IP Library Granted Patent US 12,291,354
Granted Patent B2
US 12,291,354 · App. 18/159,461 · Granted May 6, 2025

Aircraft actuator verification system and method

Inventor: Clifton Lee Harrell (Arlington, TX)
Assignee: Textron Innovations Inc.
B64F5/60B64D45/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,291,354
App. No.
18/159,461
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

In an embodiment, an aircraft includes an actuator and a flight control computer interfaced with the actuator. The flight control computer is configured to: increase an initiating force output by an initiating channel of the actuator; stop the increasing of the initiating force in response to observing restraining forces on restraining channels of the actuator; hold the initiating force at a quiescent initiating value while the restraining channels hold the restraining forces at quiescent restraining values; increase the initiating force to a target initiating value while the restraining channels increase the restraining forces to target restraining values; calculate a force fight test result by summing a difference between the target initiating value and the quiescent initiating value with differences between the target restraining values and the quiescent restraining values; and indicate the actuator failed verification in response to the force fight test result being greater than a first predetermined threshold.

Claims (43)

1. A method comprising:

increasing, by a flight control computer, an initiating force output by an initiating channel of an actuator of an aircraft;

stopping, by the flight control computer, the increasing of the initiating force in response to observing restraining forces on restraining channels of the actuator;

holding, by the flight control computer, the initiating force at a quiescent initiating value while the restraining channels hold the restraining forces at quiescent restraining values;

increasing the initiating force to a target initiating value while the restraining channels increase the restraining forces to target restraining values;

calculating a force fight test result by summing a difference between the target initiating value and the quiescent initiating value with differences between the target restraining values and the quiescent restraining values; and

indicating the actuator failed verification in response to the force fight test result being greater than a first predetermined threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initiating channel and the restraining channels are each controlled by a different flight control computer of the aircraft.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initiating channel and the restraining channels are servos.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initiating force is increased to the quiescent initiating value at a first rate, the initiating force is increased to the target initiating value at a second rate, and the first rate is different from the second rate.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initiating force is increased to the quiescent initiating value at a first rate, the initiating force is increased to the target initiating value at the first rate.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initiating force is a positive initiating force.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the initiating force is a negative initiating force.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein indicating the actuator failed verification comprises:

indicating the actuator failed verification using a display of an instrument panel of the aircraft.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

indicating the actuator failed verification in response to the target initiating value being less than a second predetermined threshold.

10. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

determining a current used to drive the initiating channel to the target initiating value; and

indicating the actuator failed verification in response to the current being greater than a second predetermined threshold.

11. An aircraft comprising:

an actuator; and

a flight control computer interfaced with the actuator, the flight control computer configured to:

increase an initiating force output by an initiating channel of the actuator;

stop the increasing of the initiating force in response to observing restraining forces on restraining channels of the actuator;

hold the initiating force at a quiescent initiating value while the restraining channels hold the restraining forces at quiescent restraining values;

increase the initiating force to a target initiating value while the restraining channels increase the restraining forces to target restraining values;

calculate a force fight test result by summing a difference between the target initiating value and the quiescent initiating value with differences between the target restraining values and the quiescent restraining values; and

indicate the actuator failed verification in response to the force fight test result being greater than a first predetermined threshold.

12. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the initiating channel and the restraining channels are each controlled by a different flight control computer of the aircraft.

13. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the initiating channel and the restraining channels are servos.

14. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the initiating force is increased to the quiescent initiating value at a first rate, the initiating force is increased to the target initiating value at a second rate, and the first rate is different from the second rate.

15. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the initiating force is increased to the quiescent initiating value at a first rate, the initiating force is increased to the target initiating value at the first rate.

16. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the initiating force is a positive initiating force.

17. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the initiating force is a negative initiating force.

18. The aircraft of claim 11 further comprising:

an instrument panel comprising a display,

wherein the flight control computer is configured to indicate the actuator failed verification by indicating the actuator failed verification using the display of the instrument panel.

19. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the flight control computer is further configured to:

indicate the actuator failed verification in response to the target initiating value being less than a second predetermined threshold.

20. The aircraft of claim 11 , wherein the flight control computer is further configured to:

determine a current used to drive the initiating channel to the target initiating value; and

indicate the actuator failed verification in response to the current being greater than a second predetermined threshold.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2023
From: BELL TEXTRON INC.
To: BELL TEXTRON RHODE ISLAND INC.
Reel/Frame 063313/0590 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2023
From: BELL TEXTRON RHODE ISLAND INC.
To: TEXTRON INNOVATIONS INC.
Reel/Frame 063313/0644 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2023
From: HARRELL, CLIFTON LEE
To: BELL TEXTRON INC.
Reel/Frame 062486/0498 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20240246698A1 · Jul 25, 2024
References Cited (31)
US 5806805A · Elbert et al. · 1998 [cited by applicant]
US 9944384B2 · Violette · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 10196131B2 · McCormick · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 11353890B1 · Auerbach · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 11442547B1 · Richard · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20120025033A1 · Huynh · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20130026298A1 · Kirkland · 2013 [cited by applicant]
US 20130201316A1 · Binder · 2013 [cited by examiner]
US 20150360771A1 · Cotton et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20170307090A1 · Defusco · 2017 [cited by applicant]
US 20180334246A1 · Lee · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20180364707A1 · Bosworth · 2018 [cited by examiner]
US 20190161182A1 · Alfred · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20200156762A1 · Tillotson · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200172066A1 · Burte · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200290728A1 · Chu · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20200307780A1 · Worsham, II · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20210049919A1 · Davis · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20210354809A1 · Grohmann · 2021 [cited by examiner]
US 20220281587A1 · Harrell et al. · 2022 [cited by applicant]
US 20220315205A1 · Moy · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220326727A1 · Cowling · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20230202676A1 · Donnelly · 2023 [cited by examiner]
US 20240246698A1 · Harrell · 2024 [cited by examiner]
CA 3147201A1 · 2022 [cited by examiner]
EP 3415417A1 · 2018 [cited by examiner]
EP 3620373A1 · 2020 [cited by applicant]
GB 2540180A · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020081615A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2020125839A1 · 2020 [cited by examiner]
Ijaz, Salman et al., “Fractional Order Control of Dissimilar Redundant Actuating System used in Large Air Craft,” 2017 29th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), IEEE, May 28, 2017 (May 28, 2017), pp. 3686-369… [cited by applicant]