IP Library › Granted Patent US 12,294,442
Granted Patent B2
US 12,294,442 · App. 17/707,140 · Granted May 6, 2025

Preconfigured uplink resource (PUR) validation in non-terrestrial networks

Inventors: Bharat Shrestha (San Diego, CA); Umesh Phuyal (San Diego, CA); Mungal Singh Dhanda (Slough, GB); Ayan Sengupta (San Diego, CA); Liangping Ma (San Diego, CA); Alberto Rico Alvarino (San Diego, CA); Xiao Feng Wang (San Diego, CA)
Assignee: QUALCOMM Incorporated
H04B7/18513H04B7/0695H04W64/003
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,294,442
App. No.
17/707,140
Granted
May 6, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for wireless communication includes validating a PUR configuration in a NTN based on location-related information associated with a satellite. For example, a UE may determine, based on location-related information of a satellite in a non-terrestrial network, whether a preconfigured uplink resource (PUR) configuration is valid. The UE may also transmit, to a base station (BS) via the satellite in response to determining that the PUR configuration is valid, a communication signal in a PUR. For example, the UE may determine, based on the location-related information associated with the satellite, if the parameter satisfies the threshold, and transmit UL data in a PUR occasion based on the determined parameter satisfying the threshold.

Claims (77)

1. A method for wireless communication performed by a user equipment (UE), the method comprising:

determining, based on a comparison between a threshold and location-related information associated with a satellite in a non-terrestrial network, whether a preconfigured uplink resource (PUR) configuration is valid;

in response to determining the PUR configuration is valid, transmitting, to a base station (BS) via the satellite, a communication signal in a PUR; and

in response to determining the PUR configuration is invalid:

adjusting, based on updated location-related information associated with the satellite, the threshold; and

determining, based on the threshold as adjusted, whether the PUR configuration is valid.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining, based on at least one of a position of the satellite or satellite navigation timing information, whether a timing advance for transmitting the communication signal to the BS in the PUR satisfies the threshold.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining, based on a position of the satellite, whether a frequency compensation satisfies the threshold.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining, based on beam position information of the satellite, whether a distance between the UE and a transmission beam associated with the satellite satisfies the threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining, based on at least one of a position or a propagation delay of the satellite, whether an elevation angle associated with the UE and the satellite satisfies the threshold.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining whether the PUR configuration is valid based on a received signal power associated with a reference signal.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining, based on at least one of a position or a velocity or a time stamp of the location-related information associated with the satellite, whether a drift rate of the satellite satisfies the threshold.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

determining a location identifier associated with the PUR configuration; and

comparing the location identifier provided by a cell in system information, the location identifier comprising one or more of cell identity, tracking area code, zone identity and virtual cell identity.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, in response to determining that the PUR configuration is not valid, that a PUR occasion is skipped.

10. A user equipment (UE), comprising:

a memory;

a transceiver; and

a processor coupled with the memory and configured to, when executing instructions stored on the memory, to cause the UE to:

determine, based on a comparison between a threshold and location-related information associated with a satellite in a non-terrestrial network, whether a preconfigured uplink resource (PUR) configuration is valid;

in response to determining the PUR configuration is valid, transmit, via the transceiver to a base station (BS) via the satellite, a communication signal in a PUR; and

in response to determining the PUR configuration is invalid;

adjust, based on updated location-related information associated with the satellite, the threshold; and

determine, based on the threshold as adjusted, whether the PUR configuration is valid.

11. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to cause the UE to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine, based on at least one of a position of the satellite or satellite navigation timing information, whether a timing advance for transmitting the communication signal to the BS in the PUR satisfies the threshold.

12. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to cause the UE to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine, based on a position of the satellite, whether a frequency compensation satisfies the threshold.

13. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to cause the UE to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine, based on beam position information of the satellite, whether a distance between the UE and a transmission beam associated with the satellite satisfies the threshold.

14. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to cause the UE to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine, based on at least one of a position or a propagation delay of the satellite, whether an elevation angle associated with the UE and the satellite satisfies the threshold.

15. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to cause the UE to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine whether the PUR configuration is valid based on a received signal power associated with a reference signal.

16. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to cause the UE to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine, based on at least one of a position or a velocity or a time stamp of the location-related information associated with the satellite, whether a drift rate of the satellite satisfies the threshold.

17. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor configured to determine whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises the processor configured to cause the UE to:

determine a location identifier associated with the PUR configuration; and

compare the location identifier provided by a cell in system information, the location identifier comprising one or more of cell identity, tracking area code, zone identity and virtual cell identity.

18. The UE of claim 10 , wherein the processor is further configured to cause the UE to:

determine, in response to determining that the PUR configuration is not valid, that a PUR occasion is skipped.

19. A non-transitory computer-readable medium having program code recorded thereon, the program code comprising:

code for causing a user equipment (UE) to determine, based on a comparison between a threshold and location-related information associated with a satellite in a non-terrestrial network, whether a preconfigured uplink resource (PUR) configuration is valid;

code for causing the UE, in response to determining the PUR configuration is valid, to transmit, to a base station (BS) via the satellite, a communication signal in a PUR; and

code for causing the UE, in response to determining the PUR configuration is invalid, to:

adjust, based on updated location-related information associated with the satellite, the threshold; and

determine, based on the threshold as adjusted, whether the PUR configuration is valid.

20. A user equipment (UE), comprising:

means for determining, based on a comparison between a threshold and location-related information associated with a satellite in a non-terrestrial network, whether a preconfigured uplink resource (PUR) configuration is valid;

means for transmitting, to a base station (BS) via the satellite in response to determining the PUR configuration is valid, a communication signal in a PUR; and

means for adjusting, in response to determining the PUR configuration is invalid, the threshold, wherein the means for adjusting the threshold is based on updated location-related information associated with the satellite; and

means for determining, in response to determining the PUR configuration is invalid, whether the PUR configuration is valid based on the threshold as adjusted.

21. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining, based on at least one of a position of the satellite or satellite navigation timing information, whether a timing advance for transmitting the communication signal to the BS in the PUR satisfies the threshold.

22. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining, based on a position of the satellite, whether a frequency compensation satisfies the threshold.

23. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining, based on beam position information of the satellite, whether a distance between the UE and a transmission beam associated with the satellite satisfies the threshold.

24. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining, based on at least one of a position or a propagation delay of the satellite, whether an elevation angle associated with the UE and the satellite satisfies the threshold.

25. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid based on a received signal power associated with a reference signal.

26. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining, based on at least one of a position or a velocity or a time stamp of the location-related information associated with the satellite, whether a drift rate of the satellite satisfies the threshold.

27. The UE of claim 20 , wherein the means for determining whether the PUR configuration is valid comprises:

means for determining a location identifier associated with the PUR configuration; and

means for comparing the location identifier provided by a cell in system information, the location identifier comprising one or more of cell identity, tracking area code, zone identity and virtual cell identity.

28. The UE of claim 20 , further comprising:

means for determining, in response to determining that the PUR configuration is not valid, that a PUR occasion is skipped.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2022
From: SHRESTHA, BHARAT; PHUYAL, UMESH; DHANDA, MUNGAL SINGH; SENGUPTA, AYAN; MA, LIANGPING; RICO ALVARINO, ALBERTO; WANG, XIAO FENG
To: QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 059792/0522 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 63169562 · Apr 1, 2021
Related Publication 20220321206A1 · Oct 6, 2022
References Cited (10)
US 20190342045A1 · Radulescu · 2019 [cited by examiner]
US 20220029764A1 · Liou · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220159601A1 · Mayer · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220232503A1 · Cheng · 2022 [cited by examiner]
US 20220295225A1 · Keating · 2022 [cited by examiner]
WO 2022036640A1 · 2022 [cited by applicant]
International Search Report and Written Opinion—PCT/US2022/022413—ISA/EPO—Jul. 7, 2022. [cited by applicant]
Lenovo, et al., “Considerations on PUR in IoT NTN”, 3GPP Draft, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #113 electronic, R2-2101130, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre, 650, Route Des Lucioles, F-06921… [cited by applicant]
Oppo: “Discussion on UP Issues for IoT Over NTN”, 3GPP Draft, 3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #113 electronic, R2-2100165, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre, 650, Route Des Lucioles, F-06921 S… [cited by applicant]
Samsung: “On Timing Relationship Enhancements”, 3GPP Draft, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #104-e, R1-2101244, 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre, 650, Route Des Lucioles, F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Ced… [cited by applicant]