IP Library Granted Patent US 12,293,426
Granted Patent B2
US 12,293,426 · App. 18/109,686 · Granted May 6, 2025

Systems and methods for contract negotiation and drafting

Inventors: Michael Denker (St. Charles, IL); Joseph Brennan (Highland Park, IL)
Assignee: Transactency LLC
G06Q50/188G06F3/0482G06F40/131G06F40/171G06F40/186
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,293,426
App. No.
18/109,686
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

The systems and methods herein provide a user-friendly, automated and transparent, contract drafting and negotiation tool. Through the contract drafting and negotiation tool two parties can negotiate agreement using template agreements including one or more sections in which each user is able to select one of a plurality of input options that affect the terms of the contract. In each instance, each party can see the option selected by the other party, as well as the options not selected by the other party. The systems and methods facilitate efficient and transparent contract negotiation and drafting.

Claims (25)

1. A contract negotiation and drafting system comprising:

one or more user devices;

a controller in communication with the one or more user devices;

a memory coupled to the controller, wherein the memory is configured to store program instructions executable by the controller;

wherein in response to executing the program instructions, the controller is configured to:

provide a first graphical user interface accessible through a first user account representative of a first party accessible through the one or more user devices through which a first user selects a contract template and is simultaneously presented a contract window and a legal issue window, wherein the contract window displays the contract template between the first party and a second party and the legal issue window displays a legal issue input tool through which the first user provides input through the one or more user devices for each of a plurality of predefined legal issue in the contract template, wherein at least one of the inputs provided by the first user is a selection of a first selected option from a predefined set of text-based multiple choice options;

in response to the selection of the first selected option, update contract text in the contract template in the contract window of the first graphical user interface, wherein the updated contract text is the formal legal language of a contract text element associated with the first selected option, thereby simultaneously showing the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options and the first selected option in the legal issue window and the formal legal language of the contract text element associated with the first selected option in the contract window;

provide a second graphical user interface accessible through a second user account representative of the second party accessible through the one or more user devices through which a second user is simultaneously presented the contract window and the legal issue window, wherein the contract window displays the updated contract template and the legal issue window displays the inputs provided by the first user, the first selected option and the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein the update of the contract text in the contract window of the first graphical user interface includes highlighting the updated contract text in a color assigned to the first user.

3. The system of claim 1 wherein the update of the contract text in the contract window of the first graphical user interface includes highlighting the updated contract text in a color assigned to the second user.

4. The system of claim 1 wherein the update of the contract text in the contract window of the first graphical user interface includes adding a new section to the contract.

5. The system of claim 1 wherein the update of the contract text in the contract window of the first graphical user interface includes removing a section from the contract.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein the first graphical user interface and the second graphical user interface each include a counter displaying a number of the plurality of predefined legal issues for which an agreement between the first party and the second party has yet to be reached.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein the first graphical user interface and the second graphical user interface each include a contract overview window including a list including the each of the plurality of predefined legal issues and an identification of whether agreement has been reached for each of the plurality of predefined legal issues.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein the memory includes statistics derived from data from a plurality of negotiated contract templates for which agreement has been reached by the first party and the second party, the statistics including an identification of a most commonly agreed multiple choice option in the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

9. The system of claim 8 wherein the first graphical user interface includes a first selection tool, the execution of which automatically chooses, in lieu of the legal issue input tool, the input of the first user for each of a plurality of predefined legal issues for which the statistics include an identification of the most commonly agreed multiple choice option in the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

10. The system of claim 8 wherein the first graphical user interface and the second graphical user interface each include a second selection tool, the execution of which automatically agrees to each of the plurality of predefined legal issues for which an agreement between the first party and the second party has yet to be reached for which a current selection is the input identified by the statistics as the most commonly agreed multiple choice option in the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

11. A method of contract negotiation and drafting in a system in which a controller is in communication with one or more user devices, wherein the controller is also in communication with memory coupled to the controller, wherein the memory stores program instructions executable by the controller, the method comprising the steps of, in response to the execution of the program instructions:

providing a first graphical user interface accessible through a first user account representative of a first party accessible through the one or more user devices through which a first user selects a contract template and is presented a contract window and a legal issue window, wherein the contract window displays the contract template between the first party and a second party and the legal issue window displays a legal issue input tool through which the first user provides input through the one or more user devices for each of a plurality of predefined legal issue in the contract template, wherein at least one of the inputs provided by the first user for the predefined legal issue is a selection of a first selected option from the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options;

in response to the selection of the first selected option, updating contract text in the contract template in the contract window of the first graphical user interface, wherein the updated contract text is the formal legal language of the contract text element associated with the first selected option, thereby simultaneously showing the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options and the first selected option in the legal issue window and the formal legal language of the contract text element associated with the first selected option in the contract window; and

providing a second graphical user interface accessible through a second user account representative of the second party accessible through the one or more user devices through which a second user is presented the contract window and the legal issue window, wherein the contract window displays the updated contract template and the legal issue window displays the inputs provided by the first user the first selected option and the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the first graphical user interface and the second graphical user interface each include a counter displaying a number of the plurality of predefined legal issues for which an agreement between the first party and the second party has yet to be reached.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the memory includes statistics derived from data from a plurality of negotiated contract templates for which agreement has been reached by two parties, the statistics including an identification of a most commonly agreed multiple choice option in the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the first graphical user interface includes a first selection tool, the execution of which automatically chooses, in lieu of the legal issue input tool, the input of the first user for each of a plurality of predefined legal issues for which the statistics include an identification of the most commonly agreed multiple choice option in the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

15. The method of claim 13 wherein the first graphical user interface and the second graphical user interface each include a second selection tool, the execution of which automatically agrees to the plurality of predefined legal issues legal issues for which an agreement between the first party and the second party has yet to be reached for which a current selection is the input identified by the statistics as the most commonly agreed multiple choice option in the predefined set of text-based multiple choice options.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 7, 2025
From: DENKER, MICHAEL; BRENNAN, JOSEPH
To: TRANSACTENCY LLC
Reel/Frame 070757/0904 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16040499 · Jul 19, 2018
Provisional Application 62534513 · Jul 19, 2017
Related Publication 20230186419A1 · Jun 15, 2023
References Cited (17)
US 6502113B1 · Crawford · 2002 [cited by examiner]
US 7069234B1 · Cornelius · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 8065202B1 · Ballaro · 2011 [cited by examiner]
US 10552525B1 · Allison · 2020 [cited by examiner]
US 20030074633A1 · Boulmakoul · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20060010377A1 · Anecki · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20060287966A1 · Srinivasaraghavan · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20070078789A1 · Griffit · 2007 [cited by examiner]
US 20090281853A1 · Misvaer · 2009 [cited by examiner]
US 20120016943A1 · Greenberg · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20120310790A1 · Curd · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140164255A1 · Daly · 2014 [cited by examiner]
US 20150220501A1 · Pickles · 2015 [cited by examiner]
US 20170068406A1 · Mark · 2017 [cited by examiner]
US 20180239959A1 · Bui · 2018 [cited by examiner]
G. Visinari and A. Groza, “Building an E-contract management system using Google Docs,” 2011, 2011 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), pp. 225-230 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
P. R. Krishna and K. Karlapalem, “Electronic Contracts,” 2008, IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 60-68 (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]