Granted Patent B2

US 12,299,466 · App. 18/317,172 · Granted May 13, 2025

Inventors: Edward Hinton (Dover, NH); Frank Pulito (Berlin, MA); Greg Giannone (Ayer, MA); Jonathan Ferrin (Derry, NH); Zachary Chupka (Pelham, NH)

Assignee: Hyland Software, Inc.

G06F9/45512G06F8/34G06F16/9024

Abstract

Claims (86)

1. A method executed by a processor of a computing device while the processor executes an automation application, the method comprising:

building a computer-controlled macro for a target application, wherein the computer-controlled macro is generated based upon:

recording a sequence of inputs received by the target application from a user, wherein the sequence of inputs causes the target application to perform an action;

recording a series of input timestamps, wherein an input timestamp is associated with each input of the sequence of inputs;

assigning one or more state timestamps to at least one of:

a screen state of the target application when the target application receives an input of the sequence of inputs or

operating system processes performed by the processor when the target application receives the input;

storing an order of the input timestamps for the sequence of inputs, and storing the state timestamps; and

executing the computer-controlled macro on the target application, by performing the actions on the target application in correct order, utilizing the order of the input timestamps and one or more state timestamps;

wherein the sequence of inputs comprises a first input and a second input, and the series of input timestamps comprises a first input timestamp and a second input timestamp and the one or more state timestamps comprise a first state timestamp and a second state timestamp;

wherein the first input timestamp is assigned to the first input, and the first state timestamp is assigned:

the screen state of the target application when the target application receives the input or the operating system processes performed by the processor when the target application receives the input; and

the second input timestamp is assigned to a second input, and a second state timestamp is assigned to second instance of:

the screen state of the target application when the target application receives the input or the operating system processes performed by the processor when the target application receives the input.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising avoiding performance delays of the computer-controlled macro via utilizing the order of the sequence of inputs and one or more input timestamps.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the state timestamp is assigned to the evidence event occurring when the target application receives the input.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the order in which the evidence event comes into existence in the target application does not correspond to the order in which the operating system processes are performed.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the state timestamp is assigned to the evidence event occurring when the target application receives the input, and

the first timestamp and the second timestamp are compared to resolve conflicting evidence events.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

presenting a graphical user interface (GUI) on a display of the computing device, wherein the GUI comprises:

a screen shot of a target application executing on the computing device; and

a directed graph representing the computer-controlled macro for the target application, wherein the directed graph comprises nodes and directed edges connecting the nodes, wherein each node in the nodes is assigned to an input received by the target application during recording of the computer-controlled macro, wherein each directed edge of the directed edges is assigned criteria that are to be satisfied in order to traverse each directed edge.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

upon receiving an indication from a user of the computing device, mimicking a first input in the computer-controlled macro to the target application;

concurrently with mimicking the first input in the computer-controlled macro to the target application:

displaying a second screen shot of the target application in the GUI after the first input is mimicked to the target application; and

highlighting a node in the directed graph that is assigned to the first input.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evidence events are information obtained from the operating system processes.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assigning one or more state timestamps to an evidence event occurring when the target application receives the input;

wherein the evidence event is selected from one or more of the group consisting of:

text written to a GUI of the target application or another application;

device context content being copied to a different device context;

activation of a window by the operating system;

deactivation of a window of the operating system;

positioning data indicating a change of position of an element of the GUI;

text representing an internal name of an element of the GUI;

text, names, positioning, and/or type information of operating system interface controls being presented to the user;

text available from an emulation protocol response; and/or

a second application being executed by the computing device.

10. A method executed by a processor of a computing device, the method comprising:

presenting a graphical user interface (GUI) on a display of the computing device, wherein the GUI comprises:

a screen shot of a target application executing on the computing device; and

a directed graph representing a macro for the target application, wherein the directed graph comprises nodes and directed edges connecting the nodes, wherein each node in the nodes is assigned to an input received by the target application during recording of the macro, wherein each directed edge of the directed edges is assigned criteria that are to be satisfied in order to traverse each directed edge;

upon receiving an indication from a user of the computing device, mimicking a first input in the macro to the target application;

determining that first criteria assigned to a directed edge in the directed graph is satisfied, wherein the directed edge is connected to the node in the directed graph; and

upon determining that the first criteria is satisfied, mimicking a second input in the macro to the target application.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the determining that the first criteria is satisfied includes at least one of:

evaluating text located in the screen shot against a constant text value;

evaluating a position of the text in the screen shot against a constant set of coordinates in the screen shot;

evaluating the position of the text in the screen shot against a variable set of coordinates in a screen state, the screen state comprising a stored screen shot of the target application and characteristics of a display on which the GUI for the target application is displayed;

evaluating the text in the screen shot against a data element;

evaluating the text in the screen shot against an expression; or

evaluating the text in the screen shot against text located in a prior screen shot.

12. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

prior to presenting the GUI on the display, recording the macro for the target application.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein mimicking the first input causes the target application to perform at least one of:

generating data;

modifying the data;

transmitting the data to a second computing device over a network connection; or

receiving the data from the second computing device over the network connection.

14. The method of claim 10 , wherein the target application is an enterprise content (ECM) application.

15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed by a processor of a computing device, cause the processor to perform acts comprising:

building a computer-controlled macro for a target application, wherein the macro is generated based upon:

recording a sequence of inputs received by the target application from a user, wherein the sequence of inputs causes the target application to perform an action;

recording a series of input timestamps, wherein an input timestamp is associated with each input of the sequence of inputs;

assigning a state timestamp to:

an evidence event occurring when the target application receives an input of the sequence of inputs; storing an order of the input timestamps for the sequence of inputs, and

storing the state timestamps; and

executing the macro on the target application, by performing the actions on the target application in correct order, utilizing the order of the input timestamps and one or more state timestamps;

wherein the evidence event is selected from one or more of the group consisting of:

text written to a GUI of the target application or another application;

device context content being copied to a different device context; activation of a window by the operating system;

deactivation of a window of the operating system;

positioning data indicating a change of position of an element of the GUI;

text representing an internal name of an element of the GUI;

text, names, positioning, and/or type information of operating system interface controls being presented to the user;

text available from an emulation protocol response; and/or

a second application being executed by the computing device.

16. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein a first input timestamp is assigned to a first input; and

a second input timestamp is assigned to a second input, and a second state timestamp is assigned to second instance of at least one of: the screen state of the target application when the target application receives the input, or the operating system processes performed by the processor when the target application receives the input, or the evidence event occurring when the target application receives the second input.

17. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , further comprising avoiding performance delays of the macro via utilizing the order of the sequence of inputs and one or more input timestamps.

18. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 15 , wherein the target application is an enterprise content (ECM) application.

19. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein the first state timestamp is assigned to the evidence event occurring when the target application receives the input, and

the first timestamp and the second timestamp are compared to resolve conflicting evidence events.

20. The non-transitory computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , further comprising avoiding performance delays of the macro via utilizing the order of the sequence of inputs and one or more input timestamps.

Assignments (1)

Continuity (4)

References Cited (76)