IP Library Granted Patent US 12,290,840
Granted Patent B2
US 12,290,840 · App. 17/776,773 · Granted May 6, 2025

Method and sieve system for screening material

Inventor: Resham Singh (Feltham, GB)
Assignee: Russell Finex Ltd
B07B1/4636B07B1/4627
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,290,840
App. No.
17/776,773
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A sieve system includes a sieve for screening material by selectively passing first particles and not passing second particles of the material based on respective dimensions of the particles relative to dimensions of screening apertures in the sieve. A holding container feeds material to the sieve and a fines container receives the first particles screened by the sieve. A first fines container load is measured at a first time, and a second fines container load is measured at a second time. A fines rate is determined by a rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured first and second fines container loads and the first and second times. An operating condition of the sieve system is based on the fines rate and may provide an indication that the operation of the sieve, another component, or the sieve system as a whole is acceptable or unacceptable.

Claims (107)

1. A method for screening material in a sieve system, comprising:

a sieve for screening material by selectively passing first particles of the material and not passing second particles of the material based on respective dimensions of the first and second particles relative to dimensions of screening apertures in the sieve;

a holding container for feeding material to be screened to the sieve; and

a fines container for receiving the first particles screened by the sieve, the method comprising:

measuring a first fines container load at a first time;

measuring a second fines container load at a second time;

determining a fines rate by determining a rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured first and second fines container loads and the first and second times;

determining an operating condition of the sieve system based on the determined fines rate; and

determining that the fines rate is equal to or greater than a fines rate high set point and determining the operating condition to be representative of a damaged or missing sieve wherein the sieve system further comprises an oversize container for receiving the second particles from an oversize discharge outlet, and the method further comprises:

measuring a first holding container load, a third fines container load, and a first oversize container load at a third time;

measuring a second holding container load, a fourth fines container load, and a second oversize container load at a fourth time;

determining a sieve load based on a difference between a) a decrease in the holding container load between the third and fourth times, and b) a sum of an increase in the fines container load and an increase in the oversize container load between the third and fourth times; and

if the sieve load is equal to or lower than a sieve load low set point, determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an underloading of material on the sieve, and

if the sieve load is equal to or greater than a sieve load high set point, determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an overloading of material on the sieve.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

measuring a fifth fines container load at a fifth time;

measuring a sixth fines container load at a sixth time;

determining a second fines rate by determining a second rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured fifth and sixth fines container loads and the fifth and sixth times;

determining an other operating condition of the sieve system based on the determined second fines rate; and

determining that the second fines rate is equal to or lower than a fines rate low set point and determining the other operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an excess of material on the sieve.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising stopping the sieve system in response to determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of a damaged or missing sieve.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

measuring a third holding container load at a fifth time;

measuring a fourth holding container load at a sixth time;

determining a feed rate by determining a rate of change of the holding container load based on the measured third and fourth holding container loads and the fifth and sixth times; and

determining a feed blockage, or at least a partial feed blockage, from the holding container to the sieve when the determined feed rate is equal to or lower than a feed rate low set point.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

operating a material conveyance system to convey material to be screened from a supply container to the holding container;

measuring a third holding container load at a fifth time;

measuring a fourth holding container load at a sixth time, the fifth and sixth times during the operating of the material conveyance system;

determining a conveyance rate by determining a rate of change of the holding container load based on the measured third and fourth holding container loads and the fifth and sixth times; and

determining a material conveyance system blockage or at least a partial material conveyance system blockage, and/or that the supply container is empty or substantially empty, when the determined conveyance rate is equal to or lower than a conveyance rate low set point.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising conveying screened material from the fines container to an additive manufacturing system.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising conveying unused material from an additive manufacturing system build chamber to the holding container for screening by the sieve system for potential re-use in an additive manufacturing system.

8. A method for screening material in a sieve system comprising:

a sieve for screening material by selectively passing first particles of the material and not passing second particles of the material based on respective dimensions of the first and second particles relative to dimensions of screening apertures in the sieve;

a holding container for feeding material to be screened to the sieve; and

a fines container for receiving the first particles screened by the sieve, the method comprising:

measuring a first fines container load at a first time;

measuring a second fines container load at a second time;

determining a fines rate by determining a rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured first and second fines container loads and the first and second times;

determining an operating condition of the sieve system based on the determined fines rate;

determining that the fines rate is equal to or lower than a fines rate low set point and determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an excess of material on the sieve; and

discharging material from the sieve to an oversize discharge outlet for removing the second particles from the sieve in response to determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an excess of material on the sieve.

9. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

measuring a third fines container load at a third time;

measuring a fourth fines container load at a fourth time;

determining a second fines rate by determining a second rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured third and fourth fines container loads and the third and fourth times;

determining that the second fines rate is greater than the fines rate low set point; and

updating the operating condition to no longer be representative, or further representative, of an excess of material on the sieve.

