apparatus of claim 17 , wherein the second communication includes multi-receiver circuitry to concurrently receive different packets communicated in parallel.

19. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the processing circuitry is configured to determine the TOF value without utilizing synchronization data.

20. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein:

the first communication circuit is a key FOB and the second communication circuit is based in an automobile; and

the processing circuit is configured to utilize the determined distance and security data communicated between the key FOB and the second communication circuit to enable operation of the automobile in response to the key FOB being within a defined proximity of the automobile and the security data authenticating the key FOB.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2022
From: SCHOBER, MICHAEL; LAFER, MANUEL; CORBALÁN PELEGRÍN, PABLO
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 062110/0765 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240201361A1 · Jun 20, 2024
References Cited (16)
US 20180059235A1 · McLaughlin et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180254870A1 · Dutz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20180254925A1 · Dutz et al. · 2018 [cited by applicant]
US 20200014526A1 · Hammerschmidt et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20200348409A1 · McLaughlin et al. · 2020 [cited by applicant]
US 20210099863A1 · Naguib · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220099790A1 · Lim · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220295430A1 · Schober et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220299621A1 · Werner et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
P. Corbalan and G. P. Picco. : Ultra-wideband Concurrent Ranging. In ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), vol. 1, No. 1, Article 1, Jan. 2020, pp. 1-40. [cited by applicant]
D. Vecchia, P. Corbalan, T. Istomin and G. P. Picco, “Playing with Fire: Exploring Concurrent Transmissions in Ultra-wideband Radios.” 2019 16th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networ… [cited by applicant]
FiRa Consortium. FiRa Consortium UWB MAC Technical Requirements, Version 1.3.0, pp. 1-79 (Jan. 2022). [cited by applicant]
Giridhar Mandyam et al. UWB Secure Ranging in FiRa, FiRa Consortium, pp. 1-13 (Aug. 2022). [cited by applicant]
Car Connectivity Consortium LLC. Digital Key Technical Specification Release 3, Version 1.0.0 (CCC-TS-101), pp. 1-469 (2021). [cited by applicant]
IEEE, Inc. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks. IEEE Std 802.15.4™-2020 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015), pp. 1-800 (2020). [cited by applicant]
IEEE, Inc. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks, Amendment 1: Enhanced Ultra Wideband (UWB) Physical Layers (PHYs) and Associated Ranging Techniques. IEEE Std 802.15.4z™-2020 (Amendment to IEEE Std 802.15.4™-202… [cited by applicant]
Cited By (1)
US 12,542,785