10. The method of claim 8 , further comprising:

measuring a third fines container load at a third time;

measuring a fourth fines container load at a fourth time;

determining a second fines rate by determining a second rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured third and fourth fines container loads and the third and fourth times;

determining that the second fines rate is equal to or lower than the fines rate low set point; and

updating the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of a blocked, or at least partially blocked, sieve.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising repeating the step of discharging material from the sieve to the oversize discharge outlet for removing the second particles from the sieve one or two or more times before updating the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of a blocked, or at least partially blocked, sieve.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the sieve system further comprises an oversize container for receiving the second particles from the oversize discharge outlet, the method further comprising:

measuring a first oversize container load at a third time;

measuring a second oversize container load at a fourth time, wherein a period between the third and fourth times does not include operation of the sieve system to discharge material to the oversize discharge outlet for removing the second particles from the sieve;

determining an increase in the oversize container load based on the measured first and second oversize container loads; and

determining a fault condition with the oversize discharge outlet in response to determining the increase in the oversize container load.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the sieve system further comprises an oversize container for receiving the second particles from the oversize discharge outlet, the method further comprising:

measuring a first holding container load, a third fines container load, and a first oversize container load at a third time;

measuring a second holding container load, a fourth fines container load, and a second oversize container load at a fourth time;

determining a sieve load based on a difference between a) a decrease in the holding container load between the third and fourth times, and b) a sum of an increase in the fines container load and an increase in the oversize container load between the third and fourth times; and

if the sieve load is equal to or lower than a sieve load low set point, determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an underloading of material on the sieve, and

if the sieve load is equal to or greater than a sieve load high set point, determining the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an overloading of material on the sieve.

14. A sieve system for screening material, the sieve system comprising:

a sieve for screening material by selectively passing first particles of the material and not passing second particles of the material based on respective dimensions of the first and second particles relative to dimensions of screening apertures in the sieve;

a holding container for feeding material to be screened to the sieve;

a fines container for receiving the first particles screened by the sieve;

a fines load sensor for measuring a fines container load;

a controller configured to:

measure a first fines container load at a first time;

measure a second fines container load at a second time;

determine a fines rate by determining a rate of change of the fines container load based on the measured first and second fines container loads and the first and second times;

determine an operating condition of the sieve system based on the determined fines rate; and

determine the operating condition to be representative of a damaged or missing sieve responsive to determining that the fines rate is equal to or greater than a fines rate high set point;

an oversize container for receiving the second particles screened by the sieve;

an oversize load sensor for measuring an oversize container load; and

an oversize discharge outlet for removing the second particles from the sieve into the oversize container,

wherein the controller is further configured to:

measure a first oversize container load at a third time;

measure a second oversize container load at a fourth time, wherein a period between the third and fourth times does not include operation of the sieve system to discharge material to the oversize discharge outlet for removing the second particles from the sieve;

determine an increase in the oversize container load based on the measured first and second oversize container loads; and

determine a fault condition with the oversize discharge outlet in response to determining the increase in the oversize container load.

15. The sieve system of claim 14 , further comprising a feed load sensor for measuring a holding container load, wherein the controller is further configured to:

measure a first holding container load at a fifth time;

measure a second holding container load at a sixth time;

determine a feed rate by determining a rate of change of the holding container load based on the measured first and second holding container loads and the fifth and sixth times; and

determine a feed blockage, or at least a partial feed blockage, from the holding container to the sieve when the determined feed rate is equal to or lower than a feed rate low set point.

16. The sieve system of claim 14 , further comprising:

a supply container for supplying material to be screened;

a material conveyance system for conveying the material to be screened from the supply container to the holding container; and

a feed load sensor for measuring a holding container load,

wherein the controller is further configured to:

operate a material conveyance system to convey material to be screened from a supply container to the holding container;

measure a first holding container load at a fifth time;

measure a second holding container load at a sixth time, the fifth and sixth times during the operating of the material conveyance system;

determine a conveyance rate by determining a rate of change of the holding container load based on the first and second holding container loads and the fifth and sixth times; and

determine a material conveyance system blockage or at least a partial material conveyance system blockage, and/or that the supply container is empty or substantially empty, when the determined conveyance rate is equal to or lower than a conveyance rate low set point.

17. A 3D printing system comprising:

an additive manufacturing system comprising a build chamber; and

the sieve system of claim 14 .

18. The 3D printing system of claim 17 , wherein the additive manufacturing system and the sieve system form a closed loop system.

19. The sieve system of claim 14 , wherein the controller is further configured to determine the operating condition to be representative, or further representative, of an excess of material on the sieve responsive to determining that the fines rate is equal to or lower than a fines rate low set point.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 13, 2022
From: SINGH, RESHAM
To: RUSSELL FINEX LTD
Reel/Frame 059903/0540 →
Priority Claims (1)
GB 1916697 · Nov 15, 2019 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20220395863A1 · Dec 15, 2022
References Cited (24)
US 4544101A · Hahn · 1985 [cited by examiner]
US 4627576A · Hahn et al. · 1986 [cited by applicant]
US 4809791A · Hayatdavoudi · 1989 [cited by examiner]
US 6129216A · Vandewinckel · 2000 [cited by examiner]
US 6575303B1 · Brock · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 6585116B1 · Doelle et al. · 2003 [cited by applicant]
US 7128204B2 · Baranowski · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 9919360B2 · Buller · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 9962767B2 · Buller · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20110285541A1 · Freissle et al. · 2011 [cited by applicant]
US 20160193696A1 · McFarland et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20170056928A1 · Torrione · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20210283846A1 · Otis, Jr. · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210323030A1 · Shawi Sanchez · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220194008A1 · Van Iersel · 2022 [cited by examiner]
DE 2443548A1 · 1976 [cited by applicant]
KR 101823402B1 · 2018 [cited by applicant]
WO 2011115508A1 · 2011 [cited by applicant]
WO 2013160864A1 · 2013 [cited by applicant]
WO 2014136121A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Search Report in corresponding Application No. GB1916697.4, mailed May 6, 2020, 5 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report in corresponding Application No. GB1916697.4, mailed Sep. 9, 2021, 4 pgs. [cited by applicant]
Examination Report in corresponding Application No. GB11916697.4, mailed Oct. 13, 2021, 2 pgs. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion in PCT/GB2020/052817, mailed Feb. 22, 2021, 13 pgs. [cited by applicant]